[HN Gopher] Fundamental Flaw of Hustle Culture
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Fundamental Flaw of Hustle Culture
        
       Author : flail
       Score  : 49 points
       Date   : 2025-08-14 19:36 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (brodzinski.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (brodzinski.com)
        
       | moc_was_wronged wrote:
       | The lottery is, famously, a tax on people who don't understand
       | probability.
       | 
       | Hustle culture is a tax on people who think they will always be
       | in the top 0.01% if they just manifest hard enough.
        
         | 01HNNWZ0MV43FF wrote:
         | I feel like the math is weird too.
         | 
         | Fermi estimate - doubling my work hours will also halve my
         | waking free time. Doubling my work hours as an individual
         | contributor will not make the company twice as productive. It
         | will not make my stocks worth twice as much.
         | 
         | Does anyone else see the math this way? Employee stock
         | ownership does not give you linear returns with hours worked.
        
           | rightbyte wrote:
           | > Fermi estimate - doubling my work hours will also halve my
           | waking free time.
           | 
           | 40h work. 56h sleep. 72h free time.
           | 
           | 80h work. 56h sleep. 32h free time.
           | 
           | Ok fair enough close enough to half I though the share would
           | be worse. But in practice, your energy is spent and the free
           | time will suck. Also a reasonable commute of 8h will make the
           | share 64 to 24, a 'third'.
        
       | mikrl wrote:
       | This is missing one extremely cynical interpretation.
       | 
       | What if the output isn't the real goal, it's having a workforce
       | that thinks more like footsoldiers than professionals?
       | 
       | Of course 2x hustle doesn't scale to 2x output, you can't tell me
       | that all these smart people are just ignorant of that. It has to
       | be a different thing getting selected for.
        
         | Wonnk13 wrote:
         | This is why I'm not a consultant. It's a generalization, but
         | there's a kind of learned helplessness almost in the culture of
         | the big4. Client has a new requirement, and someone says "oh
         | guess it'll be an allnighter, i'll start ordering pizzas". Nah
         | man, this is like four extra hours of work- push the deadline,
         | or just work smarter.
        
       | silvestrov wrote:
       | > _when someone dangles $10M in front of me_
       | 
       | I'm cynical enough to think that such $10M will be fake money.
       | 
       | It will be diluted or in some other way made into nothing.
        
         | 01HNNWZ0MV43FF wrote:
         | Yep, hundred percent.
         | 
         | No boss will ever pay you enough to retire. Ten million is
         | retire-this-afternoon money.
         | 
         | Especially a boss talking about 50 hour work weeks. If there's
         | really ten million in it, hire my friend and we'll each get
         | five million and boss gets 80 dev-hours of really solid work
         | per week
         | 
         | Oh they won't do that? Maybe it's cause they're BSing up their
         | own book
        
       | lordnacho wrote:
       | Crunch mode only works for when the finish line is in sight.
       | 
       | Instead of a 40 hour week, you find out you are within 50 hours
       | of the goal. So you ask the team to come in for 60 hours that
       | week, get 50 effective hours, and give everyone time off the week
       | after to recover.
       | 
       | That's not what happens once you have the crunch mode button
       | installed, though.
       | 
       | I used to live with a banker. He'd sit at the office all day, and
       | at about 6pm his boss would come back from meetings, and demand
       | slides be ready for the next morning. So the little bankers would
       | be sitting in the office from about 9am to midnight. This went on
       | for years. Same with weekends and presumed nights off: someone
       | would see it fit to phone the analysts on their night off to have
       | them correct the font on a slide deck.
       | 
       | Ultimately, this wears down everyone. People get stressed when
       | there's no end in sight. The bad kind of stress that makes you
       | lose your hair and your sanity.
        
         | MrGilbert wrote:
         | > The bad kind of stress that makes you lose your hair and your
         | sanity.
         | 
         | And, ultimately, your life. I'd assume that no company is worth
         | dying for, blatantly speaking. Especially so, if it's not your
         | own.
        
           | lordnacho wrote:
           | This literally happened, and was one of the reasons my friend
           | moved on from this kind of work.
        
         | malshe wrote:
         | I have this experience working in academia too. Closer to paper
         | submission, all the coauthors work longer days. Emails at
         | midnight and sometimes even Zoom calls at ungodly hours are not
         | unheard of. But once the paper is submitted, usually things
         | slow down.
         | 
         | The people who don't slow down, usually end up burned out
         | quickly. Their research suffers and it shows up in the quality
         | of their work. Then the papers get rejected more often, which
         | puts them more under pressure. It becomes a vicious cycle.
        
       | adamiscool8 wrote:
       | This is right but missing that the goal of these corporate
       | cultural proclamations is optimizing for people who are true
       | believers in the mission. Whether that leads to better business
       | outcomes than optimizing for really smart people who believe in
       | work-life balance... I personally doubt.
        
       | GCA10 wrote:
       | Wall Street and the big corporate law firms of NYC/DC have been
       | championing extreme hours since the 1980s. Maybe earlier. So it's
       | interesting to see the short- and long-term effects of this on
       | people's lives.
       | 
       | Informal assessment here, re: how these versions of "hustle
       | culture" have played out. First, people who can last a long time
       | do make a lot of money. Second, the wipe-out rate is pronounced
       | but not catastrophic. Yes, there's sometimes a price to pay in
       | terms of bad marriages, early heart attacks, etc. but it's not so
       | pervasive that everyone who chases all-out success comes up
       | short. You can win at this game.
       | 
       | Third -- and this perhaps OPs best area for questioning: When you
       | work 90-hour weeks, your judgment about picking the right
       | projects goes to hell. You're the greyhound going round the track
       | as fast as you can, chasing the rabbit that you'll never catch.
       | Your rabbit-value assessment system doesn't exist. You just keep
       | running toward whatever someone else points you toward. On Wall
       | Street, a lot of marathon hours are spent trying to close deals
       | that won't close. Or that turn out to have been identifiable
       | mistakes/misguided obsessions.
       | 
       | I was chatting earlier this year with a former Big Law attorney
       | who spent a frenzied year after Hurricane Katrina drafting
       | blizzards of legal filings so that big insurers could dodge
       | claims. Her work was valued enough that she (and her firm) got
       | paid a lot and maybe even did landmark work. Nearly 20 years
       | later, is that the career badge that you'll always feel good
       | about?
        
         | bloomca wrote:
         | > Nearly 20 years later, is that the career badge that you'll
         | always feel good about?
         | 
         | Well, if the result work has negative connotations, you
         | wouldn't even mention it (especially after 20 years). However,
         | as you said:
         | 
         | > enough that she (and her firm) got paid a lot and maybe even
         | did landmark work
         | 
         | At the end of the day, that's what mostly matters. Sure, some
         | people believe in what they are doing and put insane hours, but
         | most just do it for money. And if they manage to get a lot,
         | then yeah, it was all justified.
         | 
         | ---
         | 
         | > Second, the wipe-out rate is pronounced but not catastrophic
         | 
         | I agree with this -- people who are deeply invested in their
         | projects are often already do the second shift. So if you are
         | motivated enough, that's kind of the same, plus people can be
         | in a position where they have no external obligations (often
         | when they are young).
         | 
         | It is bad long-term, but for a relatively short term for many
         | it is a decent gamble.
        
       | dfee wrote:
       | An infection of Asian (Chinese?) culture on American work.
       | 
       | I feel terrible for them, but recognize it's upped the ante over
       | here (if they can, we should, as the article lays out), so
       | sympathy manifesting to empathy and struggle.
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/996_working_hour_system
        
         | pizzathyme wrote:
         | Exactly. Unpopular take: I don't understand how the
         | "fundamental flaw" is just the author's opinion that it's "not
         | sustainable". Asian companies have sustained 60+ hour workweeks
         | with high-skilled tech workers for decades.
         | 
         | It's not fun. I don't want to do it. I don't support it. But it
         | is one way to run a company.
        
           | lazide wrote:
           | It is generally 'sustainable' with a stay at home spouse,
           | lots of drinking, and actually not a lot of actual work. But
           | they do spend a lot of time at the office.
        
           | pimlottc wrote:
           | Sustainable for the company or sustainable for the workers?
        
       | zer00eyz wrote:
       | Before it was "hustle culture" it was "dot-com culture" or
       | "startup culture" or "IPO culture".
       | 
       | There are places where this sort of push is, manipulative. See
       | the gaming industry where people are in it for "passion".
       | 
       | But no one in dot com or startup or IPO land worked the 60 hour
       | weeks for no reason. They worked them to get paid, and for their
       | lottery tickets / stock options. It was gambling with time.
       | 
       | And for a lot of people that worked out very well. For those that
       | it didnt work out for they still did really well.
       | 
       | If you want a 40 hour a week, no hustle job, then engineering /
       | programing / startups might not be the right choice for you. Your
       | pay will be reflected in that choice.
       | 
       | It has always been this way, it will always be this way: it is a
       | game of sharks and minnows.
        
         | Shog9 wrote:
         | IOW, a few sharks eat a tremendous number of minnows.
         | 
         | Something I try to remember whenever the urge to "hustle" comes
         | back: taking payoff I got from years of startup work,
         | subtracting taxes and spread across those years... Still put me
         | at just above market rate for those years. But instead of that
         | market rate for 40 hour weeks, it was that rate for 80, 100,
         | 120 hour weeks. I could've been working two bog-standard jobs
         | for normal companies, worked fewer hours, and come out ahead.
         | 
         | Everyone has a reason for gambling. It's rarely ever a good
         | reason. But man, it's easy to lose yourself in rationalizations
         | when you're in its thrall...
        
       | vemv wrote:
       | A sizeable chunk of well-recognised founders are simply scammers
       | - they take VC money, sell dreams to customers, and exploit
       | engineers as a necessary step to keep the ball rolling.
       | 
       | Think of the operation of a pump and dump with extra steps. The
       | mission is never about creating value, it's about pumping
       | expectations and pulling the rug at the right time.
       | 
       | Maybe a few of them live in the delusion of improving society
       | with their products, but even then, the fact that they don't give
       | a damn about the quality delivered to customers (or are qualified
       | to make any technical judgement) makes them de facto scammers.
        
         | 01HNNWZ0MV43FF wrote:
         | That's why the real total compensation from a startup is salary
         | and experience. Does this look good on my resume? Will I learn
         | something I want to learn? Will I be saving money here?
         | 
         | Stocks are worthless. If the company thought their stock was
         | worth anything they wouldn't be giving it away to employees
        
       | suzzer99 wrote:
       | I've averaged 60-hour weeks for a year and a half, with bursts up
       | to 90 hours. I only did it because we were working on new tech at
       | the time, and I figured it was worth it to my long-term value as
       | a programmer. I'd never do it in some stale tech.
       | 
       | Also there was camaraderie. If I didn't like my coworkers, I
       | never would have gone through it. We certainly didn't do it to
       | make our bosses happy. In a weird way we almost had this attitude
       | like we were doing it to _spite_ our bosses. Like:  "We'll build
       | this thing for you, but you better stay out of our way. Your job
       | is to clear obstacles for us when we need it, and otherwise don't
       | tell us how to do our jobs." Luckily our bosses were smart enough
       | to just let us cook and not ruin our morale by micromanaging.
       | 
       | The NBA legend Bill Russell said his dad told him, "Son, if the
       | man asks you for 8 hours, give him 9. That way you can look any
       | man on the job site straight in the eye and tell him to go hell."
       | I like that attitude.
       | 
       | I'm still friends with many of those coworkers, even though we
       | haven't worked together since 2017. It's a bit like (I assume)
       | sharing a foxhole in war. You'll always have that bond.
        
         | rightbyte wrote:
         | > Also there was camaraderie.
         | 
         | > It's a bit like (I assume) sharing a foxhole in war. You'll
         | always have that bond.
         | 
         | What is up with the romance? Nothing makes people as numb as
         | being dragged into a trench and waiting for the shell with your
         | name on it.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-08-14 23:01 UTC)