[HN Gopher] The World Trade Center under construction through ph...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The World Trade Center under construction through photos, 1966-1979
        
       Author : kinderjaje
       Score  : 172 points
       Date   : 2025-10-07 00:40 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (rarehistoricalphotos.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (rarehistoricalphotos.com)
        
       | kinderjaje wrote:
       | > The material expenditures on the towers were enormous; 192,000
       | tons of steel, 425,000 cubic yards of concrete, 43,600 windows
       | with 572,000 square feet of glass, 1,143,000 square feet of
       | aluminum sheet, 198 miles of ductwork, and 12,000 miles of
       | electrical cable.
       | 
       | The towers also provided an extraordinary employment opportunity
       | for the construction workers of the region. More than 3,500
       | people were employed continuously on-site during construction.
       | 
       | > A total of 10,000 people were involved in its construction.
       | Tragically, 60 people were killed during construction.
       | 
       | During their lifetimes the towers were host to the birth of 17
       | babies and 19 murders.
       | 
       | Fifty thousand people called the towers their place of work and
       | on many days tens of thousands visited.
        
         | chistev wrote:
         | Interested in Reading about those murders.
        
         | n1b0m wrote:
         | I couldn't find any evidence of the birth of 17 babies. The
         | claim may be confused with the approximately 100 babies born to
         | women whose husbands died in the 9/11 attacks.
         | 
         | I also couldn't find any evidence for the 19 murders. Six
         | people were killed in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing,
         | which was an act of terrorism. Plus 9/11.
        
           | jmulho wrote:
           | There was at least one additional murder. Louis DiBono, who
           | held a lucrative contract to fireproof the steel beams of the
           | towers, was murdered in the parking lot under the North tower
           | on Oct 4, 1990. John Gotti was convicted for the murder (and
           | four other murders). The FBI, eavesdropping on Gotti,
           | overheard the order, but misheard the name and thus failed to
           | warn DiBono. Also, there was no video surveillance or
           | witnesses, and the body wasn't found for three days, all
           | indicating a lack of security. The Feb 26, 1993, bombing was
           | apparently done from the same parking lot 2+ years later.
           | 
           | https://npdf1.org/crime-scene-world-trade-center/
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gotti
        
       | chistev wrote:
       | Jules Naudet 3 hour footage of the collapse of the WTC, following
       | the firemen before and after the towers got hit.
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/CqzbHEfX3o8?si=4wfuiD94x9p11sj0
        
         | whycome wrote:
         | Did anyone film with film cameras that day? We could get really
         | really high res footage out of that.
        
       | fidotron wrote:
       | Tangentially:
       | 
       | > The vision was meant to use the trade facility and urban
       | renewal as tools to clear and revitalize what had become a
       | "commercial slum".
       | 
       | What this refers to is
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Row#New_York_City
       | 
       | Basically you cannot have Akihabara or Shenzhen style electronics
       | markets because the sort of people that built the WTC don't like
       | their chaotic appearance.
        
         | squeedles wrote:
         | Thanks for that. We seem to have lost sight of the importance
         | of "commercial biodiversity" in the past 40 or more years of
         | continuous M&A concentration.
         | 
         | Happily, I saw a little discussion of it in 2008 when the
         | advocates of letting the auto companies fail were pushed back
         | by statistics showing how many second and third tier suppliers
         | would be destroyed. But the fourth tier, the shenzhen / radio
         | alley-type stuff is still ignored. Very similar to how most
         | companies want to simply hire skills and assume that they will
         | magically appear when in years past, companies took an active
         | hand in creating them by having a career development path in-
         | house.
         | 
         | Perhaps the AI bubble will be viewed in the future as the last
         | gasp of companies that depleted the soil that they grew in and
         | now struggle to survive without anyone that knows how to do the
         | work anymore. Maybe LLMs will be all that remains, our Moai.
        
           | jgalt212 wrote:
           | There's plenty of "commercial biodiversity" left on Canal
           | Street. And it's pretty gross.
        
           | crote wrote:
           | It's a shame the same logic wasn't applied in maintaining a
           | healthy root-level auto company ecosystem. Having a single
           | megacorp at the top inevitably makes it too big to fail. On
           | the other hand, if there are dozens of smaller car companies,
           | the failure of any one of them is insignificant to the wider
           | ecosystem.
           | 
           | A company that _knows_ it is too big to fail will inevitably
           | lead to mismanagement. After all, why bother saving for a
           | rainy day when you can count on corporate welfare handouts?
           | Why bother reducing your risks when you can always rely on a
           | bailout? You can _never_ lose, so the obvious thing to do is
           | to bet as big as possible in an attempt to create as much
           | short-term  "shareholder value" as possible.
        
         | keiferski wrote:
         | I think you can expand this to "finance" more broadly. This
         | essay by the CCRU from 30 years ago is really interesting and
         | basically explores the phenomenon of marketplaces turning into
         | organized financial spaces as a space becomes more
         | capitalistic. Let's not forget what the WTC is/was: a major
         | focal point of global capitalism, not just another building.
         | 
         | http://www.ccru.net/archive/markets.htm
         | 
         |  _In 'highly developed' economies the anarchy of concrete
         | market-places has been replaced by the securitized space of the
         | shopping mall (interiorized, guarded, and surveilled). Instead
         | of dark and crowded alleys, lined by open stalls - which
         | encourage a multiplicity of tactile interactions - the mall
         | substitutes shop windows and brightly lit retail displays._
        
         | nroets wrote:
         | It's not about looks but efficient use of land: Manhattan was
         | (and still is) the financial capital of the world. It had the
         | most valuable real estate in the world. Radio Row was a poor
         | use of real estate.
         | 
         | Before the Chinese traded electronics in Shenzhen, they traded
         | it in Hong Kong. Yes, as Hong Kong transformed into a financial
         | center, it got rid of the electronics traders.
        
           | fidotron wrote:
           | > It had the most valuable real estate in the world. Radio
           | Row was a poor use of real estate.
           | 
           | So why did they force a sale price on the people there?
           | 
           | If as finance people we believe in market forces they should
           | have bought the stores out at market prices.
           | 
           | It's another heads-we-win-tails-you-lose situation.
        
           | janeroe wrote:
           | > It's not about looks but efficient use of land
           | 
           | Right, confiscation from private owners to use it for
           | erection of a building no one needs is a very efficient use
           | of land. The project will require astronomical up front
           | expenses, will stay vacant for almost 2 decades, and have
           | endless problems until its last day (fires, terrorist acts,
           | issues with the structure). But who cares, it's efficiency we
           | are talking about.
        
           | crote wrote:
           | The White House and Central Park are a poor use of real
           | estate as well. Imagine how much money you could make if you
           | developed it into a new Kowloon Walled City!
           | 
           | Besides, didn't the Twin Towers have a massive occupancy
           | problem? I recall that being the reason why so many
           | government entities were forced to move there...
        
           | Finnucane wrote:
           | 'poor use of land' meaning 'not being used for the benefit of
           | wealthy people.'
        
         | potato3732842 wrote:
         | > because the sort of people that built the WTC don't like
         | their chaotic appearance.
         | 
         | And their counterparts in government hate it because chaos is
         | inefficient (because people have rights) to impose their will
         | on (regulate) so even if you don't build WTC there becomes a
         | regulatory environment where nothing organic can get done.
        
       | jeswin wrote:
       | The Twin Towers sort of represented the height of American power
       | and prestige, and their fall kicked off the decline. From its
       | peak in the unipolar 90s, a series of expensive misadventures
       | that began after the towers fell diverted critical funds from
       | development (against the backdrop of China's inevitable rise and
       | industrial capacity), into conflict and war far away.
        
         | honkostani wrote:
         | Its fall showed, that cultural relativism and universal
         | liberalism, where just western delusions. Socialism was a dead
         | ideology by then, but this really attacked western values,
         | insofar, that a dried husk of a imperialist religious ideology,
         | revived with western demand for natural resources (oil) would
         | rather engage in cultural warfare upon western values and
         | society then trying to fix itself.
         | 
         | It was a ringing bell, bringing the attention back to the old
         | ugly worldorder of great games, land-empires and bloody
         | conquest and the inability to isolate from hostile ideologies,
         | even if you are the usa and living on a giant island. Bush went
         | to iraq and the failure to build any working state there-
         | showed not only the failure of neoncons, but also of the whole
         | "all cultures are equal" and academic impotence. There
         | explanation models had nothing for this but tired rehashes of
         | colonial/anti-colonial ideology, no predictions, no real help,
         | just "belief in universal values and western culture, and
         | righton" - and that was it. No help for the 2 billion stuck in
         | religious ember, not real analysis to free the wasted geniuses
         | trapped under burkas. Silence, ideology and absence, thats
         | whats left.
        
           | mindslight wrote:
           | Some of this rings true, but it makes way too many
           | speculative assertions about the future stated as if they're
           | simply done deals. It also uncritically channels many memes
           | from the destructionist movement presently "leading" the US,
           | rather than acknowledging that movement as part of the "
           | _cultural warfare upon western values_ ".
        
         | RajT88 wrote:
         | It is - seriously - no wonder they got destroyed. NYC is a
         | symbol, and the towers were a recognizable icon in the skyline.
         | 
         | There's a high number of coincidences about the towers getting
         | destroyed. It's no conspiracy, it's because the towers and NYC
         | meant something in the eyes of the world with regards to the
         | USA.
         | 
         | Just rattling off a few of the wild ones:
         | 
         | The episode of The Lone Gunmen which predicted an attack with a
         | plane on the towers.
         | 
         | The Sega Master System game (I forget the name, but I own it)
         | where it depicts a missile hitting the towers on the opening
         | screen. It's pixels with little wings, and super spooky in
         | retrospect.
         | 
         | The Dream Theater live album released on 9/11 which showed the
         | NYC skyline burning.
         | 
         | There's so much stuff, I almost don't blame the conspiracy
         | theorists. But they have the causality backwards. They also
         | really like to ignore the fact that 8 years earlier somebody
         | tried to blow up the towers and killed 6 people...
        
           | wpm wrote:
           | What wondrous things you'll be able to do with computer
           | graphics! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu1bivgaiVw
        
           | Ccecil wrote:
           | The album for "Party Music" from Boots Riley's band "The
           | Coup" was scheduled to be released in September and they had
           | to delay it due to the cover having a picture of the WTC
           | exploding [1]
           | 
           | Tom Clancy's book "Debt of Honor" is very similar in a spooky
           | way as well. Including the hesitation to shoot down
           | commercial airliners being used as weapons. [2]
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_Music [2]
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt_of_Honor
        
           | lisbbb wrote:
           | I recall reading an article sometime around 1999 that
           | mentioned a ban on holes being drilled between floors in the
           | towers for running network wiring because they were beginning
           | to worry about structural integrity. That article was
           | disappeared after the attacks. I know I read it, but the
           | information totally disappeared.
        
           | rjmunro wrote:
           | The article "Mother Earth, Mother Board" by Neal Stephenson
           | (https://www.wired.com/1996/12/ffglass/), written in 1996
           | says "The collapse of the lighthouse must have been
           | astonishing, like watching the World Trade Center fall over."
           | 
           | That totally freaked me out when I re-read the article a few
           | years later.
        
           | rrrrrrrrrrrryan wrote:
           | Somewhat supporting your point, the towers were literally
           | bombed in '93 with the intent of toppling them:
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombin.
           | ..
           | 
           | I imagine this terrorist attack inspired some of the art on
           | your list.
        
             | RajT88 wrote:
             | So the videogame I mentioned was from 87! I think... Around
             | then for sure. Definitely late 80's since it was for 8 bit
             | Sega.
        
         | renewiltord wrote:
         | The majority of development in the US is private. It hasn't
         | been redirected to war. What's primarily happened is that
         | Americans decided that the '90s were the perfect decade and if
         | you build anything past that you are "ruining the"
         | [community|environment|neighborhood].
         | 
         | Everything new is "gross" for the people who are on their fifth
         | year of therapy with no end in sight. It's always someone
         | else's fault but don't change anything because community
         | character is the most important thing.
        
           | mlsu wrote:
           | Even as the true "community character" -- the people who live
           | in the community -- are pushed out by the price required to
           | live there.
           | 
           | Some of the best "preserved" (via this 'build nothing change
           | nothing' tactic) communities in my expensive socal city are
           | dead. They were turned from diverse beach communities into
           | dead information technology/finance monoliths.
        
         | lisbbb wrote:
         | The 1970s weren't exactly a prosperous time period. The total
         | end of the gold standard marked the real decline.
         | 
         | China's rise wasn't "inevitable" it was underwritten when Nixon
         | went to China and they subsequently got their most favored
         | trading nation status.
        
         | bamboozled wrote:
         | I couldn't help feel the same.
         | 
         | Looking at where America is right now. It seems to make a
         | downfall.
        
           | N70Phone wrote:
           | > Looking at where America is right now. It seems to make a
           | downfall.
           | 
           | It's been happening for years now. 'America', the idea, died
           | the moment the 2nd plane hit the towers.
           | 
           | People saw that happen, and were so fearful they immediately
           | opened their hearts to fascism.
           | 
           | 2025 is merely the year where all of Bush's fascist policies
           | & Obama/Biden's failure to clean it up metastasized into the
           | overt fascism that hurts everyone in a country & eventually
           | destroys the country itself.
        
         | api wrote:
         | I firmly believe that the 9/11 terrorists won. They got what
         | they wanted, which is exactly what you describe. They also
         | destroyed the optimism and energy of our culture. I lived
         | through that time, and we have never recovered.
         | 
         | What we should have done is, as a symbolic act, rebuild the
         | towers exactly as they were (with some structural improvements
         | maybe) and go about our business. We should have gone after the
         | terrorists as an international police action and not much more.
         | 
         | That would have been a symbol of true strength. "No, your
         | little act of vandalism won't have any effect on us at all. We
         | are above that." Be like the "wall" archetype in fiction, the
         | huge guy someone punches as hard as they can and they barely
         | notice.
         | 
         | Instead we showed stupidity and weakness disguised as strength,
         | something we're now wallowing in with a whole culture revolving
         | around fake strength and compensatory fake masculinity.
        
       | jgalt212 wrote:
       | > the World Financial Center, designed by Cesar Pelli, and
       | several apartment buildings were built on this new land.
       | 
       | Now known as Brookfield place. Yet another ill-advised re-
       | branding. I believe this was done after the GFC to attract non-
       | finance companies.
        
       | netesh wrote:
       | People who like this might enjoy the amazing film Man On Wire
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_on_Wire
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIawNRm9NWM
        
         | eigenhombre wrote:
         | Highly recommended... I found it quite beautiful and moving,
         | and it's the only film I've felt compelled to write a blog
         | post[1] about. "Seeing the film (made just last year)
         | transforms the memory of the Towers from one of trauma to
         | something more like transcendence."
         | 
         | [1] https://johnj.com/posts/man-on-wire/ [2009]
         | 
         | Edit: add year
        
       | fschuett wrote:
       | Was the WTC 7 / Salomon Brothers Building part of the same
       | construction?
        
       | aerodog wrote:
       | I had the fortune of being at the top of the twin towers as a
       | child in the 90s. A total shame what Larry Silverstein
       | coordinated against these fantastic structures.
        
       | fnord77 wrote:
       | They were so stunning to look at from the outside. They were so
       | large they didn't seem real.
       | 
       | I worked for a bit on the 95 or 96th floor. Inside they were less
       | impressive. The lowish ceiling and skinny windows made it feel
       | confining. To me, in the 90s, they felt old and dated on the
       | inside.
        
       | pcurve wrote:
       | "Tragically, 60 people were killed during construction.
       | 
       | During their lifetimes the towers were host to the birth of 17
       | babies and 19 murders"
       | 
       | That is unusually high number of death during construction.
       | 
       | After 25 years, I still get emotional looking at these imageries.
       | The emotion is raw. I'm still mad that this happened.
        
         | avhception wrote:
         | I'm still mad, and I'm not even American. Even over here in
         | Germany, it was a massive shock wave that went through society
         | and I still remember the day it happened vividly. The effects
         | in society are felt to this day.
        
           | UltraSane wrote:
           | as an American I very much want to live in the reality where
           | Gore won and 9/11 didn't happen.
        
             | rkomorn wrote:
             | Are you implying Gore winning would've meant 9/11 wouldn't
             | have happened?
        
               | tempestn wrote:
               | Not the parent, and I'm not saying it definitely wouldn't
               | have happened (I have no idea), but it's at least
               | possible. There was advance intelligence around the event
               | that might have been treated differently by a different
               | administration.
               | 
               | Even if it had happened, the response would also have
               | been different.
        
               | chistev wrote:
               | What do you think the different response would have been?
        
               | tempestn wrote:
               | I have no idea; I'm just saying that with different
               | people in charge, they wouldn't have reacted in exactly
               | the same way.
               | 
               | If I had to guess, I'd say at least no Iraq war, if we
               | consider that part of the response. Patriot Act probably
               | would have looked different. I expect there still would
               | have been military action in Afghanistan, but likely with
               | differences as well.
        
               | mixmastamyk wrote:
               | In Richard Clarke's book he details the intelligence
               | community's multiple warnings to the new Bush
               | administration that spring and summer. They were ignored.
               | 
               | As Gore came from the Clinton admin he and the people
               | around him would have had a lot more experience dealing
               | with and familiar with the threats and actors, who were
               | already known.
        
               | UltraSane wrote:
               | No
        
             | squidbeak wrote:
             | Are you asserting that Al Qaeda liked Gore enough to
             | suspend their vendetta?
        
               | natebc wrote:
               | They're asserting that they want to live in a world where
               | two things are true.
               | 
               | - Gore was declared winner of the 2000 presidential
               | election
               | 
               | - the WTC wasn't attacked on September 11th, 2001.
               | 
               | the two don't have to be connected to be wishes.
        
               | UltraSane wrote:
               | No
        
             | tempestn wrote:
             | If Gore had won, maybe McCain could have been President
             | after him, and the Republican party could've gone in a very
             | different direction too.
             | 
             | If you enjoy these kinds of hypotheticals, check out the
             | series For All Mankind on apple tv.
        
           | timcobb wrote:
           | One could argue that Osama bin Laden did succeed in
           | destroying the US if not the entire Western order.
        
             | 93po wrote:
             | The US did exactly what he wanted them to.
             | 
             | He wanted to radicalize Muslims worldwide against the West
             | and drain American resources through prolonged wars.
             | 
             | It's also interesting how infrequently Americans know OBL's
             | motivations for the 9/11 attacks. A big part of it was the
             | American support of Israel, and OBL's belief that this
             | would lead to further oppression of Muslim people in
             | Palestine.
             | 
             | He did terrible things but was pretty accurate in his
             | predictions.
        
               | bamboozled wrote:
               | OBL hated Palestine ?
        
               | Hackbraten wrote:
               | "this" == "the American support of Israel"
        
       | PopAlongKid wrote:
       | For context, three of the tallest skyscrapers at the time were
       | constructed in Chicago during roughly this same period.[0]
       | (Originally known as the Hancock, Standard Oil, and Sears
       | buildings, since renamed). Chicago was also the second largest
       | U.S. city at the time, and I've often thought that the WTC
       | construction was in part motivated by a sense of civic
       | competition between the two cities.
       | 
       |  _" Of Chicago's five tallest buildings, three were completed
       | within a 5-year span between 1969 and 1974."_
       | 
       | [0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_C..
       | .
        
       | grishka wrote:
       | I'm not an American, I've only ever been to NYC once in 2014, and
       | I was only 8 when 9/11 happened, but somehow, seeing that skyline
       | with those two towers still in it, evokes the feeling of simpler,
       | friendlier times. Even though in the 90s, my own country was
       | going through the troubles of recovering from 70 years of
       | socialism -- it was anything _but_ simpler friendlier times.
        
         | teiferer wrote:
         | Yeah, it was a facade. That facade fell in 2001.
         | 
         | (I'm not saying this was good. It was a terrible tragedy. The
         | attack itself obviously, and then what followed as well.)
        
           | tempestn wrote:
           | I don't know if I'd call it a facade. More of a lull. I was
           | 20 in 2001, and growing up in the 90s it very much felt like
           | we had entered "post-history". Yes, the world wasn't perfect,
           | there was still conflict and social problems, but they were
           | better than at any time in the past, and clearly getting
           | better (along with technology) all the time.
           | 
           | I was slightly too young to really remember the cold war, and
           | my only hazy related memory is positive: the fall of the
           | Berlin wall. So, major geopolitical conflict was a thing of
           | the past.
           | 
           | Of course in reality, 10-15 years of relative peace (and of
           | course there was still regional conflict) and social
           | stability (though of course there were many unaddressed
           | problems) is just a blip, but especially growing up in that
           | era, it didn't feel that way at the time. I think that might
           | be why so many millennial and Gen-x folks feel particularly
           | disillusioned with the state of the world now.
        
             | bamboozled wrote:
             | It's true, the 90s definitely seemed like wildly optimistic
             | times and technology seemed to be unlocking the "common
             | man" in really great ways. I never had the feeling things
             | would go backwards.
        
           | tonymet wrote:
           | it was very real
        
       | mallowdram wrote:
       | Article neglects that the WTC defied NYFD building codes on
       | egress. If the code was applied as existing in 1966, it would
       | require 8 or 9 fireproof staircases. Instead Rockefeller asked
       | for and got a pass and the building instead had three staircases
       | embedded in six layers of drywall, which is far else than the
       | then standard fireproofing (brick encased). Not only that, they
       | had non-standard transit corridors that wove egress routes around
       | the two sky lobbies.
        
         | bamboozled wrote:
         | Honest question , would it have changed much ?
        
           | mallowdram wrote:
           | I suspect so. The case was made in 102 minutes, a NY Times
           | book detailing how 18 people on or above the South Tower's
           | impact zone managed to escape in one of the partially
           | collapsed staircases. Were the stairs built to firecode specs
           | in place in 1966, and not in the flimsy manner expedited by
           | Rockefeller, these stairs would have easily survived intact
           | long enough for many more than 18 to survive.
        
       | gdubs wrote:
       | My parents worked and had most of their friends in Manhattan when
       | I was a little kid -- this was back in the 1980s. I have vivid
       | memories to this day of passing the World Trade Center and being
       | completely overwhelmed by the scale of it.
       | 
       | Most high rises taper, but these towers just went straight up as
       | rectangles. And the effect was almost dizzying. They were just so
       | tall.
       | 
       | I used to love drawing the NYC skyline as a kid -- such an iconic
       | thing. New York used to be much grittier, but I loved the energy
       | of it as a kid. Was an incredible thing to experience.
        
         | sharkweek wrote:
         | I just visited NYC for the first time a few months ago, and had
         | the most amazing time, one hell of a city and I can't wait to
         | get back.
         | 
         | I could ramble for hours about all the things I loved about the
         | trip, but one of the things that stuck out was all the young
         | kids taking the subway by themselves or in small packs of
         | friends out pretty late etc. They all seemed so much more
         | street smart and independent than my own similar aged kids (we
         | live in a quiet neighborhood in Seattle). I also grew up fairly
         | sheltered in the suburbs where I had very little exposure to
         | the "real world" as they say...
         | 
         | I'd be fascinated to hear more about what it's like to grow up
         | in such a massive city.
        
           | mcast wrote:
           | The subway systems is one of the greatest socioeconomic
           | equalizers in NYC. During rush hour, you'll share a subway
           | car with a homeless man, an ER doctor wearing scrubs, a
           | fashion model wearing YSL, a finance bro, and a food delivery
           | worker. It's an amazing city for people watching.
        
       | _0xdd wrote:
       | I remember my grandfather telling me when I was younger that many
       | nice buildings were demolished to make way for the WTC. He worked
       | nearby, so he saw the entire construction from start-to-finish.
        
       | superfunny wrote:
       | I grew up in a small town in New Jersey, about twenty miles west.
       | From the highest point in our town, you could make out the
       | outline of the WTC, far off in the distance.
       | 
       | In 2001, I lived in Chicago, and I took a trip to Italy in
       | September of 2001. I remember flying into Newark airport early
       | that month, and marveling (as I always did) about the New York
       | skyline, including the Empire State Building and the WTC.
       | 
       | I returned eight days later, on the first day that flights
       | resumed after 9/11, and I remember flying into Newark again, and
       | there was still smoking climbing into the air around where the
       | WTC once stood.
        
         | bambax wrote:
         | I visited Manhattan in 1990 and took photos on top of the
         | towers, and also from the Staten Island boat shuttle. I thought
         | then and still think now that those towers looked magnificent.
         | 
         | They should have been rebuilt identically.
        
       | 93po wrote:
       | I looked at interior photos of the towers and those 18 inch wide
       | windows are _terrible_. Did everyone hate those? It 's a tragedy
       | to see such beautiful views outside those windows that look like
       | prison bars.
        
       | buildsjets wrote:
       | The article does not mention it (that I noticed), but the lower
       | floors were occupied and in use before the upper floors were
       | completed. My father was a beat cop in Manhattan in the late 60s
       | and early 70s, he tells me that the construction crew took him up
       | the elevator to a floor where the windows had not yet been
       | installed, while businesses were working in the lower floors.
       | 
       | Dad also bemoaned the loss of Radio Row to build the WTC, as he
       | was a big Ham enthusiast as a kid.
        
       | nixass wrote:
       | Found this sub recently as WTC buildings for some weird reasons
       | fascinate me in rather uncanny way, whether as a 911 event or
       | before that
       | 
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/TwinTowersInPhotos/s/cnyHzBE47C
       | 
       | Some photos form Sun Microsystems offices inside the WTC
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/TwinTowersInPhotos/s/qYMuq6LG4W
        
       | trollbridge wrote:
       | Somehow, the producer of _Godspell_ got permission to film one of
       | their musical dance scenes on top of one of the unfinished
       | towers. A good writeup of how that happened is here:
       | https://ntweblog.blogspot.com/2015/01/godspell-and-construct...
       | 
       | The actual scene from the movie:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QL6d0ASmvfs
       | 
       | The camera work for that was stunning.
        
       | phendrenad2 wrote:
       | I saw a documentary that made the case that the Twin Towers'
       | design was compromised from the beginning. The original design
       | called for pillars at the corners, but the designers wanted open
       | floor plans, so the city could be seen from anywhere in the
       | offices. (Makes me wonder if the terrorists did more research
       | than we would think)
       | 
       | I'm sure there are some civil engineers in here who would just
       | love to weigh in so now I wait. :)
        
         | justonceokay wrote:
         | I hsve a hard time believing the history would be greatly
         | altered if the planes did not cause the buildings to fall.
        
       | prmph wrote:
       | This might be an unpopular opinion, but, apart from that 9/11 was
       | a terrible act, I think the twin towers kind of dominated the NYC
       | skyline in a way that was not good.
       | 
       | By themselves they were impressive, but, jutting out of the
       | ground as they did, without peer, made for a jarring skyline. The
       | fact that they did not taper and were twin made it worse.
       | 
       | The new tower is much better integrated into NYC skyline
       | aesthetically. A shame I did not visit before returning to Ghana
       | a couple of years ago.
        
         | tempestn wrote:
         | Not sure why you're being down voted for an aesthetic opinion
         | for which you gave a logical explanation. I'm not sure whether
         | I agree or not, but the comment seemed fine to me.
        
       | lisbbb wrote:
       | A lot of public works projects and big construction projects were
       | taking place during those years because the economy was not doing
       | well. They were "jobs programs" I guess you could say.
        
       | mauvehaus wrote:
       | The book Men Of Steel is about the company that erected the steel
       | for the towers. It's highly worth reading and it talks at length
       | about some of the challenges in not only the erection of the
       | buildings, but the problems caused by the sheer scale of it.
       | 
       | The four cranes on each tower that you can see in the photos were
       | a scaling up of a proven design and it didn't scale up well. They
       | had tons of problems with them breaking down.
       | 
       | There were also some plans to do automated welding that came to
       | naught. They had to fall back to manual welding after they
       | couldn't get the automated process to work.
        
       | windows2020 wrote:
       | The Twin Towers 2 concept, which is mostly the originals with a
       | few additional floors, would have been a more fitting
       | replacement.
        
       | tukunjil wrote:
       | obl made clear his cz for that attk on his "letter to America"
       | but still America runs by zio lobbyists and funds israel to kill
       | people in medl est and to complete their ethnic cleansig prjct!
       | https://ceu.su/letter_to_america.html
        
       | rossant wrote:
       | I visited New York in 1997 and was fascinated by the Twin Towers.
       | Coming from a mid-sized city in France, they seemed unbelievably
       | tall. We went there, but unfortunately, we weren't allowed to
       | visit because of some construction work. I was quite disappointed
       | and swore to myself that I'd come back another time. Needless to
       | say, that never happened.
        
       | WalterBright wrote:
       | Seeing the pictures just makes me sad.
       | 
       | I remember having a beer in the restaurant at the top in the late
       | 90's. I wish I'd taken some photos.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-10-11 23:00 UTC)