[HN Gopher] Optician Sans - A free font based on historical eye ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Optician Sans - A free font based on historical eye charts and
       optotypes
        
       Author : exvi
       Score  : 185 points
       Date   : 2025-07-30 16:11 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (optician-sans.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (optician-sans.com)
        
       | javier2 wrote:
       | So its also monospace?
        
         | MattSteelblade wrote:
         | Doesn't look like it.
         | https://github.com/anewtypeofinterference/Optician-Sans/issu...
        
       | graypegg wrote:
       | Huh, so I'm only just learning that the Snellen chart isn't the
       | common one! I wouldn't have known the name of it, but if someone
       | asked me to doodle an eye chart from memory, I would've drawn
       | that blocky E with the serifs! I've most likely been tested with
       | the sans-serif Sloan chart I assume, but the letter forms just
       | aren't distinct enough to stick in my brain I guess. A bit of a
       | shame this font doesn't have a "Optician Serif" variant to look
       | like the Snellen letters.
        
       | cbm-vic-20 wrote:
       | That main image makes my astigmatic eyes very unhappy.
       | 
       | https://optician-sans.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Comp-3....
        
         | abtinf wrote:
         | Why did they animate it to add a blur?
        
           | GuinansEyebrows wrote:
           | probably to evoke the feeling of undergoing an eye exam.
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | I can hear the tech asking "number 1 or number 2"
        
               | ahazred8ta wrote:
               | https://web.archive.org/web/20250730205400/https://neroca
               | m.c...
        
           | atonse wrote:
           | OMG I kept thinking my glasses (progressive lenses) were
           | causing that. I didn't realize it was animating.
        
           | darkwater wrote:
           | Can't you clearly see why?
        
         | pimlottc wrote:
         | That's horrible, the full page blur is less bad since it's so
         | obvious. But man, you should never be intentionally gaslighting
         | the user by making them second-guess their own vision.
        
       | gadders wrote:
       | Nice font. Could have done without the dude's tinder profile pic
       | though.
        
         | edwinjm wrote:
         | That's how Nordic people look like <grin>
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | You know you swiped right.
         | 
         | I had the same odd sentiment about the use of the images as
         | well. It does nothing for me about wanting to use the font.
        
       | m3kw9 wrote:
       | upon entering, it reminds me to go to the Optometrist
        
       | CarVac wrote:
       | The round G _strongly_ resembles the Google logo.
        
       | its-summertime wrote:
       | that C is annoyingly O-ish, and the blurring... feels almost like
       | its made by an anti-optician
        
         | jamesdwilson wrote:
         | it was derived from eye charts that are explicitly designed to
         | find defects in your eyes - it is not a coincidence the O and C
         | look similar.
        
           | jantissler wrote:
           | And there are also alternative versions of many letters as
           | shown further down on the page.
        
           | artemisart wrote:
           | Yes I don't understand how they can claim it's optimized for
           | legibility when the base font does the inverse.
        
       | sandbach wrote:
       | Always amusing to see spelling errors on painstakingly put
       | together design websites. Unless NRK did indeed mean 'Let us all
       | behave like opticians!'
        
       | stevetron wrote:
       | My default blank document Font settings in MSWord is Liberation
       | Sans, Bold, 14 px.
       | 
       | But my cataract problem is getting worse, and I may have to bump
       | the size up yet again. I have yet to find another font I like as
       | well.
        
         | oxguy3 wrote:
         | Liberation Sans is indeed great, but I'm so intrigued: how did
         | you end up preferring a libre font but a proprietary word
         | processor?
        
       | egypturnash wrote:
       | I like how one of the testimonials is someone at Adobe basically
       | quoting the copy at the top of the page.
       | 
       | "OPTICIAN SANS: A free font based on the historical eye charts
       | and optotypes used by opticians world wide." - top copy
       | 
       | "A free typeface based on opticians' eye charts" -Khoi Vinh,
       | Principal designer, Adobe
        
         | arcticfox wrote:
         | I think all the testimonials are fake, if this wasn't clear to
         | everyone. I thought they might be real at first but none of
         | them exist. I actually thought that was kind of shitty to do,
         | since they use real companies and media outlets.
         | 
         | (I don't really follow fonts but I do know there is a
         | subculture crazy about them, so I thought it could be
         | theoretically possible that people would write reviews of
         | them).
        
           | Rendello wrote:
           | You can click them, they link to their sources.
        
             | piker wrote:
             | > "Hmm...this page doesn't exist. Try searching for
             | something else."
             | 
             | - the link under discussion
        
               | GranPC wrote:
               | Link rot is alive and well... unlike their links. https:/
               | /web.archive.org/web/20190430201350/https://twitter.c...
        
         | jaysonelliot wrote:
         | I work for Khoi. I should ask him if he really gave this quote.
        
       | isege wrote:
       | Is it just me or does it look eerily similar to the font
       | Anthropic uses?
        
       | mellonaut wrote:
       | For those that now find themselves inspired to type the Snellen
       | E, the internet provides an OFL typeface that scratches your itch
       | here1 (this unclearly licensed modification2 even comes with some
       | cute but barely readable lowercase versions of the letters)
       | 
       | 1] https://radagast.ca/snellen/snellen.html 2]
       | https://mk.bcgsc.ca/snellen-optotype-font/
        
       | jiehong wrote:
       | This reminds me of the eye chart used in some countries, because
       | it isn't based on reading letters, but on a direction.
       | 
       | For example [0], you should indicate the direction where the E
       | points to.
       | 
       | [0]: https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61MRfRwHwWL._SL1235_.jpg
        
         | mongol wrote:
         | I remember this from when I was a child. Was maybe 4-5 and had
         | not learned the letters yet. But I could turn my hand.
        
         | msikora wrote:
         | This is for kids.
        
       | throwaway290 wrote:
       | Fake testimonials.
        
       | srameshc wrote:
       | I am looking for a very readable font and I like it. I am not in
       | anyway qualified to compare it to Source Sans Pro or Opensans
       | which I believe are considered very read friendly.
        
       | Rendello wrote:
       | Previously seen on HN in 2018:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18665595
       | 
       | They made a Medium post as well:
       | https://medium.com/anewtypeofinterference/completing-a-typef...
        
       | voxleone wrote:
       | Really like this typeface. It hits that rare sweet spot between
       | experimental and functional. Big thanks to the ANTI Hamar team.
        
       | amdivia wrote:
       | The loading animation made me feel in need of a visit to my
       | optician
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-07-30 23:00 UTC)