[HN Gopher] Electricity can heal wounds three times as fast (2023)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Electricity can heal wounds three times as fast (2023)
        
       Author : mgh2
       Score  : 108 points
       Date   : 2025-10-16 12:59 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.chalmers.se)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.chalmers.se)
        
       | mgh2 wrote:
       | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3776323/
        
       | Bender wrote:
       | Will there be a ELI5 how-to for DIY'ers? Or perhaps a non-rx
       | device sold at Walmart and Amazon for DIY'ers.
        
         | rpmisms wrote:
         | I can't read, so I will be using a cattle prod on my broken arm
        
           | Eupolemos wrote:
           | That sounds like some obscure Fallout idiot savant member-
           | berry :D
        
           | Bender wrote:
           | I have both a cattle prod and a TENS-7000. I assume there may
           | be different voltages and pps that work best on different
           | wounds and there must be a database that would be used to
           | track results for everyone that self experiments. One study
           | only applies to its small set of masochists. I would like to
           | see the numbers evolve over time from more masochists so we
           | can share each others pain, pleasure and recovery. Also the
           | best places to stick it and results of different molecules to
           | work in conjunction with the TazeMeBro-20000. _e.g.
           | Terrasil3X vs Max strength Desitin vs other off-label options
           | and other supplements._ Diabetics seem to prefer Terrasil3X.
           | The step-by-step guide should have videos of unclothed people
           | configuring and applying the TENS to every possible wound
           | location.
        
           | observationist wrote:
           | spoken[loudly and slowly, since they can't read] Open science
           | citizen research is awe inspiring. Thanks for contributing to
           | humanity's progress, you are a true hero!
        
           | RajT88 wrote:
           | Cattle prods are expensive. Use a fireplace lighter. Much
           | lower project cost.
        
           | bregma wrote:
           | Instructions unclear: cattle prod is now going to require an
           | embarrassing visit to emerg to remove.
        
         | carlosjobim wrote:
         | Get an electric blanket and sleep cozy and warm on cold nights,
         | while the electromagnetic field revigorates your body and your
         | soul.
         | 
         | You also save on your heating bill.
        
         | makeitdouble wrote:
         | You could probably repurpose an electric face massager ?
        
           | kipchak wrote:
           | Anecdotally trying a nuface device on sore muscles a couple
           | of times there seems to be some sort of positive effect.
        
         | canadiantim wrote:
         | Find a device capable of Transcutaneous electrical nerve
         | stimulation (TENS) or just type TENS into amazon
        
         | greenavocado wrote:
         | Shoplift, get caught, resist, get tasered. Free electrotherapy
         | that comes with free room and board too.
        
       | AaronAPU wrote:
       | It seems odd that cells wouldn't naturally move in the right
       | directions with some purpose. Which makes me wonder if their
       | purpose is just not understood and these faster healing wounds
       | might have some yet unknown downside.
        
         | altruios wrote:
         | Maybe a randomized walk is the optimal healing algorithm
         | barring any directive force? A local maximum. It can use the
         | endocrine signaling though... and other directive signaling. So
         | maybe those wear with time?
         | 
         | Maybe not just any electric signal will do, maybe frequency and
         | amplitude are a factor as well. A 'healing signal'.
         | 
         | Curious research. We'll see what becomes of it.
        
         | aeternum wrote:
         | There is evidence from flat worms that electric fields is how
         | cells naturally move in the right directions with purpose.
         | However they produce the fields chemically via ion gradients.
         | 
         | There's a very cool researcher who used this method to create
         | flatworms with heads (or tails) on both sides.
         | https://www.cell.com/biophysj/fulltext/S0006-3495(17)30427-7
         | 
         | IMO the issue is with unhealthy people, things like poor
         | circulation reduces the body's ability to produce the natural
         | ion gradients and thus why the external electric field helps.
        
           | mnadkvlb wrote:
           | Michael Levin's labs, where this research is going on, showed
           | organ (eg. eyes) regeneration etc. I really hope these guys
           | are going in right direction regarding regeneration based on
           | electric fields as a proxy for gene expressions.
        
             | gooseyard wrote:
             | I learned of Michael Levin via Sally Adee's "We Are
             | Electric", one of the more interesting pop-sci titles I've
             | read in a while, the section on Levin's lab was definitely
             | the highlight.
        
         | pedro_caetano wrote:
         | They do move 'naturally' in the right direction if you think of
         | a cell and it's membrane it can be loosely abstracted as a
         | dielectric material and like any other dielctric can be
         | polarized.
         | 
         | The issue with diabetes is that over time periphery blood
         | supply becames problematic which means healing takes way
         | longer, sometimes never healing at all leading to necrosis
         | (dead tissue).
         | 
         | So you could argue that 'accelerated healing' tissue is a
         | poorer grade tissue by some metric, e.g. connective tissue is
         | not as flexible or strong etc. But in diabetic wounds the
         | alternative to 'accelerated healing' tissue could literally be
         | an amputated limb.
        
       | spidersouris wrote:
       | > The project was recently granted new funding so the research
       | can get to market and benefit patients.
       | 
       | How is it now? Has this been extended to real use outside of
       | research?
        
       | UI_at_80x24 wrote:
       | I wouldn't be surprised if there isn't significant cross-over
       | with this[0] observation of plant-roots growing faster when
       | exposed to low-voltage electricity.
       | 
       | [0]https://www.nature.com/articles/d44151-023-00162-5
        
         | wrs wrote:
         | And electric bone healing stimulation. [0]
         | 
         | [0]
         | https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/advs.20...
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | In other news:
       | 
       | > EPFL researchers have demonstrated the first pill-sized
       | bioprinter that can be swallowed and guided within the
       | gastrointestinal tract, where it directly deposits bio-ink over
       | damaged tissues to support repair.
       | 
       | https://actu.epfl.ch/news/a-pill-that-prints-2/
        
       | georgeburdell wrote:
       | 20 years ago when I was an undergrad I was studying the effect of
       | electric fields on the chemical vapor deposition growth of
       | (material du jour). Electricity turned what was a natural, random
       | process, into one where we could direct the growth this way and
       | that way. We didn't measure whether the growth rate was enhanced,
       | but it's not surprising to me that a similar effect might show up
       | all over the place to help speed along a natural process, because
       | at the boundary, progressive chemical reactions isn't like
       | stacking legos, it's like adding some, then taking a few away,
       | then adding some more, and so on.
        
         | makeitdouble wrote:
         | Yes. The healing nature of electricity was a well known effect
         | [0], what this study brings to the table is more accuracy on
         | how fast and how much.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcurrent_electrical_neurom...
        
       | glial wrote:
       | See also: "The Body Electric: Electromagnetism And The Foundation
       | Of Life"
       | 
       | https://www.harpercollins.com/products/the-body-electric-rob...
        
       | alex1138 wrote:
       | So Frankenstein was right?
        
         | burnt-resistor wrote:
         | Close, it was Dr. Frank-N-Furter.
        
       | tcherasaro wrote:
       | I can supply my own anecdata here.
       | 
       | I recently went through 6 weeks of PT for injured tendons /
       | tendinitis in my arms with 0 results.
       | 
       | The therapist suggested we try dry needling + electric
       | stimulation for another 6 weeks. So we did that and I recovered
       | 90% in the second 6 weeks of therapy.
       | 
       | There were side effects but they were minimal and completely gone
       | now.
       | 
       | It looked a little like this except on my arms:
       | 
       | https://youtube.com/shorts/pTEPMgDdy2A?si=MSx7YnmUbApsigWe
       | 
       | I was skeptical but sold on the benefits and relieved to have an
       | effective therapy option to fall back on when it happens again as
       | it does every couple years. Unfortunately, my insurance doesn't
       | pay for it.
        
         | simmerup wrote:
         | WHat were the side effects?
        
           | glitchc wrote:
           | I've had electro-acupuncture to as part of my recovery from
           | shoulder surgery. One possible side-effect is that nerves can
           | occasionally misfire or auto-fire. It could manifest itself
           | as a tick or a twitch, where a specific muscle fires on its
           | own without any stimulus (or the wrong stimulus). It goes
           | away with extra physical training. I guess it is to be
           | expected as the needle does cause some minor physical damage
           | on insertion and removal.
        
         | froobius wrote:
         | Without a twin with the exact same injury and no intervention,
         | to compare with, we don't know from this whether it was just
         | the six extra weeks of healing that made the difference.
        
           | fluoridation wrote:
           | I mean, GP did open up by saying it was an anecdote, not that
           | it was evidence that electrotherapy works.
        
             | froobius wrote:
             | Yes but some anecdotes are closer to evidence than others.
             | And people seem to be treating the above anecdote like it
             | is evidence. Which we both agree it isn't.
             | 
             | It isn't convincing given the time frame / lack of
             | comparison.
        
               | simmerup wrote:
               | People are adults and can be willing to take chances on
               | anecdotes instead of waiting 30 years for science to
               | maybe fund some studies that end up just as murky
        
               | froobius wrote:
               | Sure, I don't disagree with that. Although, in addition
               | to labelling something as an anecdote, it's also useful
               | to flag the confounding factors.
        
               | benterix wrote:
               | My friend had a kid with a bad eczema. She tried
               | everything. Desperate, she took her to one of these
               | charlatans. He asked the girl to stand on a copper plate.
               | After a few days the eczema disappeared. Now my friend
               | totally believes in all this stuff.
        
               | simmerup wrote:
               | The risk to reward ratio there is off the charts though.
        
               | rogerrogerr wrote:
               | I mean, if I didn't have anything else I was trying that
               | could plausibly explain it, that'd be really hard to
               | resist accepting as the cause. Totally understand it.
        
               | cootsnuck wrote:
               | We still don't understand the placebo effect. But
               | definitely better to accept it's a thing and move on than
               | believe grifters actually know what they're talking
               | about.
        
               | stickfigure wrote:
               | "Biome recolonized by the bacteria of hundreds of other
               | people who also put their dirty feet on the plate"
        
               | msandford wrote:
               | It's a wonderful theory, but alas. Copper is aggressively
               | antimicrobial.
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimicrobial_properties_of
               | _co...
        
             | deadbabe wrote:
             | The GP told a good story and was very personable and
             | relatable.
             | 
             | But you can treat their data as garbage, pseudoscience,
             | backed by nothing. Because it is. Any effects are likely to
             | be placebo. Wait for real research. Science isn't a
             | popularity contest.
        
               | fluoridation wrote:
               | My point is that it's tone-deaf to complain about lack of
               | rigor when the first thing the comment says is that it's
               | not meant to be evidence. It's like reading a fictional
               | novel and giving it a negative review for not containing
               | sufficient citations for the events being related.
        
         | stronglikedan wrote:
         | > try dry needling
         | 
         | Yeah, that's a "no" from me dawg. My PT stuck the needle in,
         | and I was fine with that. Then he moved it a little, and I
         | turned pale as a ghost and started sweating. Same thing
         | happened when I had my nerve conduction study - never again.
         | Needles going in and out is fine. Needles moving around under
         | my skin ain't gonna happen any more. (Except at the dentist,
         | but that's what the laughing gas is for!)
        
           | drjasonharrison wrote:
           | My experience with dry needling was just in and out, no
           | movement laterally or in depth after insertion. I'm sorry you
           | experienced this.
        
             | adastra22 wrote:
             | The whole point of the electro therapy is to make the
             | muscle move though, so this is effectively the same
             | (Galilean relativity) as moving the needle, right?
        
           | bwoah wrote:
           | I had the same thing happen once, and it was as fascinating
           | as it was unsettling. _Very_ slight movement of one needle in
           | what seemed like a pretty inconsequential part of my body
           | produced a near-instantaneous full-body reaction involving
           | many systems.
        
             | fair_enough wrote:
             | That's the magic of action potentials. As sodium ions (+1
             | charge) propagate, they dissipate throughout the cytosol
             | and sometimes leak out of the cell membrane, but they also
             | trigger their own influx of regenerative current by opening
             | voltage-gated ion channels on the cell membrane. Think of
             | it as a "signal repeater".
             | 
             | As long as the initial stimulus is strong enough to trigger
             | an action potential, the signal propagates all the way from
             | the nerve ending to the central nervous system, and
             | whatever response the CNS cooks up always makes it all the
             | way to all the muscles it intends to trigger. Stated
             | another way, the peripheral and central nervous system have
             | enough of these signal repeaters for any signal to travel
             | anywhere.
        
         | eth0up wrote:
         | Do you have any opinion on tens units? I have found them
         | ineffective, but perhaps one can be modified?
         | 
         | If you happen to be aware of a diy poor man's hack, maybe point
         | me yonder. I gots lots o' problems. I'm also interested in
         | zapping me 'ead, but that's more complicated and... seemingly
         | expensive.
        
       | wigglefruit wrote:
       | so they kind of "cattle prodded" the cells into moving the right
       | way
        
       | ninalanyon wrote:
       | I'm all in favour of extra therapeutic options. But what jumped
       | out at me was that 1 in 11 people worldwide have some form of
       | diabetes.
       | 
       | This is surely a relatively new state of affairs so wouldn't it
       | be a rather good idea to prevent it at source so to say rather
       | than cope with the negative effects?
        
         | adastra22 wrote:
         | What do you suggest? Free access to Ozempic?
         | 
         | The real underlying reason for this is quite simple: Haber-
         | Bosch enables us to have abundant and cheap food for everyone,
         | and our evolutionary history hasn't wired us up to respond
         | appropriately to that.
        
           | CGMthrowaway wrote:
           | >Free access to Ozempic?
           | 
           | How does that "prevent it at source"? I was going to say
           | "free access to meat and eggs" and then I read the rest of
           | your comment. You are blaming metabolic dysfunction on the
           | people setting low prices for food, did I read that right?
        
             | quickthrowman wrote:
             | There's not a surplus of meat and eggs anywhere. There are
             | vast surpluses of all grains due to the Haber-Bosch process
             | and the Green Revolution, plus national security concerns.
             | 
             | Therefore, grains are cheap, everything is pumped full of
             | salt and sugar, and people eat overeat.
             | 
             | Also, famines were semi-regular occurrences across the
             | world until very recently.
             | 
             | Your idea would work if meat and eggs took fewer resources
             | to produce, but reality does not work like that.
        
               | JDEW wrote:
               | > Therefore, grains are cheap and people eat too much of
               | them.
               | 
               | People only overeat themselves into obesity once you
               | process those carbs into high fructose corn syrup etc.
               | Seems like a very different problem.
        
               | adastra22 wrote:
               | High fructose corn syrup is very likely one of the
               | reasons American's health is significantly worse than
               | other nations. However the entire globe is suffering from
               | the obesity epidemic, not just the USA.
               | 
               | There are regions of the world that are doing better than
               | others, and a wide spectrum of reasons for that, but it
               | is only comparative/relative improvement. Obesity is
               | getting worse everywhere, across the board, as people are
               | uplifted into middle class incomes and able to purchase
               | and eat whatever they want & as much as they want.
        
           | JDEW wrote:
           | To blame abundant food for obesity and not the fact that we
           | make everything ultra addictive [0] seems like inverse logic
           | to me.
           | 
           | [0] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41574-025-01143-7
        
             | adastra22 wrote:
             | Then why do we have a growing obesity epidemic in countries
             | that DON'T have nearly as many problems with ultra-
             | processed food? Southern Europe, Japan, and India are
             | usually held as exemplar countries with very good natural
             | food culture. All of them are struggling with increasing
             | obesity.
             | 
             | I'm not saying that ultra-processed foods are fine. They
             | are bad and very much part of the story. But it is not the
             | whole story either.
        
               | markdown wrote:
               | You haven't been to India, have you? The capitalist push
               | to get every Indian eating addictive junk (most commonly
               | with the use of sugar) is as aggressive as it is anywhere
               | else in the world.
        
       | rurban wrote:
       | Not just skin, muscles also. It's standard therapy for some years
       | already for partially torn muscles. As with my shoulder right
       | now. Going to EMS therapy twice a week.
        
       | tiku wrote:
       | So we just use those muscle stimulator things on battery on
       | wounds?
        
       | davzie wrote:
       | This seems to run counter to the anecdotal evidence that some say
       | grounding has on healing. I assume grounding is discharging the
       | body (if to be believed) whilst this article would have us
       | believe we should add charge. I don't have a dog in the race,
       | it's just interesting.
        
       | financetechbro wrote:
       | An interesting lecture that's is tangentially related:
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/iHVGe--xDDA?si=Rl4xRqNzxiuY0Zom
        
         | cootsnuck wrote:
         | I knew before clicking it was going to be Michael Levin. His
         | lab is doing really interesting work.
        
       | simmanian wrote:
       | The article and the comments remind me of Michael Levin's work on
       | bioelectricity.
       | 
       | 20 min ted talk - https://youtu.be/XheAMrS8Q1c
       | 
       | 3 hr lex fridman episode - https://youtu.be/p3lsYlod5OU
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-10-16 23:00 UTC)