[HN Gopher] Meshtastic 64 - A meshtastic radio for the Commodore 64
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Meshtastic 64 - A meshtastic radio for the Commodore 64
        
       Author : geerlingguy
       Score  : 99 points
       Date   : 2025-09-23 23:54 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (64jim64.blogspot.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (64jim64.blogspot.com)
        
       | simonjgreen wrote:
       | Pretty cool. I wish Meshtastic had more focus on routing and a
       | way to safely do store & fwd. It's difficult to actually mesh
       | well with it. I run a few solar powered higher altitude nodes and
       | provide reasonable coverage but I've observed many messages never
       | reach their destination.
        
         | NoiseBert69 wrote:
         | Looking at their GitHub there are some things upcomming
         | 
         | - They want to make device telemetry opt-in. This will cause
         | the network to be more quiet
         | 
         | - A few patches ended up in master for handling corner cases of
         | their flooding and next-hop routing algorithm
         | 
         | - There's also a merge request ("Add packet replay feature")
         | which maybe can solve the reliability problem
         | 
         | Currently bigger Meshtastic networks are very very unreliable.
         | I almost cannot traceroute a device that is one or two hops
         | away. And our channels are not very saturated (10-20% ChUtil).
        
         | firesteelrain wrote:
         | This. I like the idea of Meshtastic however APRS is much more
         | extensive and even has satellite coverage like the ISS.
        
           | rfmoz wrote:
           | It would work a Meshtastic repeater from the ISS?
        
             | NoiseBert69 wrote:
             | LoRa is extremely robust and can work with super weak
             | signals. At the price of being very very slow in the most
             | reliable configuration .
             | 
             | That combination is toxic for a high amount of parallel
             | users.
             | 
             | I think it would need big modifications: fast uplink and
             | robust slow downlink.
        
             | firesteelrain wrote:
             | It would not. We would need to make a case to add
             | Meshtastic. Amateur radio has had a much better chance
             | since the days of the Space Shuttle. Astronauts routinely
             | make ISS to Earth contacts with amateur radio operators.
             | There is also ARISS.
             | 
             | 5w ISS contacts are hard enough as it is
        
           | Gigachad wrote:
           | APRS requires a license right?
        
             | firesteelrain wrote:
             | Correct. Developed by the late Bob Bruninga. I had many
             | email exchanges with Bob and we were able to send SSTV
             | images through his NO-* series of amateur radio satellites
             | with some technical advice a few years ago.
             | 
             | APRS is much more extensive and even available via
             | commercial ham radio
        
         | mikeytown2 wrote:
         | Checkout MeshCore, it has the concept of a room server which is
         | a private store and forward server. Also see this
         | https://github.com/mikecarper/meshfirmware/blob/main/MeshCor...
        
       | thw_9a83c wrote:
       | In case you didn't know what Meshtastic [0] is: Meshtastic(r) is
       | a project that enables you to use inexpensive LoRa radios as a
       | long range off-grid communication platform in areas without
       | existing or reliable communications infrastructure.
       | 
       | [0]: https://meshtastic.org/
        
       | spiritplumber wrote:
       | Cool! We made https://www.robots-everywhere.com/cellsol/ in 2020
       | but I think Meshtastic is further along. However, ours can run on
       | an atmel328.
       | 
       | We also respect and forward Meshtastic and DisasterRadio packets,
       | but there is currently no reciprocity. What can be done about it?
        
         | khimaros wrote:
         | how about reticulum?
        
       | xtajv wrote:
       | It pains me to mention this but I don't think it's responsible
       | not to: https://github.com/meshtastic/firmware/issues/4030
       | 
       | At time of writing (2025-09-27, plus or minus a timezone), there
       | does not appear to be any serious attempt to secure application-
       | layer message contents. (At least, not yet)
       | 
       | My hope is that this cool new radio link option will still gain
       | traction and grow and develop without painting itself into a
       | corner, security-wise.
       | 
       | To wit- security hints on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model
       | have improved _substantially_ since my last readthrough.
        
         | ahdanggit wrote:
         | I appreciate you pointing that out. I've been curious about
         | meshastatic and wondered how well the encryption was being
         | handled.
        
           | mikeytown2 wrote:
           | Check out the alternative https://github.com/meshcore-
           | dev/MeshCore Seattle has the largest functioning mesh core
           | installation in the world
        
             | wtallis wrote:
             | MeshCore seems to enforce a strict separation between
             | client devices and repeater devices, which is a significant
             | downside for many use cases.
        
         | mdevttt wrote:
         | As if the Meshtastic devs care about anything but pretending to
         | be a business masquerading as an open source project.
         | 
         | They are quite possibly one of the most toxic projects right
         | now.
        
           | leetrout wrote:
           | I keep seeing folks in my circles playing with it but this is
           | the first I have heard this opinion.
           | 
           | Could you elaborate?
        
             | geerlingguy wrote:
             | It seems like there are some people in the Meshtastic and
             | MeshCore community who have it out for each other, for
             | reasons beyond me.
             | 
             | I've only personally tested Meshtastic, and from a
             | technical perspective, it still feels very beta, and I
             | wouldn't put critical communications on it. However, it's a
             | fun introduction to LoRa and long range low power RF, and
             | can be a fun way to communicate much like I think amateur
             | radio was to its early adopters.
             | 
             | I think one thing that causes a lot of community
             | strangeness is the strong push by some to make it what it's
             | not, like some doomsday-proof communication system that
             | will outlive cellular networks and atomic bombs. It could
             | be useful but requires skilled operators and coordination
             | to work well (like using different frequencies and coding
             | at events for much more bandwidth).
        
           | Hackbraten wrote:
           | At least in the linked issue, the project member who, on
           | request of an outside contributor, reopened the issue seemed
           | pretty open towards a fix?
        
       | JKCalhoun wrote:
       | Jeri Ellsworth posted that she has her Minitel on Meshtastic:
       | https://bsky.app/profile/jeriellsworth.bsky.social/post/3lzj...
        
       | bullen wrote:
       | What frequency is the one that you can buy?
       | 
       | Is there an assembly application planned or will it be basic for
       | now?
        
         | jim-64 wrote:
         | This is my project. I've only built 915MHz ones since I'm in
         | the USA but I could provide 868 too. Thanks, I should note
         | this! BASIC works well for parsing strings, printing to the
         | screen, and using the Kernal serial routines. I do have some
         | ideas of helper code using assembly that may get added, but
         | plan to keep the main code BASIC.
        
           | bullen wrote:
           | I think 433 would be even better?
           | 
           | Or 169MHz if meshtastic supports it? Edit: Seems no, sadge.
           | 
           | If you add EU freq. I will buy!
        
       | _joel wrote:
       | Nice, Jeff Geerling / Adrian Black mashup needed
        
         | geerlingguy wrote:
         | Finally got to meet Adrian at VCF Midwest, as I've gone down
         | the retro rabbit hole his videos are a great reference. And he
         | and others have built up some invaluable tools to diagnose and
         | fix quirks on these old systems.
         | 
         | Would like to figure out Meshtastic on the Apple II as well!
        
       | jim-64 wrote:
       | Thanks! This is my project. Happy to answer any questions.
        
         | geerlingguy wrote:
         | Thanks for showing it at VCF! I'm glad to have met you and
         | gotten to talk about the setup, even better to see more of the
         | story on your blog.
        
       | tclancy wrote:
       | Oh man, I have all my retro consoles, but the C64 and 128 were
       | the only gear my parents sold out from under me. I should be
       | happy it's not taking up space in a closet but stuff like this
       | makes me miss it dearly.
        
       | nsxwolf wrote:
       | I built a Meshtastic and found a few nodes but made 0 contacts.
       | Gave up after a few weeks. The community seems to be more
       | interested in talking about it and showing pictures of their gear
       | as opposed to actually doing anything with it.
       | 
       | It's like a way less fun ham radio.
        
       | indigodaddy wrote:
       | I spy Trader Joe's balsamic vinegar?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-09-27 23:00 UTC)