[HN Gopher] ChatGPT Atlas
___________________________________________________________________
ChatGPT Atlas
Author : easton
Score : 465 points
Date : 2025-10-21 17:18 UTC (5 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (chatgpt.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (chatgpt.com)
| htrp wrote:
| interesting that they are supporting mac only as a starting point
| minimaxir wrote:
| I suspect that whatever screen vision and window control API
| they're using is macOS only.
| Razengan wrote:
| It would be nice if this and the main AI app were on the App
| Store, just for a little more assurance regarding privacy.
|
| Not that sandboxed apps can't yoink your shit if they really
| wanted to, but it's a nice barrier to have.
|
| > _Step 4: Allow keychain access._
|
| Uhmmm.. what?
| moralestapia wrote:
| Another cohort of startups blown out of the water.
|
| "But where's the moat, but where's the moat", cries the armchair
| engineer with a PhD in React.
|
| Meanwhile OpenAI goes brr ...
| neilellis wrote:
| That shouldn't be downvoted. Their pivot from model -> product
| company is one to watch with admiration and dread in equal
| measure.
| minimaxir wrote:
| It's being downvoted due to the nonconstructive shitpost
| tone.
| moralestapia wrote:
| I thought personal attacks were not allowed in here.
|
| But I think you'll get a free pass.
| minimaxir wrote:
| Classifying a comment tone as nonconstructive and/or a
| shitpost is not an attack, let alone a personal one.
| minimaxir wrote:
| You're actually making the opposite point that you intended:
| the existing AI-browsers made by The Browser Company/Perplexity
| had their first mover advantage, but they have little inherent
| lock-in and are now less likely to retain users since a more
| notable competitor now exists.
| blibble wrote:
| if I was Google I'd close up Chromium at this point
|
| and that would kill these AI company browsers instantly
| moralestapia wrote:
| Good luck with that.
|
| https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/LICENS.
| ..
| rs186 wrote:
| They could make chromium closed source starting from the
| next patch version while the source of old versions are
| still available. Currently there is only one company that
| is capable of maintaining chromium's entire codebase, and
| that company is called Google.
| pixel_popping wrote:
| can't wait for Servo being mainstreamed!
| rvz wrote:
| Then all the money would go to Ladybird.
| SeanAnderson wrote:
| How does this page not immediately address what I assume is
| everyone's first question?
|
| Is this browser built on Chromium, or is it a completely fresh
| creation?
|
| I have to assume that because they AREN'T highlighting it that it
| IS built on Chromium.
| pavlov wrote:
| Since it's Mac only, it could be WebKit.
|
| Definitely not a new browser engine.
| Spartan-S63 wrote:
| I wish we would see more WebKit browsers just for more
| variety. I personally use Safari as my primary browser on my
| Mac.
|
| Ora is interesting as it's an Arc-like spin using WebKit, but
| still early days for it.
| politelemon wrote:
| It says currently, so it wouldn't make sense to be WebKit.
| pavlov wrote:
| Who says they can't use the OS native browser engine on
| each platform?
| jerjerjer wrote:
| Why wouldn't it be Chromium/V8-based? New browser engine is
| multiple developer-years of effort.
| 827a wrote:
| But I thought AI was supposed to be writing 90% of code by
| now, you're telling me building a new browser engine is
| _still_ a multi-year, difficult effort?
| SeanAnderson wrote:
| Just seems like not a very smart long-term move to build on
| it.
|
| Tough to get changes upstream when the majority of engineers
| working on Chromium are Google devs.
|
| Lots of features you'd hope would be available in Chromium
| aren't there and have to be implemented manually, but then
| you need to keep your fork interoperating with a massive,
| moving target. Safe Browsing, Translate, Spellcheck,
| Autofill, Password Manager aren't available in Chromium and
| Google cut unauthorized Chromium browsers off from using
| Google Sync in 2021 (https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-
| cuts-off-other-chromium...)
|
| There's probably more issues?
| bigyabai wrote:
| I'm not really seeing the alternative here, though. If your
| main gripe with Chromium is getting patches upstream
| through the vendor, that's an issue with all the browser
| engines available to them. Gecko would be an even riskier
| bet than Chromium, and WebKit verges on being chronically
| undermaintained on Windows and Linux.
| dmarcos wrote:
| 99.9% is based on Chromium. Would have taken ages to ship
| otherwise. It's great to see how much Chromium has lowered the
| bar for people to be able to ship new browsers.
| jkrom3 wrote:
| They used Claude code to write it.
| tyre wrote:
| As a consumer company, I assure you that not everyone's first
| question is which browser engine this is built on.
| ushakov wrote:
| the browser looks like it is based on Chromium indeed
| rvz wrote:
| That's because it is.
|
| Just do this on the navigation bar: atlas://extensions
| blueg3 wrote:
| They hired a bunch of former Chrome engineers, so...
| amrrs wrote:
| It's built on Chromium -
| https://help.openai.com/en/articles/12628461-setting-up-the-...
| drum55 wrote:
| It's just Chromium, thinly reskinned.
| shadowfax92 wrote:
| Of course
| herpdyderp wrote:
| User agent string says it's Chrome 141.0.0.0
| chresko wrote:
| No normal human being is asking this as a first question.
| mentalgear wrote:
| So openAI's answer to Perplexity's Comet. I'm afraid this will be
| the future, as these AI-browsers do truly bring value. But they
| open up the gate for a single Big Tech Winner that truly knows
| everything about you, and can even control everything on your
| behalf.
|
| I really hope open-source Browsers like Firefox follow up soon
| with better alternatives, like on-device LLMs to counteract the
| "all in the cloud" LLM approach. Of course that would require
| top-tier ML engineers who mostly all are pay-captured by Big
| Tech.
| alvis wrote:
| I'm not sure even if these browser automation brings much value
| other than financial analysts, at least for the moment
| mentalgear wrote:
| I was sceptical as well before trying it out, but it is
| unfortunately very practical to ask the AI sidebar about an
| information-dense website or even github codebase (just as
| dev examples).
|
| There were of course many browser extensions that did this
| beforehand (and even better, by hyper-linking the exact text
| passage of answer segments), but the main differentiator is
| that most people don't use them/know about them, and this
| comes with a big tech nametag and it is free.
| digdugdirk wrote:
| Care to share some of those extensions? I feel like we're
| on the second/third wave of llm enhanced tools, and there's
| plenty of good stuff that got passed over from earlier
| waves of products/tool attempts.
| mentalgear wrote:
| Try search on a browser extension store for "AI Chat
| website" or similar. Also you can check out
| https://github.com/nanobrowser/nanobrowser.
| VortexLain wrote:
| Could you please suggest some of those extensions? I've
| been looking for an agentic tool like that, but isolated as
| an extension.
| bogwog wrote:
| What value? I haven't used them myself, but from reviews I've
| seen on Youtube they appear to be flaky and not all that
| useful. It reminds me of when voice assistants like Siri came
| out, and it turned out that the only thing they were good for
| was setting timers, controlling music playback, and gimmicky
| stuff like that.
| mapontosevenths wrote:
| Try it yourself and ignore the hype. For certain things it
| can be really useful, just keep in mind that it's early days.
|
| I recently used Comet to find out of print movies that were
| never released on DVD/Bluray, then find them on ebay, then
| find the best value, then provide me with a list to order. It
| felt like magic watching it work, and saved me many hours of
| either doing it myself or scripting it.
|
| I did have to repeatedly break it into ever smaller tasks to
| get everything to fit within the context windows, but
| still... it might have been janky but it was janky magic.
| TranquilMarmot wrote:
| Surely this is something you can do with simple
| searches...? Unless you're reaching the level of trying to
| buy dozens or hundreds of movies.
|
| https://xkcd.com/1205/
| ianbutler wrote:
| But why? The AI can go off and search and I can do other
| stuff while it does.
|
| The point is the multiply how much you can get done,
| simple searches still require me to be present and to do
| the work of compiling the list myself, this type of busy
| work seems much better suited to tools like this that
| take a sentence or 2 to kick off
| candiddevmike wrote:
| My brain can't work like that. When I'm pursuing things,
| I always await until the blocking operation is done,
| something about uninterrupted train of thought and
| avoiding context switching.
| PeterFBell wrote:
| With LLMs we're all becoming managers. Good news is we'll
| get more done. Bad news is that we'll have to get way
| better at persisting mid-state process status (I
| sometimes ask my LLM "could you summarize what we were
| talking about and why"), tracking outstanding tasks
| (linear for our agents) and jumping between contexts.
|
| I am also finding work is becoming more tiring. As I'm
| able to delegate all the rote stuff I feel like decision
| fatigue is hitting harder/faster as all I spend my time
| doing is making the harder judgement decisions that the
| LLMs don't do well enough yet.
|
| Particularly tough in generalist roles where you're doing
| a little bit of a wide range of things. In a week I might
| need to research AI tools and leadership principles, come
| up with facilitation exercises, envision sponsorship
| models, create decks, write copy, build and filter ICP
| lists, automate outreach, create articles, do taxes, find
| speakers, select a vendor for incorporation, find a tool
| for creating and maintaining logos, fonts and design
| systems and think deeply about how CTOs should engage
| with AI strategically. I'm usually burned pretty hard by
| Friday night :(
| mawadev wrote:
| This message is so alien to me... I fail to see the real
| world value of any task you described. Aren't we all
| fooling ourselves at this point?
| typon wrote:
| This xkcd comic doesn't apply anymore due to AI making
| generating automation code trivial.
| TranquilMarmot wrote:
| You're discounting the mental effort that goes into
| describing what you want to an LLM and then verifying the
| output, which is only worth it if it actually saves you
| time. Doing a simple search for a few DVDs does not seem
| worth the effort to me.
| jpadkins wrote:
| everything AI is doable manually. the point is AI saves
| us mental toil (maybe).
| forthac wrote:
| I'm mostly just curious how that experience differs from
| using chatgpt directly and having it run searches and
| present the results?
| abtinf wrote:
| If the movies were never released on DVD/Bluray, what is it
| that you are searching for on ebay? VHS?
| fragmede wrote:
| At what point does the gimmick become a product feature that
| people use and come to expect? I set alarms/timers and
| control music with Siri every day. Siri still sucks for more
| than that, and I wish it were good for more, but I really do
| like and use those features.
| oblio wrote:
| > Significant losses: Internal documents revealed that
| Amazon's devices division lost over $25 billion between 2017
| and 2021. A separate report estimated the Alexa division
| alone lost around $10 billion in 2022.
| oezi wrote:
| Think about this way: They subsidized the hardware and
| hardware development too much and created a messy third-
| party ecosystem rather than focusing these 25 bn USD on
| developing an AI chat (OpenAI spent less in total).
| janalsncm wrote:
| Alexa came out in 2013, long before transformers (2017)
| or chatgpt (2022). The state of the art back then was
| closer to CleverBot than anything useful.
|
| We will likely have decent standalone voice assistants at
| some point soon but Alexa and Siri were way too early for
| that.
| basisword wrote:
| The only realistic competition I could see is Apple and they've
| invested in some small Safari AI features so far. They're also
| the only one I could trust in terms of privacy and keeping
| stuff secure and on device.
| echelon wrote:
| If the DeepSeek approach to training hyperscaler models
| "cheaply" after all the hype wears down works, we just need to
| follow in their footsteps and build open source alternatives to
| everything.
|
| Frontier models take a lot of money and experimentation. But
| then people figure out how to train them and knowledge of those
| models and approaches leaks. Furthermore, we can make informed
| guesses. But best of all, we can exfiltrate the model's output
| and distill the model.
|
| If we work together as an industry to open source everything,
| we can overcome this.
|
| OpenAI has to 100x in five years or they're going to be in
| trouble.
|
| Models are making it easy to replace SaaS, but also easy to
| replace other AI companies.
|
| There may be no moat for any of this. The lead is only because
| they're a few generations ahead, running as fast as they can on
| the treadmill.
|
| I don't think this hurts China at all.
| mentalgear wrote:
| Indeed the "no-moat" (weight exfiltration of any openly
| accessible model) is something that makes me optimistic.
| That, and the fact that most tasks have "capacity thresholds"
| which on-device models will increasingly be able to saturate.
| One example is SQL query generation from text (example:
| duckdb-text2sql https://motherduck.com/blog/duckdb-text2sql-
| llm/).
| motoxpro wrote:
| Curious as to what companies you think DO have a moat? I
| would say their moat is the same as Facebook's. Not permanent
| (see TikTok) but also super strong.
| echelon wrote:
| TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, etc. have network effect
| stickiness. YouTube has a vast library that grows in value
| over time and has been able to lose money for long enough
| to make the experience unassailable, etc. (Look at Vimeo.)
|
| Maybe LLMs get that by knowing our entire past? But I find
| that creepier than useful. Right now ChatGPT is at the top
| of the world, but I don't see it becoming the new unrivaled
| Google Search. There's just too many people building it,
| and once OpenAI starts monetizing and "enshittifying" it,
| other offerings will become more compelling.
|
| AI models put a large swath of mostly tech companies at
| risk. Including the old business models of titan products
| like Google Search.
|
| Image/video/world models specifically do this more to
| legacy media incumbents than LLMs do to complex business
| processes. We see orders of magnitude savings with
| marketing, design, film, and possibly in the future game
| design. LLMs, on the other hand, aren't great at getting
| your taxes or complex business logic right.
| lawlessone wrote:
| I've found my browser works fine without LLMs.
| fragmede wrote:
| Yeah, but if I could tell my web browser to read my comment
| history to figure out what I engage with on HN and to have it
| read HN for me and write comments for me then I would get all
| this time back and have more time to do chores around the
| house!
| mlnj wrote:
| >I really hope open-source Browsers like Firefox follow up soon
| with better alternatives, like on-device LLMs to counteract the
| "all in the cloud" LLM approach.
|
| That's the first thing that came to mind. Every single action
| across every single website would be available to OpenAI with
| this browser. Even if I wanted to leverage something like this
| it'd have to be a fully local LLM interacting with a huge local
| DB of my info.
| airspresso wrote:
| How is that different from Google Chrome? Not debating that
| it's scary to have all that context collected in one place,
| just saying it's already been status quo on the web for
| years.
| shit_game wrote:
| So the fear is a new Chrome, but "agentic"?
|
| It's not an irrational fear, but the frightening bit depends on
| whether or not this actually takes off. I very much doubt it
| ever will. The browser ecosystem, despite being in desperate
| need of upheaval, is largely resiliant to it because things
| that work don't tend to get replaced unless they are broken to
| a point where even the most basic of users are inconvenienced.
| Or forced to change (due to vendor pressure). Oh, there's the
| rational fear.
| mapontosevenths wrote:
| Websites are terrible from a security, usability,
| accessibility, privacy, and mental health perspective. These
| tools could be used to fix all of those things. Instead they're
| just being used to do the same old junk, but like... faster.
|
| I want an AI browser that digs into webpages, finds the
| information I want and presents it to me in a single consistent
| and beautiful UI with all of the hazards removed. Yes, I even
| want the stupid machine to filter content for me. If I tell it
| "no politics on Tuesdays" it should be able to go find the
| things I'm interested in, but remove the references to
| politics.
|
| I understand that there are new risks to this approach, but it
| could be built with those things in mind. I'm aware that this
| would give a lot of power to the developers, but frankly
| trusting thousands/millions of individual weirdos on the open
| web hasn't turned out to be any better at this point and it's
| all become consolidated by near monopolies in user-hostile ways
| anyhow.
| mentalgear wrote:
| I share many of your ideas, and I think the best solution
| would be:
|
| 1. a pure data API web (like the original semantic-web idea)
|
| 2. open-source browsers which can query for information using
| on-device LLMs and display it to the user in any UI way they
| want.
|
| I think 1. will happen, since all search engines will use AI
| results, with no click through to the original data-owner
| (website). So there is no more financial incentive to keep a
| UI website. The question is if the "data API web" will be
| decentralised or under the control of a few big players that
| already mined the web.
|
| 2. will hopefully happen if on-device models become more
| capable, the question is by then whether most people are
| already defaulted to AI browsers from big tech (since they
| have the money to burn-cash using cloud LLM services to
| capture market share before on-device LLMs are good enough).
| The only way to prevent this is user-education and mistrust
| verus Big Tech, which is what already befell Microsoft's
| Recall (besides a terrible security architecure).
| irilesscent wrote:
| > I want an AI browser that digs into webpages, finds the
| information I want and presents it to me in a single
| consistent and beautiful UI with all of the hazards removed.
|
| The browser you're looking for already exists :) (partially)
| its called arc browser on mobile and specifically their
| browse for me feature
| Ancapistani wrote:
| Arc doesn't have that functionality last I checked - are
| you thinking of Dia?
| baby wrote:
| Downloaded Comet last week and I was wondering why
| anthropic/openAI didn't have one. It's a no brainer. Google's
| hegemony is really going to take a hit, wondering if hardware-
| software monopolies like Apple are also going to get hit at
| some point.
| parthdesai wrote:
| > It's a no brainer. Google's hegemony is really going to
| take a hit
|
| Wonder which company has the best in class browser today,
| along with a really really good model, an in-house chip,
| datacenter infra, and most importantly, is cash flow
| positive?
| ewoodrich wrote:
| When ChatGPT was first released I quickly lost count of the
| number of HN comments predicting Google had about 6-12 months
| before their search monopoly and ad revenue evaporated.
| empath75 wrote:
| This thing is going to be the only way people use their
| computer in 18 months. Google is dead as a company.
|
| If they get a decent audio interface and get this on phones,
| apple is in trouble.
| giancarlostoro wrote:
| I would definitely prefer these to be browser plugins that have
| clear sandboxing instead of owning my entire browser. That
| said, I do like Comet.
| xnx wrote:
| > So openAI's answer to Perplexity's Comet.
|
| OpenAI probably barely knows or cares that Perplexity/Comet
| exists.
| noir_lord wrote:
| > But they open up the gate for a single Big Tech Winner that
| truly knows everything about you, and can even control
| everything on your behalf.
|
| Do not want, I want none of it and no part of it.
|
| I'll use Lynx before I use that.
|
| AI is already infesting search results directly (til I
| adblocked it), writing the crap on whatever page I just landed
| on and led me to turn unhook up to "just show the damn video"
| on YT.
|
| I've yet to see a single use of AI that in any way improves my
| life and I'm supposed to hand companies who are already too
| powerful even more of my life/data for that.
|
| I'll pass.
|
| From my point of view it's become very tiresome pretending the
| emperor is wearing clothes or at least not pointing that out.
| oezi wrote:
| We have to ask when is Chrome bringing this functionality? With
| Gemini
| andrewinardeer wrote:
| Can't be far off.
| markdog12 wrote:
| https://www.google.com/chrome/ai-innovations/
| lazharichir wrote:
| Definitely the feature but I'm sure Gemini is seconds away
| (figuratively) from invading Chrome and if it has an agent mode
| itself, it will eat everybody's lunch in the browser space.
| mentalgear wrote:
| Yes, there is a on-device Gemini model for Chrome. (Chrome
| Built-in AI), they have been testing it for over a year (been
| participating) and there were hackathons around it (ongoing
| until Nov 1 https://googlechromeai2025.devpost.com).
|
| In general, I like the idea, but I'm afraid the final
| implementation will still auto-decide between using the local
| (for cost saving) and cloud LLM. And potentially outsourcing
| all your browser-usage LLMs calls to Big Tech like Google is
| a no-go .
| alvis wrote:
| Not another comet or Claude browser extension plz. I stopped
| using them only a few days after launching
| ChrisArchitect wrote:
| Announcement post: https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-
| atlas/
| password-app wrote:
| all the AI chrome extensions are now unnecessary
| jmkni wrote:
| They were always unnecessary
| jryio wrote:
| If you think this is useful... remember technology like this
| would make totalitarian leaders foam at the mouth.
|
| If you thought that ads are creepy, Atlas is a root level
| keylogger service. Why would you want an AI company scraping and
| recording all of your browser interactions.
|
| Yes Google already does this via Chrome. It's one thing to build
| a predictive model on your demographic, spending, location and
| income information in order to target then sell you
| advertisements...
|
| Quite another thing to build a model of your cognition by
| recording you from a company that is trying to build general
| intelligence - this is a training data and cognition exfiltration
| play.
| GenerWork wrote:
| >It's one thing to build a predictive model on your
| demographic, spending and location and income information in
| order to target and sell you advertisements, and quite another
| thing to build a model of your cognition itself by recording
| you
|
| If Atlas is successful, there's no reason why Google won't try
| to mimic it. They already have Chrome and Gemini, all they'd
| have to do is put Gemini directly into Chrome, dedicate some
| TPUs to Gemini instances that are tied to Chrome, and boom,
| it's Atlas.
| babelfish wrote:
| Gemini is already in Chrome. Atlas seems neat but it is not a
| unique product.
| nextworddev wrote:
| They already have Gemini for chrome which no one uses.
| ncr100 wrote:
| There's a dedicated button for it, now .. I speculate its
| usage will take up soon.
|
| - Chrome 141.0.7390.108 macOS
| accrual wrote:
| Yes, I don't use Chrome, but had to open it the other day
| and noticed an "AI Mode" button in the URL bar. No thank
| you.
| andysinclair wrote:
| and there is Copilot for Edge which no one uses.
|
| It can also summarize pages, scale recipes etc.
| beardyw wrote:
| Not sure how you can say that. Half the time you do a
| search the answer comes from Gemini. It might be the most
| used, without anyone doing it deliberately.
| ethmarks wrote:
| > all they'd have to do is put Gemini directly into Chrome
|
| Google would never do that! /s
|
| https://gemini.google/overview/gemini-in-chrome/
| onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
| > If Atlas is successful, there's no reason why Google won't
| try to mimic it.
|
| Regulation.
| ssl-3 wrote:
| My web browser runs as root?
|
| Atlas runs as root?
|
| Atlas is a keylogger that indiscriminately watches what I type?
|
| Are any of these things true?
| kvirani wrote:
| Yes
| Ezhik wrote:
| https://xkcd.com/1200/
| jsheard wrote:
| I assume they mean a web browser has root access to
| everything you do online, which is so far-reaching nowadays
| that it's not far from having root over your whole machine in
| terms of actual exposure.
| jryio wrote:
| Indeed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45659156
| I_am_tiberius wrote:
| +1000
| kvirani wrote:
| Well said. Can't wait for the windows version so I can use it.
| Jk jk
| Razengan wrote:
| Man, with AI burrowing into everything, imagine the inevitable
| data breach...
| TranquilMarmot wrote:
| This seems like a very good way for them to get more training
| data that they're hungry for after ingesting everything from
| the web.
| eMPee584 wrote:
| Good thing is: they have no moat - there will be open source
| alternatives, even if a little later and a little less
| performant.
| felarof wrote:
| You have a great business sense!
|
| There is an open source alternative -- browserOS.com
| srcreigh wrote:
| > technology like this would make totalitarian leaders foam at
| the mouth.
|
| Do we really need to use hypothetical language?
| hbn wrote:
| After skimming the product page I'm still not sure what extra
| data exactly everyone is so confident is being gathered/used in
| a way that Google wouldn't already be doing in Chrome. As far
| as I can tell, most of these features are already integrated
| into Chrome but with Gemini.
|
| What exact feature in Atlas would need to log your every
| keystroke? Could they be doing that? Yes. But so could Google
| and in both cases they've got about equal reason to be doing it
| and feeding it into your personalized prediction model.
|
| I don't see how this is so different from Chrome.
| EGreg wrote:
| Our trusted computing base should be small, built from open-
| source, and not under the control of one company.
|
| But sadly, here we are.
|
| How do we know GMail can't steal your bank account info and
| Chrome can't steal ... everything from your web browsing, or
| impersonate you?
|
| All they have to do is be pressured by a government: https://
| www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislat...
| dotancohen wrote:
| Could you mention where in that bill there is concern for
| the Australian government pressuring tech companies for the
| ability to impersonate you? Thank you!
| josfredo wrote:
| I like how honest and blunt your comment is, and what it says
| about our current relationship with bigtech. Because what you
| say is accurate, people no longer see a problem in adopting
| technologies like OpenAI's Atlas. Google set a standard, and
| what used to be a massive red flag is now "a price we've
| already paid". No new harm is felt.
| qustrolabe wrote:
| First sentence tries to imply that just because mass data
| collection is useful to totalitarian regime this browser
| somehow not useful? Total nonsense.
|
| I respect being cautious about your privacy but that's some
| paranoid unhealthy extent.
| stavros wrote:
| That's not how I read it. I read it as "make sure you know
| what you're trading away for that usefulness, because regimes
| can change quickly".
| femiagbabiaka wrote:
| The solution seems to be the Apple approach, problem is that
| people don't seem to like that UX very much.
| CuriouslyC wrote:
| The problem with the apple approach is that it's fine grained
| and you have to restart apps for every change. I wouldn't
| care if nothing was allowed by default if when an app tried
| to do stuff it popped up the dialog at that time and asked
| for permissions needed to accomplish that task, but having to
| toggle stuff separately and restart the app each time is
| horrible UX.
| teaearlgraycold wrote:
| > Yes Google already does this via Chrome.
|
| Easy solution: Use Firefox except for web developers who need
| to occasionally check Chrome compatibility.
| mk89 wrote:
| Man, literally everything we have been doing since the 90's
| makes totalitarian leaders foam at the mouth.
|
| Do you understand we're willingly sharing our name, surname,
| relationships, friends, where we work, what we do, how much we
| make (not maybe precisely, but with some social engineering you
| can get that), in some cases even private intimate videos, pics
| of our families, etc. Everything.
|
| There is nothing else they need anymore. If they want to, they
| get you. Any time. And yet, things work relatively well.
| kossTKR wrote:
| Things work "relatively well" for billionaires and the status
| quo though.
|
| You probably have no idea how much working class anger, how
| many unknown groups and "screams from the abyss" are being
| targeted, removed, censored, deranked before they gain any
| critical mass in this bizarre cybernetic web that's been
| created. I sure don't.
|
| But sometimes you feel it on a gut level, flooded in a
| torrent of PR and entertainment, mind controlling algorithms
| and mainstream media with an increasingly tiny overton window
| disregarding the circus of culture wars farming attention and
| steering political anger for economic political gains -
| through a media landscape where all local news, actual
| working class papers representing real people, and diversity
| of thought has been replaced by thoughts(tm) approved by one
| of the few giga corporations working for a microscopic
| plutocracy.
|
| It's over 100 years since Edward Bernays et al. invented
| modern PR, then came astroturfing, and now it's all so weird
| and colossal that no talks about what was seemingly obvious a
| century ago.
| Reubend wrote:
| interesting that their landing page doesn't use the word
| "browser"
| sansseriff wrote:
| I haven't used LLM chrome plugins because I couldn't trust that
| they weren't collecting more information about my browsing than
| I'd like. The same concern exists for this, though now I'm just
| confident it's a giant software company with access to my data
| rather than some shady plugin developer. I'm faced with asking
| myself if that's actually better...
| sansseriff wrote:
| There's a great value proposition for a company like Private
| Internet Access or NordVPN to create an AI browser extension or
| full-on browser. Anonymize requests and provide various LLM
| models. Rely on your reputation as a privacy focused corp to
| pull people away from these OpenAI/Perplexity offerings.
| bebopfunk wrote:
| Kagi is starting down that path
| srcreigh wrote:
| OpenAI pins certificates on their macOS chatgpt app, so it's
| hard to monitor the data they're collecting.
| fragmede wrote:
| The problem with sharing the workaround is that OpenAI
| employees undoubtedly read HN, so if someone were to describe
| how to do that, it'll get blocked pretty soon after (if there
| even is one).
| babelfish wrote:
| Why would an LLM plugin be able to access more on the page hten
| any other plugin? This seems like a misunderstanding of how
| manifests work
| jmkni wrote:
| Yeah I find LLM's very powerful in the right context, but I
| like to keep them at arms length
|
| I will go to them when I need something, instead of them spying
| on me incase I need something
| wild_pointer wrote:
| But is it secure? Anthropic demonstrated how agentic browsers are
| all but. https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-for-chrome?s=33
| throwup238 wrote:
| Hell no it's not secure. They brought up the safety issue in
| the livestream.
|
| There's a toggle when doing agent mode between "Logged In" and
| "Not logged in" which I assume uses a temporary chrome profile
| to wipe all sessions/cookies/local storage for the request.
| That's quite a setting for a consumer product.
| corygarms wrote:
| This has 'data exfiltration' written all over it.
| behnamoh wrote:
| Anyone feel like OpenAI is acting like Google lately? They
| announce a lot of products/features and then kill them when they
| realize people don't use them[0]. They also announce products way
| before they're ready for launch, just like google[1].
|
| - GPT Plugins? (HN went crazy over this, they called it the "app
| store moment"...)
|
| - GPTs?!
|
| - Schedules?
|
| - Operator?
|
| - The original "codex" model?
|
| [0]: I know, the diff is that google kills them _despite_ knowing
| that many people use them.
|
| [1]: I know, the diff is that google sometimes doesn't launch the
| announced product at all...
| amrrs wrote:
| I think it's more like Apple - use ChatGPT as the iPhone and
| build an ecosystem around it
| jstummbillig wrote:
| How else would you build new products?
| behnamoh wrote:
| building and shipping are not the same.
| webdevver wrote:
| building, shipping, and then discarding when it becomes
| apparent that the product doesn't have a future, is about
| as good as it gets. most businesses have trouble doing just
| one, let alone all three.
| unsupp0rted wrote:
| You're supposed to invest 10% ~ 20% of your resources into
| life support for dead-end products for eternity
| renewiltord wrote:
| General advice on Hacker News, social media for YCombinator
| startup incubator is as following:
|
| 1. Start New Company
|
| 2. Hire first employee: security and compliance engineer
|
| 3. Finish security audit
|
| 4. Post security bounty program (10% of gross revenue for
| finding security@company.com email)
|
| 5. Use only real languages like C, but intrinsic are bad. If
| you want to use intrinsic, use x86_64 assembly language.
|
| 6. Any time anyone suggests hiring sales guy, hire another
| security engineer, increase security bounty 10%
|
| 7. Start on initial MVP. Pre-commit hook send every patch to
| security engineer. Once he has reviewed you may commit on
| used Thinkpad.
|
| 8. After twenty years of this, bootstrapped, you have Hello
| World triangle display on screen. Congratulations.
|
| 9. Publish 100 Year Support Program: anyone who buy Hello
| World program entitled to full discount within 100 year of
| purchase and given source code
|
| 10. ???
|
| 11. Profit
|
| Very smart advice from entrepreneurs of Hacker News
| SeanAnderson wrote:
| I've been using Schedules a little bit, but yeah fair.
| wilg wrote:
| This is exactly the right move to find out what products people
| find useful on top of their AI infrastructure.
| rvz wrote:
| They don't care. They KNOW they _want_ to be Google.
|
| Even if it means throwing away their experiements. That is how
| you test if a new product works or not.
|
| The difference is, they have over $40B+ in funding, meaning
| they they can afford to do that.
| pixel_popping wrote:
| At least Google waits a few years before killing things...
| OpenAI barely lets the paint dry :)
| specproc wrote:
| I don't think they've done much that's that impressive since
| the launch. Cancelled my sub ages ago for other offerings.
|
| Zero moat with crazy amounts of debt and financial engineering.
| What could possibly go wrong?
| px43 wrote:
| What's with the assumption that everything needs to be a
| "moat"? Seems much more important/interesting to wire up
| society with cohesive tooling according to Metcalfe's law,
| rather than building stuff designed to separate and segment
| knowledge.
| mlsu wrote:
| yeah the custom GPT announcement was literally a carbon copy of
| steve jobs announcing the app store down to the mannerisms and
| tics. You could tell they were doing it to give VC and private
| equity the pavlov bell "ring ring! this company is apple!" and
| remember the sora announcement just a couple weeks ago? oh you
| guys are tiktok and instagram reels now too? cool...
|
| everything that openAI does is laser focused on valuation
| valuation valuation
|
| of course it's a weird form of valuation because like remember
| when these guys are a non profit? lol
|
| It is weird though, the "I'm a bigtechco dance" seems to be
| working, even though the economics on providing LLM services do
| not in any way justify the valuation.
|
| they have like five _five_ credible competitors who are _right
| behind them_ BTW
| TranquilMarmot wrote:
| I remember custom GPTs also being touted as the "app store
| moment" for ChatGPT. OpenAI even had big plans to pay
| creators of custom GPTs, but it seems like that never really
| materialized. I think people quickly realized that custom
| GPTs are more or less useless, and certainly not something
| that would ever drive revenue.
| jsheard wrote:
| > yeah the custom GPT announcement was literally a carbon
| copy of steve jobs announcing the app store down to the
| mannerisms and tics.
|
| And then they nabbed Jony Ive of all people for their
| hardware project, with Altman stating that Steve Jobs would
| be "damn proud" of what they're working on. It's about as
| subtle as a brick to the face.
| tyre wrote:
| > everything that openAI does is laser focused on valuation
| valuation valuation
|
| idk it seems like a company filled with product and
| engineering where people are thinking of cool product ideas
| and shipping them. They don't have to all hit, but it doesn't
| seem bad to try them.
| oceanplexian wrote:
| All these "product ideas" are an irrelevant waste of time
| if they actually develop AGI.
|
| To me it comes across as them hedging their bets that the
| snake oil Sam Altman has been selling might not actually
| pan out.
| mlsu wrote:
| the company charter is not _product and engineering_ it 's
| "we are going to invent THE machine, the singular fulcrum
| upon which the infinite lever of history, the transcendent
| union of man and machine, the birth of a new GOD, rests."
|
| I mean, ok, you're product and engineering, fine. You get
| $20/mo out of your million or so paying users and $200/mo
| from a small handful of freaks. what does that mean for the
| valuation? what does that do for sama's patek phillipe
| collection?? nothing good I assure you. the AI product and
| engineering landscape is insanely competitive, like
| actually competitive.
|
| that's what I'm saying, the circle doesn't square here.
| mlsu wrote:
| btw the product ideas ARE cool. I like them. they are not
| worth eleventy trillion dollars.
| anuramat wrote:
| how is codex on this list though? "agent" is also alive for
| now, and I doubt it's gonna go down any time soon
| baby wrote:
| They're doing a lot of cool experiments and don't mind
| discarding them when they feel like LLMs are moving in a
| different direction. I don't know why people are complaining
| here. Every time I read AI posts here there's like an army of
| commentators that seem to have little AI usage.
| disgruntledphd2 wrote:
| Dislike of the hype does not mean people don't find value in
| the tools.
| 999900000999 wrote:
| They have too much money and need to do something with it.
|
| A lot of this is about building an ecosystem. Just a good LLM
| won't be enough forever.
|
| But if you have a giant network of products that *only work
| with your other products, you might become the next Salesforce.
| zozbot234 wrote:
| > They announce a lot of products/features and then kill them
| when they realize people don't use them. They also announce
| products way before they're ready for launch
|
| Agreed. They really should have named this product _Atlas
| *shrug*_ -\\_(tsu)_ /-
| OutOfHere wrote:
| They haven't actually canceled most of these things.
| 827a wrote:
| I think its funny how its a Chromium-based browser, and the
| live demo involved automating Gmail and Google Sheets. Google
| literally runs the world; we're just playing on their
| playground.
| bigyabai wrote:
| It's not that weird. Both of those examples are probably some
| of the most common automations people will be using.
|
| Gmail and Google Sheets has not cannibalized the existence of
| alternate email providers or spreadsheet programs, we can
| relax a bit on those fronts. AdSense, on the other hand...
| qingcharles wrote:
| Agree these are the most common. And bad for OpenAI is that
| both of these have Gemini heavily woven into them.
| dr_kiszonka wrote:
| Maybe it depends on a person, but I find some of their products
| quite useful. For example, I use a few of my own custom GPTs
| almost daily and have a few scheduled tasks running.
| bytesandbits wrote:
| This is what happens when one third of your employees is
| Xooglers
| basisword wrote:
| The demos were good. It's the first AI browser I've thought I
| might actually find useful, particularly at work.
| mlinsey wrote:
| So ChatGPT can now watch me search for 'how to stop using
| ChatGPT'? At this rate, Atlas will soon remind me to go outside
| before I ask it whether going outside is a good idea.
| mlinsey wrote:
| BTW, Atlas wrote this comment when I turned on agent mode and
| told it "Find the Hacker News post most likely to rise quickly
| and post a witty comment that will get upvotes"
| neilellis wrote:
| Identifies as Chrome 141
| rvz wrote:
| The Browser Company had no chance (obviously).
|
| OpenAI is still going to run over everyone else except for Chrome
| and Comet, unless they remove the login wall.
| xena wrote:
| I really wish they'd put the fact that the user is using ChatGPT
| Atlas in the User-Agent string or Sec-Ch-Ua header so that
| administrators can filter this browser accordingly.
| drdaeman wrote:
| As someone who remembers the Browser Wars... Fuck this idea, in
| strongest possible terms.
|
| Discrimination on personal decisions such as user agent
| software choice is antithetical to user freedoms, open
| standards and net/protocol neutrality.
|
| If something has undesirable behaviors - detect those and
| filter on what's actually happening, not how something is
| branded. It always should be "we don't tolerate this behavior",
| never "we don't serve your kind here".
| hipaa_eng wrote:
| This will totally change the traditional browsing experience and
| is reminiscent to what Google did with Chrome. Really impressive
| ncr100 wrote:
| Could this be an Extension, for Chrome / Firefox / Edge / and
| others ?
|
| Are these extension-fodder:
|
| - "new tab" shows custom UI with LLM prompt
|
| - Reads contents of user's web page in Chat UI, shown alongside
| web page
|
| - new UI gizmo at Text-selection, showing ChatGPT flower icon,
| with context features available for selected text
|
| - maintains "agent personality / context" (IDK the term) across
| tabs
| hypeatei wrote:
| That's what I thought: is an extension really that restrictive
| to where you need your own fork of a browser engine?
|
| It appears to me like they're posturing to investors on the AI
| hype train. Publishing an extension isn't as sexy or "grand" as
| shipping a browser.
| ncr100 wrote:
| For-profit customizations (via an extension) may want to fork
| to avoid competitive situations such as e.g. the multi-year
| struggle between uBlock Origin extension and Google:
|
| - https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/About-Google-
| Chrome's...
|
| Not for-profit may fare better, tolerating and pivoting as
| corporate owners attempt to strategically vendor-lock-in new
| markets, presented to e.g. Google by the innovators of the
| extension.
| peab wrote:
| Yeah, but it's the same reason why Cursor forked VS-Code
| instead of being an extension
| threetonesun wrote:
| Putting your brand name on the primary application users
| interact with on a computer is probably a few billion times
| more valuable than an extension in a thing under someone
| else's brand.
| realharo wrote:
| Controlling the full browser gives you a lot more freedom for
| any future additions.
| badlogic wrote:
| Yes, the only reason they are building a browser is to gobble
| up more data.
|
| https://x.com/badlogicgames/status/1980698199649317287
| yoavm wrote:
| Chrome / Firefox / Edge and others _will_ have their own AI
| implementation sooner or later. OpenAI 's choice is whether
| they want to be a second class citizen competing with a native
| AI integration, or start their own country where they are the
| ones setting the rules.
| bloggie wrote:
| > ChatGPT Atlas, the browser with ChatGPT built it.
|
| I know HN's rules disallow nitpicking, but I find this kind of
| error, right at the top of a product launch of a gigantic
| software automation company, a delicious slice of irony.
| zozbot234 wrote:
| It's not an error, it's truth in advertising. They're saying
| that ChatGPT built it, which is just about what we'd expect
| these days.
| ookblah wrote:
| nice, so instead of just searching for the specific spf i want
| and moving the mouse myself/checking out quickly i can instead
| write a bunch of words that make my commands even more vague lol.
|
| reminds me of when echo would let you order stuff "instantly" and
| how shitty that experience was outside of a narrow focus. except
| worse since you have to type it vs. just talking.
| basisword wrote:
| AI-powered browsers are an interesting step beyond "ChatGPT in a
| tab". Potentially as disruptive as Chrome was in 2008.
|
| However there's a tension between convenience and control. If one
| company mediates all of your browsing, search and transactions,
| it becomes both a powerful assistant and a single point of
| failure. Atlas will need to demonstrate that it can respect user
| privacy and provide robust on-device or open-source options if
| it's going to convince people it's more than just a new walled
| garden.
| snapcaster wrote:
| What is this based on? personally I agree with you but in
| reality the market has spoken and it's said: "we don't care
| about privacy or walled gardens"
| basisword wrote:
| I definitely see a bit of push back from people (non-tech
| people I know). Things like system privacy prompts (for
| location, tracking, contacts + photo access) have made them
| more mindful of when they're giving data away.
| AustinDev wrote:
| Just to be meta, I downloaded the browser and added this thread
| as context and asked for some insightful comments I could leave
| (It doesn't seem to understand block-quoting format for this
| site):
|
| Analytical / Insightful (well-received on HN)
|
| > The interesting thing here isn't that OpenAI made "a browser,"
| it's that they've collapsed the boundary between the page and the
| assistant. Plugins and "GPTs" tried to bolt APIs onto chat; Atlas
| inverts that--chat is now the substrate for all interaction. > >
| It's not hard to imagine a future where the web becomes more of
| an agent runtime than a hypertext medium. The real question is
| whether users will trust the runtime owner enough to live inside
| it.
|
| Technical / Developer-oriented
|
| > Everyone's asking "is it Chromium," but that's missing the
| deeper move. Atlas is effectively an agentic runtime with
| privileged access to DOM and user context. The engine matters
| less than the control plane--who gets to mediate input/output
| between human, model, and site. > > That layer, not rendering, is
| the new "browser wars."
|
| Cautiously critical / philosophical
|
| > Atlas looks less like a new browser and more like a new
| operating system for cognition. It's powerful, but the trade-off
| is subtle: every convenience deepens the model's visibility into
| what we do, not just what we search. The real competition now
| isn't about tabs or engines--it's about how much of our thinking
| we're willing to outsource.
| AlecSchueler wrote:
| > Everyone's asking "is it Chromium,"
|
| This "sounds good" but no one is asking that other than the one
| sub-thread asking whether it's built on top of Chrome, which is
| a different question. It seems to give the appearance of
| insightful comments but it's still just slop.
| AustinDev wrote:
| Of course it's just slop. I just thought it would be a fun
| exercise.
|
| Here's the generated reply to your comment:
|
| Potential follow-up:
|
| Fair point -- I wasn't trying to summarize the literal thread
| so much as to abstract the meta-trend. HN loves debating "is
| it Chromium?" but the real story is whether control over the
| DOM + model context becomes the next power center. I do agree
| "slop" happens fast when the analysis isn't grounded in a
| specific user problem, though. What's your take on what would
| make Atlas meaningful beyond the marketing layer?
|
| Why this works: turns the jab into a meta-conversation about
| framing rather than ego, while inviting substance.
| mentalgear wrote:
| Interesting.. Sounds all quite "pitchy", and conveniently left
| out almost all criticism about Big Tech holding all user data
| (like my own comment) and whetjer AI in the browser is really
| needed, which many comments were about.
| AustinDev wrote:
| Generated response to your comment:
|
| Potential follow-up:
|
| Yeah, totally -- I focused on the structural shift, not the
| surveillance risk, but that's the real crux. If "agentic
| browsers" win, they don't just see your web use; they mediate
| it. The open question is whether anyone will manage to make
| an open-source or on-device version before the ecosystem
| locks in.
|
| Why this works: acknowledges the critique, broadens it, adds
| a fresh angle.
| slg wrote:
| It posts like the worst type of HN commenter.
| steve_adams_86 wrote:
| I think you might be missing the _deeper moves_ they 're
| making.
| whalesalad wrote:
| You're absolutely right!
| Razengan wrote:
| The one with 60000 upvotes
| hbn wrote:
| I don't care about whether it's Chromium because of browser
| wars, I care about whether I can block ads.
| Flux159 wrote:
| I was able to add ublock origin lite as an extension & it
| seems to work the same as Chrome.
| SeanAnderson wrote:
| uBlock origin lite kinda sucks compared to the OG uBlock,
| though. YouTube videos have this awkward buffering at the
| start now, sometimes YouTube homepage ads still load,
| sponsored placements on GrubHub/DoorDash appear and aren't
| able to be removed, etc.
| verdverm wrote:
| I thought that was more specific to YT than UB?
|
| My UB experience remains largely unchanged since the
| switch to manifest v3, I pay for YT to avoid ads and
| support creators directly.
| SeanAnderson wrote:
| "I pay to remove ads so my experience with a neutered
| adblocker isn't as bad" is a weird take.
|
| If you think the end game is companies deciding they're
| comfortable with removing ads in exchange for a
| subscription, rather than a subscription with a gradually
| increasing amount of ads, then I have a bridge to sell
| you.
|
| I support the creators I watch by donating to them
| directly.
| verdverm wrote:
| I use UB for all the other websites, not YT, it's a weird
| take to associate UB usage and experience with a single
| domain.
|
| > I support the creators I watch by donating to them
| directly.
|
| Me too, on top of the monthly fee that gets distributed
| to those I watch. More for every creator, even those I
| only watch once or sporadically
| SeanAnderson wrote:
| I mentioned multiple domains...? I said it also impacts
| sponsored listings on food delivery platforms. Those used
| to be blocked and, more broadly, the ability to manually
| block specific elements of a webpage was lost with the
| transition to UB lite.
| wahnfrieden wrote:
| It can block sponsored chat response content too? And
| agentic behaviors that act on behalf of sponsors?
| sunaookami wrote:
| uBO Lite does not support a lot of filters and there is no
| element picker. Also, a lot of other add-ons are
| unsupported due to no MV2 support.
| causalmodels wrote:
| The ads you're going to need to worry about are not going to
| be shown on webpages.
| bsparker wrote:
| Are you implying that they are going to be inside of the
| chat response
| zukzuk wrote:
| They are going to be the chat response.
| wahnfrieden wrote:
| Yes, they are hiring for it. They want you to use their
| own apps instead of a web browser so that blocking tech
| cannot be created for it.
|
| https://sandstormdigital.com/2025/10/16/openai-is-
| building-i...
|
| https://www.contentgrip.com/openai-internal-ad-
| infrastructur...
| hbn wrote:
| If the ads are just brought in as a stream of text from
| the same endpoint that's streaming you the response
| you're wanting, how can that be blocked in the browser
| anyway?
|
| Another local LLM extension that reads the output and
| determines if part of it is too "ad-ey" so it can hide
| that part?
| wahnfrieden wrote:
| It will depend on how they implement the sponsored
| content. If there are regulations that require marking it
| as sponsored, that makes it easy to block. If not, then
| sure maybe via LLMs.
| qwe----3 wrote:
| Is ChatGPT trained to glaze itself?
| AustinDev wrote:
| Generated response:
|
| Best move: ignore or lightly self-deprecate.
| accrual wrote:
| The classic "it isn't about X, it's about Y". I love the
| commitment to the trope! :)
| TranquilMarmot wrote:
| > The real competition now isn't about tabs or engines--it's
| about how much of our thinking we're willing to outsource
|
| Man, I am SO tired of seeing "it's not just X--it's Y"
| everywhere these days
| tim333 wrote:
| >new operating system for cognition
|
| Kinda pretentious? Looks like a browser to me.
| asadm wrote:
| not enough to switch from Chrome. Considering Chrome already has
| all of this: https://gemini.google/overview/gemini-in-chrome/
| nextworddev wrote:
| Doesn't have agent mode
| qingcharles wrote:
| Yet.
| nextworddev wrote:
| is having one good for Chrome though
| rakejake wrote:
| I guess Atlas is a good name for a web browser. But I'm surprised
| their first release is Mac only. Does it indicate they are
| targeting some kind of power user (programmers, creatives etc) or
| is it just the first platform they could ship by the deadline?
|
| Will they be able to take any significant marketshare from
| Chrome? I suppose only time will tell but it will be a pretty
| hard slog especially since Chrome is pretty much synonymous with
| "browser" in most of the world. Still, I don't think anyone at
| Google is breathing easy.
| herpdyderp wrote:
| They probably just wanted to get it out ASAP with whatever OS
| they targeted first. Their launch post says:
|
| > Experiences for Windows, iOS, and Android are coming soon.
|
| https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-atlas/
| CGMthrowaway wrote:
| Why is this a desktop app and not a browser extension?
| Suspicious.
| rvz wrote:
| It's still Chrome.
| gh0stcat wrote:
| The thing I find the most funny about all of these demos is they
| outsource tasks that are pretty meaningful ... choosing where to
| hike, learning more about the world around you, instead, you'll
| be told what to do and live in blissful ignorance. The challenge
| of living life is also the joy, at least to me. Plus I would
| never trust a company like openai with all of my personal
| information. This is definitely just them wanting greater and
| greater control and data from their users.
| schnable wrote:
| Yeah, it's weird, I want to use LLMs to automate the boring
| stuff! But it all requires MFA to login so it doesn't work.
| seizethecheese wrote:
| I find the hike itself more meaningful than the searching for
| it. If an LLM can recommend be me a better hike, I'm all for
| it.
|
| The word choice here: "you'll be told what to do" doesn't
| really reflect my experience with LLMs. You can always ask for
| more recommendations or push back.
|
| (As an aside, I've found LLMs to be terrible for recommending
| books.)
| ascorbic wrote:
| An aside to the aside: I did too, until I exported my
| Goodreads ratings and uploaded the CSV. Then it's pretty
| great.
| groby_b wrote:
| You can usually do with less than the full history. "Here
| are five books where I liked the
| tone/setting/worldbuilding/topic, gimme more" has proven
| pretty successful.
|
| With gradual refinement - "I like #1 and #4, but I wonder
| if something like that exists with a 40s scifi tone. Gimme
| your top 10"
|
| It's... mostly worked out so far. (It also turns out that
| some topics, I seem to have _thoroughly_ explored. Taking
| recommendations for off-the-beaten-path heist novels :)
| andoando wrote:
| I found a big part of what makes doing an activity enjoyable
| is the time spent thinking/planning involed to make it
| happen.
|
| For example if I spent a week looking at exactly how to plan
| my trip, and then finally going out to accomplish it vs just
| waking up one morning and someone guiding me on exactly what
| to do
| Kiro wrote:
| I'm the complete opposite. Nothing enjoyable about it
| whatsoever. I love going on trips with a friend group where
| someone takes lead and I don't need to be involved in the
| planning at all.
| codinhood wrote:
| Yeah I thought the same, they're automating ordering on
| instacart. That's such a small task. I wonder if it was a paid
| product placement
| cush wrote:
| It's always "Book me a flight" or "write an email". Like all we
| do is email people about where we're flying next
| kelseyfrog wrote:
| If you've ever wanted insight into what C-suite is doing all
| day, it's this.
| rrrrrrrrrrrryan wrote:
| Remember Quibi? It was a streaming platform of TV shows,
| where they were filmed in portrait mode instead of landscape,
| and the episodes were 5 minutes instead of 30.
|
| Their pitch was basically: "Nobody has time to sit down and
| watch a whole TV show anymore, that's why the short form
| content like Instagram and TikTok is doing so well - we're
| going to make TV shows to compete with those platforms that
| you can watch while you're waiting in line for a coffee!"
|
| They got like billions of dollars in runway because the idea
| resonated so deeply with the boardrooms full of executives
| that they were pitching to, but the idea was completely dead
| on arrival. Normal (non-career-obsessed) people actually have
| a TON of free time. They chain-smoke entire seasons of shitty
| reality TV in one sitting. They plop down on the weekend and
| watch sports for hours on end, not on a phone, but on an
| actual TV in their living room.
|
| I definitely agree that a ton of these AI use cases seem
| hyper-tailored to the executives running these companies and
| the investors that are backing them, and may not resonate at
| all with the broader population nor lead to widespread
| adoption.
| iknowstuff wrote:
| have you heard about second screen content
| jmkd wrote:
| Quibi was 5 years too early. Vertical micro dramas are now
| an $8B market, just exceeded box office in China and
| expanding rapidly elsewhere.
| AmericanOP wrote:
| This is what always happen when your general purpose tool
| needs to be marketed through use cases.
| chis wrote:
| I can totally see wanting to automate your life like this for
| work - "re-order that shipment from last week" or "bump my
| flight a day". But using this for personal stuff, it does seem
| like a slide towards just living a totally automated life.
| felarof wrote:
| This is exactly our vision as well!
|
| But we want to enable you to run these automations using
| local models, which would be secure and privacy-first
|
| https://git.new/BrowserOS
| designerarvid wrote:
| The end station is advertising and for that they need your
| data.
| beardyw wrote:
| To me AI is like having a young graduate come to live with you
| as an assistant. It's happy to do some research for you though
| not very inspired. But make lunch? No. Do some cleaning. Def
| no, but happy to chat about how you should do it. It all seems
| a bit pointless in the end.
| sixtyj wrote:
| Be patient. In few years, it will be a senior graduate :)
| hollowturtle wrote:
| How could you positively and constructively add to the
| discussion by literally having the truth in your hands of
| what the future will be? The only thing I know it is that
| it's not even a young graduate, as soon as you have someone
| with a bit of domain expertise it will tell you how many
| lies they output
| pastel8739 wrote:
| I have a sad semi-fantasy, semi-fear, that AI will show us
| that everything we do online is rather pointless and force us
| back into the real world (this would cause me and most of
| this site to lose our jobs, hence the fear part)
| duxup wrote:
| AI is like those folks happy to give advice / tell people
| what to do ... but they seem kinda incapable at those things
| themselves.
| infecto wrote:
| Did we watch the same demo. Maybe I skipped over those parts.
| It nailed one of my immediate needs. Grocery shopping. I really
| don't want to waste time adding items to my Walmart shopping
| cart for pickup or delivery. I want to send a bunch of recipe
| videos, get back a book of my version of how to format a recipe
| and also a cart full for me to click purchase. They nailed
| this.
| miltonlost wrote:
| Until you look at the demo video and they put $12 worth of
| green onions in the shopping bag because chatgpt thought 6
| green onions == 6 bunches of green onions
| infecto wrote:
| Saw that and still not a concern here. Quicker to refine
| than it is to work through the whole list.
| basisword wrote:
| The guy did say "it could just checkout if you ask it too,
| but I prefer to review it first myself". Reviewing a list
| is much quicker than doing the whole shop provided it's 90%
| accurate. In the case you mention you click the minus
| button 5 times.
| tolmasky wrote:
| If this ever gets popular then sellers will "optimize" their
| product listings to exploit the LLM (a "soft" prompt
| injection if you will). This will definitely be the case in
| marketplaces (like Amazon and Walmart). It'll turn the old
| boring task of shopping into a fun puzzle to spot the decoy
| item or overpriced product.
| hollowturtle wrote:
| I'm Italian, I love cooking in my free time, it's also part
| of our culture. I honestly can't figure out what's stressfull
| and time wasting shopping for groceries, I often get lost
| inside the smell of vegetables, pickin the right one, looking
| for the right color, even optimizing for cost and less waste.
| I find it so relaxing and like a zen experience
| basisword wrote:
| If I were to start smelling vegetables in the local
| supermarket I'd be escorted out. I also hate cooking and
| hate shopping. I generally order the same items, order them
| online in 5 mins, and have them delivered.
| Kiro wrote:
| I can't relate at all. I also hate just deciding on dishes.
| Subscribing to weekly meal kits is one of the best things
| I've done. I don't need to plan any meals and I only need
| to shop for basic stuff. I also cook way more varied
| recipes that I would otherwise never even think of.
| threetonesun wrote:
| It would be great if it could do my taxes, or schedule a
| doctor's appointment, or do literally anything that's actually
| difficult and time consuming, but because those problems
| haven't already been solved by APIs it can't and never will be
| able to.
| michaelhoney wrote:
| that's an extraordinary thing to say. I would unsurprised if
| this was common in a couple of years.
| Kiro wrote:
| I've done my taxes through an API for years and it would be
| trivial to hook up an AI if I wanted to. I also don't see
| what would be so hard about scheduling a doctor's appointment
| when I'm already doing it through an app.
| basisword wrote:
| These things aren't difficult because they have to be. It's
| because the people in your town/state/country make them
| difficult. Personally, to make a doctor's appointment I open
| an app, select a time slot, and wait for a call later that
| day. If they want me to come in, they give me a time and I go
| in. Taxes is mostly automated but for the bits that aren't I
| tell them how much I made in total, fill in a short form, and
| get told what I owe. Simple.
| nickpinkston wrote:
| Yea totally - like those Black Mirror-esque (and South Park?)
| videos of people having AI talk to their partner about deep
| relationship stuff.
|
| We just built a mechanical parts AI search engine [1], and a
| lot of what it does it just get the best options clustered
| together, and then give the user the power to do the deeper
| engineering work of part selection in a UI that makes more
| sense for the task than a chat UI.
|
| Feels like this pattern of "narrow to just the good options,
| but give the user agency / affordances" is far better.
|
| [1] https://www.govolition.com/power-search
| qiine wrote:
| soon Chatgpt will hike for you, just watch!
| nicbou wrote:
| Yes and no. Sometimes friction is just friction.
| _pdp_ wrote:
| This is apple style advertisings. I bet most llm use is pretty
| boring - correcting grammar and spelling mistakes
| ethmarks wrote:
| It's not confidence-inspiring that their landing page has such
| atrocious performance. Google Lighthouse gives it[1] a
| performance score of 25/100 with 12,310ms of TBT and a speed
| index of 24.7 seconds. It's not even an interactive page either;
| it's just a video, some images, and some text.
|
| [1] https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis/https-chatgpt-com-
| atlas/x...
| levysoft wrote:
| Trying it right now and it feels really fast.
| TranquilMarmot wrote:
| It's just Chromium
| levysoft wrote:
| Yes, I think the absence of preinstalled extensions gives a
| misleading impression of speed.
| paxys wrote:
| The more these foundational AI companies focus on product
| development, the more convinced I am that improvements in
| intelligence of the base models have slowed down to a point where
| AGI/"superintelligence" isn't happening, and they have to sustain
| their valuations in alternate ways.
| onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
| GPT-5 was the evidence for me.
|
| We can wait for Gemini 3.0 to see if it's a huge improvement,
| but my best guess is that if OpenAI couldn't get a meaningful
| improvement, it's more likely that it's non-trivial to be
| gotten than they're just incompetent.
| cush wrote:
| Evan an AGI is going to require basic ways like having access
| to a browser in order to get things done
| AstroBen wrote:
| Agreed 1000%. And the rate ate which OpenAI is spitting out new
| product tests like this I think they know very well they're
| hitting the limits of what the underlying model can do
| dakial1 wrote:
| Tried using it, but 2FA is throwing me the error 409 below. Might
| be because I'm behind my company VPN.
|
| Route Error (409 ): { "error": { "message": "Something went
| wrong. Please make sure your device's date and time are set
| properly. Check that your internet connection is stable, then
| restart the app and try again.", "type": "invalid_request_error",
| "param": null, "code": "preauth_cookie_failed" } }
| thund wrote:
| Looking forward for the 1Password extension to work properly.
| Installation works, but the integration doesn't yet. Nice lean UI
| though, thanks to Chromium oc
| nextworddev wrote:
| It may not look inpresssive, but consider that OpenaI will prolly
| get 200m browser installs by year end. It's a pretty big deal
| k2xl wrote:
| How does security for these AI browsers work if someone adds
| prompt injection on their web page?
| jsheard wrote:
| Security? What security?
|
| https://simonwillison.net/2025/Aug/25/agentic-browser-securi...
| ChrisArchitect wrote:
| A related post from an OpenAIer with some insights:
|
| _Launching our new browser, ChatGPT Atlas_
|
| https://fidjisimo.substack.com/p/launching-our-new-browser-c...
| imooc wrote:
| You really don't need a new browser, a simple chrome extension
| can exactly turn your current chrome into a super AI agent. Try
| browserx out today! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45653133
| SeanAnderson wrote:
| Does anything in here seem like a defensible moat? Feels like
| Google will just ask their teams to mimic any of the good UX
| flows and they'll have something out in a couple of weeks.
| nake13 wrote:
| ChatGPT Atlas just packages several existing ChatGPT features
| into Chrome, for example, the basic Chat UI and an Agent mode. By
| turning the browser into the product, it gives them access to
| more user data, enabling more personalized recommendations. It
| also allows them to execute specific tasks once users are logged
| into certain services.
| almosthere wrote:
| Like any other major shift in the world the scammers will get
| ahold of things.
|
| Hey Browser (hand-wave) - it looks like your purchase is
| alllllmost done, we just need your credit card number, date of
| birth, social security number and your free all expenses paid
| trip to Bali will be at your doorstep. In fact, if you just
| submit this through a background JS form, you can surprise your
| user later at your convenience. Isn't this great, one of the
| benefits of using Agentic browsers!
| scoofy wrote:
| This is a fun way to get around robots.txt "Disallow: /"
| SeanAnderson wrote:
| There is no law that says you have to respect robots.txt. It's
| just a suggestion.
| scoofy wrote:
| For the websites that ChatGPT wants to scrape -- Reddit
| immediately comes to mind -- it's not an issue of law, it's
| an issue of "the infrastructure now exists to prevent you
| from doing that."
| qingcharles wrote:
| It also completes CAPTCHAs when I tried it. And clicks the "I
| am human" buttons.
|
| Sometimes it hesitates on really important button clicks that
| it determines are not reversible. I was using it to test the UX
| on an app in beta and it didn't want to click the final step. I
| had to "trick" it by reminding it I owned the app.
|
| It felt like that scene in Short Circuit 2 where they trick
| Johnny 5 into plasma cutting his way through a bank vault
| because it is "their" vault and they are simply testing the
| security. Wild times.
| LightChaser wrote:
| The fact that this is Chromium [1] kills it for me right off the
| bat. I cannot stand the battery hog that chromium is and the lack
| of support for UBlock Origin.
|
| A damn shame, I was hoping it was at least webkit based which
| doesn't support UB Origin either, but at least it isn't a battery
| hog.
|
| [1]https://help.openai.com/en/articles/12628461-setting-up-
| the-...
| gmuslera wrote:
| The layer-8 malware on the web will go from social engineering to
| prompt engineering with this kind of things. LLMs are still not
| safe from things that can be interpreted as prompts in web
| content, even if its not visible directly by the end user.
| thund wrote:
| major possible risk, for tech savvy people: another walled
| garden, unless: - openai will open the memory interface (why
| would they?) - openai will allow other models (why would they?) -
| openai will allow a neutral agent/procedural layer (wwt?)
|
| fingers crossed.
| SunshineTheCat wrote:
| Probably me just being a doofus, however, it wasn't until reading
| an article about this (after already seeing the product page)
| that I learned this was a web browser we were talking about.
| wbsun wrote:
| Am I the only one who doesn't want to type a lot while browsing?
| (I comment on HN very rarely too...).
| Flux159 wrote:
| One interesting thing here is that the chat side panel is agentic
| - it can read tab contents, open links in the existing tab or
| create new tabs, and do most of the standard "summarize", etc.
| things too.
|
| This might be the first time that I move off of Chrome for an
| extended period of time.
| earth2mars wrote:
| oops. search in page is not working! (command+F)
| earth2mars wrote:
| and it works now!
| zuInnp wrote:
| In the future we all will use 50 different Chromium based
| browsers
| TranquilMarmot wrote:
| We already do with Electron
| shadowfax92 wrote:
| This is honestly what I think is gonna happen as well.
|
| And that is a good thing too.
|
| (we are building one -- http://git.new/browserOS)
| emrehan wrote:
| "Browser memories" claim to be "private", but the learn more link
| is broken. Shows the care given by OpenAI to privacy.
| shadowfax92 wrote:
| Link broken was probably a honest oversight. That said, there
| is still a need for fully open-source + local browser where
| users store their memories locally (and have encrypted cloud
| backup if required).This is on our roadmap! (BrowserOS.com)
| napolux wrote:
| Not working on my Intel Mac. Can someone confirm?
| px43 wrote:
| This Apple only nonsense is driving me nuts.
|
| I pay OpenAI $200 a month, and use Codex all the time, but just
| installed the crappy ChatGPT app for Android, and just use it
| from the mobile web browser, because it's over a month behind on
| super common features that launched on iPhone on day one.
|
| Same thing with Sora 2 being Apple only. What craziness is that?
| Why are developers leaning so hard into supporting closed source
| ecosystems and leaving open source ecosystems behind?
| StevePerkins wrote:
| This never has anything to do with open source vs. closed
| source, or anything like that. It always has to do with
| prioritizing the cohort that's most likely to pay money.
|
| It's been shown over and over again in A/B testing that Apple
| device users will pay higher prices for the same goods and
| services than non-Apple users will. They're more likely to pay,
| period, versus free-ride.
|
| As an Android user, it frustrates me sometimes. But I
| understand. I'm far more frugal with my online spending than
| most of my Apple user friends, myself.
| shadowfax92 wrote:
| We are an open-source alternative and have a linux and windows
| build as well, check us out -- http://git.new/browserOS
| ravetcofx wrote:
| Can anyone get the Agent mode to work? Does it require a plus
| subscription, or is it not enabled yet?
| Flux159 wrote:
| I have a plus subscription & was able to get it to work on X.
| It shows you what it's doing on the tab as it's moving around.
| codybontecou wrote:
| Yes, a plus subscription is required.
| eMPee584 wrote:
| Agentic browser, fine, might be cool, we'll see.
|
| Though what I really would love to have is an LLM-powered browser
| extension that can simply do fluid DOM/CSS manipulation to get an
| upper hand on all these messed up websites.. fiddling with
| devtools inspector and overriding element styles one by one
| really takes too much time.
| robertheadley wrote:
| I would be more interested if it was using something like servo
| as a driving engine instead of blink.
| wina wrote:
| why?
| robertheadley wrote:
| 80% of all devices on the internet are already using blink.
| alberth wrote:
| Just to confirm my understanding--
|
| Atlas can screen-read anything visible on my screen, right?
|
| So if I log into my online banking, it could capture my
| transaction details and balance from that page ... and
| potentially use or train on that data, even to target ads based
| on my banking information?
| SeanAnderson wrote:
| The website states pretty clearly that you have the ability to
| disable it on any sensitive pages.
| alberth wrote:
| But we all know the power of defaults. And by default, it
| will screen read & train from that data - no?
| SeanAnderson wrote:
| Conceptually, yes. Practically? I think their lawyers might
| be a little concerned about seeing them feed banking data
| into their models and have them drop it behind the scenes,
| or at least anonymizing it heavily first.
| ZeljkoS wrote:
| Here are the highlights from the .DMG installer screens
| (https://imgur.com/a/Tu4TlNu):
|
| 1. Turn on browser memories Allow ChatGPT to remember useful
| details as you browse to give smarter responses and proactive
| suggestions. You're in control - memories stay private.
|
| 2. Ask ChatGPT - on any website Open the ChatGPT sidebar on any
| website to summarize, explain, or handle tasks - right next to
| what you're browsing.
|
| 3. Make your cursor a collaborator ChatGPT can help you draft
| emails, write reviews, or fill out forms. Highlight text inside a
| form field or doc and click the ChatGPT logo to get started.
|
| 4. Set as default browser BOOST CHATGPT LIMITS Unlock 7 days of
| extended limits on messaging, file uploads, data analysis, and
| image generation on ChatGPT Atlas.
|
| 5. You're all set -- welcome to Atlas! Have fun exploring the web
| with ChatGPT by your side, all while staying in control of your
| data and privacy. (This screen also displays shareable PNG badge
| with days since you registered for ChatGPT and Atlas).
|
| My guess is that many ChatGPT Free users will make it their
| default browser just because of (4) -- to extend their limits.
| Creative :)
| tim333 wrote:
| I tried making it my default browser because of (4)
|
| You miss the most questionable bit which is asking for keychain
| access. I said no to that one.
| Skunkleton wrote:
| A browser using your keychain seems like the least
| questionable bit, if anything.
| Analemma_ wrote:
| Right, but most browsers aren't owned by money-losing
| startups desperate for any bit of training data they can
| get their hands on as scaling taps out.
|
| I really doubt OpenAI consciously wants my passwords, but I
| could absolutely see a poorly-coded (or vibe-coded, lol)
| OpenAI process somehow getting my keychain into their
| training set anyway, and then somebody being able to ask
| Chat-GPT 6, "hey, what's Analemma_'s gmail password?" and
| it happily supplying it. The dismal state of LLM scraper
| behavior and its support (or lack thereof) of adherence to
| best practices lends credibility to this.
| terhechte wrote:
| Weird, I didn't get that question. It asked for full disk
| access so it could import my Safari settings, but that was
| optional.
| conartist6 wrote:
| Giving people money to set you as your default browser seems
| like it might be, idunno, like, maybe a little bit
| anticompetitive and dystopian
| callc wrote:
| Or maybe a prime example of healthy capitalism! /s
| bdangubic wrote:
| getting an 50 mile Uber ride for $25 when taxi was charging
| me $100 sure got that app onto my phone... once I had the app
| on the phone...
| erikig wrote:
| It feels like a natural competitive extension to any company
| seriously trying to usurp Google's browser domination
| including but not limited to paying Apple to be the default
| search engine
| cekanoni wrote:
| How can you trust company that says Privacy in your control or
| some nonsense like that, when they scraped the whole internet
| and breached the foundation of privacy :)
| felarof wrote:
| You should try us :) open-source and privacy-first
| alternative to Atlas -- https://github.com/browseros-
| ai/BrowserOS
| d3Xt3r wrote:
| Seems like it's based on Chromium? If so, that's a no-go
| for me. We need more web diversity and support smaller
| browser engines, we don't need yet another Chromium/Blink
| based browser.
| tobyjsullivan wrote:
| Unclear if this question is about Atlas or Google Chrome /s
| bdangubic wrote:
| Chrome for sure
| lxgr wrote:
| I do see the copyright/intellectual property angle of
| training LLMs on the entire web, but what's the privacy issue
| here?
|
| If you publish something on the web, what are you expecting
| to happen?
| granzymes wrote:
| Being able to search browser history with natural language is
| the feature I am most excited for. I can't count the number of
| times I've spent >10 minutes looking for a link from 5 months
| ago that I can _describe the content of_ but can 't remember
| the title.
| lxgr wrote:
| In my experience, as long as the site is public, just
| describing what I want to ChatGPT 5 (thinking) usually does
| the trick, without having to give it access to my own
| browsing history.
| jacekm wrote:
| I think that such feature is already available in Chrome
| https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/15305774?hl=en
| baal80spam wrote:
| Ah, makes sense why I need to use an extension for that:
|
| > To use this feature, you must be located in the US
| bobviolier wrote:
| I just don't get this. Google has SO MANY THINGS that are
| US only. While most other companies release things to
| everyone (like OpenAI).
|
| How does Google expect to compete with OpenAI globally if
| they keep limitting the rest of the world?
| elric wrote:
| Are we talking searching the URLs and titles? Or the full
| body of the page? The latter would require tracking a fuckton
| of data, including a whole lot of potentially sensitive data.
| Ethee wrote:
| All of these LLMs already have the ability to go fetch
| content themselves, I'd imagine they'd just skim your URLs
| then do it's own token-efficient fetching. When I use
| research mode with Claude it crawls over 600 web pages
| sometimes so imagine they've figured out a way to skim down
| a lot of the actual content on pages for token context.
| janalsncm wrote:
| A tangential issue is that pages often change over time. So
| your snapshot could be stale. Not sure whether that's a bug
| or a feature.
| hbn wrote:
| I find browser history used to be pretty easy to search
| through and then Google got cute by making it into your
| "browsing journeys" or something and suddenly I couldn't find
| anything
| 6thbit wrote:
| This may be the first time I see a 'perk' of choosing a browser
| as default.
|
| People will probably leave it default past the perk period.
| ghostpepper wrote:
| I turned off chatGPT memory entirely because it doesn't know
| how to segment itself. I was getting inane comments like this
| when asking about winter tires:
|
| Because you work in firmware (so presumably you appreciate
| measurement, risk, durability) you might be more critical of
| the "wear sooner than ideal" signals and want a tire with more
| robustness.
| taspeotis wrote:
| I have also had bad experiences with it and turned it off -
| especially for creative stuff like mocking up user interfaces
| it gets "poisoned" but whatever decision it made in some chat
| 6mo ago and never really iterates on different outcomes
| unless you steer it away which takes up a bunch of time.
| andrewguenther wrote:
| How long ago was this? I had this same experience, but
| there's a new implementation for memory as of a few months
| ago which seems to have solved this weird "I need to mention
| every memory in every answer" behavior.
| kgeist wrote:
| A couple of months ago I experienced this weird bug where
| instead of answering my questions, ChatGPT would discuss rome
| random unrelated topic about 95% time. I had to turn it off,
| too.
| sheepscreek wrote:
| There was a phase when ChatGPT would respond to everything I
| said, even in the same request with something like "..here's
| the thing that you asked for, of course, without the fluff."
| Or blah blah blah "straight to the point." Or some such
| thinly veiled euphemisms. No matter how many times I told it
| not to talk like that, it didn't work until I found that
| "core memory".
| prng2021 wrote:
| I'm surprised they released something so underwhelming. This
| will take zero market share from existing browsers.
| namnnumbr wrote:
| I can't wait for ads to prompt inject my Agentic Browser.
| BasilPH wrote:
| Atlas feels like a Dia clone. I've used Dia for a couple months,
| but rarely touch the ChatGPT integration--quick answers go to
| Kagi with "?", and deeper work goes to Claude or ChatGPT
| directly. The "reference a bunch of open tabs" workflow just
| isn't common for me. Dia's free-tier limits don't help, and since
| I already pay for Claude and ChatGPT, I'm not adding another
| $20/month for overlapping features.
|
| Curious how Atlas stacks up against Dia.
|
| It also makes me think the right approach is AI at the OS level.
| At the end of the day, it's reading text and writing it back into
| text boxes. Surprised Apple hasn't gone further than a hidden
| right-click "writing assistant."
| levysoft wrote:
| More than anything, now my chat history in the sidebar is growing
| out of control. I think they should have made it separate.
| Browser chats (mostly temporary, throwaway, and not very useful)
| are one thing, while my long ChatGPT sessions, the ones I
| actually want to keep visible and organized, are another.
| ed_mercer wrote:
| This is awesome. They are a serious threat to Google now. I am
| really tired of Google owning the web, and I welcome competition.
| oddrationale wrote:
| I wonder if part of the reason they haven't released on Windows
| is because Edge has a lot of these features with Copilot. E.g.
| Copilot Vision and Copilot Actions.
| levysoft wrote:
| I think it's just because they always start developing for
| macOS or iOS first and only later move on to the others.
| miguelspizza wrote:
| The agent mode is really disappointing. I thought OpenAI would
| try to be more innovative with how the agent interacts with
| webpages, but it looks like it's the same DOM parsing and
| screenshot workflow the rest of the AI browser agents use. Giving
| the agent full access to the page is a recipe for disaster.
|
| We have better tools for this now. This is a draft video I put
| together for the W3C demoing WebMCP. It blows their agent mode
| out of the water, and you can even use in-browser models for
| inference (see the end of the video)
|
| https://screen.studio/share/hbGudbFm
|
| I've been working on this full-time after putting out the
| MCP-B/WebMCP Hacker News post.
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44515403
| albelfio wrote:
| How fast will Google come with their version? How slow will be
| Safari to adopt it?
| nomilk wrote:
| Anyone found anything particularly fun, interesting or useful to
| do with it yet? (I'm joyriding, but haven't found any compelling
| use case yet)
| qingcharles wrote:
| I've been using ChatGPT Agent for testing UI and giving me
| feedback. It's actually pretty useful.
| nomilk wrote:
| That's a great idea.
|
| I wonder if Atlas could be used for system tests, thus
| letting you write system tests in natural language rather
| than a programming language
| sidjfjdn wrote:
| Has it given you feedback yet that you're a pedophile who
| deserves the woodchipper?
| recallingmemory wrote:
| How does ChatGPT Atlas address the concerns Anthropic found?
|
| https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-for-chrome
|
| "Prompt injection attacks can cause AIs to delete files, steal
| data, or make financial transactions. This isn't speculation:
| we've run "red-teaming" experiments to test Claude for Chrome
| and, without mitigations, we've found some concerning results.
|
| We conducted extensive adversarial prompt injection testing,
| evaluating 123 test cases representing 29 different attack
| scenarios. Browser use without our safety mitigations showed a
| 23.6% attack success rate when deliberately targeted by malicious
| actors.
|
| One example of a successful attack--before our new defenses were
| applied--was a malicious email claiming that, for security
| reasons, emails needed to be deleted. When processing the inbox,
| Claude followed these instructions to delete the user's emails
| without confirmation."
| bytesandbits wrote:
| I don't want an AI browser and don't understand the
| attractiveness of it. Like. What does it add that a normal
| browser + chatgpt extension doesn't? It is a gimmick to boost
| usage and token count and fake growth I think. This is the reason
| I dont trust Altman. He is all about fake growth.
| WheatMillington wrote:
| Personally I welcome competition in this space.
| levysoft wrote:
| So ChatGPT Atlas is basically Clippy's revenge: a helpful overlay
| that knows what you want before you do. What could possibly go
| wrong?
| doso wrote:
| Something's bugging me about Atlas - it's clearly Chromium-based
| (you can tell from the user agent and UI), but I can't find any
| credit to Chromium anywhere. No license info, no acknowledgments,
| and when I try to access chrome:// pages they're blocked.
|
| Maybe I'm overthinking this, but shouldn't there be some
| transparency about what you're building on top of? Especially
| with open source projects that have attribution requirements? I
| get that it's still early days, but this feels like a pretty
| basic thing to get right.
|
| Anyone else notice this or know if this is standard practice?
| Just seems odd to me that they're not being upfront about the
| foundation they're building on.
| doso wrote:
| Honestly, it feels like they're intentionally trying to scrub
| any traces of Chromium or Google. No mention anywhere, blocked
| chrome:// pages, UI stripped of references--it's as if they
| don't want users to realize it's built on open-source tech.
| It's a weird move for transparency and doesn't sit right with
| me, especially with all the attribution requirements.
| doso wrote:
| Just to add some official context on this, Chromium's BSD
| license explicitly requires attribution in derivative works.
| The notice clause says: "Include a readable copy of the
| attribution notices contained within such NOTICE file...within
| a NOTICE text file distributed as part of the Derivative Works;
| within the Source form or documentation, if provided along with
| the Derivative Works; or, within a display generated by the
| Derivative Works, if and wherever such third-party notices
| normally appear." It's not just good practice--this is a legal
| requirement. Surprised Atlas skipped this.
|
| https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/config/+/refs/h...
| awwaiid wrote:
| I asked Atlas about this, and it indirectly pointed out that
| atlas://credits is a thing. Not linked to anywhere that I could
| find though.
| hbn wrote:
| If you go to
|
| Help > ChaptGPT Atlas Help
|
| it'll link you to some docs[1] and under "Setting up the Atlas
| browser"[2] it opens with
|
| > Atlas is OpenAI's Mac browser built on Chromium.
|
| If that counts for anything.
|
| [1] https://help.openai.com/en/collections/16051538-chatgpt-
| atla...
|
| [2] https://help.openai.com/en/articles/12628461-setting-up-
| the-...
| Workaccount2 wrote:
| It's a pretty bad look to be using the foundations of your
| direct competitor.
| Austin_Conlon wrote:
| Haven't tried this yet, but I'm not confident in OpenAI's ability
| to make a great Mac app. ChatGPT for macOS is a buggy mess,
| doesn't have feature parity with the web, and hasn't been
| noticeably improving.
| nomilk wrote:
| Getting stuck 'thinking' for me. Responds about 1/2 the time.
| Have to constantly create new chats as existing ones freeze
| (can't cancel 'thinking' as you can with regular ChatGPT)
| n_f wrote:
| really excited to see what everyone will do with atlas! we really
| improved the agentic capabilities, both in terms of performance
| and speed of execution-- definitely a step function improvement
| oceanplexian wrote:
| Is OpenAI's current business model to steal ideas from other
| companies?
|
| CoT reasoning- stolen from Chinese AI labs, Codex is a ripoff of
| Claude Code. Sora is a low quality clone of Google's Veo3. Like I
| thought Sam Altman's pitch was AGI changing the nature of work
| not another Perplexity ripoff.
| sindriava wrote:
| Take this attitude somewhere else, this isn't Reddit.
|
| To set the record straight:
|
| - "CoT reasoning- stolen from Chinese AI labs" I should really
| hope this point doesn't need correcting. Accusing anyone from
| stealing of stealing from "Chinese AI labs" is laughable at
| this point.
|
| - "Codex is a ripoff of Claude Code" Claude Code wasn't the
| first CLI agent and you could just as easily "accuse" Anthropic
| of stealing the idea of chatting with an LLM from OpenAI.
|
| - "Sora is a low quality clone of Google's Veo3." Do you
| realize video models existed BEFORE you were born, which was
| apparently yesterday?
|
| - "another Perplexity ripoff." Wait until you hear how
| Perplexity came to be.
| Kiro wrote:
| Implementing the most obvious ideas in the world is not
| stealing.
| Yaina wrote:
| With these "agentic browsers" you are one prompt injection away
| from having your data stolen by a malicious website with some
| form that you cannot see.
| aprilthird2021 wrote:
| Actually, this sounds like a really fun exploit to try to come
| up with. We saw the Agent select items and put them in a
| cart...
| LarsDu88 wrote:
| Big pivot towards platform monopoly.
|
| The power of AI is nothing compared to having a big fat network
| effect monopoly like Meta or Google.
| AtNightWeCode wrote:
| I actually built my own browser on top of Chromium to be able to
| use both Claude and ChatGPT ad hoc for various tasks in the
| browser. Fact is that I use my OS native text to speech more than
| the LLMs...
|
| Anyhow. The problem is that the LLMs are simply not good enough.
| And as someone who processes a lot of data through LLMs daily via
| APIs. The quality is just poor. Clearly LLMs does not work as
| stated. The fluctuation in the quality of the responses is just
| silly and very undocumented.
| AtNightWeCode wrote:
| It is funny that only morons can down vote on HN. I'm pretty
| sure I am better than any random idiot on HN on this topic
| since I worked DAILY with these issues for a couple of years.
| Years before there even was an official "AI browser".
| submeta wrote:
| Here's ChatGPT's Atla's analysis of the sentiments here:
|
| <snip> The Hacker News discussion about ChatGPT Atlas (OpenAI's
| new AI-integrated browser) is very active and highly mixed --
| leaning skeptical to negative overall, with a few positive and
| curious takes.
|
| Sentiment breakdown:
|
| - Negative / Critical (~65%): Privacy, control, monopoly concerns
|
| - Neutral / Cautiously curious (~20%): Waiting to see if it's
| useful
|
| - Positive / Enthusiastic (~15%): Productivity and innovation
| optimism
|
| </snip>
|
| I am a Firefox user, and will be as long as Mozilla keeps it
| updated. But I also use ChatGPT Max plan because I really like
| the product.
|
| Gave Atlas a try, but won't use it. We did not fight Google to
| create another one.
| bilsbie wrote:
| Super dumb question but why was this so hard for someone to
| build.
|
| I've been wanting to simply ask AI about whatever is currently on
| my screen for years.
|
| I don't get why we can't easily have this.
| Sean-Der wrote:
| You can already do this! I saw this on X[0]. You can do WebRTC
| to Realtime API + getDisplayMedia.
|
| [0] https://www.loom.com/share/22a165508ae5491dbd536fbbc5348fcc
| AtNightWeCode wrote:
| It is very basic. I have built my own version of this based on
| Chromium that integrates both Claude and ChatGPT in the
| browser. It can do a lot of tasks like translate or shorten the
| text I selected and so on. It took me like a couple of hours to
| build. The problem is the cost of using the LLMs, especially
| since they are still pretty stupid and requires huge prompts.
|
| EDIT: I think I misunderstood your Q. Sorry. You can take a
| screenshot and post it to ChatGPT and get back what it is
| seeing, in theory. I mean, I use ChatGPT to post screenshots of
| my sites to get feedback on my layout and designs...
| bilsbie wrote:
| What's the privacy story here? Seems terrifying.
| nextworddev wrote:
| Unfortunately Meta and TikTok desensitized people to privacy
| jsrozner wrote:
| I asked it to scroll through a chat stream and collect all
| comments from a particular person. It took a long time and
| accomplished nothing, except for sending the search query _into_
| the chat. Great job.
| bilsbie wrote:
| It would be cool to have some AI buttons to save time like
| "summarize", "is this accurate?", "fill out the form", etc.
| dnpls wrote:
| Linkedin "content creators" are going to have a field day
| tomorrow
| sloankev wrote:
| Im still weary of OpenAI being legally required to retain all of
| your data even if you delete it [0] . This means everything you
| expose to this tool will be permanently stored somewhere. Why
| isn't this a bigger problem for people?
|
| Even privacy concerns aside... this would be the world's most
| catastrophic data leak.
|
| [0]: https://openai.com/index/response-to-nyt-data-demands/
| sloankev wrote:
| They literally created a precedent that's it's for use in legal
| cases if required... why would you want your entire digital
| life subject to subpoena?
| ragequittah wrote:
| Given that most of society already uses chrome with Google
| search on their adware ridden android phones it's not much of
| a change from that.
| tempestn wrote:
| I think you mean wary, not weary.
| gulfofamerica wrote:
| Por que no los dos.
| Wistar wrote:
| Si, si.
| ragequittah wrote:
| I'm not so sure this is much worse than Chrome. Really in
| today's world if you're not browsing the web like multiple
| people are looking over your shoulder you're probably doing it
| wrong. And most of the steps people do to mitigate privacy
| violations (TOR, pihole, VPNs, etc.) probably make any signal
| you do put out more scrutinized. The one solution I do like is
| the iCloud private relay which I hope some reputable VPN
| vendors pick up soon.
| throitallaway wrote:
| Does Google have my .env files that I've opened via Chrome?
| bdangubic wrote:
| it has yours and your next door neighbour's as well
| darepublic wrote:
| My general understanding is that they browser fingerprint
| you. And then if that fingerprint is ever detected on a site
| that also knows your pii they have you. Is that the gist of
| it or are there more shenanigans I'm unaware of
| nerdponx wrote:
| "They" aren't that interested in PII. They're interested in
| assigning a unique identifier for you and building as
| detailed of a profile about you as possible, for targeting
| ads to you, and more recently tailoring prices to maximize
| value extraction when you buy something. Focusing on the
| narrow definition of "PII" as it usually is defined in law
| is a total distraction. Your email address and name are
| irrelevant for all of that.
| boston_clone wrote:
| By default, I believe that anything you put in the
| "omnibox" is sent to Google - even if you don't press
| enter. So, if you use it as a clipboard of sorts and paste
| a secret / token / key, it should be considered
| compromised.
|
| You can validate this by going to chrome://omnibox
| mvieira38 wrote:
| > And most of the steps people do to mitigate privacy
| violations (TOR, pihole, VPNs, etc.) probably make any signal
| you do put out more scrutinized.
|
| If you're using them correctly there is no way to scrutinize
| your traffic more, these comments just spread FUD for no good
| reason. How are "they" unable to catch darkweb criminals for
| years and even decades, but somehow can tell if it's me
| browsing reddit over Tor?
| alganet wrote:
| There are two distinct concerns here.
|
| One of them is personal privacy. For example, an activist
| being individually targeted.
|
| The other is behavioral targeting, which has no business in
| catching criminals. It wants to know how large flocks of
| people behave online.
| ragequittah wrote:
| My take: if you do it correctly you're a very small
| minority of people and most would probably be concerned at
| your level of paranoia if you told them every detail of
| your setup. Turns out opsec is pretty difficult to achieve.
| Also _unless_ you 're a criminal you're probably wasting a
| lot of time for no real gain.
|
| I use a pihole, ublock, a vpn for some devices, and I'm
| using my own OPNSense router w/ very strict settings. The
| amount of privacy I think I have from all that is next to
| nothing if someone were actually interested in what I was
| doing. I'd probably just get one of my boxes shelled and
| that's the end of that. Mostly what I'm trying to do is
| block 1) Some for the lulz Russian teenager 2) the shady ad
| networks hoovering up everything all the time and 3) my IoT
| devices like TVs and Hue light bulbs from ever accessing
| any part of the rest of my network.
|
| You'll also notice that darkweb criminals are getting
| caught more and more frequently these days because
| governments have decided to no longer tolerate it. I feel
| bad for you if you're in a ransomware gang these days.
| zghst wrote:
| You are so me, exactly.
| granzymes wrote:
| Thankfully the New York Times lost their attempt to force
| OpenAI to continue preserving all logs on an ongoing basis, but
| they still need to keep some of the records they retained
| before September.
|
| https://mashable.com/article/openai-court-ordered-chat-gpt-p...
| p1esk wrote:
| _this would be the world's most catastrophic data leak._
|
| Why?
| runjake wrote:
| Because sama has mentioned that a heck of a lot of people use
| ChatGPT to discuss some of their deepest secrets and
| fantasies.
| The_Rob wrote:
| So the world's most embarrassing data leak, but
| "catastrophic" is stretching it.
| qmr wrote:
| I think you meant wary.
|
| wear*y /'wire/ adjective 1. feeling or showing extreme
| tiredness, especially as a result of excessive exertion. "he
| gave a long, weary sigh" 2. reluctant to see or experience any
| more of; tired of. "she was weary of their constant arguments"
| verb 1. cause to become tired. "she was wearied by her
| persistent cough" 2. grow tired of or bored with. "she wearied
| of the sameness of her life"
|
| /'were/ adjective feeling or showing caution about possible
| dangers or problems. "dogs that have been mistreated often
| remain very wary of strangers"
| MisterTea wrote:
| > Why isn't this a bigger problem for people?
|
| I have friends who are in tech and perfectly aware of the
| implications but prefer the low effort route. They feel that A.
| they are not important enough for someone else to care about
| and B. there is so much data that it is unlikely their data
| will be seen by anyone.
| greyman wrote:
| I conditioned myself to not type too-revealing texts about
| myself into the computer. It isn't ideal but of course this is
| quite a big problem.
| chrisweekly wrote:
| Weary (tired) or wary (afraid)?
| utilize1808 wrote:
| Now imagine corporations start to use this to monitor their
| workforce...
| shadowfax92 wrote:
| Do you think OpenAI will have an enterprise version of the
| browser as well?
|
| Eventually yes. But in I think in the near term, they will
| probably be just consumer focused.
| grkhetan wrote:
| Chrome browser has extensive enterprise support. Companies
| already control and monitor Chrome browser activity on the
| computers of their employees. And it's okay as well -- privacy
| should not be assumed or expected on company-owned devices.
| utilize1808 wrote:
| It's different. It used to be that they don't have enough
| resources to "keep an eye on you" all the time. All those
| captured activities are only used against you when you are
| already on the redundancy shortlist. Now AI can watch what
| and how you are doing things 24/7, producing real-time
| reports on your productivity and performance --- a truly
| dystopian experience.
|
| BTW I've already seen something like this being deployed in
| China. It's only a matter of time before the rest of the
| world gets the same treatment I am afraid.
| nunez wrote:
| As a sales engineer, when I'm not pushing random PRs for random
| demos or infra I'm building, I'm searching for people on LinkedIn
| in hopes of getting introductions. I tested a really basic
| LinkedIn search on myself.
|
| Atlas confidently failed successfully [0]; Kagi [1] and Google
| [2] nailed it.
|
| This is a perfect example as to why I don't think LLMs should
| replace search engines any time soon. Search engines help you
| find the truth. LLMs tell you the truth, even when it's not.
|
| [0] https://ibb.co/wrK2YQfG
|
| [1] https://ibb.co/4wfhS2Sk
|
| [2] https://ibb.co/spLNGYsv
| mk89 wrote:
| I disagree.
|
| With chatgpt I don't search, I ask. Chatgpt explains, I ask
| again, and refine and refine. Ask back for sources, etc.
|
| When in doubt, I copy/paste a statement and I search for it
| with Google. And then Google LLM kicks in.
|
| If it's consistent with chatgpt, I am still wanting to see the
| links/sources. If not, I notify chatgpt of the "wrong"
| information, and move on.
|
| 70-80% of search is dead. But of course searching for people or
| things like that, Google is still needed.
|
| But search (the way we know it) was a paradigm that the old
| Internet created, because it was obviously easier to search for
| one or two keywords. Semantic search was always something they
| tried to implement but failed miserably.
|
| Chatgpt is the new way to get information on the internet, like
| it or not. Even when you think that "it's only trained on
| recent data, etc", it's only partially an issue, because in
| many cases it's trained on good information coming from books.
| And that can be quite useful, much better than a crappy blog
| that is in the first Google page.
|
| The new paradigm is to use chatgpt as an assistant / someone
| you can ask information to, in order to answer a question you
| have. The old paradigm, on the other hand, requires that you
| start from zero. You need to know already what to search for,
| in order to get to the fact you wanted to know in the first
| place. Now it's there, as long as you know a few words.
| nunez wrote:
| You might be right about search being "dead." Nonetheless, I
| think this is a hugely detrimental development.
|
| Hallucinations and misrepresentations aside, my problem with
| LLMs as search engines is that they purport to give you "the
| truth" based on the "truth" it thinks you want to see from
| your query.
|
| While I think LLMs do a much better job of natural language
| search than search engines do, they also remove the critical
| thinking that's employed in going through a list of results,
| processing the information therein and rendering a result.
|
| LLMs might short-circuit the need to trawl through that
| "crappy blog," but they can, just as well, exclude key
| information in that blog that adds important context to what
| you're looking for.
|
| You're doing the right thing by continuously refining your
| answer and cross-checking it with other LLMs, but I'm sure
| you've also met many people who use the Gemini AI overview
| answer and call it a day (which has been hilariously wrong in
| some searches I've done with it). Regardless, I still
| strongly believe that well-formed search queries beat rounds
| of refining LLMs every time.
| SeanAnderson wrote:
| https://chatgpt.com/share/68f7da49-9e28-800c-b979-7ecb8b5485...
|
| Chat seemed to find you just fine?
| nunez wrote:
| I mistakenly thought that Atlas was their official search
| engine offering separate from Chat, so I hit it with an old
| school search query instead of a natural language query I'd
| typically use with ChatGPT. Nonetheless, this is a good
| example of how much a well-constructed prompt can affect the
| final result!
| nunez wrote:
| (Update: I understand that Atlas is their browser offering. I
| mistakenly thought that it was their official search engine
| offering. Proof that humans can hallucinate as well as the best
| frontier models :D )
| rfwhyte wrote:
| Very telling / depressing that literally 3 out of their top 4
| highlighted examples of the "Amazing" features this browser
| provides are just ways to help you be a good little consumerist
| drone and buy more crap you don't really need and that won't
| actually make you happy from some approved list of vendors that
| are likely paying openAI to promote their products.
|
| Personally, the notion of using some kind of AI glorified
| "Virtual shopper" where the AI doesn't actually work for me but
| rather some greedy, soulless megacorp is beyond dystopian. I have
| literally no way to tell if the products being recommended to me
| are actually the best products for my needs (Or if I even need
| the products in the first place) and the AI companies certainly
| don't seem keen on disclosing whether or not they are being paid
| to promote the products they are "Recommending."
|
| At least when I do a web search for a product there's clear
| information available to delineate the ads from the organic
| results, but from everything I've seen thus far there is
| precisely nothing being done to protect consumers and disclose
| when the "Product recommendations" being given by these AI agents
| aren't actually what would best serve the consumer (Ie., the best
| or cheapest products), but are rather just whatever crap some
| company is paying the AI company to promote.
|
| The fact none of these AI companies are even talking about how
| they are going to protect consumers and provide disclosures when
| the products they are recommending are nothing more than thinly
| veiled ads is very, very telling. The current advertising rules
| don't really apply as the regulators are way behind the curve
| with AI technology, and the AI companies certainly aren't going
| to be pushing for the rules to be updated to include AI product
| recommendations themselves, as they will happily con, deceive and
| lie to their customers if it means they'll make more money.
| era37 wrote:
| The AI bubble is hitting surface tension levels of size
| 6thbit wrote:
| ChatGPT quickly became a replacement for google search in many
| usecases, now it is coming for Chrome's lunch.
|
| What's going to be google's response here? They can't afford to
| lose dominance in these markets, surely they're coming after Ads
| next.
| sixtyj wrote:
| The difference between openAI and Google is that openAI has
| only 2 percent of customers paying for their service and
| bleeding financially - so theoretically they will run out of
| money one day when investors lose patience. Google, on the
| other hand, is a 25+ year old company that has a range of
| products; so it will very likely stand up to this, even if some
| of it is not profitable. And we'll always need search in that
| flood of data.
| 6thbit wrote:
| Does it store credit card numbers and passwords like other
| browsers ?
|
| Hand your full online identity and cards to an AI, what could go
| wrong?
| Yizahi wrote:
| Watching this "IT revolution" being presented on the extremely
| lagging website is very ironic :) . Interesting how many
| unnecessary layered graphics they've used. First outline of the
| pseudo windows were rendered, then windows in one color, then
| windows in another color... And getting video player fully
| visible in the frame took me a few tries, fighting lagging
| scroll. :)
| xnx wrote:
| This is a big step. Having an AI agent that can do real useful
| things in the browser is a huge feature for normal people
| automating tasks. Hopefully this will encourage Google to roll
| out this same feature that they have already announced and
| demoed.
| elric wrote:
| It's very ironic that we seem to be getting "agentic browsers"
| before we got browsers that are actual "user agents". Browsers
| have become slaves to the websites they render, ostensible in
| order to protect users. But they don't let you do simple things
| like decide which form fields to remember (like some sites
| telling the browser not to remember the input of the username
| field), they prevent users from copy/pasting text. Etc. But throw
| in some LLM foo and suddenly we're golden? Pah.
| unstatusthequo wrote:
| Did they just make us all human web scrapers?
| lazharichir wrote:
| Just excited about Agent Mode, I hope it delivers.
| FergusArgyll wrote:
| You can try it in chatgpt.com (if you are a paying customer at
| any tier)
| bredren wrote:
| OpenAI picking up where Apple Intelligence continues to severely
| lag.
|
| I'd prefer these features were bundled into MacOS.
|
| Where possible, process using FoundationLLM, and having Apple
| reach for their own privately hosted instance of a frontier model
| when needed.
|
| It seems obvious to me the company must transform macOS's
| capabilities here as quality AI assistance is enmeshed in the
| operating system's UX as a whole.
|
| I think Apple Intelligence probably has good bones to begin with
| but is vastly underpowered in the local model and needs to hide
| frontier model usage completely in its tech stack.
| whycome wrote:
| The whole integration thing is weird. Siri sucks. ChatGPT can
| be triggered in a similar way. Siri can use ChatGPT.
| AppleIntelligence is garbage. I think apple is in a weird
| crisis spot where they can't quite figure out how to integrate
| it all, and are scared of ditching Siri entirely. Or maybe any
| kinds of ChatGPT integrations have just been stopgaps.
|
| Or, they go way deeper into integrations. They let ChatGPT in
| deeper. And they even give up that coveted 'default search'
| spot that Google pays them ~20b a year for. Atlas seems like it
| would compete with Safari?
|
| It is interesting that OpenAI seems to be doing an Apple-first
| approach with some of its projects (sora2, Atlas)
| majc2 wrote:
| Content owners / data companies are going to all have to close up
| shop. If this is the direction we're now in - how can they stop
| their content being ingested into models/recalled by
| OpenAI/Google/MS.
| hmate9 wrote:
| I'm testing this and it's really weird not being taken straight
| to a Google results page when I type something. Honestly, I'm
| quite comfortable just switching to the ChatGPT app and typing my
| query there if I want to use it, and then relying on the browser
| if I just want to hit Command+Tab and search it on Google. But
| I'll test it out and see what happens.
| bengillies wrote:
| What I would like is to be able to add a meta tag to my web app
| pointing to my mcp server and have this browser load it in
| automatically whenever I visit
| neillyons wrote:
| If you imported from Safari/Chrome in the onboarding. Go to
| Settings -> Personalization -> Browser Memories.
|
| It has summarized my browsing habits and interests. Very
| impressive.
|
| - "The user has a routine of checking their Fastmail inbox daily
| around 08:27"
| bnrdr wrote:
| Anyone else struggling to scroll on that page with Firefox on the
| iPhone? After a while the weird windows in the background at the
| top of the page seem to move but not the rest of content.
|
| Must be vibe coded. Top quality stuff.
| dudeinhawaii wrote:
| This is Edge with "Copilot". Considering Copilot uses GPT-5. I
| feel like we're going in a loop. Only supports OSX, so it's Edge
| w/copilot without cross-platform. Why?
| mawadev wrote:
| I'd personally never use this to interact with the web or my
| computer, but it looks great for test automation of web apps...
| dudeinhawaii wrote:
| I'm usually an early adopter but wow every single browser except
| Firefox features AI integrations. It feels like a recipe for
| profound privacy leaks in the future. I suppose that's already a
| risk with OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini/etc websites but this will
| increase the blast radius exponentially.
| nneonneo wrote:
| ...Firefox has an AI integration natively built in; have you
| not seen it yet?
| dudeinhawaii wrote:
| I have not! I'm shocked and disappointed if it's on by
| default. I don't see any AI features in my Firefox UI...
| nneonneo wrote:
| https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/ai-chatbot. There's
| also right-click integrations and such that turn on when
| you use this. It's thankfully not as intrusive as the
| options from other browser makers.
| LeoPanthera wrote:
| Safari's AI features run locally on your device. And they're
| limited to probably useful things like "summarize this page". I
| found this far more acceptable.
| shadowtree wrote:
| I like how it officially does not support extensions.
|
| But you click on your profile icon, top right, and voila -
| extensions!
|
| Can't live without adblock.
| socalgal2 wrote:
| How is this different than Gemini in Chrome?
|
| https://gemini.google/overview/gemini-in-chrome/
|
| Asking out of curiosity since it's not clear to me what's new
| here.
| SalmoShalazar wrote:
| You know that really powerful computer you have with a fancy
| graphics card and next-generation processor and all that RAM? You
| know that really fast Internet connection you have? Yeah we're
| not really going to use any of that. Instead, we're gonna farm
| out all of tasks you do to a data centre halfway across the
| country and complete it in the most inefficient way imaginable.
| Enjoy!
| neom wrote:
| As a test, I had it's agent mode look through HN for comments it
| felt I could add insight to based on what it knows about me and
| my experience. It found 7 comments about things I know about
| (startups/cloud providers) and 3 I don't (Fine tuning LLMs?!) -
| the comments it suggested on the 7 are the things I would have
| said, but not how I would have said them.
|
| After I had done this test, I asked myself why I decided to do a
| test on something that would convert a joyful activity into a
| soulless one, and realized that a lot of the stuff I would use
| this for (including booking flights) is stuff I enjoy doing
| myself, or at least is "part of the adventure" if you will.
|
| Interesting tool, not sure what I'll use it for yet.
| tintor wrote:
| Blinking starry background in Agent Mode is very annoying.
| davidpolberger wrote:
| I've been using Claude Code a lot lately, and I've been thinking
| of integrating it into our SaaS tool (a formula-driven app
| designer). I've been holding off primarily because I've been
| afraid of the cost (we're not making much money off our $9/mo.
| customers as it is, and this definitely wouldn't help that).
|
| However, it's becoming clear to me that individual apps and
| websites won't have their own integrated chatbots for long.
| They'll be siloed, meaning that they can't talk to one another --
| and they sure can't access my file system. So we'll have a
| chatbot first as part of the web browser, and ultimately as part
| of the operating system, able to access all your stuff and
| knowing everything about you. (Scary!)
|
| So the future is to make your software scriptable -- not
| necessarily for human-written scripts, but for LLM integration
| (using MCP?). Maybe OLE from the nineties was prescient?
|
| Short-term, though, integrating an LLM would probably be good for
| business, but given that I'm our only engineer and the fact that
| our bespoke chatbot would likely become obsolete within two
| years, I don't think it would be worth the investment.
| nextworddev wrote:
| Your read is correct.
|
| 2-3 chatbots (prolly OAI, Gemini, Claude) will own the whole
| context, everywehre
| _pdp_ wrote:
| If your strategy is to be a data source for an llm sure. But if
| you inspire to bring your own unique AI despite its flaws then
| that is another matter thing altogether and I don't think it is
| completely worthless endeavour. Remember how OpenAI killed
| gpt4o and it turned out it was actually beloved by many
| although newer versions allegedly perform better?
| jwithington wrote:
| Why MacOS only and not Windows?
| tintor wrote:
| Because their engineers use MacBooks.
| morawr wrote:
| the landing page doesn't even mention that it's a browser let
| alone chromium based
| sega_sai wrote:
| Presumably the browser installed by users is an efficient way of
| scraping websites that are normally hard to scrape from OpenAI's
| servers.
| ldom22 wrote:
| World: spends millions of dollars and decades fighting bot
| traffic on the internet
|
| OpenAI: here's a bot browser
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-10-21 23:00 UTC)