[HN Gopher] Fractal Imaginary Cubes
___________________________________________________________________
Fractal Imaginary Cubes
Author : strstr
Score : 52 points
Date : 2025-10-12 19:08 UTC (8 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.i.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.i.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp)
| dmd wrote:
| I have a 3D-printed Sierpinski Tetrahedron. It's lovely.
|
| https://imgur.com/a/oZwCFLu
| robinhouston wrote:
| This page may be a bit confusing, out of context.
|
| By 'imaginary cube', Hideki Tsuiki means a three-dimensional
| object that is not a cube, but which nevertheless has square
| projections in three orthogonal directions, just like a cube
| does. Examples include the cuboctahedron and the regular
| tetrahedron.
|
| His previous work on non-fractal imaginary cubes is written up at
| https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/5/2/273
| nomel wrote:
| I assume this means the four images at the top are the same
| structures at different angles?
| nom wrote:
| Exactly.
| CGMthrowaway wrote:
| This has inspired me to imagine a fractal chandelier design, e.g
| made of cut glass
| pmontra wrote:
| Being able to see a shadow and learning that it has area zero
| made me think that there is something wrong with the definition
| of area.
| mecsred wrote:
| None of the shadows you can physically see in the photos have 0
| area because the construction of the fractal isn't perfect.
| What a perfect construction would look like and if it's ever
| theoretically possible to make physical are complicated
| questions. Beyond me for sure, how would an infinitely thin
| object even interact with light?
|
| I would assume the problem with the idea is in the fractal
| physics rather than the definition of area, which has been
| solidly useful for me.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-10-20 23:01 UTC)