[HN Gopher] Show HN: Baby's first international landline
___________________________________________________________________
Show HN: Baby's first international landline
Hi HN, As a weekend project, I hacked together a physical phone, a
Raspberry Pi running Asterisk and Twilio, to let toddlers safely
make international calls. I've documented the setup in this write-
up and published the code + Ansible playbooks on GitHub so others
can replicate it. I built this so kids of expats can easily stay
in touch with family on other continents. Would love feedback from
anyone who's worked on something similar or tries building this
themselves! writeup: https://wip.tf/posts/telefonefix-building-
babys-first-intern... github repos: -
https://github.com/nbr23/ansible-role-telefonefix -
https://github.com/nbr23/allo-wed
Author : nbr23
Score : 211 points
Date : 2025-10-08 13:31 UTC (5 days ago)
(HTM) web link (wip.tf)
(TXT) w3m dump (wip.tf)
| hawaiianbrah wrote:
| This is so cool! Mine is too young but I was planning to hack on
| something similar when they're of age. Thanks for the
| inspiration!
| oofbey wrote:
| I gotta say. I miss landlines.
| hlieberman wrote:
| I really like this... except you should add a special case for
| 911. I strongly believe that all phones, and anything that looks
| like phones, should be able to dial out in an emergency.
|
| Obviously, this can raise its own problems -- you'll have to
| train the kids not to randomly dial 911! -- but you never know
| what circumstances might exist where someone in a panic reaches
| for the nearest phone.
| superb_dev wrote:
| Also if you want to test dial 911 I've been told you can
| schedule a test call with you local dispatch!
|
| I setup a phone system with Asterisk for fun a while ago and I
| avoided emergency calls because I didn't know how to safely
| test it
| vermilingua wrote:
| You can, but you should prefer dialling 933 which will use
| the same routing infrastructure, and reads out the address
| that 911/933 believes is associated with your connection.
| Does not take time away from a human dispatcher so should
| always be preferred unless there is a critical reason to test
| 911.
| superb_dev wrote:
| Oh this sounds much better, thank you!
| ssl-3 wrote:
| Dialing 933 tests call routing and address reporting when
| dialing 933, but 911 and 933 are not the same number.
|
| And one might assume that it should work the same....and it
| may in fact be the same once a call reaches the greater
| telephone network.
|
| But calling 933 does not necessarily test 911 call routing
| as it relates to a specific pile of _local_ gear.
|
| So sure: One should call 933 as an informal test and make
| sure it produces a good report.
|
| One should -also- call 911 and make sure that works
| correctly and that the result of a call is a good report,
| too (after calling the local non-emergency number for the
| PSAP and making arrangements).
|
| It's perfectly acceptable, OK, and appreciated (by PSAP
| operators and supervisors alike) to ensure that 911 calling
| is tested and working, end-to-end, upon the implementation
| of any particular telephone system. (But again, please let
| them know about it, first.)
|
| Lives do sometimes rely on 911 calls working properly, and
| an untested system is at best an unproven mystery.
|
| Please test it. "It -should- work fine!" is not good
| enough.
| Terr_ wrote:
| Hmmm, I wonder if something like this applies to testing
| emergency-apps on my smartphone.
|
| Unlike a landline, it's harder to say where it ends up or
| who'll get angry at you for "testing".
| vermilingua wrote:
| Kari's Law [0] is relevant here. Not strictly applicable as
| this is not a MLTS (phone line multiplexer), but very much in
| line with the spirit of the law as it was adopted after a child
| was unable to dial 911 from a motel phone.
|
| [0] https://www.fcc.gov/mlts-911-requirements
| bryogenic wrote:
| I just setup the same HT801 but I used SIP-domains and twilio
| services/functions instead of SIP trunk and asterisk. I'll make
| sure to reply again once I have a write up.
|
| Nice work!
| mnutt wrote:
| This is a great project writeup, I did something _very_ similar
| for my son. (HT802, asterisk, twilio, calling relatives) With all
| of the NAT involved I could never get sjsip to work properly so I
| ended up having to use the old sip module, but looking at yours
| makes me want to revisit it.
|
| Once you have asterisk set up and running, it becomes easy to
| also set up all sorts of other extensions like "check the
| weather" / "tell a joke" / "check the train statuses". I put up
| some code for it here: https://github.com/mnutt/rotary
| winterec wrote:
| Great work! Thank you for sharing this. I'm looking forward to
| making one just like this too.
| bignerd_95 wrote:
| Nice project! Another route you might consider is flashing a
| small custom firmware on the Grandstream HT80x so the logic runs
| directly on the ATA instead of on the Pi/Asterisk side.
|
| I wrote a tool that can extract and repack Grandstream firmware
| (https://github.com/BigNerd95/Grandstream-Firmware-
| HT802/tree...).
|
| For example, I made a simple ARM patch that intercepts incoming
| caller IDs and triggers a bash script to decide what to do, in my
| case it checks a spam-lookup service and returns 0 or 1 so the
| ATA either rings or rejects the call.
| protocolture wrote:
| I cant remember the circumstances, it might have involved an
| RMA with grandstream, but I vaguely recall this tool saving my
| bacon at one point.
| toast0 wrote:
| This seems neat. I have some minor stuff I'd like an ATA to do
| differently [1], and maybe I can make it work with this, if I
| get motivated!
|
| [1] I don't quite remember what I wanted to do, so that's the
| first part! But I have a telephone controlled gate, with 3-pair
| wiring, and right now I'm using two pair for phone inbound and
| outbound, and one pair I can't use... If I can get the ATA to
| interface well enough with just one pair to the gate, then I
| can use two pair for ethernet, and I don't need to use a modem
| to interface with the gate over the phoneline.
| b_e_n_t_o_n wrote:
| For some reason I thought it was for toddlers to call other
| toddlers. I think if you were looking for a feature to add, it
| would be to let kids call their friends. Could lead to some cute
| moments :)
| eastbound wrote:
| Oh yes then monetize the recordings! (Sorry, Silicon Valley
| PTSA kicking in)
| robertlagrant wrote:
| Just play an advert instead of a ringtone! The user is
| motivated to listen!
| technofiend wrote:
| I love everything about this. I've often thought families that
| wanted to extend their network between trusted friends could set
| up a literal private branch exchange (aka PBX) with only their
| friends as fellow members.You have a way for people to call each
| other without handing kids a smart phone and can also avoid the
| inevitable costs and unwanted calls associated with real land
| lines.
| horseradish7k wrote:
| almost if like they could be regional, for people within the
| same area... and there'd be a book with everyone's numbers...
| protocolture wrote:
| >only permit calls to be made to an adult-controlled set of
| numbers timezones and "awake/asleep" schedules, to avoid calling
| Europe at their 1am prevent inbound calls entirely
|
| This is interesting. Was there a serious issue while using a
| regular landline?
|
| As a former toddler myself, I think that the worst I got up to
| was calling the radio station and giving bad traffic tips.
|
| My overseas family had such a long number, stored in a book in my
| grandmothers handwriting, that theres little chance I would have
| connected and woken them up.
|
| Is this designed to counter a specific threat model?
| kimixa wrote:
| ... Do you not see a toddler dialing random numbers as anything
| but a nuisance to the people whose numbers they happened to
| dial? Or waste emergency services' time? (their numbers are
| intentionally easy to dial, and likely more recognisable being
| repeated in media even to the young after all)
|
| It feels like you're forcing other people to take the effort of
| dealing with your child in that situation.
| protocolture wrote:
| There's another thread here where they are talking about the
| necessity to make emergency services numbers available
| anyway, because kids are often the people who make the
| crucial phone call when a parent has an accident. And its
| doubtful that the parent is going to collapse, push an
| ansible update to his project, and then have the kid dial
| emergency.
|
| Theres potential for nuisance, but not one that seemed like a
| big threat for that whole period where toddlers routinely had
| access to phones.
|
| I asked because I am interested in whats happening, maybe
| they have a unique situation/environment that requires this.
| Maybe they have phone jockey kids who mastered the technique.
| mrweasel wrote:
| > Was there a serious issue while using a regular landline?
|
| So a few other issues with landlines, in other countries:
|
| 1) Crazy expensive.
|
| 2) You can't sign-up for one anymore.
|
| 3) They may no longer be available. The cables have already
| been removed in some parts of Denmark.
| miki123211 wrote:
| In a lot of places a "landline" is:
|
| a) a phone using the ITU protocols, connecting to the router
| over ATM, or
|
| b) a straight up SIP / VOIP phone which just happens to be
| operated by your ISP, but which could, in principle, work
| anywhere, as long as it was connected to the internet, or
|
| c) a cell phone in a landline-like enclosure, perhaps with a
| carrier-side restriction that prevents its SIM card from
| working outside its intended local area.
| mrweasel wrote:
| That is pretty interesting, because I figured that maybe
| that would solve my issue of trying to get a cheap
| "landline". Sadly no. My ISP also doesn't want to do VOIP.
| They have the product, but doesn't sign up new customers.
| protocolture wrote:
| Voip is a classic loss maker for ISPs.
|
| Right up there with email servers and DNS.
|
| It increases their attack surface and support costs
| without any real bottom line benefit.
|
| I suspect I will be adding IPTV to that list in 5 years
| too.
| protocolture wrote:
| For arguments sake lets include voip in there under landline.
| dwedge wrote:
| > My overseas family had such a long number, stored in a book
| in my grandmothers handwriting, that theres little chance I
| would have connected and woken them up.
|
| The article is about a phone with one button per person, so the
| thing that stopped you from doing this is not applicable. You
| now have a toddler who can press a button whenever they want
| and dial someone - you don't see how a child who doesn't
| understand timezones etc. might cause a problem here?
| jeduardo wrote:
| One sidenote is that the Twilio part is harder than it looks. Not
| because of technical factors, but because of the paid
| requirement. Twilio refused to take my money and upgrade me to a
| paid account, even though they forced me to go to their confusing
| KYC procedure, where they asked me many times to provide the same
| set of documents. Support was useless, it looked like an AI bot
| repeating the same thing, but this was before the widespread
| usage of AI bots.
|
| Eventually I gave up and went to Telnyx, which had a better KYC
| process and actual humans behind support that could resolve any
| quirks with KYC. Apparently not being born where you live breaks
| a lot of the automation behind some of these processes, go
| figure.
| VenturingVole wrote:
| I'm not sure if they've changed the process since your issues
| (hopefully) - I was using their trial and when it expired had
| to go through the KYC process. They under-promised by saying
| two working days to reach out, but everything was wrapped up
| within an hour and done over email.
|
| I nearly moved away from Twilio having read the negative
| feedback, but my personal experience so far was very prompt
| support.
| jeduardo wrote:
| Hey, that's good to hear. Was it a recent experience for you?
| Maybe they heard some of the feedback and acted on it.
|
| This encourages me to revisit them, not because I'm unhappy
| with my current provider, but rather because Twilio offers
| what I need (a number that can receive and send SMS) in
| regions where my current provider doesn't.
| VenturingVole wrote:
| This was last week.
|
| I ought to caveat that from a KYC perspective, I likely
| would have been 'easy' since my career history involves
| many well-known companies and the requested account was for
| a UK company that has been running for nearly 20 years.
|
| Though I'm no longer personally in the UK. Microsoft on the
| other hand: It was impossible for me to open up an Azure
| account even with their Customer Support. Suspect I will
| have to use Tailscale to bypass overly rigid geographical
| controls.
| dwedge wrote:
| After what Twilio did to Authy users I'd be very reluctant to
| use them for anything unless they were the only choice.
| throw-10-13 wrote:
| Hardest part of this is getting a twilio account that actually
| works.
|
| One of the worst service providers ive ever had to work with.
| mrweasel wrote:
| That explains the pricing. I've been looking for a cheap way to
| get a SIP/VOIP connection, so the kid and I can play with some
| old phones she's been gifted. I really want to make one or two
| of them work, so she can do internal calls at home, and maybe
| call grandmam.
|
| It's easy enough to get a VOIP account with a local company,
| but the pricing is just insane. I really wish I could find an
| ATA solution that can do internal call and use a SIM to call
| out. They exist, but the prices rather high.
| schwartzworld wrote:
| If you're in the US just get a magic jack
| ale42 wrote:
| This is using Twilio, but given there's an Asterisk server
| behind, you can actually use any VoIP provider that allows
| outgoing calls over SIP right? Depending on the country you live
| in and/or where you want to call, you might get simpler & cheaper
| options (although for emergency service if you want to have it,
| which I think is important unless there's an alternative way to
| call emergencies around, it's more complicated).
| _ZeD_ wrote:
| uhmm...
|
| >>> As a weekend project, I hacked together a physical phone, a
| Raspberry Pi running Asterisk and Twilio, to let toddlers safely
| make international calls.
|
| how often do toddlers make international calls???
| detaro wrote:
| that probably depends how many close family members they have
| abroad.
| Timwi wrote:
| It's right there in the post:
|
| > I built this so kids of expats can easily stay in touch with
| family on other continents.
|
| Just think of families fleeing from war or persecution. This
| isn't rare by any measure, unfortunately.
| atemerev wrote:
| Ahem. Some people never heard of immigration/emigration?
|
| (The system is valuable for adults too, if some of your
| relatives live in a country which blocks Whatsapp and other
| voice calling apps, like Russia or China).
| bombcar wrote:
| If you want this as a ready to go product - https://tincan.kids/
| and disable 911 if international.
| schwartzworld wrote:
| Or a magic Jack. Cheap as hell
| robertlagrant wrote:
| I would love a way to make an IP phone that just lets my kids
| call their friends on their phones, and no-one else. I will take
| a look!
| otterpro wrote:
| see TinCan phone mentioned in the comments, which does this.
| However, it means that all their friends need to buy the phone
| as well.
| aurbano wrote:
| This is awesome!
|
| Would it be possible to ditch Twilio and build it as a peer-to-
| peer system though? Or does that always require a coordination
| server?
| yojo wrote:
| I've also been looking at setting up a dumb phone for my kids,
| but haven't thought to go the rPi Twilio route.
|
| There's an existing product that seems to have some mindshare in
| the space: https://tincan.kids/
|
| Basically $100 for the phone, plus $10/mo to call arbitrary
| numbers. My main concern here is the company goes belly-up and
| you're left with a phone-shaped brick.
|
| Another option I considered was a cheap unlimited SIM coupled
| with a GSM "desk phone" e.g. https://www.amazon.com/Generic-
| Wireless-Telephone-Cordless-8...
|
| The problem here is there's no way to filter inbound calls. The
| last thing I want is spammers ringing the house phone in the
| middle of the night.
| sharkweek wrote:
| That Tin Can device has infiltrated (in a good way, what a fun
| idea!) my oldest kids' social circle at elementary school. Most
| of his friends are requesting one for Christmas and we're
| planning on getting our kid one as well.
|
| Really hoping the idea lasts, lots of good memories of dialing
| friends on our landline growing up and chatting casually.
|
| Now if only it could replicate the dread of calling a crush's
| house and her dad picking up the phone...
| christiansafka wrote:
| Found a post from Twilio using the same tech stack in 2013! What
| a trip. Cool project!
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5409914
| BuildTheRobots wrote:
| Very interesting.
|
| I had a similar problem a few years back with a technophobe
| Grandma who wouldn't use whatsapp and a stingy aunt who'd moved
| to the states.
|
| Used a Fritz!Box as it'll act as a DECT<->SIP server so my
| grandma could keep picking up her usual handset. Had a rule which
| matched the aunt's phone number so it got bounced via my
| FreeSwitch server rather than her PSTN, and some least-cost
| routing rules to pick a US based provider SIP provider with a +01
| PSTN number so my aunt saw the incoming call looking local and
| could ring back if necessary at a cheap rate.
|
| Honestly, the weird technical abominations we come up with to try
| and serve family members. The same Grandma went through a phase
| of falling, not being able to get up and then waiting hours for
| an ambulance to arrive. Would she tell the family? Would she sod.
| Was her regional ambulance service still dispatching jobs via
| pager message? You betcha. Did this end up with an SDR, POCSAG
| decoder and a regx looking for her postcode? Absolutely not; why
| would you ask such a thing?
| renshijian wrote:
| I couldn't help but smile when I read about building an
| international landline system with the patience of "raising a
| child"! This analogy of complex technology to the process of
| raising a life is so resonant - from the first "cry" (dial tone)
| to the first toddler steps (stable communication), every
| troubleshooting is like soothing a fussy baby. If all technical
| documentation were written with such warmth, the world would have
| many more happy engineers
| otterpro wrote:
| I love this idea as I grew up with ancient dial up phones, and I
| miss actually holding a handset and dialing a number to make
| calls. However, gen alpha has grown up in completely digital era,
| and most interaction occurs on FaceTime (or other video chat),
| and I don't think we can ever go back even if we wanted to. My
| kids' grandparents WANT to see their precious little grandkids so
| we always use video calls, if it involves kids and grandparents.
|
| I, on the other hand, want this to communicate with friends who
| want to do the same.
| quit32 wrote:
| Odd use of Twilio for just a SIP Trunk provider. They also offer
| programmable voice SIP, a product that is a distinct offering
| from the Elastic SIP trunking used here. With PV SIP you can
| directly register the Grandstream HT801 ATA to a programmable SIP
| endpoint on Twilio and move all the programming logic, including
| text to speech, to a Twilio serverless "function" and completely
| cut out the need for a RasPi and Asterisk.
|
| Also FYI for those who do want to use Asterisk behind CGNAT and
| cannot open ports - if you use PV SIP you can also register it as
| a Trunk in Asterisk and it can then receive inbound calls over
| the connection established by the outbound registration with
| simple a simple Twiml bin that routes whatever Twilio numbers you
| want to the SIP user you used to register the Asterisk's SIP
| Trunk. Asterisks can can then use inbound number plan to further
| route the inbound call as needed.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-10-13 23:01 UTC)