[HN Gopher] Britain's spies-for-hire are running wild
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Britain's spies-for-hire are running wild
        
       Author : bingden
       Score  : 45 points
       Date   : 2025-07-25 19:13 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.politico.eu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.politico.eu)
        
       | readthenotes1 wrote:
       | Competition of Carmichael Industries.
       | 
       | (Just finished a Chuck rewatch)
        
         | mr90210 wrote:
         | Irene Demova
        
       | throwawayffffas wrote:
       | > [The company] appointed investigative agencies to surveil me,
       | initially covertly and then overtly with vehicles and cameras
       | placed outside my house.
       | 
       | Isn't that just stalking? Why didn't they just call the cops?
        
         | XorNot wrote:
         | I'm guessing because none of it happened. Seriously an
         | anonymous client, talking about an anonymous company, hiring
         | another anonymous company, stating that a credible professional
         | (the senior lawyer) said it was a big issue but not actually
         | confirming _with the lawyer_ that they knew of this case and
         | had said that?
        
           | matthewdgreen wrote:
           | I was curious about this so I visited ChatGPT and asked if
           | there are documented cases in the UK where these things have
           | happened, and I was met with a deluge of well-documented
           | cases where corporations hired private intelligence firms to
           | infiltrate activist groups and surveil critics and ex-
           | employees, complete with links to primary and secondary
           | sources which I briefly checked out just to make sure it
           | wasn't hallucinating. Then it asked me if I wanted a second
           | deluge and I declined.
           | 
           | I don't know why people have a mental model of the world that
           | is so incompatible with reality that they'll post skeptical
           | takes to HN when we live in a world where so much data is
           | available at the tip of our fingers.
        
             | XorNot wrote:
             | And then you didn't post your prompt, the links you looked
             | at or really anything that would mean anyone could
             | establish a common basis of reality or determine if actual
             | nefarious action was happening.
             | 
             | For example, "infiltrating an organization" is also just
             | joining it, which is quite dissimilar to say, stalking if
             | all they did was not actually believe in the organization,
             | rather the say, menacingly post men and machines outside of
             | someone's residence for the purpose of intimidation via
             | threat of violence.
             | 
             | Did you find any of that? Specifically in the UK, by
             | private investigation organizations, specifically providing
             | stalking for hire? Confirmed by more evidence then "well
             | someone totally said it happened but we won't say who or by
             | who?"
        
       | cs02rm0 wrote:
       | Bit of a mess of an article IMHO.
       | 
       | Intelligence agency staff leave their roles, just like anyone
       | else does. Unregulated? They're as regulated as the rest of us.
       | Then you have the article casting aspersions on them for doing
       | so, it must be about money and malign foreign influences. Of
       | course foreign states use proxies; so does the UK. Why's that
       | even mentioned as if it's implying ex-intel staff are the proxies
       | - which as far as I'm aware, they're not?
       | 
       | Should we ban these people from working again, or ensure they
       | only flip burgers for the rest of their lives for daring to leave
       | the public sector?
        
         | matthewdgreen wrote:
         | I have no idea how regulated "the rest of us are." This brush-
         | off does not convince me that private spying is good, or that
         | regulations are sufficient to stop it. In fact, the existence
         | of an article in Politico makes me strongly suspect this is
         | part of a discussion in which someone argues for more
         | regulation. Fortunately I don't live in the UK. Unfortunately
         | I'm not convinced that is a barrier.
         | 
         | ETA: the argument "what, do you expect these people not to keep
         | engaging in work that we traditionally reserve for governments,
         | how will they feed their kids?" also leaves me quite cold.
        
         | Maxious wrote:
         | US veterans have to seek permission to enter employment or
         | invest in companies that do business with foreign governments
         | https://dodsoco.ogc.osd.mil/Portals/102/summary_emoluments_c...
         | 
         | Australia introduced a less onerous 1/5/10 year permission
         | period but for anybody with "training in military tactics and
         | use of software or technology with military applications"
         | https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2024-05-07/new-l...
         | 
         | Most famously due to a former US citizen turned Australian
         | citizen awaiting extradiction back to the US for allegedly
         | training chinese fighter pilots (although this seems to be more
         | of an ITAR violation)
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecution_of_Daniel_Duggan
        
       | speedbird wrote:
       | Time to reinforce treason legislation.
        
         | criddell wrote:
         | High treason in Britain is mostly about attacks on the
         | monarchy.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-07-27 23:00 UTC)