[HN Gopher] Using Cesium-137 testing to find counterfeit wine
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Using Cesium-137 testing to find counterfeit wine
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 40 points
       Date   : 2025-09-27 21:42 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (kitchensisters.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (kitchensisters.org)
        
       | frankfrank13 wrote:
       | i want a Catch Me if you Can about this guy --
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudy_Kurniawan
        
         | dddgghhbbfblk wrote:
         | It's a pretty wild story. Rudy was also very prolific so there
         | are a lot of his bottles out there in collections and
         | potentially still on the auction market. He had a huge impact
         | on the expensive wine collection trade.
        
         | roolgo wrote:
         | There is a pretty good documentary about this guy and the wine
         | auction: Sour Grapes.
        
       | vzaliva wrote:
       | It should be noted that cesium dating works for counterits
       | produced in last ~60 years (or less) as Cesium-137 half-life of
       | about 30 years.
        
         | avidiax wrote:
         | Wouldn't that just mean that the detector needs to be
         | increasingly sensitive to detect a late-1940's forgery?
        
           | rtkwe wrote:
           | You should also be able to use the presence of the decay
           | daughters as another way to detect forgeries.
        
             | philipkglass wrote:
             | Cesium 137 decays to barium 137 which is stable and
             | naturally occurring, so the cesium daughter wouldn't be
             | useful for this case (non-destructive testing of sealed
             | wine bottles).
        
               | rtkwe wrote:
               | Ah, inconvenient that it doesn't have a longer chain of
               | gamma emitting daughters.
        
         | numpad0 wrote:
         | Half life is just time until only half of the original amount
         | remains. Double that and it represents the time it takes to
         | halve again. The actual detection threshold would be separate
         | from half life.
        
         | perihelions wrote:
         | The idea with cesium-137 is that it didn't exist naturally in
         | significant quantities prior to 1945. An airtight container,
         | sealed from the atmosphere prior to 1945, should not contain
         | any.
         | 
         | It's not like some other radioisotopes using in dating, such as
         | carbon-14, which are continuously produced naturally (i.e. by
         | cosmic rays initiating nuclear reactions in the high
         | atmosphere). In _that_ case, an airtight container had a known
         | concentration at the time of its sequestration, and
         | radioisotope dating (to oversimplify) counts the number of
         | half-lives that elapsed since that point. (Or with the example
         | of organic matter--the number of half-lives since a tree was
         | felled into lumber--since it ceased metabolizing atmospheric
         | gases).
        
       | hadlock wrote:
       | Apparently there are companies out there who engineer otherwise
       | inert particles, or mixes of particles, that fluoresce under
       | specific wavelengths, for example Mobil might add the particles
       | to their premium Mobile 1 synthetic motor oil product to find
       | counterfeit products in certain markets. By opening a bottle of
       | oil purchased off the shelf they can hit it with ~620nm && ~580nm
       | and if it does not respond correctly, it is relatively easy to
       | demonstrate that it is counterfeit and quickly get it removed
       | from shelves. This can also be applied to crude oil and quietly
       | tested at the refinery to verify it hasn't been diluted with
       | similar product.
        
         | mrexroad wrote:
         | > Mobil might add the particles to their premium Mobile 1
         | synthetic motor oil product to find counterfeit products in
         | certain markets. By opening a bottle of oil purchased off the
         | shelf they can hit it with ~620nm && ~580nm and if it does not
         | respond correctly
         | 
         | Interesting. I haven't heard they had additives in the oil to
         | detect counterfeits. I assume the fluorescing behaves
         | differently at 620nm and 580nm? I recall they had issues with
         | counterfeits in some countries and have made attempts to combat
         | it with packaging (e.g. specific letters on label fluorescing
         | under UV, and currently their Scantrust app [0] validation
         | tool). I'd be interested to know how it behaves, as having the
         | oil itself fluoresce when not labeled as such might be annoying
         | when using UV dyes for monitoring leaks. For example, I like to
         | run LiquiMoly's molygen every few changes to monitor changes in
         | seeping on one of my older cars, but it is only helpful when i
         | run the oil w/ dye after non-dyed oil.
         | 
         | [0] https://www.mobil.com/en/sap/our-products/mobil-anti-
         | counter...
        
         | analog31 wrote:
         | From what I've read, there are also fluorescent compounds in
         | the other fluids used in cars. A mechanic can shine a UV light
         | under your hood and spot the leaks.
        
       | kayo_20211030 wrote:
       | If I buy a bottle of plonk for $20 and it tastes as I except, I
       | don't stress about what gamma rays it's emitting. I just reckon I
       | got what I paid for. Of course, if I payed $1 million, and I dare
       | not open it, I might stress quite a lot. But really, that's for
       | other people not me. I sadly don't have a million bucks to spend
       | on wine.
        
         | Cthulhu_ wrote:
         | At these numbers you don't buy a product, you buy an investment
         | with the intent to sell it later on; if it turns out to be a
         | fake though, it's worthless. On the other hand, if you get it
         | verified, it goes up in value by a lot.
        
         | burnt-resistor wrote:
         | Collectable wine is essentially orthogonal to quality and taste
         | when blind tasted.
         | 
         | Never pay over say ~$30-40 USD for a bottle of wine if all you
         | care about is taste. That's the gist I got from VEN 3 at UC
         | Davis. And, always buy budget wine while suggesting to people
         | it was "expensive". ;)
         | 
         | People who want to collect expensive wine, more power to them,
         | but it seems to me somewhere between a tulip bulb, Beanie
         | Babies, and art market.
         | 
         | https://localwiki.org/davis/VEN_3
         | 
         | https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/wine-study-shows-price-in...
         | 
         | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-08080-0
        
           | kulahan wrote:
           | Two Buck Chuck was a famously inexpensive and delicious wine
           | from... Trader Joe's, I think? Though last I heard it got
           | moved to Three Buck Chuck. It's my dad's favorite.
           | 
           | Incidentally, he once went to a wine auction with a rich
           | friend. The friend bid on a $1000 bottle of wine (ostensibly
           | inexpensive among this crowd) and gave it to my dad as a
           | gift, who ended up not drinking it until years later when his
           | first grandchild was born.
           | 
           | If I remember correctly, he preferred the Two Buck Chuck.
        
           | HPsquared wrote:
           | I suppose it's like rare classic cars. They're usually not
           | great to drive, and often aren't ever driven.
        
           | bsder wrote:
           | > Never pay over say ~$30-40 USD for a bottle of wine if all
           | you care about is taste.
           | 
           | Change that to 30-40 EUR from Carrefour? Sure. In the US, not
           | so much.
           | 
           | I do not understand how I can spend a minor fortune on wine
           | in the US and not like a single bottle (including many
           | imported from France!). By contrast, I can spend very
           | reasonable amounts on wine in France and almost never have a
           | bottle that I don't like.
        
             | OJFord wrote:
             | You've answered it yourself? 'imported from France'.
             | 
             | It's more expensive in the UK too for example, but not to
             | the extent it is over there.
        
         | fred_is_fred wrote:
         | I wish I could find the study but there was one done where
         | people were given the same wine samples and then told how much
         | the bottle cost - either a low or high number. People enjoyed
         | the "expensive" wine more and rated it more highly. Like you,
         | at 1M I might feel more like "why did we waste money on this?"
        
       | gdbsjjdn wrote:
       | Insane to see the government resources used to prosecute this -
       | it's basically play money for rich guys who want to show off.
        
       | ChuckMcM wrote:
       | Pretty wild story. Reminded me of the story of salvaging a Roman
       | trade vessel off the coast of Greece. Everyone carefully
       | cataloged and managed the various amphorae of trade goods, and
       | one of the divers made off with a quarter million dollars worth
       | of lead keel weights. :-)
        
       | lacoolj wrote:
       | Oh cool this was what they did in White Collar! Good ol' Neal
       | Caffery vs. Matt Kessler (I think was his name)
       | 
       | Time to re-watch
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-09-29 23:01 UTC)