[HN Gopher] Flapping-wing robot achieves self-takeoff by adoptin...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Flapping-wing robot achieves self-takeoff by adopting
       reconfigurable mechanisms
        
       Author : PaulHoule
       Score  : 77 points
       Date   : 2025-10-08 20:30 UTC (7 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.science.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.science.org)
        
       | mhb wrote:
       | The essential missing (or maybe I just missed it) video:
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/tD5I6x_bPkw?si=KFTx89LmPjrVu5Ib
       | 
       | Edit - better video:
       | 
       | https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/video/2025/bird-like-robot-with-n...
        
         | 05 wrote:
         | It's a render. A real life takeoff video is still missing..
        
           | yorwba wrote:
           | Movie S5 from the supplementary material:
           | https://imgur.com/a/LVb2m22
        
             | 05 wrote:
             | Looks super cool. Now I want to build one and stick an FPV
             | camera on it:)
        
             | orthecreedence wrote:
             | You can see the string attached to it! Do they think we're
             | stupid??
        
               | yorwba wrote:
               | The string goes slack when it lifts off, so it's not like
               | it's being pulled up. I think it's there to catch it in
               | the inevitable case of a crash. And maybe they haven't
               | figured out how to land gracefully yet.
        
       | monooso wrote:
       | I look forward to Boston Dynamics turning this into something
       | that will haunt my nightmares.
        
       | bigjohnjacob wrote:
       | The birds aren't real people are gonna love this.
        
       | ACCount37 wrote:
       | Pretty cool. Just two servos per wing, with one shared BLDC motor
       | to provide the power to the strokes. That's comparable to what
       | normal fixed wing drones have. Extreme mechanical complexity
       | though.
       | 
       | I can't see this being practical, but it makes for one hell of a
       | tech demo. Wish there was footage available. It feels really
       | incomplete without a video of this bird taking off, flying and
       | landing.
        
         | JKCalhoun wrote:
         | I saw recently the Chinese (The Chinese!) are experimenting in
         | this area (and with flying insect machines?) -- perhaps for
         | surveillance drones that will look for all practical purposes
         | like an ordinary bird/insect.
        
           | ACCount37 wrote:
           | The whole "surveillance drone" thing is so overrated. No one
           | gives a shit, really.
           | 
           | People make things like insect drones and bird drones because
           | they're cool. That's it. That's the only practical purpose.
           | Anything else is flimsy justification, sometimes employed to
           | get the funding to do the cool thing.
        
       | ge96 wrote:
       | I used to be obsessed with rc ornithopters but I always thought
       | the main problem was that hulking gear ratio/mechanism and the
       | oscillation making it not really great for flight compared to
       | fixed wing/propeller driven.
       | 
       | This one (servo driven) is really light compared to the usual RC
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuOw6BUOo78
       | 
       | This guy does great work, it's like his obsession
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrB1pKInIu0
        
         | PaulHoule wrote:
         | I had a really stylish robot dragonfly that I got from Big Lots
         | at a huge discount, trouble was it could not fly in any amount
         | of wind and the only place I could fly it was in Barton Hall.
        
           | ge96 wrote:
           | I might know the one you're talking about, did it have a fan
           | as a rudder?
           | 
           | Oh speaking of dragonfly-like ornithopter this one is
           | hardcore https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCrS52sM3Zs
           | 
           | Reminds me of that Chicken Run movie ha
        
             | PaulHoule wrote:
             | It was this
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FlyTech_Dragonfly
             | 
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7j6KPbn4eE
        
         | JKCalhoun wrote:
         | Yeah, totally subscribed to "that guy". I think he's been
         | experimenting with ducted fans (kind of not ornithopters) and
         | also dragon-fly type of flight with four wings (entomopter?).
        
         | asdff wrote:
         | Advanced bird drones must be born secret technology. It makes
         | little sense how so much can be understood about birds and yet
         | there is no perfect bird replica on the market aside from these
         | pared down maker lab tier efforts.
         | 
         | And indeed, lending further credence to the born secret idea is
         | that the CIA has been experimenting on bird drones since at
         | least the 1960s (1), and this was only revealed to the public
         | in 2013. The state of the art must be so far advanced. What a
         | prize for an intelligence agency to be able to create a
         | surveillance system where it does not matter if it is detected
         | on radar, or visualized at all because it looks exactly like
         | indigenous bird populations.
         | 
         | 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_AQUILINE
        
       | fijiaarone wrote:
       | Robots aren't real.
        
       | jacquesm wrote:
       | What an amazing quality article.
        
         | ElijahLynn wrote:
         | Truth, so much detail and depth.
        
       | ElijahLynn wrote:
       | For the videos: search the page for "Movies S1 to S5" And click
       | download to download a zip file of five videos. The fifth video
       | shows the actual flight. Albeit, there's a string attached to the
       | top, which doesn't appear to be helping it, but I'm not certain.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-10-15 23:01 UTC)