[HN Gopher] GPT might be an information virus (2023)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       GPT might be an information virus (2023)
        
       Author : 3willows
       Score  : 44 points
       Date   : 2025-07-27 20:23 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (nonint.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (nonint.com)
        
       | hayden_dev wrote:
       | "might"
        
         | anthk wrote:
         | You are right. The web it's already rotten. There are tons of
         | AI generated articles on supposed serious news sites. These
         | will be worse over time.
        
         | DrammBA wrote:
         | "2023"
        
       | andy99 wrote:
       | I think it is an information virus, but differently - it's
       | homogenized everything, and made people dumber and lazier. It's
       | poisoned public and professional discourse by reducing writing
       | and thinking from the richness of humanity to one narrow style
       | with a tiny latent space, and simultaneously convinced people
       | that this is what good writing looks like. And it's erased
       | thought from board classes of endeavor. This virus is much worse
       | than the relatively benign symptoms described in the article.
        
         | crimsoneer wrote:
         | This is how the church felt about the printing press.
        
           | XorNot wrote:
           | Who is "the Church" in this analogy?
        
         | A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 wrote:
         | Like most progress, it made some things easier ( and some
         | things worse as a result ). What I do find particularly
         | fascinating is that it is doing that even in professions that
         | should know better ( lawyers, doctors ). That my boss uses it
         | is no surprise me to. I always suspected he never really read
         | my emails.
        
         | 3willows wrote:
         | Perhaps that is the real danger. Everyone except a small elite
         | who (rightly) feel they understand how LLMs work would simply
         | give up serious thinking and accept whatever "majority" opinion
         | is in their little social media bubble. We wouldn't have the
         | patience to really engage with genuinely different viewpoints
         | any more.
         | 
         | I recall some Chinese language discussion about the experience
         | of studying abroad in the Anglophone world in the early 20th
         | century and the early 21st century. Paradoxically, even if you
         | are a university student, it may now be harder to break out of
         | the bubble and make friends with non-Chinese/East Asians than
         | before. In the early 20th century, you'd probably be one of the
         | few non-White students and had to break out of your comfort
         | zone. Now if you are Chinese, there'd be people from a similar
         | background virtually anywhere you study in the West, and it is
         | almost unnatural to make a deliberate effort to break out of
         | that.
        
           | 3willows wrote:
           | The point being: when you find someone who is tailoring all
           | his/her/its attention to you and you alone, why bother
           | talking to anyone else.
        
       | anthk wrote:
       | There are public sources of information such as a curated
       | WIkipedia, open content from Kiwix, Gutenberg Math books and
       | OpenStreetMap for maps. Better, you can download offline and
       | curated version of these so anyone can have a working snapshot
       | anytime. That's good to avoid future AI tamperings. As long as
       | these as AI free, we are potentialy in the right direction.
        
         | boredatoms wrote:
         | We can only trust a snapshot from pre AI years, eventually
         | everything will be contaminated
        
       | ayaros wrote:
       | We're going to have to go in the opposite direction and rely on
       | directories or lists of verified human-made/accurate content. It
       | will be like the old days of yahoo and web-indexes all over
       | again.
        
         | DaveZale wrote:
         | A few years ago, some talk briefly circulated about local
         | internet efforts, possibly run by public libraries.
         | 
         | Local news coverage has really suffered these past several
         | years. Wouldn't it be great to see relevant local news emerge
         | again, written by humans for humans?
         | 
         | That approach might be a good start. Use a cloud service that
         | forbids AI bot scraping to protect copyright?
        
           | ayaros wrote:
           | This doesn't seem to be structured differently than a
           | standard-fare social media app. All the same issues with
           | human verification on those apps would apply to this too.
           | 
           | Unless you mean a platform _only_ for vetted local
           | journalists...
        
             | righthand wrote:
             | Tie the account to the Library Card and then you can open
             | it up to anyone.
        
         | MPSimmons wrote:
         | I had the thought the other day that one of the most valuable
         | things a human-driven website could offer would be a webring
         | linking to other human-driven websites
        
       | 4b11b4 wrote:
       | virus is a good way to think about the effect radius
        
       | resters wrote:
       | It's a method of storing information that makes it far more
       | useful than previous methods.
       | 
       | Sure we can idealize feats of the human brain such as memorizing
       | digits of pi. LLMs put more human behavior into the same category
       | as memorizing digits of pi, and make the previously scarce "idea
       | clay" available to the masses.
       | 
       | It's not the same as a human brain or human knowledge but it is
       | still a very useful tool just like the tools that let us do maths
       | without memorizing hundreds of digits of pi.
        
       | aspenmayer wrote:
       | _Curious Yellow_ , anyone?
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasshouse_(novel)
       | 
       | > "Curious Yellow is a design study for a really scary worm: one
       | that uses algorithms developed for peer-to-peer file sharing
       | networks to intelligently distribute countermeasures and resist
       | attempts to decontaminate the infected network".
       | 
       | Hat tip to HN user cstross (as I discovered the idea via
       | Charlie's blog):
       | 
       | http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-archive/October_2002.ht...
       | 
       | These topics were first brought to my attention through his
       | amazing novel _Glasshouse_. I've had the pleasure of having my
       | first edition copy of the book signed by the author, and I then
       | promptly loaned it indefinitely to a friend, who then misplaced
       | it. The man himself is a friendly curmudgeon who I am happy to
       | have met, and I have enjoyed reading about the future through his
       | insights into the past and present.
       | 
       | Also I must acknowledge Brandon Wiley, who wrote the inspiration
       | for Curious Yellow as far as I can tell.
       | 
       | https://blanu.net/curious_yellow.html
        
       | hnpolicestate wrote:
       | The same thing could have been said about the computer in general
       | and masses adopting the personal computer.
       | 
       | That's how I view LLM's now. They are what follows computers in
       | the evolution of information technology.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-07-27 23:00 UTC)