[HN Gopher] 4000 gone: Inside NASA's brain drain
___________________________________________________________________
4000 gone: Inside NASA's brain drain
Author : awnird
Score : 34 points
Date : 2025-10-16 19:32 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.planetary.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.planetary.org)
| jfengel wrote:
| What kills me is that it's not even saving that much money.
|
| The average salary for a government employee is $67k. Round it up
| to $100k, and multiply by 2 for the usual overhead. That means
| that removing 4,000 salaries saves us $800,000,000 a year. Or
| about .046% of the deficit.
|
| (That's the amount of the shortfall. It's .012% of the budget.)
|
| Employees aren't the driving factor in the cost of the
| government. A lot of the money goes out the door, in the form of
| entitlement payments, grants to states, and contracts. If you
| want to cut the budget seriously, you have to cancel programs,
| not just the individuals who manage them.
|
| The article says that these 4,000 employees are 20% of the
| agency. Applying that to my estimate, that means you could fire
| everybody, and save $4 billion per year. That would still leave
| $21 billion in NASA's budget.
|
| Canceling that, too, would not even be a rounding error in our
| $6.66 trillion budget and $1.27 trillion deficit.
|
| It attracts a lot of attention, and removes the much-reviled
| government employees that they've spent decades demonizing. But
| it doesn't solve any of the budget problems, and doesn't even
| pretend to. So we're losing a key element of American prestige,
| and getting basically nothing in return.
| lawlessone wrote:
| "Cecil Graham: What is a cynic? Lord Darlington: A man who
| knows the price of everything, and the value of nothing" -
| Oscar Wilde
| edmundsauto wrote:
| Your math makes sense, but it was never about the money.
| fbd_0100 wrote:
| There's a thriving community of aerospace startups in the US
| right now that are eager to snatch these NASA folks up. It
| won't be the right move for all of them, and it's unfortunate
| to get displaced from a comfortable, prestigious job like that,
| but I strongly believe a lot of these people will go on to do
| great things in industry, and potentially have a far greater
| impact on aerospace than they ever could at NASA.
|
| Not saying I agree with the cuts, just pointing out there may
| be a silver lining.
| metalman wrote:
| gone yes, but where?, space x, china?
| rangestransform wrote:
| Anecdotally, I work with a JPL alumni (not current layoff
| batch) in the autonomous driving industry
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-10-16 23:01 UTC)