[HN Gopher] Felix Baumgartner, who jumped from stratosphere, die...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Felix Baumgartner, who jumped from stratosphere, dies in Italy
        
       Author : signa11
       Score  : 105 points
       Date   : 2025-07-19 10:38 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theinternational.at)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theinternational.at)
        
       | lode wrote:
       | https://archive.is/2025.07.17-234516/https://www.theinternat...
        
       | justmarc wrote:
       | Such a shame. People who have met him have always said he was a
       | stand up guy.
       | 
       | Definitely a man who pursued his passions.
       | 
       | RIP.
        
         | cenamus wrote:
         | Definitely caused some controversy in recent years aswell, like
         | recommending Orban for the peace nobel prize. Literally the man
         | that turned Hungary into the poorest and most illiberal EU
         | country. But again, Baumgartner prefers dictatorships to
         | democracy.
        
           | falseprofit wrote:
           | *preferred...
        
           | neuroelectron wrote:
           | At least they maintained communism, even if officially it
           | stopped being communist, it was still de facto communist and
           | that's why it became so poor. Don't think of them as poor but
           | as equal outcome.
        
             | biggestlou wrote:
             | What on Earth are you talking about?
        
             | miningape wrote:
             | Yeah I starved to death, but at least we all died equally
             | starved!
             | 
             | Equality of outcome is the cruelest lie the untalented,
             | lazy, and comfortable tell each other. They assume it means
             | raising the bar to their level instead of drawing it on the
             | ground. It's enforced mediocrity, peddled by those who fear
             | effort and resent excellence.
        
               | NoOn3 wrote:
               | If for you outcome is the same why you would prefer
               | capitalism over socialism or communism? only because
               | small group of rich people will be in more good? But if
               | it doesn't affect you in any way, and maybe it will make
               | it worse, there will be no point in it.
        
             | cenamus wrote:
             | Equal outcome? Like 99% of power in Hungary is split
             | between Orban and his uni dorm buddies. The guy doesn't
             | even have any ideology, just loves power, money and
             | football. Used to be bearded liberal left wing, turned
             | gelled hair far right after the first thing didn't pull any
             | voters. Didn't care about immigrants until the far far
             | right party got some votes on the issue and then started
             | leaning in heavily.
        
             | District5524 wrote:
             | Communism in Hungary was introduced and kept up by Soviets
             | after the 2nd ww. The very considerable difference between
             | Orban and Kadar (the longest serving communist leader) is
             | that Kadar paid attention not to make his direct family and
             | direct friend the most exorbitantly rich guys in 15 years,
             | which probably also made lots of mid-income people poorer
             | in Hungary. And despite very strong democratic backsliding
             | in many areas, it is still more democratic than during
             | Soviet-led times. But that's probably not due to Mr Orban's
             | character or self-restraint. Baumgartner's idea is probably
             | related to fashionable libertarian ideas of those rich
             | people who never had the patience to feel sympathy for
             | other people, nor to study history or humanities, but feel
             | like they should have a say.
        
           | inglor_cz wrote:
           | I remember Obama getting the Nobel Peace Prize not even a
           | year into his first term, with no concrete peace-related
           | achievements under his belt. There are also Kissinger, Abiy
           | Ahmed and Yasser Arafat on the list of laureates. Overall, it
           | might be the weakest of the Prizes, in the "too dependent on
           | momental popularity and political pressure" sense.
           | 
           | The scientific Nobels + Literature are usually awarded with a
           | decent time gap after the relevant achievement, which helps.
           | Maybe the Nobel Peace Prize should only be awarded to
           | professionally retired people over 70. That would prevent it
           | from being too politicized.
        
             | volleyball wrote:
             | (Shimon Peres too in list of questionable peace laureates)
        
             | cenamus wrote:
             | The over 70 criteria wouldn't help much nowadays, with
             | basically every leader being in his 70s+ (Trump, Biden, Xi,
             | Netanyahu, Erdogan, Khomeini, Putin, etc.)
        
           | j3th9n wrote:
           | You have your information from the corporate media.
        
           | raffael_de wrote:
           | As far as Hungary's development of the GDP per capita is
           | concerned your statement is wrong.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_in_Eu.
           | ..
        
       | gsf_emergency_2 wrote:
       | > _Illness_
       | 
       | Unreviewed translation of "Unwohlseins"
       | 
       | Other media hint at seizure/cardiac arrest.
        
         | pantalaimon wrote:
         | "feeling unwell" would be the more direct and more correct
         | translation
        
           | mithras wrote:
           | I wouldn't agree, it's a big step beyond just feeling unwell.
           | With this word I would think someone might need medical
           | assistance.
        
       | Xenoamorphous wrote:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44596845
        
       | sneak wrote:
       | AP says it was a paraglider crash.
        
       | lordnacho wrote:
       | If you die on your first parachute jump, you're unlucky.
       | 
       | If you live your entire life doing these "small chance each time"
       | stunts, maybe we should not be so surprised that your eventual
       | demise was this kind of thing.
       | 
       | Was an interesting character, RIP.
        
         | kylecazar wrote:
         | Definitely a true statement, but reports are saying he was
         | already unconscious as he fell, so some open questions remain
        
           | Simon_O_Rourke wrote:
           | Not that I doubt the reports, but how could anyone possibly
           | make that call?
        
             | catlikesshrimp wrote:
             | Yes. A pathologist can know if there was a catasthropic
             | event like the natural rupture of an artery (e.g. stroke,
             | heart attack) In vivo events evolve differently than post
             | mortem ones, e.g. strangling a dead body shows differently
             | than strangling a person to death.
             | 
             | More recently, he might have been wearing a vital signal
             | monitor that kept logs.
             | 
             | Nowadays probably the latter.
        
             | diggan wrote:
             | Someone so famous and regularly doing spectacular things
             | surely have a bunch of sensors attached to them that
             | reports a bunch of metrics about their physiological state.
        
           | ngruhn wrote:
           | Well if "unconscious" happens to you in a restaurant you
           | don't fall out of the sky.
        
             | 0x000xca0xfe wrote:
             | The final result is often similar while driving. Or walking
             | down a flight of stairs, at least for oneself.
        
               | baobabKoodaa wrote:
               | No it's not. In both examples you are very likely to
               | survive. This is different than the ~0% chance of
               | survival Felix had in the air.
        
               | 0x000xca0xfe wrote:
               | Tens of thousands die falling on stairs every year. You
               | don't have to fall out of the sky to die. Just last year
               | a good friend of mine had to bury her sister because she
               | fell while exiting her car. You are more likely to
               | survive than in small aviation crashes but most people
               | (probably Felix included) spend way more time on that
               | than flying. As a motorcyclist I'm surely not well of
               | either when I suddenly fall unconscious.
               | 
               | There are many activities where you really should not
               | pass out while doing them, but they don't make for
               | interesting headlines.
        
               | achierius wrote:
               | "Many people die from X" is different than "you will most
               | likely die if you X".
               | 
               |  _Most_ people who pass out in vehicles probably survive.
               | Say we ignore the cases where you 're on a side street,
               | stuck in traffic, going at slow speeds, etc. (and just
               | end up idling in the road with people honking/routing
               | around you) -- so just consider the deadliest case, going
               | at speed on the highway. While there aren't statistics
               | for this particular scenario, we can look at the numbers
               | for multi-car collisions in general, as that's near to
               | the worst thing that could happen if you did just stop
               | managing your car while at speed (gliding into the median
               | is much less likely to be fatal): https://crashstats.nhts
               | a.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/.... One line in the
               | report suggests this should be broadly comparable to what
               | we're thinking of: "In about 40 percent of fatal single
               | vehicle rollovers and 57 percent of multi- vehicle
               | rollovers, investigating officers reported that no crash
               | avoidance maneuvers preceded the crash".
               | 
               | Even still: the fatality rate is <10%!
               | 
               | Compare to >80% if you pass out while doing underwater
               | cave diving.
        
         | Simon_O_Rourke wrote:
         | There's a concept I read about before called micromorts, where
         | activities are given a danger rating something like the
         | expected number of fatalities per million events.
         | 
         | So riding a motorbike 100 miles is 8 micromorts.
         | 
         | Hang-gliding is 9 micromorts.
         | 
         | Base jumping is 430 micromorts.
         | 
         | And summiting Everest is 37,000 micromorts.
         | 
         | Incidentally, of those - I know of two guys who died either on
         | Everest or at base camp there over the past 15 years. First guy
         | fell on the descent, and the second guy developed health issues
         | at altitude (apparently related to an Israeli team immediately
         | prior stealing their oxygen bottles).
        
           | d_e_solomon wrote:
           | I try to calibrate risk based on the likelihood of dying
           | during my commute. I'm glad that there is a more standardized
           | scale!
        
             | smus wrote:
             | Is there anything you do that ends up being more dangerous?
             | Genuinely curious
        
               | criddell wrote:
               | I often think about this _while_ riding my bicycle to
               | work. The exercise and quiet time surely has a positive
               | impact on my health span, but being among cars risking
               | collision and breathing in exhaust is a negative. What's
               | the net result?
        
             | perilunar wrote:
             | Well if you commuted by riding 100 miles per day on a
             | motorbike for 40 years your total risk is roughly 77,000
             | micromorts (77 millimorts?), or double the risk of
             | summiting Everest once!
        
           | perilunar wrote:
           | > summiting Everest is 37,000 micromorts
           | 
           | That's _only_ 3.7 % -- I imagined it was higher.
           | 
           | Does the death rate of 'summiting' include those who die
           | before they reach the top? or those that abandon an attempt
           | and survive?
        
             | bee_rider wrote:
             | Everest is such a well-known target, they have helpers and
             | there's a whole system, right? I vaguely think I've seen
             | photos of a line at the top...
             | 
             | I think it is somewhat commercialized. Actually, I'm
             | surprised the death rate is that high. I wonder if it is
             | pulled up by people who aren't really ready, because it is
             | so popular. FWIW,
             | 
             | https://www.climbing-kilimanjaro.com/mount-kilimanjaro-
             | death...
             | 
             | > Approximately 50,000 people ascend Mount Kilimanjaro
             | every year. According to Kilimanjaro travel guides and
             | recorded statistics, on average 3 to 10 people die each
             | year. It is widely believed that the actual number could be
             | two to three times higher, although these estimates are not
             | substantiated by reliable data.
        
           | hhmc wrote:
           | I feel like you want some higher moments on these. At least
           | the standard deviation would be useful on top of the
           | expectation.
        
           | gdiamos wrote:
           | probability is memoryless.
           | 
           | If you have been base jumping for 20 years, you have the same
           | risk on your next jump as someone trying it for the first
           | time.
        
             | jamwil wrote:
             | Yes but you're answering the wrong question. It's not,
             | "what is the probability of death on my next jump?". It's
             | "what is the accumulated probability of death by jumping
             | repeatedly."
             | 
             | The way you answer it is by flipping it upside down (what
             | is the probability of surviving a single jump?) and
             | multiplying that value by itself n times, where n is the
             | number of jumps.
             | 
             | .99999 * .99999 * .99999 * ...
        
               | gdiamos wrote:
               | That's only if you are planning to jump 100 more times.
        
           | vladgur wrote:
           | A lot more than 2 people die on Everest per year according to
           | Wikipedia and I'm sure oxygen bottle theft plays a role but I
           | haven't read anything attributing deaths to "Israeli team
           | stealing oxygen bottles".
           | 
           | Mind sharing where you got these news from?
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_who_died_climbi.
           | ..
        
         | lazyant wrote:
         | also with time they get more cocky? While new drivers have a
         | higher crash rate in their first year of driving, the fatality
         | rate is actually highest in their second year, not their first.
        
       | lionkor wrote:
       | I watched him jump live, that was incredibly cool and spooky when
       | he started tumbling. I won't forget that
        
         | usr1106 wrote:
         | It was not transmitted live, but with a suitable delay. They
         | would not have shown it in case.
        
       | meta-level wrote:
       | Reminds me of Yuri Gagarin, first man in space who later died in
       | a plane crash..
        
         | cwicklein wrote:
         | And me of Francis Gary Powers.
        
         | Muromec wrote:
         | First man who returned from space alive
        
           | mongol wrote:
           | No man, dead or alive, returned from space before him
        
       | neuroelectron wrote:
       | >Austrian extreme athlete Felix Baumgartner (56) died on Thursday
       | afternoon in a paragliding accident
       | 
       | quite a legacy
        
       | jboggan wrote:
       | My 4-year-old daughter asks to watch his Red Bull Stratos jump
       | almost every night before bed. She's obsessed with space because
       | of him and says "Felix is my favorite astronaut." May he continue
       | to inspire.
        
         | laurent_du wrote:
         | My son was literally asking me about him yesterday. Wonder how
         | many kids think about him every day.
        
       | basisword wrote:
       | I was just watching his jump again last week. Was surprised to
       | find his record only stood for a couple of years before someone
       | went higher in a much less media-covered jump.
        
         | franze wrote:
         | 2 years later by a Google guy without much media circus
        
           | sitkack wrote:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Eustace
        
         | dundarious wrote:
         | Eustace went higher, but did not freefall -- he had a parachute
         | to slow his descent. Baumgartner was in freefall. Different
         | categories.
        
       | Rygian wrote:
       | The bystanders, and especially the poor woman who was injured in
       | the accident, have for sure lived a traumatizing experience.
        
         | rectang wrote:
         | Fortunately, from what I read, the woman, a hotel employee who
         | was struck by debris from the poolside wooden hut where
         | Baumgartner crashed, is expected to make a full recovery. I
         | hope she is not afflicted by any lingering health or financial
         | problems.
         | 
         | I haven't seen any indication that Baumgartner was paragliding
         | in a forbidden area. My understanding is that restrictions on
         | paragliding are a patchwork, from licensing and insurance
         | requirements to where you are allowed to fly.
        
       | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
       | > Baumgartner lost control of his motorized paraglider due to a
       | sudden illness and crashed into a hotel pool.
       | 
       | He may have died while paragliding rather than from paragliding.
       | 
       | A heart attack or stroke could have been the actual cause of
       | death
        
       | Zigurd wrote:
       | Red Bull athletes list: https://www.redbull.com/us-en/athletes
       | 
       | The dead ones appear to have been removed from the list, and from
       | all other mentions on the website. Quickly, too. Somebody's got
       | that in their job description.
       | 
       | I no longer find it entertaining to watch sports where there is
       | such a high risk of death, or lifelong impairment, from brain
       | injuries, for example. I used to love ski movies. But too many of
       | the people in the credits are dead now.
       | 
       | Apart from things like unconscionable contracts, I wouldn't
       | restrain people from extreme sports. I'm sure a lot of of them
       | die in their beds. I just don't find it entertaining to watch.
        
         | Waterluvian wrote:
         | I feel that Penn explained this incredibly well in one of my
         | favourite magic tricks:
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/Jko5BGhc-Ys?si=Uz6jvQ5voEYAxg8W
         | 
         | We have such a weird relationship with the spectacle of risk.
         | As he says, a tightrope act is just as difficult at any height.
         | The only need to make it dangerous is because the audience
         | wants the circus.
         | 
         | And I think somewhat implicit in the point he's making is that
         | he believes that while the audience wants the spectacle, the
         | performers have a responsibility not to give it to them.
        
           | xanderlewis wrote:
           | > a tightrope act is just as difficult at any height
           | 
           | Well, sort of. But surely part of the feat is overcoming the
           | natural fear of heights.
        
             | Waterluvian wrote:
             | That's true. But I don't think anyone in the audience is
             | being wowed by that detail.
        
               | Barrin92 wrote:
               | That's exactly what they're wowed by. The general
               | audience cares about the risk-taking, the bravery and
               | daring aspect of it, and maybe the visual flashiness.
               | It's the psychology that's interesting to a general
               | audience because that's what they relate to. Technical
               | excellence is always something peers are more interested
               | in than spectators, your ordinary viewer isn't invested
               | in the technical proficiency of tightrope footwork.
        
               | baobabKoodaa wrote:
               | There's 3 distinct things:
               | 
               | A) The ability of walking a tightrope
               | 
               | B) The ability of overcoming your fears to the extent of
               | being able to walk a tightrope at a dangerous height
               | 
               | C) The risk of falling
               | 
               | I would argue that the audience cares about A and C. The
               | audience doesn't care so much for B.
        
               | majormajor wrote:
               | I think the audience largely just cares about C.
               | 
               | I would not be surprised if most lay people don't know
               | why or how it's even that hard, or what goes into
               | training. "Oh, it's just someone who has good balance" vs
               | an awareness of the technical details of physical
               | fitness.
        
               | zdragnar wrote:
               | Having watched a few of Cirque du Soleil's shows, I can
               | confirm that A is much more impressive and exciting than
               | C.
               | 
               | Sure, there's risk, but seeing how effortless they make
               | it look is amazing. The skill to do it fearlessly is far
               | more impressive than the fact that something bad didn't
               | happen. Audience members expect that it won't happen.
               | There's a visceral reaction, of course, but that's it.
        
               | somenameforme wrote:
               | Completely agreed. I think the first time you go with
               | some friends to an olympic diving board, it's the exact
               | same thing. When you look at it from the ground it's
               | "only" 10m, it doesn't feel so scary. But when you get up
               | there and look down, zomg is 10m friggin high! Oh and the
               | climb up there... It's high enough that by the time you
               | reach the platform you've completely dried off.
               | 
               | It's completely safe and trivial to do, but awesome
               | nonetheless, and a show for your friends, just because
               | it's really scary the first time you do it!
        
           | mtalantikite wrote:
           | This reminded me of an old Dave Chappelle joke about the
           | Siegfried & Roy tiger show (around 1:10 min mark):
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kth0UOU5a_M
        
           | watwut wrote:
           | > As he says, a tightrope act is just as difficult at any
           | height. The only need to make it dangerous is because the
           | audience wants the circus.
           | 
           | Tho, only a few of the people who engage in these dangerous
           | sports are famous or earn money on that. As in, if you look
           | at those sports, there are always people who seek the danger
           | and possible self destruction. They do it, because they want
           | to do them. Not because of the audience.
        
         | gdbsjjdn wrote:
         | There's a level of economic coercion involved though as well -
         | "going pro" is only possible by pushing for riskier and riskier
         | stunts. If you want to get paid to ski, skateboard, etc you
         | need to be doing increasingly extreme things to risk your own
         | health and safety. The companies do lots of risk mitigation
         | once you're filming a TV spot, but to get to that level you
         | already had to be putting your body on the line for years.
        
           | perilunar wrote:
           | The ethical thing is to refuse to be complicit by refusing to
           | watch.
        
       | franze wrote:
       | Here in Austria he was a very controversial person cause of his
       | stance on democracy, right wing views and conflicts with Austrian
       | journalists.
        
         | antonvs wrote:
         | He should have come to live in the US, he would have been
         | welcome in the current administration.
        
           | wolfi1 wrote:
           | He sure would have been welcome as a tax avoider
        
       | jjcob wrote:
       | Austrian newspaper _Der Standard_ [1] is reporting that he was
       | using a camera attached with a string, and authorities are
       | considering the possiblity that it got caught in the propellor,
       | leading to a collapse of the parachute.
       | 
       | Allegedly he tried to open the emergency chute, but was already
       | too low.
       | 
       | [1]: https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000280134/justiz-in-
       | ita...
        
       | stillsut wrote:
       | Curious parallel to Gary Powers: the man who fell from the
       | stratosphere in a shot down U2 and later in life died crash
       | landing into a populated area:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Gary_Powers#Death
        
       | MarkMarine wrote:
       | I'm the a moon's distance away from a being a pro athlete or
       | pushing any adventure sports field I participate in, but I do
       | things for fun that some people think are insanely dangerous.
       | I've toned it back now that I have kids (which changed my
       | thinking) but for a long time I would have been quite happy with
       | that exit from life. Doing something I loved, never put through
       | indignity of advanced age, dying quickly and without suffering.
       | 
       | God speed Felix
        
         | tetris11 wrote:
         | I used to walk across pitched roofs 3-floors up as a teen, and
         | squeeze between cars and busses on my bike in narrow london
         | roads (back before bike lanes were a thing) to the point that I
         | would routinely get to my job with bloodied knuckles.
         | 
         | At the time I was clearly just vibing off the adrenaline, but
         | looking back on it all as mature adult... I get heart
         | palpatations.
         | 
         | There are many parallel worlds where I am not alive, and I
         | think of those other selves often.
        
         | usrusr wrote:
         | My risk habits have a rather low chance of dying per injury
         | event, but life changing injury isn't all that rare. I do
         | occasionally see myself envying those with a risk profile
         | that's more on the binary end of the spectrum: where it's
         | either a clean end or everything is fine.
        
       | fuzzythinker wrote:
       | Slightly misleading title. He's famous for first to jump from the
       | stratosphere, breaking the sound barrier. That wasn't the cause
       | of his death. More on him
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Baumgartner .
       | 
       | Maybe a more interesting and impressive fact from the wiki is
       | learning about Alan Eustace, who was a senior VP of engineering
       | at Google. Just before retiring, on October 24, 2014 *at age 57*,
       | he made a free-fall jump from the stratosphere, breaking Felix
       | Baumgartner's world record. He won the Laureus World Action
       | Sportsperson of the Year in 2015.
        
         | fuzzythinker wrote:
         | Found HN post (236 comments) on Alan Eustace breaking the
         | record: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8504931
        
         | Graziano_M wrote:
         | At the Air & Space Museum in DC there's a little exhibit for
         | each of them right across from each other.
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | [dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44596845
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-07-19 23:01 UTC)