[HN Gopher] Ask HN: What's the best hackable smart TV?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Ask HN: What's the best hackable smart TV?
        
       I want to get a second TV which will more or less be a second
       monitor for my System76 laptop which is plugged into a bunch of
       music equipment, like a korg midi keyboard, and a novation drum
       pad, all of which work great with linux.  I want to buy this TV
       used. I'm seeing a bunch of Samsung, LG, RCA, Sony, etc on Facebook
       Marketplace. What a cesspool Facebook has become, right?  Any
       suggestions on the best brand or even model for that kind of thing?
       I don't really want to battle with a bunch of shit that tries to
       coerce me to install another app from a streaming provider slash
       gambling entrypoint.  I imagine mostly it will just need HDMI to
       work, and all the TVs will support that. But, I thought maybe there
       would be a fun brand that offers interesting other options.
        
       Author : xrd
       Score  : 203 points
       Date   : 2025-10-06 12:42 UTC (4 days ago)
        
       | jqpabc123 wrote:
       | I bought a Hisense model from Costco and set it to "store mode".
       | 
       | For all practical purposes, it is just a dumb HDMI display
       | attached to my computer.
        
         | mongol wrote:
         | What does store mode do?
        
           | elmean wrote:
           | It lobotomizes the TV
        
           | hamdingers wrote:
           | It disables smart features and many of the settings making it
           | more like a dumb HDMI screen.
           | 
           | This may seem like a good thing, but it also usually enables
           | a "vibrant" postprocessing picture mode, motion smoothing,
           | and maximum brightness so the display looks good in a well
           | lit big box store. Unless your viewing environment is similar
           | (or you don't care so much) that's probably not what you
           | want.
        
             | twostorytower wrote:
             | Motion smoothing is awful.
        
               | cheschire wrote:
               | I've always thought this feature might have more
               | potential if more modern deep-learning tech was baked
               | into the video and not just dumb frame interpolation.
               | 
               | I can imagine that there would be a potential to generate
               | interpolated frames that intelligently make fast-moving
               | scenes more understandable while leaving slow-moving
               | scenes more or less at their intended 24 FPS.
               | 
               | Many action movies, especially with close hand-to-hand
               | combat in tight spaces, are difficult to understand
               | visually because 24 FPS just doesn't quite catch the
               | movements.
        
               | somat wrote:
               | It will happen, look at the results they are getting out
               | of the framegen stuff on pc graphics cards. DLSS and
               | friends.
               | 
               | I sort of don't like it(Old man shakes fist at sky "I
               | want my frames to be real") but they are getting amazing
               | results.
        
               | gwbas1c wrote:
               | Depends on the TV. I prefer it off, but on my fancy OLED
               | TV, there is too much "judder" without it on.
        
             | fragmede wrote:
             | It _also_ , in my case, puts up a giant info banner on the
             | screen across the content, about the screen's capabilities,
             | so YMMV.
        
           | jimt1234 wrote:
           | This is interesting to me. I never heard of "store mode". Is
           | that common for "smart TVs" these days? My interest here is
           | for my elderly mother who tries to watch TV, but her current
           | LG is constantly bombarding her with notifications for
           | software updates, recommendations and ads. It's very
           | frustrating for her; it's to the point where she's afraid to
           | turn on the TV.
           | 
           | I want a TV for her that will power-on directly to YouTube-
           | TV, and that's it, nothing else, no notifications, nothing.
        
         | otterley wrote:
         | Are you able to adjust its picture settings when it's in store
         | mode?
        
       | RajT88 wrote:
       | Craigslist an older 1080p TV. People are getting rid of old
       | "dumb" TV's, and sometimes you can get them free. I see seemingly
       | undamaged LCD TV's out by garbage bins all the time. I sourced
       | one such a TV for my wife for $100 a few years ago to use as a
       | monitor - works great. No apps or anything - dumb as they come.
        
         | gruez wrote:
         | You're missing out on resolution (4K) and picture quality (HDR,
         | contrast ratios, color gamut) improvements by doing this.
        
           | PenguinCoder wrote:
           | Good. Some of us don't need or want those things.
        
           | MyOutfitIsVague wrote:
           | My experience with HDR has been pretty abysmal on a $500 4K
           | TV. Badly tuned HDR is way worse than no HDR at all.
           | 
           | I have 20/20 vision, and I really can't tell the difference
           | between 1080p and 4K for video games and movies. I will never
           | do below 4k again on a desktop, but 1080p is more than fine
           | for a TV. Higher framerate makes a far bigger difference than
           | higher resolution for video games too.
        
             | addandsubtract wrote:
             | You can see the difference in 4K when the bitrate is there,
             | but most streaming platforms compress their videos too much
             | for it to be worth it. It's definitely not the jump that
             | 720p to 1080p is, though. I agree with everything else you
             | said.
        
             | yesb wrote:
             | Whether 4k is worth it depends a lot on the size of the TV
             | vs how far away you sit. For a 65" TV, I don't see much
             | difference between 4k/1080p above ~8ft away.
             | 
             | HDR is indeed effectively a marketing gimmick on many cheap
             | TVs. They are getting better though
        
               | MBCook wrote:
               | Also the content being viewed. High bandwidth 1080p can
               | look sharper than over-compressed 4k.
               | 
               | It's why even non-4k BluRays sometimes look better than
               | streaming.
        
           | reaperducer wrote:
           | _You 're missing out on resolution (4K) and picture quality
           | (HDR, contrast ratios, color gamut) improvements by doing
           | this._
           | 
           | Not everyone suffers from FOMO.
           | 
           | I've only seen one movie that was worth the bother and
           | expense of seeing it in 4K (Rear Window).
           | 
           | The rest of the things you mention are mostly for a very
           | small slice of theoretical people with perfect vision in
           | perfectly lit rooms at the perfect height and viewing angle.
           | 
           | Beyond icons on a sticker checklist, they mean nothing to the
           | 99% of people who just want to watch sportsball or eat
           | popcorn while watching Disney films with their kids.
           | 
           | You can put lipstick on a pig, but most people are still
           | watching pigs.
        
             | addandsubtract wrote:
             | Rear Window? A movie from 1954? Can you explain how that
             | was better in 4K when the footage isn't even 4K?
        
               | diggan wrote:
               | If it was shot on film, isn't it possible to get 4K from
               | it? Thought that was old news already.
        
               | hank808 wrote:
               | It was on film, probably 35mm. That film contains more
               | information than 4k video. Resolution is between 4K and
               | 6K.
        
               | MBCook wrote:
               | Plus it's a black & white movie, and b&w film has a
               | higher "resolution" than color too right? Because you're
               | dealing with silver particles instead of physically
               | larger color grains.
               | 
               | Or something like that. Someone more in the know please
               | check my math.
        
               | reaperducer wrote:
               | It's not in black and white.
        
               | stevedh wrote:
               | It was shot in colour. But the rest of the comments in
               | the tree apply.
        
               | MBCook wrote:
               | It seems my memory fails me.
        
               | meatmanek wrote:
               | Obligatory Technology Connections video:
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVpABCxiDaU
        
               | dghlsakjg wrote:
               | The footage is analog (on film). It was shot with 0
               | pixels, so 4k pixels on an edge doesn't matter. Side
               | note, footage itself is a term derived from film (how
               | many feet of film).
               | 
               | You can scan film into whatever digital resolution you
               | want. You could do an 8k scan if you felt like it. You
               | might run into issues where the resolving power of the
               | film is less than the scan, but 4k is not an unreasonable
               | resolution to pull out of well lit studio shot movie
               | stock.
        
             | Larrikin wrote:
             | Pretty sure I read this same comment when the transition
             | from DVD to 1080p/Blu-ray occurred and people were updating
             | their TVs.
        
               | Blackthorn wrote:
               | The difference is the 4k content isn't available like the
               | 1080p content was then. Streaming "4k" is a bad joke with
               | its bitrates.
        
             | carlosjobim wrote:
             | The OP is not asking for a TV to watch TV on, he's asking
             | for a TV to use as a second monitor for his laptop. When it
             | comes to computer interfaces, the difference between 4K and
             | HD is enormous. Especially for text.
        
           | cheschire wrote:
           | HDR is a mixed bag on PCs, and 4K comes at a system
           | performance cost. OP said this was intended to be a monitor.
        
           | Atomic_Torrfisk wrote:
           | Yes, but I think you are missing out on the part where it is
           | close to free. I have a nice monitor for photos and other
           | crap, but most of the shit I do is text. I do not need 4k.
        
           | RajT88 wrote:
           | If I (like my wife) was going to use a TV as a monitor at her
           | desk, I would definitely want a 4k monitor. Up close, that is
           | a video wall, with no need of window scaling.
           | 
           | Such as it is, I use 3x 1080p displays. It's fine for me, and
           | approximates a larger curved super-wide display (while also
           | being cheap). She does just fine with 1080p resolution
           | however - rarely has more than 2-3 windows on screen at a
           | time.
        
         | shayway wrote:
         | Be warned, 'seemingly' is a key word there. I have picked up
         | eight TVs up from alleys over the past few years and each has
         | had a broken screen only visible when plugged in. I have no
         | idea how people are breaking so many TVs.
        
           | RajT88 wrote:
           | I can help: Children.
           | 
           | I can remember when the Nintendo Wii came out, and people I
           | know were damaging things when the remotes would go flying.
           | It's like the Wii release every day in a house with kids. My
           | brother-in-law is on their third TV in 5 years.
        
       | gdulli wrote:
       | What does hackable mean in this context, and what's the downside
       | of any old smart TV not connected to the internet and the input
       | left on your laptop, where you'd never see anything having to
       | with the manufacturer's app OS?
        
         | MisterTea wrote:
         | Most TV's today are actually giant Android computers. I opened
         | a friends TV a few years back to try and examine a back light
         | issue and to my surprise there were just 3 small PCB's in the
         | TV: Power supply, LCD driver/interface, and the video input
         | board that contains an Arm SoC. The PSU had a small harness
         | that ran to the other two boards and the SoC board had a ribbon
         | cable to the LCD panel.
         | 
         | The Arm SoC is the real interesting part here as it also has
         | WiFi and Blue Tooth interface, Ethernet, and USB port(s).
         | They're like a giant black box Raspberry Pi. If we could get
         | our hands on the SoC datasheet then its possible we could flash
         | that SoC to run whatever OS we want and actually have a Smart
         | TV instead of a spyware and malware vector. Though I am sure no
         | TV maker would ever let the plebs disable their money making
         | spying and data exfiltration schemes.
        
           | gruez wrote:
           | >If we could get our hands on the SoC datasheet then its
           | possible we could flash that SoC to run whatever OS we want
           | and actually have a Smart TV instead of a spyware and malware
           | vector
           | 
           | Surely it's more straightforward to buy a SBC yourself and
           | plug that into your TV? Even if you could flash it, dealing
           | with random SoC/hardware seems not worth the hassle compared
           | to shelling out $50-200 for a SBC that you picked and can be
           | carried between TVs? Flashing third party ROMs like lineageos
           | makes sense because there's no real alternative for
           | smartphone hardware, but the same isn't true for smart TVs.
        
             | MisterTea wrote:
             | > Surely it's more straightforward to buy a SBC yourself
             | and plug that into your TV?
             | 
             | Of course it is. Though my point is we already have the
             | hardware in the TV and it would be awesome to actually use
             | it the way we want to use it. Also, I have two dumb TV's,
             | each with a small PC hooked to it and they haven't moved in
             | years.
        
       | trenchpilgrim wrote:
       | You probably want a computer monitor rather than a TV; monitors
       | will prioritize latency which is important for music production.
        
         | wintermutestwin wrote:
         | Huh? You are confusing video refresh rate with audio latency.
        
           | trenchpilgrim wrote:
           | Does the stuff on the screen not need to also be low latency
           | when recording live instruments?
        
             | wintermutestwin wrote:
             | Irrelevant.
        
         | nomel wrote:
         | Related, many modern TVs have "game mode" which prioritizes
         | video latency, with the loss of some of the algs being
         | available.
         | 
         | RTINGS actually tracks this, with most being comparable to
         | monitors at the same refresh rate, while in game mode (around
         | 10x faster than non-game mode). [1]
         | 
         | 4k@120Hz with VRR is even available in < $1k TVs these days!
         | 
         | And, for audio latency, unless you're using the built in
         | speakers, it's fairly trivial to make the video and audio paths
         | independent.
         | 
         | [1] https://www.rtings.com/tv/tests/inputs/input-lag
        
       | IlikeKitties wrote:
       | What you are looking for is a digital signage display and some
       | android tv box
        
         | hmokiguess wrote:
         | this should be more upvoted, could even bundle them in a grid-
         | like view and have multiple streams
        
       | gosub100 wrote:
       | I think Tizen lets you write your own apps. I know I installed
       | Emby on one of the very cheap smart tvs recently and had to
       | install it via developer mode and pull in the package by typing
       | the IP of my laptop into the TV (maybe vice versa).
       | 
       | I didn't write the code but it seemed like you can get a
       | development account from Tizen and write your own apps.
       | 
       | To be clear, Tizen is not a brand of TV, it's the name of the OS.
       | It's fairly common on various no-name hardware brand, check it
       | out.
        
       | colangelod wrote:
       | If you just want it for the HDMI input to use as an aux screen
       | for what ever computer your running than anything with an HDMI
       | input in the size range you want should work. I run all the TV's
       | in my house like this; connected to mac mini's instead of futzing
       | with the onboard software mostly because I despise typing one
       | letter at a time with a tv remote.
       | 
       | Honestly all the onboard TV OS stuff I have interacted with in
       | the last decade has been more or less terrible and I wouldn't
       | even consider it when buying a TV especially one that is just
       | going to be a screen. All of the recent installs Ive dealt with
       | (family and friend support) has revealed a ton of pay-to-play
       | features (Samsung frame tv's cough cough). I applaud you for
       | wanting something neat but I cant say Ive come across anything
       | Ive ever actually wanted to use beyond "select input -> HDMI1"...
        
         | patrickk wrote:
         | This, this, this.
         | 
         | Just never, ever connect the TV to the internet. Connect up an
         | Nvidia shield, or a mini-PC/raspberry pi configured with
         | whatever apps you desire, hidden behind a pi-hole. Connect a
         | steam deck if gaming/linux desktop usage is your thing. I only
         | touch the TV remote to switch on the TV, and even that could be
         | automatable with home assistant+CEC if that's of interest.
        
           | dn3500 wrote:
           | I had a TV once, can't remember the brand, that refused to
           | stream from my dlna server unless it could contact its own
           | corporate servers over the internet first.
        
         | foobarian wrote:
         | Unfortunately the family likes live TV, and that is very hard
         | to get without compromising the UX.
        
           | horsawlarway wrote:
           | OTA TV Tuners fill this niche.
           | 
           | It's been a bit since I've done this (I'm not watching live
           | TV anymore), but something like HDHomeRun worked fine.
           | 
           | It basically pairs an antenna with a small computer to
           | convert to network traffic, then gives you an app on your
           | streaming device to play it back.
           | 
           | You do need to be able to run the vendor's app, and you'll
           | get stuck with that UI for live tv (So yeah - totally agree
           | that you're compromising the UX). But still no reliance on
           | the "smarts" built into the tv.
        
             | beala wrote:
             | I have an HDHomeRun box and use it through Plex. I've never
             | installed the HDHomeRun software. Plex immediately
             | recognized it as soon as I plugged it in. There is a
             | noticeable amount of latency between selecting a channel
             | and starting the stream, so channel surfing is pretty
             | cumbersome, but I almost never do that. With the paid
             | version of Plex (Plex Pass), you also get DVR support which
             | automatically removes commercials from the recording, so
             | that's pretty much the only way I use it.
        
         | horsawlarway wrote:
         | Yup.
         | 
         | You generally don't want a smart tv you can hack. You want a
         | decent computer you own sending signal through the external
         | inputs.
         | 
         | The SBC in the TV is, hands down across basically every "smart"
         | TV I've interacted with, a cheap piece of crap (even well into
         | the "expensive" brands and models).
         | 
         | Manufacturers stick the absolute cheapest garbage in there that
         | can output the advertised resolution during playback without
         | stuttering.
         | 
         | So you can spend hours/days/week wrestling this cheap,
         | underpowered board back from the manufacturer... or you can
         | just side-step it entirely and spend much less time and effort
         | sticking a decent computer you own behind the tv.
        
         | joshstrange wrote:
         | This!
         | 
         | All my TVs have an Apple TV on them and that's all that is used
         | (aside from a game console here and there). I pretty much never
         | need to interact with the TV OS. Is there a Netflix app on my
         | TV? Probably, I'll never know, I've never even launched the app
         | store.
        
       | Xelbair wrote:
       | Any that you can put in store mode, and run all smart features
       | off separate device.
       | 
       | Otherwise it will run out of updates fast, services will stop
       | working and only way to fix that is to buy.. a separate device.
       | 
       | This also let's you make search easier as you can just look at
       | the panel itself when comparing.
        
       | bestouff wrote:
       | Any smart TV where some hacker could install its own build of the
       | OS ? Kinda like LineageOS for smart TV ?
        
         | yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
         | Not per se a TV, but it is worth pointing out that LineageOS
         | literally has builds for some set top boxes; if I go to
         | https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/ and filter to device type >
         | set top box, then it lists 7 options.
        
       | th0rine wrote:
       | Older LG sets (tested on C9 OLED) had security vulnerabilities
       | you could use to root your TV and then do "??????" you wanted
       | with them. WebOS as a platform causes a lot of unproductive
       | discussion surrounding it's ecosystem and such but if you want to
       | "hack" or actually have a shell on your TV it's great for that to
       | do anything else you want. Personal favorites include changing
       | the default screensaver behavior to the bouncing DVD logo,
       | running Chocolate Doom, and a port of Space Cadet pinball
       | natively. More info here - https://rootmy.tv/
        
       | tamimio wrote:
       | I ditched the whole smart TV years ago. I was never a fan of the
       | slow, ad-ridden software, and later found that enormous packets
       | were being sent when I monitored the DNS at the network level
       | despite the TV being 'turned off'. Instead, I got a non-smart TV
       | (you can find old Sony TVs) and attached a TV box or direct hdmi
       | to an old laptop instead, far smoother and better at all levels.
        
       | hamdingers wrote:
       | For "fun and interesting" consider an LG WebOS TV. Many can be
       | rooted[1] which allows installing a homebrew channel[2] of
       | unauthorized apps or writing your own.
       | 
       | I initially did it for Jellyfin before they made it into the
       | official app store, but the Moonlight game streaming app has
       | unlocked many hours of entertainment.
       | 
       | 1. https://cani.rootmy.tv
       | 
       | 2. https://www.webosbrew.org/
        
         | postexitus wrote:
         | Only older models that have not been upgraded to latest webos.
        
         | A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 wrote:
         | Can confirm and will add that depending on what model you get,
         | webos UI is a breath of fresh air compared to other
         | heavyweights ( like samsung ).
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | Moonlight is really fantastic. It's worked better than Geforce
         | Now for me. Amazon's thing worked best, but they don't have as
         | many games as my Steam does.
        
           | diggan wrote:
           | Are you using it over Ethernet or WiFi? I remember I tried
           | Moonlight to a local computer two or three years ago over
           | Ethernet and the latency was still too bad, any ideas if
           | that's better today?
        
             | stavros wrote:
             | It goes gaming desktop PC -> ethernet -> fiber -> 5g ->
             | wifi -> Amazon Fire stick at a flat 100km away from the PC,
             | and I still finished Expedition 33 on it with no problems.
             | 
             | I'd say definitely give it another go.
        
             | doublerabbit wrote:
             | Moonlight works flawlessly for me and I use FreeBSD as a
             | daily driver. Of all OSes to play games.
             | 
             | UnRaid + KVM VM + GPU Passthrough with Moonlight has meant
             | I no longer have to dual boot to game.
             | 
             | 60FPS at 1080p on a 4k screen. 4k struggles but I think
             | that's more my GPU then anything else. I do have 2x of
             | them.
        
               | VoidWhisperer wrote:
               | I'm assuming you don't play many games with anticheat
               | though since they'd flag it running in a VM
        
             | mrandish wrote:
             | If you were using a TV streaming stick, many have slow
             | Ethernet due to slow port (Micro-USB), slow PHY hardware
             | (100 mbps) or slow network stack. For the popular streaming
             | apps they only need 25 mbps max, so most stick makers put
             | no effort into design or validation testing beyond that
             | minimal use case. And they don't care about latency.
             | 
             | I use Moonlight via direct 1 gbps Ethernet from a high-end
             | gaming PC in the same house through a Google Chromecast 4K
             | HDMI dongle with a powered USB-C hub for the RJ-45 input
             | and it works flawlessly at 60 fps 4K 10-bit HDR with around
             | 12 ms video latency. Some USB 3 hubs and USB Ethernet
             | dongles won't reach full speeds on some streaming devices
             | USB ports. The second one I tried worked at full 1 gbps.
             | 
             | You have to verify every software and hardware component in
             | the chain is working at high-speed/low latency in your
             | environment with a local speed test hosted on your source
             | machine. I used self-hosted OpenSpeedTest. Moonlight works
             | great but none of the consumer streaming stick or USB
             | hub/RJ-45 dongles test for high speed/low latency across
             | dozens of different device port hardware/firmware combos -
             | so you can't trust claimed specs. Assume it's slow until
             | you verify it's not.
        
           | zdware wrote:
           | Moonlight is great, but be careful about overestimating how
           | fast video decoding is. I would get 10-40ms additional
           | latency, jitter doing moonlight from tv, vs running it on
           | Linux on my mini PC homelab hooked up to the TV, my
           | decoding/network latency was like 1-2ms for a frame
        
             | stavros wrote:
             | Yes, of course, I wouldn't play a game that requires fast
             | reactions over Moonlight, but 40ms won't ruin the
             | experience for most games.
        
         | andrepd wrote:
         | Unfortunately it still spies on you if you connect to the web
         | :S
         | 
         | I guess you can mitigate that if you use something like a pi-
         | hole? I do wish there was a solution using root/devmode to
         | block ads (or better yet, run in whitelist mode!).
        
           | hamdingers wrote:
           | You're correct on all points.
           | 
           | However, if you do have an pihole/adguard home, this list
           | does get rid of all the ads: https://gist.github.com/d4kine/b
           | 2458cc9d693d7d36193be0247094...
        
             | andrepd wrote:
             | Hmm but I'm skeptical. All it takes is an update and the
             | list is no longer relevant. And there's no guarantee that
             | data isn't passed anyways through the domains that are not
             | blocked.
             | 
             | Still, would love an "opensnitch" in whitelist mode for my
             | TV!
        
         | bryceacc wrote:
         | This is also the coolest thing you can do for a rooted webOS
         | tv:
         | 
         | https://github.com/satgit62/How-to-Install-and-set-up-Ambili...
         | 
         | doesn't need to go through another device to capture the HDMI,
         | it's built right in!
        
           | Retr0id wrote:
           | Second-coolest has got to be
           | https://repo.webosbrew.org/apps/org.webosbrew.custom-
           | screens... ("Bouncing DVD logo" screensaver)
        
           | bsimpson wrote:
           | I had a spare pair of Hue lights that I mounted behind my
           | Android TV. Bummer I can't use Hue Sync on built-in streaming
           | apps.
           | 
           | Only time they get used is when I'm playing Fortnite. I had
           | Huenicorn set up for NixOS, but I haven't bothered trying
           | again in SteamOS.
        
         | jp191919 wrote:
         | Great..... another rabbit hole to go down. I have an LG CX and
         | I never knew I could root it. Glad I never gave it internet
         | access.
        
       | MisterTea wrote:
       | I mentioned in another post here that I opened a friends TV and
       | found just 3 PCB's: Power, LCD interface, and Video SoC. The
       | video SoC is an Arm SoC for TVs that runs Android complete with
       | video input switching matrix and processing. The SoC board had
       | Wifi, bluetooth, Ethernet and USB. It's all there.
       | 
       | My dream is to hack that SoC to boot whatever OS. Though good
       | luck getting the datasheets...
        
       | bombcar wrote:
       | A Vizio without accepting the agreement is a fine hdmi TV.
        
       | alprado50 wrote:
       | Im using a 43 inch samsung tv as a monitor. It works fine as long
       | as you never conect it to internet.
        
       | Rucadi wrote:
       | I compiled/ported the mario64 port to the LG TV quite easily, so
       | I would say that LGTV is the best for that.
        
       | bitwize wrote:
       | A dumb TV with an x86 HTPC attached to the back via VESA bracket.
       | Sceptre dumb TVs from the Wal-Mart web site are your cheat code.
        
         | AstroJetson wrote:
         | Winner!! I have a pair of these that have multiple HDMI ports.
         | So my "hacking" is hanging a raspberry pi or a x86 computer.
        
       | black_dog_irish wrote:
       | https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2022/tv-thats-not-necs-pi-...
        
       | newsclues wrote:
       | I wish there were more modular tvs like this
       | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-epPf7D8oMk
        
       | matt_heimer wrote:
       | I have Sony Bravia TV that has Android TV so I went looking for
       | the docs to confirm you can enable developer mode, access adb,
       | and sideload apps. While looking at the docs I discovered I can
       | load HTML5 apps from USB! I never knew that but I'm going to do
       | some experimentation in the near future.
       | 
       | https://pro-bravia.sony.net/develop/app/getting-started/inde...
        
         | imp0cat wrote:
         | There is also a Sony Bravia integration for Home Assistant
         | (using the REST API that's in almost all Bravia TVs).
         | 
         | https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/braviatv/
        
           | slipperybeluga wrote:
           | YMMV. it's never worked well for me. works great for the
           | first week, then it stops connecting or i suddenly have
           | several zombie bravia devices, all of which aren't connected.
        
         | slipperybeluga wrote:
         | best thing i ever did with my bravia was install a custom
         | launcher via adb to finally rid myself of the endless ads,
         | upsetting news, and terrible suggestions constantly shoved in
         | my face without my consent. nice to be able to uninstall the
         | misc bloat that you can't get to with the gui and just have a
         | simple interface. all i want is to access jellyfin and maybe
         | one or two other apps. much better all around experience now.
         | 
         | here's a nice reference for a lot of the stuff installed on
         | bravia that you can elect to remove via adb:
         | 
         | https://github.com/therealhoodboy/skinny-bravia
        
         | cosmic_cheese wrote:
         | It's difficult to do better than Sony for an Android TV. Their
         | Android build is one of the most junk-free out there. The newer
         | ones can also use their internal speakers as a center channel
         | when external stereo speakers are hooked up (giving dialogue a
         | boost) which is pretty cool.
         | 
         | I use mine as a dumb TV but the built-in smarts are
         | serviceable.
        
       | paulgerhardt wrote:
       | Do recommend the LG C series (C5 or C4 are new or the C1 series
       | if you want a deal on classifieds - same hardware as the higher
       | end models but needs a firmware bit flip). The OS is very
       | rootable and it makes a great TV that doubles as a monitor.
       | Supports free sync / g-sync. OLED is nice at this scale.
       | 
       | Text is very readable, refresh rate is good. It uses the same
       | panels as the fancier G series in the larger sizes. One can root
       | the firmware to make it go brighter. (Though this is screen works
       | well in medium or dimly lit rooms. It does not shine in very
       | bright rooms).
       | 
       | Plenty of YouTube videos singing the C series praises as a TV /
       | Monitor.[1] LG webOS is also trivial/friendly to root in
       | developer mode and network control of the tv is a nice to have.
       | 
       | Would avoid Samsung. I love the matte on the Frame and the design
       | of the Serif but the OS is frustrating / impractical to root.
       | 
       | [1] https://youtu.be/Qtve0u3GJ9Y
        
         | xer0x wrote:
         | Thanks that's great to know! I've got one to tinker with.
        
         | zeusk wrote:
         | > same hardware as the higher end models but needs a firmware
         | bit flip
         | 
         | Is this firmware bit flip known? couldn't find anything off
         | google.
        
           | DavideNL wrote:
           | https://cani.rootmy.tv/
        
             | conradev wrote:
             | This is incredible. I had no idea that there is a Homebrew
             | channel!
        
         | mmastrac wrote:
         | I am curious if the Cx series has the same issue as my B2 where
         | Dolby Vision (Atmos?) seems to kill the video processing
         | circuitry and requires me to power-cycle it.
         | 
         | Apparently the only fix is to disable it in your source, but it
         | works like 75% of the time and I'd hate to lose the excellent
         | picture quality of Netflix and YouTube via Google TV.
        
           | tracker1 wrote:
           | Worth trying are a different cable, and maybe a different
           | source depending on your setup... my previous AVR had pretty
           | consistent issues against my TV that I constantly had to soft
           | power off and on to work around, it only happened when using
           | the ARC port. On another setup, it turned out to be an issue
           | with the cable.
           | 
           | YMMV.
        
             | mmastrac wrote:
             | Unfortunately the Google TV is direct attach, no cable.
        
           | lossolo wrote:
           | I have CX, works without issues here. I'm watching raw .mkv
           | and .mp4 files with DV, HDR and Atmos.
        
         | whalesalad wrote:
         | I have a C2 OLED and it is a really nice TV. I've never
         | connected it to the internet or tried to root it though. It
         | behaves as a simple no-frills display.
        
         | michalf6 wrote:
         | I was looking for a 40-43in 4K TV for PC monitor use,
         | considered the LG C series, but it wouldn't work in my bright
         | room.
         | 
         | I went with Samsung QN90C instead and I'm super happy with it.
         | It's very bright, fights glare well, and there's Jellyfin for
         | it.
        
         | dsp_person wrote:
         | all the methods to root have been patched in the latest webos
         | version :(
        
           | tgtweak wrote:
           | Even the USB key .mp3 homebrew?
        
         | kelthuzad wrote:
         | I bought the Samsung Frame TV and I love it, but you're correct
         | about Samsung's OS (it's sluggish, filled with ADs and by far
         | the worst TV OS that I've used so far)
        
           | batrat wrote:
           | Ads? I thought HN crowd already know how to use a pihole or
           | at least adguard dns. I got Samsung TV's in every room
           | because they are easy to use with a Galaxy phone, using it as
           | a remote and a keyboard. Also wireless DEX is soooo
           | underrated. Want a specific app on tv? no problem. I'm
           | basically using them as displays for my phone.
        
           | BozeWolf wrote:
           | Contrary experience from me: i hate my samsung frame,
           | especially because of the ads. And more especially because of
           | that samsung tv channel which autostarts. And I hate it even
           | more because these ads change the menu in such a way that you
           | cannot navigate it blindly because it inserts itself as a
           | button mid way in the menu bar. You cannot disable or disable
           | those things easily. Built in airplay is unstable.
           | 
           | Bought and connected an apple tv, always switch on the tv
           | with that. Most problems solved.
        
         | iguessthislldo wrote:
         | I have one of them (don't remember which number) and OLED part
         | is very nice. I haven't done anything with the TV itself, but I
         | forked an old library
         | (https://github.com/iguessthislldo/libLGTV_serial) to control
         | it remotely through serial and Home Assistant without
         | connecting it to my WiFi. I originally set this up for a much
         | older 1080p LG TV, and was able to use it with a newer one with
         | a few modifications.
         | 
         | edit: Apparently I specially have C3PUA according to the model
         | data I added. Also if anyone is interested in this, I can
         | update the README because I didn't change it after I forked it.
        
         | esperent wrote:
         | > same hardware as the higher end models but needs a firmware
         | bit flip
         | 
         | I have a C1, and I got the technician's remote to try this. But
         | it didn't work in my case - it seems that only some of them use
         | the same hardware, probably based on supply chain needs. Still
         | though, amazing screen. Takes a bit messing around with picture
         | settings (there's some good guides online) but I've never found
         | the "TV" parts to get in the way, just connected it via HDMI,
         | put it in PC mode, disable wifi, and it's good to go. I guess
         | I've been using it around 4 years now.
         | 
         | The only serious issue is the shininess of the screen. It's not
         | terrible but I did have to rearrange my office a bit to make
         | sure it wasn't facing a window.
        
         | kjkjadksj wrote:
         | How much pause should oled burn in give you though? Both from
         | the buying used perspective and using as a secondary monitor
         | where there might be fixed ui elements?
        
         | zdware wrote:
         | ++ for the LG homebrew community. The homebrew store literally
         | has an app now that will auto refresh your dev token so your TV
         | doesn't go out of devmode and uninstall all of your home brew.
         | Used to have to setup a cron job to renew/refresh dev mode.
        
           | matheusmoreira wrote:
           | Is rooting just for homebrew or can I get rid of all the
           | advertising and dark patterns?
        
             | technothrasher wrote:
             | Pi-hole gets rid of a lot of the advertising, and homebrew
             | gets you an ad-free YouTube client, but dark patterns are
             | still there.
        
         | rcarmo wrote:
         | I second this simply because LG is the least evil of all smart
         | TV manufacturers _and_ has the best panels and (usually)
         | connectivity.
        
           | bsimpson wrote:
           | I think LG made the 5K iMac panels.
        
           | IshKebab wrote:
           | Less evil than Sony? I have an LG TV. I can't recommend it
           | purely because they have the audacity to omit a play/pause
           | button from the remote control. Pausing requires pressing the
           | "centre" button one, two _or three_ times depending on which
           | app you are in. Pure insanity.
           | 
           | WebOS is trash too.
           | 
           | Probably going to buy a Sony next time.
        
         | aljgz wrote:
         | I Second avoiding Samsung. I had an LG, had to let it go to my
         | ex, and got a Samsung because the rtings said it has a better
         | color space coverage. The quality in the out of box experience
         | is day and night. Samsung does every trick to take you to the
         | homepage to show you ads. Even when using as a monitor, will
         | analyse your content and phone home to use in showing you more
         | "relevant" ads. I disconnected it from the rest of the world
         | completely. If I could sell it for 70% of the price, I would,
         | and would get an LG again.
        
         | baby_souffle wrote:
         | Another +1 for LG but it's worth mentioning that there are a
         | few things that a TV firmware does that you don't necessarily
         | want in a Monitor. Simple example: most TVs will stay on
         | _forever_ with the "no signal" image bouncing around... but a
         | proper monitor will interpret that as a sign that the PC has
         | gone to sleep so the monitor should, too.
         | 
         | I have not looked into hacking the firmware to change this
         | behavior but if there's a "custom rom" out there that can do
         | this, I'd appreciate a link!
         | 
         | One of the best things about LG in general is their serial
         | port. It's hit/miss which of their models will have it exposed
         | on the back, but if yours does, the protocol is well documented
         | and is very simple.
         | 
         | My LG TV (used as a monitor) is really chatty on the network
         | and so I keep it disconnected so I don't get periodic
         | interruptions from little overlays telling me that $someApp has
         | been updated and needs me to agree to new terms (yes, really!).
         | 
         | To re-gain remote control for automation, I use the serial
         | port. I have an ESP32 connected to a mmWave sensor for active
         | "at desk?" detection. This is integrated with Home Assistant
         | which knows which PC my KVM is pointing to and if it's on or
         | not. This lets me re-implement basic "if not at desk and no PC
         | is on, put the display to sleep" automation.
         | 
         | My biggest complaint is more of an ecosystem issue; why is
         | DisplayPort not common on TVs? Because this TV-As-A-Monitor is
         | HDMI only, my KVM has to be HDMI and so does every PC that's
         | hooked up. Would have been a lot nicer if the whole chain could
         | be display port :/.
        
       | WorldPeas wrote:
       | I use a NEC OPS module tv I got on facebook marketplace as a
       | digital signage monitor. Best purchase I've made yet, though I
       | will admit the feet for it being 200 dollars was quite a shock
       | (they're made out of steel and about 2 feet long each so it makes
       | sense) completely dumb tv, takes all inputs from HDMI to
       | component and has features like auto-sleep without any real
       | smarts inside. I love it.
        
       | Gualdrapo wrote:
       | I long for a Framework-like TV.
        
         | cheeze wrote:
         | Can you expand here? What are you looking for in specific?
         | 
         | I think I have a framework-like TV. It's a high end TV set to
         | store mode which has no smartOS annoyances. From there, I have
         | expansion modules (they connect via HDMI) like a HDFury Vertex
         | with CFW, Nvidia Shield, PS5, etc.
         | 
         | Decoupling the TV from the OS has helped a ton with longetivity
         | 
         | What more are you looking for?
        
       | chatmasta wrote:
       | Why does it need to be a TV? Why not a monitor? I don't know why
       | we even differentiate between the two of them these days...
       | basically the only difference is that a TV might have an IR
       | receiver for a remote.
       | 
       | I'd go with a basic monitor and factor out the "smart TV" into
       | whatever device you prefer - Apple TV, Chromecast, Firestick, any
       | SBC with Kodi loaded onto it... an Xbox... why couple the smart
       | features to the display?
        
         | dreamcompiler wrote:
         | TVs are much cheaper than monitors. They are produced in larger
         | numbers and their lower price is enabled by spying and
         | advertising.
        
           | atmanactive wrote:
           | Agree, but also, much worse image quality. Put a, for example
           | 32" TV and a monitor one next to each other, set native
           | resolution, put up a screen with a lot of text, and you'll
           | see - the difference is night and day.
        
             | andsoitis wrote:
             | TV panels optimize for viewing video (including subtitles)
             | NOT for text-intensive work.
             | 
             | So you find that TV panels are much larger at lower price
             | points than computer monitors because they serve different
             | purposes.
        
             | Kon5ole wrote:
             | >Agree, but also, much worse image quality.
             | 
             | I managed to grab a 55" 8K LG before 8K went out of
             | fashion. I run it at 4k120 for games and 8k60 with doubling
             | for productivity.
             | 
             | I've never had a better monitor and if one should exist
             | it's not available in any store I know about. Monitors
             | costing 2-3x as much as this TV did back then are worse.
             | When it dies I will have to downgrade. :-/
        
         | robertakarobin wrote:
         | I had the same thought but found there are very few TV-size
         | monitors on the market, and the ones there are cost an arm and
         | a leg. There are also very few "dumb" TVs -- we finally got one
         | by Insignia, Best Buy's store brand, which has been fine. If
         | someone knows a better alternative please let me know!
         | 
         | Worth clarifying that when I was a kid "TV-size" meant anything
         | above 13", but the times have changed considerably. :)
        
         | whitehexagon wrote:
         | I bought a decent 4k monitor to go with my 4k media box, and
         | the required 4k cable, but wouldnt play because 'for your
         | safety, blocked because not a TV' or some such nonsense, think
         | it was HDCP? Annoying enough for me to cancel 4k paid tv, plus
         | they were busy agressively reducing the broadcast bitrate. Also
         | ended up with a load of bluray 4k discs I cant use, and they
         | wonder why people download stuff.
        
         | raffraffraff wrote:
         | I got a nice Philips Evnia 43" OLED monitor. 12 years belt
         | that, I bought a 42" 1080p LG monitor. Monitors all the way.
        
         | dec0dedab0de wrote:
         | Because I need to be able to plug in an antenna to watch
         | football
        
         | palata wrote:
         | > Apple TV, Chromecast, Firestick
         | 
         | Those are not exactly hackable, are they?
        
       | yetanother-1 wrote:
       | Side question: what TV is best for integration into home
       | assistant from experienced HA users...
        
         | joshstrange wrote:
         | I think Samsung TVs can be interacted with through HA's
         | SmartThings integration but I don't use that at all. Instead I
         | have my Harmony Hubs (yes, a dying breed, literally) connected
         | and that's the only way I interact with my TVs via HA.
         | 
         | "Alexa, turn on Living Room TV" -> HA -> Harmony -> IR Blaster
         | 
         | I think through the Apple TV integration I can control them
         | even further but I greatly prefer just using the Harmony
         | remote. I'm not looking forward to the day when those stop
         | working completely and I have to evaluate other options. Every
         | year or so I look around but nothing beats my old Harmony
         | remote (with a coin battery that lasts so long I've lost track,
         | easily over a year) and the Harmony Hub (which actually sends
         | out the signals).
        
       | j45 wrote:
       | I've generally heard LG is the place to start looking, only
       | because they are the inheritors of the hidden jewel that was/is
       | webOS.
        
       | finnlab wrote:
       | I can recommend The LG B2, great panel, great price. The software
       | sucks however but you won't find OLED much cheaper.
        
       | warmwaffles wrote:
       | A dumb TV like a Sceptre with a smart hackable device.
        
       | puskavi wrote:
       | You could score some insane screens from recycling centers, but
       | at least in Finland, its fucking illegal to repurpose (steal)
       | "electronic waste" However, depending where you're located, all
       | that stuff might go to somewhere else than smasher and smelter,
       | so please check such places around you! Good example is
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbqOvBHVpbw ,he found old tobacco
       | ad display (ips!) for cheap!
        
       | boydYVR wrote:
       | I have a 10yr old Insignia 1080p TV. One of the 3 HDMI inputs is
       | a Roku stick and I have Home Assistant watch for it and load the
       | Jellyfin app whenever the TV gets turned on. Works most of the
       | time and it's nice to avoid the Roku ads.
        
       | palata wrote:
       | I always wonder if there is a kind of AOSP-based alternative to
       | Android for TV?
        
       | palata wrote:
       | I actually would like to have a hackable AOSP device with some
       | kind of open source chromecast (because chromecast comes with the
       | Google Services, I guess?).
       | 
       | Then I can plug that into any dumb TV/beamer I find.
        
       | KaiserPro wrote:
       | Dpeends what your after, but a second hand NEC multisync, which
       | has an ST slot
       | https://www.sharpnecdisplays.eu/p/download/cp/Products/Optio...
       | 
       | but that might be a bit too basic. because its basically a
       | monitor with 100% duty cycle and a PC.
        
       | psyclobe wrote:
       | Stay away from lg, anything with android is a good choice; custom
       | launchers to remove the gif damn Home Screen. I stick to Sonys my
       | one of tv is so terrible will never buy one again.
        
       | serf wrote:
       | I kind of hate smart TVs -- my family got a Samsung one that got
       | feature obsoleted in _months_ , but I needed a cctv kiosk -- I
       | bought a fire stick and the cheapest +speakers monitor on amazon
       | with an HDMI port and USB power, was pleasantly surprised; 4k,
       | tiny, performant, adb access isn 't fucked up, and you can change
       | the home screen.
       | 
       | By the end of the day it's just an android device with an HDMI
       | out, and that's exactly what I wanted.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-10-10 23:00 UTC)