[HN Gopher] The Rapper 50 Cent, Adjusted for Inflation
___________________________________________________________________
The Rapper 50 Cent, Adjusted for Inflation
Author : gaws
Score : 393 points
Date : 2025-10-17 16:40 UTC (6 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (50centadjustedforinflation.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (50centadjustedforinflation.com)
| 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote:
| I'm in my Lambo maggot
| defraudbah wrote:
| these harry potter fans are weird man
| 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote:
| I don't get it. I posted 50 Cent lyrics
| defraudbah wrote:
| awesome website!
|
| looking forward to see websites for $uicideboy$, C-Note, 2
| Chainz, maybe Lil $1
| defraudbah wrote:
| damn, it wasn't sarcasm, people are dumb here
| thenthenthen wrote:
| bbno$?
| observationist wrote:
| https://archive.is/68cAI
|
| (In case you can't see the official link for firewall purposes.)
| CaptainOfCoit wrote:
| ... Is the term 50cent commonly blocked in firewalls, or am I
| missing some joke?
| observationist wrote:
| It's a newly registered website, gets classified as a risk by
| some organizations "Newly-Registered-Domain". After 30 or 60
| days, it's no longer flagged and blocked.
| CaptainOfCoit wrote:
| Thanks! Funny I one minute before your comment, commented
| on when the domain was registered.
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45619354
| rx_tx wrote:
| > Based on 50 Cent's name being coined
|
| I see what they did there.
| srameshc wrote:
| the images at the top is the best part, we get a little over 2 50
| Cents. Makes it so much easier to understand inflation
| Rendello wrote:
| I love it. If you track your mouse over the graph, the image of
| 50 Cent expands with inflation.
|
| It reminds me of another great interactive rapper graph:
| "rappers, sorted by the size of their vocabulary":
|
| https://pudding.cool/projects/vocabulary/index.html
| defraudbah wrote:
| yeah, no wonder cunninglinguist was pretty high in that list :)
| HPsquared wrote:
| And "0 Cent" before June 1994 :)
| codyb wrote:
| Using the first 35,000 words is a bit unfair for a rapper such
| as Lil Wayne who's been releasing work since he was 14.
|
| Also I wonder if this is including proper nouns and other
| references. (I'd think it should, but it's hard to account for
| the fact that referencing seven different Chris's would be
| counted as one token used seven times. Similarly, many words
| have many meanings, and those are all being lumped together as
| well, so no accounting here can probably ever be perfect).
|
| If you had all the lyrics for all the rappers I think I'd -
| aggregate word counts - combine variations - remove most
| commonly used words in each language (I, I'm, You, You're, etc)
|
| Then see who came out ahead. You shouldn't get penalized for
| releasing more.
|
| You could probably do a bunch of cool analysis with that data.
|
| edit: Oh no, there's actually a Genius API isn't there. No no
| no no. I have no time!
| Rendello wrote:
| The original author was pretty clear about the limitations of
| his work. I certainly would like to see an updated version,
| so I'm glad you got nerd sniped and not me. I look forward to
| see your super accurate updated version in a few months ;)
| jihadjihad wrote:
| Blackalicious near the top of the pack checks out.
| 1970-01-01 wrote:
| 1994? The artist 'made it' in 2003.
|
| 88 cent in 2025.
|
| Not great, not terrible.
| sgt wrote:
| So before 2003 he was less than 50 cent? When was he a dime?
| gdsdfe wrote:
| I miss the era when the internet was more fun like this
| CaptainOfCoit wrote:
| Seems the creation date of the domain was 2025-10-08, so you're
| in luck, this particular fun exists and was created in this
| era!
| mk_stjames wrote:
| I would argue that valuation of '50 Cent' (real name Curtis James
| Jackson III) was essentially flat leading up to immediately
| before the release of Get Rich or Die Tryin', his debut album
| released February 6, 2003.
|
| Which, undeniable, is an * all-time banger * that substantially
| increased the valuation of 50 Cent to something far surpassing US
| dollar inflation.
|
| Seriously, go listen that that album again; total game changer.
| Top cut: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D3crqpClPY
| cma256 wrote:
| If you're into AI music I leave this without comment:
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4GrSKMzQg0
| mk_stjames wrote:
| I was prepared to be absolutely fucking disgusted by such a
| comment but I.... shit. I mean... this is.... this is wild
|
| I gotta go contemplate 'where we're at' again it seems. If
| that is truly a straight generative audio diffusion model....
| wait, how did they get the same verse by verse chord
| progressions to match? this has to be professionally post-
| produced, right? AI models aren't able to do this end-to-end
| yet, right?
| conception wrote:
| Probably not end to end, no. But you can make something
| similar to just about any pop song on suno.com now.
| kayge wrote:
| As a big fan of Chris Cornell I went through the same
| stream of emotions with their Motown version of Like a
| Stone[0]. And if you can get past the thumbnail, check out
| the 2000s Rock version of Many Men[1]
|
| [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_88Qg8FGrqY [1]
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gFKREP3gPg
| cma256 wrote:
| I had similar emotions. The cover of 21 Questions by the
| same YouTuber is even better. And other covers of Mario's
| "Let Me Love You" and Mariah Carey's "All I Want For
| Christmas" are equally mind blowing.
|
| I'm ashamed to say I prefer these to the originals so much
| so that its difficult for me to listen to them any more.
| Make of that what you will...
| yellowapple wrote:
| > wait, how did they get the same verse by verse chord
| progressions to match?
|
| Usually these AI covers don't use AI for the whole thing,
| but rather specifically for melding the to-be-impersonated
| voice into some given melody. That's been possible for a
| couple years now with decent results; one of my favorite
| examples is that of Plankton from Spongebob singing
| Disturbed's cover of "Sound of Silence":
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eLRsw9mkmY
|
| Possible that these newer ones are also using AI to
| generate other musical elements, but it's probably all
| being combined after-the-fact rather than being generated
| all at once.
| treetalker wrote:
| Since 50 Cent worked with Robert Greene to co-author _The 50th
| Law_ , maybe now he and Peter Thiel can co-author _Zero to 109
| Cents_.
|
| Or, you know, something about rap and the Antichrist.
| lanewinfield wrote:
| hi, i made this. thank you for posting.
|
| unfortunately due to the government shutdown, the BLS inflation
| data for September 2025 is delayed from October 15 (as it
| normally is) until October 24[1], so please check back then to
| see if he is >109 Cent.
|
| assuming future stability, the site will automatically update on
| the 15th of every month.
|
| [1] https://www.bls.gov/bls/092025-cpi-reschedule-notice.htm
| karmakaze wrote:
| It would be fun to have currency conversions too.
| earlyriser wrote:
| Conversions to Nickelback, Poundz, Los Pesos, DJ Euro and
| Yen.
| at-fates-hands wrote:
| Or to Robert Deniro's
| edbaskerville wrote:
| Robert Dinero?
| kayge wrote:
| Don't forget Johnny Cash and Eddie Money :D
| dmurray wrote:
| Since this goes back to 1995 I'd also like to request Franc
| Sinatra, Nick Gilder, and Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch.
| Rochus wrote:
| Where is the inflated music?
| jerf wrote:
| 1. Go to, let's say, a video like this:
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qm8PH4xAss [1] Start it
| playing.
|
| 2. Copy and paste this into your browser location bar: javasc
| ript:void(document.getElementsByTagName("video")[0].playbackR
| ate = 50/prompt("Inflation-adjusted 50 Cent value:"))
|
| 3. Enter the inflation-adjusted 50 Cent value, which as we
| are talking about this today, is 109.
|
| _Et voila_ , inflation-adjusted 50 Cent music, and anyone
| finding this later can adjust it to their current inflation-
| adjusted value.
|
| I believe there are limits on how slow the browsers will
| playback video. This code is not guaranteed to work past any
| possible hyperinflations or massive deflations that may occur
| in the future.
|
| If you're curious how that may sound with a more careful job
| done then the browsers will do with stretching, consider
| Beethoven's 9th symphony stretched to 24 hours: https://www.y
| outube.com/watch?v=JSJ9Bkhb1Q4&list=PLMEcbs3sHQ... Some of
| you may well legitimately love this. Obviously the frequency
| profile of doing this to a 50 Cent piece will be quite
| different but it at least gives the idea.
|
| [1]: It is sheer coincidence that this video ID ends in
| "Ass". This is "50 Cent - In Da Club (Official Music Video)"
| for those wondering.
| femiagbabiaka wrote:
| You're doing a public service, thank you.
| mckeed wrote:
| Curious how you set it up. Do you have to manually update it
| when inflation data comes out, or is it automatic?
| lanewinfield wrote:
| it's on a scheduled workflow with github actions that
| rebuilds the site on the 15th, 30 minutes after the data is
| released.
|
| cron: '0 13 15 * *'
| khazhoux wrote:
| This is a powerful visual representation. I would suggest that
| the impact could be even stronger if you provided side-by-side
| images of 50 Cent, where the second is scaled up
| proportionately.
| brk wrote:
| If you scroll across it displays multiples of the image
| representative to the inflation at the time point.
| lanewinfield wrote:
| that's a good idea. in future versions, i might need to
| consider multiple renderings as different economists likely
| prefer alternative visualizations of 50's monetary
| adjustments
| dsamarin wrote:
| Quick self nerd snipe:
|
| I think the area should be scaled proportionally, so the new
| width and height should be multiplied by sqrt(cents/50)
| zdragnar wrote:
| If we're going to be pedantic about it, his name hasn't
| changed, so really he should be shrinking proportionally
| rather than growing over time
| CSMastermind wrote:
| A currency being worth half it's value in 25 years is absurd. The
| US despreately needs to make it's money a stable unit of measure.
| joshuamcginnis wrote:
| We're $38.8 trillion in debt and still printing.
| https://www.usdebtclock.org/
| kristofferR wrote:
| Inflation is just what you want when your debt is denominated
| in the currency that is being inflated, though. The more
| inflation the easier it will be to service the debt.
| BartjeD wrote:
| That's why everyone sane is fleeing into gold and silver.
| mothballed wrote:
| They're probably too late, it's already priced in. Gold
| is up like 30% in 3 months.
| nonethewiser wrote:
| Being up doesnt show that it's priced in.
| mothballed wrote:
| Of course not. It being known to the market is what
| causes it to be priced in.
| lesuorac wrote:
| Thanks, I'll go short gold now since it's going to go
| down!
|
| Things being priced in is such horse shit. Momentum
| trading works specifically because the market fails to
| price in information.
| nonethewiser wrote:
| In some sense it's absurd. But historically its normal.
|
| And to be more precise, 25 years to halve is actually less
| inflation than the historical average of 3.29% from 1914-2025.
| At that rate it would take 21-22 years to halve.
|
| Actually there is a surprisingly good trick to be able to
| calculate this called the rule of 72. Take the inflation
| percentage (2, 3 %) and divide 72 by it. Thats how many years
| it will take to halve. Not completing accurate but actually
| very close.
|
| But yeah, inflation is a bitch over long time horizons. It
| makes me laugh when people say stocks are risky. Say you are 20
| years old and want to save $2M USD for your retirement by 65.
| Expect that to be more like $470k.
| mothballed wrote:
| If you move to before the central bank was created in 1913,
| the dollar remained remarkably stable in relation, although
| it did oscillate, it never deviated more than 50% from the
| starting point until after creation of the fed.
|
| https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/Dollar_v.
| ..
| woodruffw wrote:
| It seems difficult to draw any inference from this, given
| how different the US's economy and global position is in
| 2025 versus 1913.
| mothballed wrote:
| ... I was directly addressing GGP using 1914 as a cutoff.
| Now you object to the cutoff I didn't introduce only when
| someone introduce data on the other side of it? Funny how
| that magically ends up being the case.
| woodruffw wrote:
| To be clear, I think it's also hard to make inferences
| after 1913. But it's _easier_ (and particularly after
| 1945, 1971, etc.) because the US's geopolitical status
| after those periods is at least _analogous_ and a matter
| of econometric research.
| mothballed wrote:
| The period from 1776-1913 arguably had as many changes as
| the period from 1913 to 2025.
|
| In the first 130 years of the US, the value of the dollar
| didn't change, as far as I can tell, more than 50% from
| the starting point.
|
| From 1913 to 2025, the dollar lost 96+% of its value. The
| difference between a ratio of 2:1 and a ratio of more
| like 30:1.
| woodruffw wrote:
| > The period from 1776-1913 arguably had as many changes
| as the period from 1913 to 2025.
|
| I'm not arguing it didn't. But I think in _kind_ the US
| 's global economic position didn't change substantially
| between full independence in 1783 and 1913. It grew
| during that period, but the idea of the US as a peer (and
| then dominant) economic world power is a distinctly post-
| WWI one.
| mothballed wrote:
| Why do you believe that makes the data comparison pre to
| post central bank irrelevant?
| gbacon wrote:
| Lots of topics that we discuss on HN require careful
| thought and other difficult efforts but somehow do not
| extinguish our curiosity. Going back to the ancient
| Romans, an ounce of gold has always been able to purchase
| a suit of clothes. As the market becomes more efficient
| at producing goods and services, we should expect prices
| to decrease, not inflate. In some sectors, we do see this
| outcome but not in others. Yes, the analysis required to
| explain why is difficult, and perhaps more difficult is
| having to face conclusions that challenge one's priors.
| woodruffw wrote:
| There's a big gap between curiosity and making
| inferential leaps.
|
| > As the market becomes more efficient at producing goods
| and services, we should expect prices to decrease, not
| inflate.
|
| Yes, that's why the cost of clothes has decreased in real
| terms.
| somenameforme wrote:
| What is the source of data that image is using? It seems
| odd. A datum I quite like is the Campbell's Tomato Soup
| Inflation Index. [1] Since their introduction in 1897,
| Campbell's has sold the same tomato soup in the same size
| container. Its price remained quite stable until 1971 at
| which point it went into loony land, like many other data.
| [2]
|
| The point is that even after the central bank was
| introduced, the US remained on a literal or defacto gold
| standard, of varying sorts, until 1971. That's when Bretton
| Woods ended and the value of the USD became based on
| absolutely nothing and the government granted themselves
| the power to 'print' arbitrary amounts at their discretion.
|
| [1] - https://theglitteringeye.com/the-tomato-soup-index/
|
| [2] - https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/
| mothballed wrote:
| It's from a variety of sources due to the large time
| period and discontinuity in government and 3rd party
| measuring apparatus over 250 years. Refer to Table 5 for
| the non-BLS period sources.
|
| https://www.measuringworth.com/docs/cpistudyrev.pdf
| rkowalick wrote:
| The correct calculation isn't too hard either.
|
| If currency halves in purchasing power in 25 yrs, that means
| inflation is 100% in 25 years, so (1 +
| r)^25 = 2 r = 2^(1/25) - 1 ~ 2.8%
| nonethewiser wrote:
| In terms of being able to do it in your head, its a lot
| harder.
| sudo_gopnik wrote:
| Historically - it's actually NOT normal. Link and quote below
| that examines this with graphs but, the crux is that we have
| accepted higher inflation in order to achieve stable
| inflation that is predictable.
|
| "For the pre-Fed period (1790-1913), the average annual
| inflation was 0.4 percent with a coefficient of variation of
| 13.2. During the period 1941-2016, these figures changed to
| 3.5 percent and 0.8, respectively. If we look at the post-
| Volcker era (1988-2016), annual inflation was 2.2 percent on
| average with a coefficient of variation of 0.4." -
|
| Source: https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/regional-
| economist/s...
|
| Also recommend Debt: The First 5000 Years (David Graeber) and
| Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Thomas Piketty) which
| cover this and more on how current concepts of finance and
| capital post-1914 are incredibly different from the majority
| of human civilization.
|
| I think a broader historical/anthropological approach is
| helpful here to understand why those tradeoffs were made.
| Aurornis wrote:
| > "For the pre-Fed period (1790-1913), the average annual
| inflation was 0.4 percent with a coefficient of variation
| of 13.2. During the period 1941-2016, these figures changed
| to 3.5 percent and 0.8, respectively. If we look at the
| post-Volcker era (1988-2016), annual inflation was 2.2
| percent on average with a coefficient of variation of 0.4."
| -
|
| Citing an average number is misleading since the chart of
| the value of a dollar during that time looks like a zig-zag
| with some massive swings in both directions. This means
| periods of severe deflation, too, which can be very bad for
| people.
|
| It definitely was not flat or consistently near zero,
| though citing an average number is a great way to give that
| impression.
| wredcoll wrote:
| Maybe a better metric is some kind of yearly median, i.e
| what you would actually experience living year by year.
| dragonwriter wrote:
| > Citing an average number is misleading
|
| Not when you are also citing the coefficient of variation
| it isn't.
|
| > since the chart of the value of a dollar during that
| time looks like a zig-zag with some massive swings in
| both directions.
|
| Uh, exactly the claim made, "we have accepted _higher_
| inflation in order to achieve _stable inflation that is
| predictable_." (emphasis added)
|
| Characterizing this as a bad thing is, IMO, quite
| bonkers, but so is denying that it is exactly what has
| happened.
| gbacon wrote:
| Your starting point of 1914 is strangely specific. Why did
| you choose it?
| jollyllama wrote:
| A span of time that happens to include The Great Depression.
| mothballed wrote:
| Get a brokerage account that has a sister bank account. Put
| money in, buy TIPS/gold/equities, pay the 30% tax or whatever
| on the inflationary difference, then buy your stuff. The point
| is to force you into buying more stable units of account and
| then taxing the inflation as a "capital gain."
|
| Pretty genius because it can be framed as taxing greedy
| capitalists when literally they're just taxing fractional
| inflation.
| silisili wrote:
| We tend to target 2% inflation. Half in 25 years is under 3%,
| so on target.
|
| That said, I feel like this number is way off, personally,
| based on changes in housing and food prices between the two
| times.
| nonethewiser wrote:
| Certainly a lot of that inflation was in the last ~8 years. I
| certainly know what you mean.
|
| Groceries are one of the more discretionary items. Your
| mortgage is fixed, demand for gas is inelastic, etc. But
| groceries you respond to the price. And so many staples have
| become 2,3,4X times more expensive compared to pre-covid. I
| remember the cheap beef (chuck roast) was about $4/lb and
| decent steak (ribeye) was about $9/lb. Now its about $10/lb
| and $22/lb.
|
| So psychologically, now your "splurging" just gets you the
| "cheap" stuff.
|
| Wages have risen a bit. But 1) not nearly as much as
| inflation 2) these are very asymetric and 3) the way they
| rise doesnt feel like wage inflation. Even those who saw
| wages rise due to inflation probably felt like it was other
| things. Such as simply changing jobs. Or just normal yearly
| review. Or maybe they havent switched jobs and have some
| "unrealized gains" awaiting them still. No one one saw their
| wages incrementally rise month by month.
| silisili wrote:
| I think wages are a great way to look at it too, rather
| than just comparing prices.
|
| Said another way, I think making 100k in 1995 would make
| one feel way, way richer than making 200k today.
| lotsofpulp wrote:
| How you feel is also very geographically dependent, and
| quality of life dependent.
|
| The government published nationwide inflation measures
| are completely irrelevant to anyone who had a goal of
| buying land in a tier 1 metro, or in the higher end
| suburbs of tier 2 metros. And you will feel very
| different based on if you have kids or not.
|
| Land, healthcare, and education pretty much eclipse
| everything else.
| pinkmuffinere wrote:
| Why??? My (very limited) understanding is that we like a small
| amount of inflation, to incentivize reinvestment into the
| economy/R&D/etc. If there's no inflation, you incentivize
| dragon-hoarding behavior
| jsbg wrote:
| that's why no one every buys TVs
| wredcoll wrote:
| honestly its a large factor for me personally when I look
| at buying a new tv!
| jancsika wrote:
| Wait, what's absurd about it?
|
| I feel like this is the real-life version of my favorite joke
| from Andy Kindler: "I know they said don't re-invent the wheel,
| but does it have to be so _round_? "
|
| Edit: emphasis
| imtringued wrote:
| How would that work? You have a claim to a past output that no
| longer exists. If the nominal value of the claim stays the
| same, the real value of the denomination unit must change.
|
| People don't understand that money is a time and location bound
| object and pretend it is infinitely liquid and fungible when it
| isn't. Money is kind of like electricity. When you borrow it
| into existence and spend it, it travels a path through society,
| but it must then travel along a return path back to the source.
| Inflation could be thought of as a form of resistive loss,
| where current stays the same but voltage drops.
|
| There's a reason why demurrage (or its ugly brother inflation)
| is a necessary bitter pill if you want a working money system.
| It forces money to travel down the return path sooner than
| later.
| crazygringo wrote:
| It's not absurd. And there's no automatic way to make money
| perfectly stable. That's not how money works.
|
| And deflation is much worse. So we target a small 2% yearly
| inflation so that if it's 1% or 3% it's not a big deal. Whereas
| if you target 0% and wind up with -1%, you've got problems.
| nonethewiser wrote:
| I wonder how the data is updated. I dont see any network calls so
| I guess it's provided on build. The latest datapoint is August.
| Do we just not have data for the last few months? I suppose you
| could have github action or whatever to pull in the latest and
| republish on change.
|
| edit: i see elsewhere in the comments the author explains this.
| github action indeed.
| lanewinfield wrote:
| you bet. I pull it straight from the BLS.
| nly wrote:
| It's remarkable how over this time frame how inflation in the UK
| and the USA has been so similar.
|
| https://www.rateinflation.com/consumer-price-index/uk-histor...
|
| https://www.rateinflation.com/consumer-price-index/usa-histo...
|
| Both approx +110%
|
| Yet over that time UK GDP per capita is up only 46% compared to
| the US which is up a massive +223%. Depressing.
| jhallenworld wrote:
| They don't say that the currencies are pegged, but I'm pretty
| sure they're defacto pegged. Same deal with the Euro.
| metalliqaz wrote:
| They don't call USD the global reserve currency for nothing.
| borisjabes wrote:
| 2.6% per year inflation. Fed did a decent job.
| RhysU wrote:
| 30% error.
| deadbabe wrote:
| Chamillionaire was another rapper who pivoted into tech investing
| and venture capitalism and did 50x to his net worth. I think he
| still posts here.
| t1234s wrote:
| Didn't he make more money from his stake in Vitamin Water being
| acquired by Pepsi or CocaCola than from rap?
| defraudbah wrote:
| not really, he has a lot of businesses, this was one of them
| which turned out to be very successful. He was a very famous
| rapper back in the days, and he invented mixtapes :)
| ops wrote:
| He absolutely did not invent mixtapes.
| fair_enough wrote:
| How many 2025 dollars will it cost me to take a nice lady to the
| candy shop?
| chriswalz wrote:
| A lot less than in da club that's for sure
| fair_enough wrote:
| I don't care if there are some special privileges unlocked at
| higher "karma" levels, I hope my "karma" stays at 69 forever
| because of this thread.
| chistev wrote:
| It wouldn't matter because she can't get a dollar out of you.
| david927 wrote:
| The full chart
|
| https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/2j0...
| mothballed wrote:
| Imagine how much worse that chart would look were it not for
| deflationary pressure from science/technology introduced
| efficiencies.
| k2enemy wrote:
| That's an incredibly misleading graph. Never look at something
| with a growth rate on a linear scale, as it will always have a
| "hockey stick" shape, even with constant growth. If you look at
| the same series on a log scale, you see high inflation in the
| 70s, but from the '80s on it looks pretty similar to the
| pre-70s trend.
| undebuggable wrote:
| I'm tired of using technology, boss.
| emaccumber wrote:
| The favicon updating is a nice touch.
| ErroneousBosh wrote:
| Pretty good value for a dollar, you don't see much of that these
| days.
| bevelwork wrote:
| Yesterday's 50cent in today's dollar
| m463 wrote:
| I wonder if 10cc resizes due to changes in male fertility.
| DyslexicAtheist wrote:
| reminds me of the time, a Malaysian newspaper mentioned him in a
| story an converted his name to local currency: 1.50 Malaysian
| ringgit https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3915
| aidenn0 wrote:
| I guess we gotta sip something cheaper than Bacardi now?
| ryanschaefer wrote:
| Made this a while back riffing on the same idea
|
| https://ryanschaefer.github.io/Its-one-banana-michael/
| cantalopes wrote:
| This is the reason for internet to exist
| supportengineer wrote:
| I think he increased since this morning!
| RhysU wrote:
| Too bad ska -punk beat him to today's value of 109 cents:
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck-O-Nine
| ranman wrote:
| Eventually he'll be about tree fitty
| hsbauauvhabzb wrote:
| Do you offer 50 cent in other currencies? Approximately what
| point in time would he have appropriately been called 50 euro
| cents?
| arneslot wrote:
| I created an account just to comment that I laughed my balls off
| as a hiphophead.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-10-17 23:00 UTC)