[HN Gopher] Best xkcd
___________________________________________________________________
Best xkcd
Author : antitoxic
Score : 34 points
Date : 2025-10-18 14:55 UTC (8 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.heavyconsulting.net)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.heavyconsulting.net)
| wonger_ wrote:
| Aka "crowdsourcing a stack ranking of xkcds," or just the page
| title, "which one is the best xkcd?" Found a lot of gems I've
| never seen before
| Neywiny wrote:
| Not sure what methodology they're using for analysis. Maybe just
| total wins? But there are better methods I've discussed on here
| before. I'm partial and biased towards using the choices as a
| sorting algorithm, but you can also do elo scoring like
| competitive chess and some video games
| MathMonkeyMan wrote:
| At the bottom is <https://xkcd.com/1654/>, which is actually
| pretty funny.
| caminanteblanco wrote:
| It should really be ; instead of & though, otherwise the first
| failed install method will stop the rest of the script from
| executing
| jonathrg wrote:
| That's &&
|
| & runs the thing in the background. So this is running all
| the commands in parallel.
| 7373737373 wrote:
| This might be a good use case for https://trueskill.org/ since
| that takes into account what the rating of the other comic was
| when one is chosen over the other, it also gives an uncertainty
| value for each rating
| crazygringo wrote:
| It shouldn't change the mean though, with enough data.
|
| In gaming, people often play against others closer to their
| skill, so you have to take that into account.
|
| But with the comics, they're being chosen randomly so there's
| no bias like that to correct for.
|
| Also people's assessment of the comparison comic is so noisy,
| knowing its rating probably won't help that much.
|
| Uncertainty is key for deciding on the top ranking, but you can
| just use the standard formula for that.
| crazygringo wrote:
| > _This site was created in the early months of 2011_
|
| Top comic:
|
| > _This comic beat 10 other comics and was beaten by 1 other
| comic for a total score of 0.9091._
|
| Guess this site never got too popular...
| ProAm wrote:
| No, I will not be a constant in your algorthim
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-10-18 23:02 UTC)