[HN Gopher] If you are harassed by lasers
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       If you are harassed by lasers
        
       Author : 1970-01-01
       Score  : 86 points
       Date   : 2025-09-26 19:12 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.laserpointersafety.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.laserpointersafety.com)
        
       | mrguyorama wrote:
       | It's fascinating how much of this has to be devoted to "You are
       | probably not seeing a laser. You are probably not being harassed
       | by an organized group"
       | 
       | People who have delusions or people deep into their conspiracy
       | theories have an insane level of _insistence_. They will refuse
       | to accept  "That's just not how that works" as an answer. It's
       | scary.
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | There are diagnoseable mental illnesses that cause people to
         | believe they are being targeted by sinister forces. They can't
         | believe because their brain is malfunctioning.
        
           | ryandrake wrote:
           | Reddit's r/gangstalking is where they meet. Yet another group
           | that might benefit from therapy or mental help.
        
             | lawlessone wrote:
             | The kind of reinforcement they give each other is the same
             | kind some people are now getting from chatbots instead.
        
             | JumpCrisscross wrote:
             | Wait, that isn't a parody sub?
        
               | culi wrote:
               | Nope. The phenomenon is more widespread than people
               | realize. Here's an Aeon piece worth reading about it
               | 
               | https://aeon.co/essays/how-the-psychiatric-narrative-
               | hinders...
        
           | vintermann wrote:
           | I think what they feel is that they've had some experience,
           | and they have an unshakeable feeling that it's _deeply
           | significant_.
           | 
           | As Philip K. Dick said, of his own "laser pointer" incident:
           | "If you were me, and had this happen to you, I'm sure you
           | wouldn't be able to leave it alone."
           | 
           | Remember, that even for us healthy people, there's ultimately
           | no _objective_ answer to what 's important or not. There may
           | be more or less objective _conditional_ answers (e.g. if it
           | 's important that I don't starve to death tomorrow, it's
           | important that I eat), but those already assumes something is
           | important. It has to bottom out in something that's important
           | _for its own sake_ , something whose importance can't be
           | justified from something else's importance.
           | 
           | I think the "gangstalking" people have had experiences that
           | their mind does not allow them to dismiss. They may be
           | capable of accepting _different_ explanations for why the
           | experience mattered - but they can 't accept that it _isn 't_
           | important, because it's somehow a _root_ important thing for
           | them.
           | 
           | In that very same Philip K. Dick essay, he more or less
           | apologized for this, and listed up various different
           | explanations that he'd tried. But he was lucky enough that
           | his "ultimate importance" experience was basically pleasant.
           | The genuinely paranoid people are not so lucky.
        
         | armada651 wrote:
         | The problem with such delusions is that people desperately need
         | a physical explanation. Because the alternative is that they
         | are seeing things that are not real, which is an even scarier
         | thought than some organized group pointing lasers at you.
        
         | munificent wrote:
         | _> They will refuse to accept  "That's just not how that works"
         | as an answer._
         | 
         | For many people with mental illness, it's not a "refusal". That
         | implies agency and deliberate choice from a properly
         | functioning mind. When it's the mind itself that is
         | malfunctioning, those kinds of verbs don't really work. The
         | very _definition_ of  "delusion" is a thing you are compelled
         | to believe even in the absence of evidence. If you are able to
         | stop believing it, if you are able to _not_ refuse to change
         | your belief, then it 's not a delusion in the first place.
         | 
         | Further, some people suffering in this way have anosognosia,
         | which means not only are they delusion, but their mind is also
         | incapable of perceiving its own malfunction.
        
         | goopypoop wrote:
         | "That's just not how that works" isn't an answer; it's a
         | dismissal.
         | 
         | Who's convinced by "lol no ur stupid"?
        
         | OkayPhysicist wrote:
         | Every biohacking community ends up with a page like this
         | talking about implants. "Yes, we implant ourselves with little
         | devices that interact with electromagnetic radiation. No, you
         | probably didn't have such a device implanted in you without
         | your knowledge. If you did, it wouldn't be much use to your
         | adversaries. Please seek psychiatric help".
        
         | tencentshill wrote:
         | The run-on sentence style paranoid people type is getting a lot
         | more common online.
        
         | culi wrote:
         | Sounds like the writings of a "targeted individual". Or
         | "gangstalking". It's a more common phenomenon than people
         | realize. There's even a subreddit community of individuals
         | experiencing this
         | 
         | https://old.reddit.com/r/Gangstalking/
         | 
         | Here's a fascinating Aeon piece on the phenomenon
         | 
         | https://aeon.co/essays/how-the-psychiatric-narrative-hinders...
        
         | jlarocco wrote:
         | Honestly, "That's just not how that works" isn't a very
         | convincing argument.
         | 
         | If you can't explain why it doesn't work that way, there's no
         | reason anybody should believe you.
        
         | ascorbic wrote:
         | It's a very carefully-worded page from somebody who has clearly
         | had to deal with a large number of people suffering from
         | paranoid delusions.
        
       | rolph wrote:
       | in preparation for the shift to projected energy weapons,
       | 
       | "If you see light or feel heat from an unknown source"
       | 
       | the whole thing reads a little like a paranoia trigger.
        
         | lawlessone wrote:
         | >"If you see light or feel heat from an unknown source"
         | 
         | "If you see the flash, it's already too late"
        
         | anon84873628 wrote:
         | I read it as sympathetic to the paranoid people who believe
         | these things, and gently steering them towards medical help
         | instead.
        
         | wildzzz wrote:
         | The section above seems to explain why this article is written
         | the way it is. Many people do experience sensations or see
         | things that we otherwise cannot. They may have heightened
         | sensitivity or could have a mental or neurological condition
         | that produces these experiences. Some people may feel like they
         | are going crazy seeing or hearing things that aren't actually
         | there. Others feed into the experiences and believe they exist,
         | like targeted individuals do. Someone that may be unsure if
         | they are really seeing lasers or feeling indeterminate heating
         | may and hasn't totally fallen down the DEW or TI rabbit hole
         | could benefit from seeing something that basically says "I
         | believe you're hearing/seeing/feeling these things, there may
         | be medical explanation so you may want to see a doctor."
        
         | JALTU wrote:
         | It's in the title itself! lol
        
         | Theodores wrote:
         | Only the paranoid survive... I am going there.
         | 
         | What about LIDAR on self-driving cars?
         | 
         | I have heard that these damage cameras and I am curious as to
         | whether they are equally damaging to eyeballs.
         | 
         | Do I need my tin hat or is there nothing to worry about?
        
       | donnybrook007 wrote:
       | great instructions for AI to learn
        
       | Exoristos wrote:
       | A long page of human drama at
       | https://laserpointersafety.com/sentences/sentences.html, e.g.:
       | "Suspended sentence, rehab for 55-year-old who aimed a laser pen
       | at a helicopter after it interrupted his audiobook".
        
         | pryelluw wrote:
         | That hole page explains why aliens won't come visit.
        
           | nurettin wrote:
           | I have seen a crab brush his eye with one of his foldable
           | mouth arms. We already have aliens. They are more weird than
           | anything I saw on star trek.
        
         | moralestapia wrote:
         | >A South Australia Police helicopter checking on COVID
         | compliance during a three-day lockdown [...]
         | 
         | Whew.
        
         | stepanhruda wrote:
         | Fighting noise pollution with light pollution
        
         | culi wrote:
         | If you want more "human drama" read up on Hong Kong protesters'
         | extensive use of lasers against police and security cameras. A
         | powerful enough laser can pretty quickly render a security
         | camera unusable. Ofc it can also blind someone (even indirectly
         | looking at the beam) quite easily
        
           | Onavo wrote:
           | It can also set off the alcohol-in-tube fire alarms
        
         | trod1234 wrote:
         | A lot of helicopters today are being used to harass entire
         | neighborhoods where complaints to local government go
         | completely unresolved, so I can emphasize with that situation,
         | not that I'd ever do something that stupid.
         | 
         | Its not uncommon to have them hovering for 1-2 hours straight
         | 3-7 times a week, every week, at times with no active calls on
         | the community police dashboard almost entirely between 11pm and
         | 4am, often less than 1000 feet in altitude (high dBs enough to
         | shake windows).
         | 
         | That aside, using a helicopter as a broadcast mechanism over a
         | loudspeaker to a neighborhood is entirely unacceptable during
         | hours people normally sleep.
         | 
         | Everyone is complaining and they've been doing that at least 3
         | years now.
         | 
         | How many times can you hear, "Missing person, or Felony
         | Suspect", black shirt, denim pants, black suspect, call 911",
         | or "suspicious person, black hoodie, call 911", before they
         | lose all credibility. Around 10?
         | 
         | It seems really racist too, always hispanic or black, where the
         | descriptions provided apply to most if not all people of those
         | demographics.
         | 
         | Makes the average person feel like we live in a police state
         | without due process or a rule of law when the only means to
         | resolve is front-of-line blocked through local government which
         | ignores complaints.
         | 
         | I shouldn't be hearing this at 2am regularly, some people work.
        
         | lostlogin wrote:
         | When you have a helicopter circling your house for hours, you
         | do start to lose rational thought.
        
       | LargoLasskhyfv wrote:
       | ...don't read to much
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valis_(novel)#Synopsis
        
         | number6 wrote:
         | I read and read and it totally reminded me of Valis
        
       | h1fra wrote:
       | what's up with the submit date? @dang
        
         | cpach wrote:
         | Apparantly their user name is '1970-01-01'
        
         | ric129 wrote:
         | that's the submitters' user name, not the submission date
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | More dangerous are infrared lasers.
        
         | giantg2 wrote:
         | Or UV
        
         | notherhack wrote:
         | Is there an effective anti-IR coating for eyeglasses like there
         | is for UV? Seems like a good thing to have but a web search
         | doesn't turn up much. It might interfere with facial
         | recognition, but maybe that's a feature.
        
           | compass_copium wrote:
           | Zenni sells one now, with privacy as a selling point
        
           | mrob wrote:
           | Thin films of gold are reflective in the infrared and
           | transparent in blue/green optical wavelengths. Gold can be
           | applied to most surfaces by various physical vapor deposition
           | processes in a vacuum.
        
           | ottah wrote:
           | Any laser light strong enough to damage your vision, might
           | also pass through a optical coating. Distance can attenuate
           | the strength, but really the only defense is proper rated
           | glasses for the spectrum.
        
         | gblargg wrote:
         | What about visible lasers that lack an IR filter and have more
         | IR energy in the beam?
        
           | ascorbic wrote:
           | They will at least trigger the blink reflex
        
       | javier_e06 wrote:
       | My backyard neighbor installed a backup generator with a very
       | annoying green led that shines right through my kitchen window. I
       | hate HOA's and I don't live in one but I really lost sleep about
       | this. One night I just went a back there and put a small green
       | sticker on the plastic case. Still shines on but the annoying
       | glow shines elsewhere. Inspection passed.
        
         | AnotherGoodName wrote:
         | There was a time in the electronics world when bright, house
         | illuminating leds first came about and manufacturers used them
         | in place of the dull red/green indicators. Black tape
         | everywhere. Macbooks were one of the worst offenders. They had
         | an extremely bright and worst of all pulsating led that was on
         | when the device was in standby. Used to shine right through
         | laptop bags and keep everyone nearby awake.
         | 
         | Fortunately that fad is somewhat over and manufacturers mostly
         | learnt not to put in the brightest led they could source.
        
           | giantg2 wrote:
           | I think I've used more electrical tape covering LEDs than I
           | have for any other purpose.
        
           | thr0w wrote:
           | Was just about to post this - thought I was neurotic for
           | taping over LED displays in the 2000s. My sight and hearing
           | get annoyingly sensitive when I'm in bed at night.
        
           | zerocrates wrote:
           | I still have electrical tape right now over the power LED on
           | my computer case: it's a pretty bright white LED that pulses
           | in sleep and as far as I know my motherboard won't let me
           | turn that behavior off. I guess I could have just pulled the
           | leads to the LED instead.
           | 
           | Now that I think about it, that was probably actually one
           | motherboard ago and it might be different now... but the
           | tape's working just fine so who needs to check?
        
           | paxys wrote:
           | The situation still hasn't improved all that much. Just
           | looking around I have electrical tape over the LEDs of my
           | modem, router, computer monitor, soundbar, humidifier, fan,
           | entryway intercom, thermostat. And these are all new devices.
        
             | doubled112 wrote:
             | I use stickers designed for dimming LEDs. They're almost
             | like a thick window tint cut into various shapes. Dim
             | enough to stop the LED from being annoying but you can
             | still see its status.
             | 
             | A little more expensive, but they look a little nicer too.
        
               | layer8 wrote:
               | https://www.lightdims.com/
        
               | doubled112 wrote:
               | I think those are the ones. I've been working on the pack
               | of them for years.
        
             | thewebguyd wrote:
             | The one that got on my nerves recently is a little bedside
             | 3-in-1 wireless charger.
             | 
             | Has one of the brightest LEDs I've seen lately right on
             | front of the charger whenever a device is on it. Why would
             | they put a bright light on a night-stand accessory, and put
             | it in the front where its shining right into your eyes as
             | you try to sleep?
             | 
             | Or better yet, why have an LED on it at all in the first
             | place? Any device I'm putting on it has its own charging
             | indicator, I don't need the charger itself to have one.
        
             | Analemma_ wrote:
             | IME consumer electronics have gotten a lot better about
             | this, but appliances and other things outside the tech
             | sphere are still awful. My portable AC unit has a bright-
             | as-hell seven-segment display for the temperature which
             | shows "--" even when it's turned off!
        
               | formerly_proven wrote:
               | This might just be amateur EEs doing their thing in an
               | organization that doesn't constrain these aspects of the
               | product. Data sheet says If(cont)=20 mA? Okay, 20 mA it
               | is.
        
             | dotancohen wrote:
             | I much prefer two or three coats of black nail polish. It
             | looks much nicer than tape, is more durable, and the light
             | can barely be seen - just enough to see it when you want
             | to. Like it should have been from the factory.
        
           | cdjk wrote:
           | The pulsing macbook leds were horrible. I was in college
           | then, living in dorms or other shared housing where my laptop
           | was always in my bedroom overnight. I got in the habit of
           | putting a dark shirt over it.
        
           | dkenyser wrote:
           | My brand new Netgear router I just bought is so bright it's
           | actually blinding if I catch a glimpse late at night so we
           | might not be out of the woods just yet.
        
         | bboygravity wrote:
         | I can highly recommend aluminum tape or copper tape. Doesn't
         | let any light through and super easy to apply.
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | > _One night I just went a back there and put a small green
         | sticker on the plastic case_
         | 
         | Did you try talking to them about it first?
        
           | ottah wrote:
           | This is more important, you have to give people a chance to
           | rectify the situation.
        
           | actionfromafar wrote:
           | Depending on the neighbours, may be asking for more trouble.
        
         | nenenejej wrote:
         | One night I just went a back there and...
         | 
         | Expects vandalism or more serious crime.
         | 
         | ...put a small green sticker
         | 
         | Ok, good engineer!
        
         | brikym wrote:
         | What do you suggest I do about Ford pickup trucks with
         | annoyingly high, bright high beams?
         | 
         | Maybe a light bar for the rear of the car and some reflective
         | material for the sunvisor?
        
           | actionfromafar wrote:
           | Green stickers
        
         | scrps wrote:
         | Not to hijack your post with a PSA but I think you'll endorse
         | it...
         | 
         | If you are building a product and it has any indicator lights
         | please dim/diffuse/lightpipe them.
         | 
         | It seems to be a trend these days of ultra bright LEDs for
         | indicators, I have so many devices I've either disconnected,
         | dimmed or taped over the LEDs because it is so bloody bright.
        
           | brikym wrote:
           | Please forward this to the billboard advertising industry.
        
       | mmaunder wrote:
       | Someone pointed a laser at someone.
        
       | numb7rs wrote:
       | On a side note, this site reacts to window size changes (phone
       | rotation portrait <-> landscape) with a really nice animated
       | shuffle of the content. It's more visible on the "Sentences" page
       | linked in another comment [0]. I've not seen that before, and
       | certainly wasn't expecting it on a site that is otherwise pretty
       | no-frills.
       | 
       | [0] https://laserpointersafety.com/sentences/sentences.html
        
       | gweinberg wrote:
       | Phish has a helpful song explaining how to deal with laser
       | ahrassment:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YpLTljxq6M&list=RD2YpLTljxq...
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | The US military doesn't even use laser pointers much any more.
       | Maybe for pointing at a map during a briefing, but not for
       | pointing at the enemy. Single-pulse range finders, yes.
       | Continuous laser designators are "Hi, I'm an enemy, kill me now."
       | They were more popular in the 1980s before everybody else got IR
       | sensing technology.
        
         | LorenPechtel wrote:
         | Yeah, a beam of anything is asking for a beam-rider to find it.
         | (Doesn't have to be a missile--wake-follower torpedoes are a
         | form of beam-rider. They don't look for a ship, they try to
         | follow a wake until they run under/into a ship. Passive so the
         | enemy doesn't hear your sonar pinging, nor do sonar masking
         | systems have any effect on it. The weakness is such torpedoes
         | are very predictable and can be tricked into going for a towed
         | decoy.)
        
         | ACCount37 wrote:
         | There are still a few laser designators and munitions that use
         | them. Mostly LGBs, as far as I'm aware - JDAMs didn't eat
         | everything yet.
        
       | groos wrote:
       | Some statistics from the sentencing page:
       | 
       | Median age 27 Male: 98% Female: 2% Youngest: 19 Oldest: 64 Median
       | prison time: 12 months Median probation time: 24 months
       | 
       | All of the above were Copilot inferred. Don't know why I need to
       | know the above, though. :-)
        
       | merksoftworks wrote:
       | I dug around on this web page and found outlinks to:
       | 
       | The "Stop Gangstalking Awareness Group", and especially this page
       | about "Understanding Neuro Weapons." LaserPointerSafety has not
       | evaluated the accuracy or usefulness of this group or their
       | information. (Thanks to M.D. in July 2024 for bringing this to
       | our attention.)
       | 
       | These are kind of kooky links:
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20240509210655/https://stopgangs...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-09-26 23:00 UTC)