[HN Gopher] BrowserPod: In-browser full-stack environments for I...
___________________________________________________________________
BrowserPod: In-browser full-stack environments for IDEs and Agents
via WASM
Author : apignotti
Score : 50 points
Date : 2025-09-30 14:42 UTC (8 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (labs.leaningtech.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (labs.leaningtech.com)
| j369 wrote:
| "In particular, we plan to support React Native environments in
| 2026." Genuinely curious, what is the benefit or use case of
| this? I thought react native runs in the web already.
| apignotti wrote:
| React native can indeed target the We. Instead we are referring
| to running the native build toolchain for react native, which
| is required to build android apps, in the browser.
| hk1337 wrote:
| > Incompatible Browser
|
| > This demo requires a Chromium-based browser (Chrome, Edge,
| Brave) to function properly.
|
| > Please switch to a compatible browser to experience the full
| capabilities of BrowserPod.
|
| well, that sucks.
| apignotti wrote:
| We are working on it. Firefox is currently unsupported due to
| Atomics.waitAsync being not yet enabled by default. Safari on
| the other hand has some subtle inconsistent behavior at the
| edge between getters, global variables and `this`.
|
| BrowserPod is intended to work across all browsers, but we are
| not there yet.
| Zagreus2142 wrote:
| Having banged my head on years/decade old inconsistencies
| between Chrome and Firefox with respect to webrtc APIs, some
| of these inconsistencies will never be ironed out.
|
| But also, imo, Chrome is way more entrenched that LLM agents.
| I'm sure people will be happy with chromium being
| containerized this way.
| jckahn wrote:
| I don't see any indication of this being open source.
| apignotti wrote:
| Indeed, it's not. It's possible we might decide to release the
| code in the future, but for the time being we are keeping it
| proprietary.
| myflash13 wrote:
| I wonder if this would enable the truly "serverless" application
| I've been thinking about. Imagine shipping a whole
| Rails/Laravel/Wordpress app to the user to be run in their
| browser with sqlite. Technically you would only need a CDN to
| distribute the app.
| apignotti wrote:
| What you describe is 100% possible. Rails is one of our
| priorities. PHP is also easy to achieve.
| mckmk wrote:
| Imagine being able to sync that sql database with some sort of
| cloud storage(s3, google drive, one drive).
|
| Or, even better imagine being able to load your own
| applications in into your cloud storage and run them in browser
| remotely.
| seanw265 wrote:
| Very cool. I've spent quite some time working on compiling Nodejs
| for WASIX. Not an easy task.
|
| Would love to see this open sourced at some point.
| irrationalfab wrote:
| Very interesting tech. Ephemeral, high-fidelity preview
| environments that require zero setup are a key enabler. They let
| you rapidly validate changes within the complete context of a web
| or mobile app, accelerating feedback loops and cutting friction
| for minor updates. This also empowers business users to safely
| implement small, self-contained UI adjustments which is
| particularly powerful when combined with LLM-driven suggestions.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-09-30 23:01 UTC)