[HN Gopher] The Answer (1954)
___________________________________________________________________
The Answer (1954)
Author : dash2
Score : 21 points
Date : 2025-10-02 18:13 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (sfshortstories.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (sfshortstories.com)
| dash2 wrote:
| Direct link:
| https://archive.org/details/angelsspaceships0000fred/page/36...
| dooglius wrote:
| The review is only a little shorter than the story!
| ajkjk wrote:
| I think if a story gives you a sense of wonder when you're young,
| it's a good story, even if it seems cheesy later. Probably the
| reason it doesn't later is that you saw so many things like that
| when you were young and they don't surprise you anymore.
| antisthenes wrote:
| I agree.
|
| I would give anything to feel a sense of wonder that I used to
| get when reading sci-fi in my youth.
|
| But "can't enter the same river twice" and all that.
| xmprt wrote:
| Who's writing good scifi these days which evoke that same
| sense of wonder? Project Hail Mary was a fun read but felt a
| bit too in the weeds with the details.
| bobbiechen wrote:
| Gotta be Ted Chiang. Try his short story collection titled
| Exhalation: Stories.
| joblessjunkie wrote:
| Reminds me quite a bit of Asimov's "The Last Question", which
| mines the same "computer-as-God" vein, is also very short, and
| has a suspiciously related title. Asimov's story appeared in
| 1956, just two years later.
| gjm11 wrote:
| My exact thought process on seeing the title here: "Ah,
| 'insufficient data for meaningful answer'. No, wait, that one's
| called 'The Last Question'. So perhaps it's 'There is _now_ '."
| :-)
|
| (Asimov's is better. Also, the version of this one in my memory
| is better than the actual story, in that "There is _now_ " is
| better than the rather clunky equivalent in the story. I
| suppose it's possible that I'm remembering a different,
| slightly better written, story with the exact same idea.)
| Animats wrote:
| It's the same story as "Company Man", posted here yesterday. But
| it was a new idea when Asimov wrote it.
| dredmorbius wrote:
| <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45443298>
| rbanffy wrote:
| You might call it weak and gimmicky all you want, but it
| entrenched itself deeply into our collective imagination.
|
| I saw many people come up independently with a direct quote from
| this story when they saw the IBM promotional image of a man
| standing in front of an IBM Quantum System One machine.
|
| The image: https://www.techmonitor.ai/wp-
| content/uploads/sites/29/2023/...
| imglorp wrote:
| I think humans are weak and prone to leaping on gimmicks and
| extrapolating with limited information to wherever their
| imagination takes them.
|
| If shown a dazzling, mysterious, $10m glass cube draped with
| all that hyperbolic "quantum future wow!!" marketing,
| ordinarily smart people will leap to anything. In reality, QC
| doesn't seem to have a ton of applications yet.
| satisfice wrote:
| See Arthur C. Clark, Nine Billion Names of God, from 1953
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-10-02 23:00 UTC)