[HN Gopher] Nintendo Switch 2 account bans continue: warning aft...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Nintendo Switch 2 account bans continue: warning after buying old
       copy of Bayo 3
        
       Author : freedomben
       Score  : 49 points
       Date   : 2025-07-17 19:30 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.tomshardware.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.tomshardware.com)
        
       | DrillShopper wrote:
       | Switch 2 is a hard pass for me if Nintendo can brick on a whim
        
         | surgical_fire wrote:
         | I'll handle it like I handled all other Nintendo consoles. I
         | have one for legit use and one that I open up for, er,
         | "alternative" content.
        
           | taraindara wrote:
           | I'll just give up on them altogether, and patiently wait for
           | simulators I can use instead.
        
             | surgical_fire wrote:
             | Eh, I tend to like them. The Switch was the console I liked
             | the most since my SNES days.
             | 
             | I am far from heing against piracy, but I can pay, ao I do.
        
           | giancarlostoro wrote:
           | At that point just emulate it on a Steam Deck...
        
         | heavyset_go wrote:
         | Yeah, I can wait for emulators instead of spending $500 on
         | something I won't own.
        
         | thesuitonym wrote:
         | I don't like this practice, and it's one of the primary reasons
         | I'm not buying a Switch 2, but his console wasn't bricked, it
         | was just banned from playing online. And don't trot out that
         | tired old "effectively bricked" line, words have meanings, and
         | the words you said do not mean what happened.
        
           | viraptor wrote:
           | If someone bought it for online play specifically, then there
           | is no difference between being banned from playing online and
           | the console not turning on. You're just nitpicking on the
           | meaning, but we know what happened.
        
         | nonchalantsui wrote:
         | Just to be clear, this isn't brick on a whim, this is disabling
         | access to online services on a whim.
         | 
         | Seems a lot of commenters are getting that confused due to not
         | opening the link.
        
           | Someone1234 wrote:
           | Online Services, including any digital purchases which could
           | be into the hundreds of dollars in value.
        
             | nonchalantsui wrote:
             | Yes, although if one is buying used, then you're likely
             | already avoiding digital purchases through this online
             | service.
             | 
             | So just keep buying used. Pretty easy workaround.
        
               | gs17 wrote:
               | Do we know if it blocks you from downloading "game key"
               | cards? In that case you're effectively stuck with Switch
               | 1 titles. Not that you should need a "workaround" for
               | being punished because someone else did something.
        
           | skwirl wrote:
           | So not being able to download any of the games you have
           | purchased ever again?
        
             | nonchalantsui wrote:
             | Article says you can still play those, just not re-download
             | on the same system it seems.
        
               | 0_gravitas wrote:
               | ah, very reasonable...
        
           | RandomBacon wrote:
           | Agreed, and you shouldn't be downvoted for it, oh well.
        
       | chmod775 wrote:
       | "Another man who adopted face-eating bird has his face eaten."
       | 
       | I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
        
         | FirmwareBurner wrote:
         | You know how like some men have those fetishes where they pay a
         | dominatrix to kick them in the balls for pleasure, and it's all
         | legal and consensual?
         | 
         | Well similarly, some _consoomers_ like to pay Nintendo to get
         | kicked in the balls, figuratively, instead of paying for a
         | device that respects you, like a Steam Deck for example.
         | 
         | Just stop giving money to companies that disrespect you, it is
         | that simple, you DON't NEED Nintendo's latest slop in your
         | life. But no, they like it more when Mario or Yoshi kicks them
         | in the balls instead, so here we are.
        
           | andrepd wrote:
           | > Just stop giving money to companies that disrespect you, it
           | is that simple, you DON't NEED the latest slop in your life
           | 
           | Well I agree, you don't! Unfortunately, Nintendo produces not
           | slop, but some of the most outstanding games I've ever played
           | (plus a fair bit of slop too).
           | 
           | Myself I don't mind to wait a few years and play on an
           | emulator :)
        
           | kulahan wrote:
           | You don't NEED video games at all, so it's kinda moot to say
           | that you don't NEED the newest "slop". It's 100% an
           | entertainment device which is completely unnecessary to life,
           | just like computer games and phone games.
        
           | turtlebro wrote:
           | Nintendo has the best 1st party games. They care a lot about
           | making games that are just fun. What does Valve have?
           | Lootbox, gambling ridden, addictive dopamine juicers. Their
           | offering sucks compared to Nintendo.
        
             | freedomben wrote:
             | Portal and Half-life series will forever be some of my all-
             | time favorite games, but yeah their newer stuff does seem
             | to be not that great, though I'm very much a "play local"
             | kind of guy
        
       | giingyui wrote:
       | >got flagged by big N
       | 
       | Big N, really?
        
         | giancarlostoro wrote:
         | It's funny to me because I've never heard anyone refer to
         | Nintendo as "Big N" there's a handful of other things referred
         | to as Big N, Nintendo is not one of them.
        
           | nope96 wrote:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_N
           | 
           | "Nickname for Nintendo"
           | 
           | I remember it being frequently used as far back as the 80s by
           | Electronic Gaming Monthly
        
         | mvdtnz wrote:
         | American racists don't get to claim exclusive rights to the
         | letter N.
        
         | kotaKat wrote:
         | "Big N" is an older term from Nintendo. Think the giant
         | rotating "N" from the Nintendo 64 logo.
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nb-h4oLctQc
        
       | downrightmike wrote:
       | Nintendo is adamant about destroying our reselling rights. I'll
       | continue skipping this generation.
        
         | phatfish wrote:
         | This is about someone buying a used cart that had been dumped
         | with the MIG Flash mod.
         | 
         | I remember when this MIG mod got released people were saying
         | buying used would now be a roulette as Nintendo can spot the
         | duplicated cart when it is used online and blacklist your
         | switch. Not sure how often it ended up happening, but at least
         | once it seems from this article.
         | 
         | Can't say I'm happy with how Nintendo is dealing with physical
         | games, which means I'll need a really good reason to buy a
         | Switch 2 myself. But Microsoft (and to a lesser extent Sony)
         | are trying harder to kill physical sales and resale.
         | 
         | Nintendo at least have some skin in the game as they have the
         | largest percentage of physical sales compared to
         | Microsoft/Sony.
        
           | weinzierl wrote:
           | _" Nintendo can spot the duplicated cart."_
           | 
           | I think they cannot spot the duplicated cart specifically,
           | they just see the same "cart" (or key) used twice or multiple
           | times at the same time and block it and possibly all devices
           | involved.
           | 
           | Not defending Nintendo, but I believe it is technically
           | impossible for them to distinguish between the pirate and the
           | victim.
        
             | snickerdoodle12 wrote:
             | That means they're happy to punish the victim. The moral
             | choice would be to punish neither in this case.
        
             | isk517 wrote:
             | Yeah, if they were able to directly identified a duplicated
             | cart then the easiest solution would be to update the
             | console software to just not play duplicated carts. There
             | shotgun approach is just biting them in the ass since the
             | market has apparently already been flooded with duplicate
             | carts and all they are doing is antagonizing people who
             | believe they bought in good faith a legitimate game
        
             | tshaddox wrote:
             | This can't be a new thing, right? For decades there have
             | been entire businesses dedicated to buying and selling hard
             | copies of video games, and online play has been common for
             | at least one decade. I think it's on them to figure out how
             | to make copying hard copies difficult or to distinguish
             | between the legit copy and illicit copies. Banning people
             | for using a legitimate hard copy of a video game because
             | someone else has a illicit copy of it is in no way
             | acceptable.
        
           | BolexNOLA wrote:
           | It's unclear to me in your comment if you know this so just
           | want to point out that with Switch 2 a lot of the cards are
           | just licenses for a digital download - particularly 3rd party
           | games. 1st party though it looks like they're (currently)
           | putting the whole game on the cards.
           | 
           | Given their obsession with piracy/emulation I wouldn't be
           | surprised to see them completely abandon it in the future and
           | just have the cards be license keys like Sony/M$ currently
           | do. We'll see i suppose.
        
       | delecti wrote:
       | The title is technically true, but leaves out the pretty
       | significant context that he has openly used the MIG Switch, a
       | device technically for "backups", but realistically for piracy.
       | 
       | It's within the realm of possibility that you could get in
       | trouble after buying used games which have been the source of
       | pirated copies, but I don't believe that this guy's situation is
       | an example of that happening.
       | 
       | "Nintendo cuts off online access for console after guy uses tool
       | made for piracy" is a less compelling title though.
        
       | puppycodes wrote:
       | Is this IP troll energy pervasive in other Japanese tech
       | companies or is Nintendo an outlier?
        
         | mvdtnz wrote:
         | This has nothing to do with patent trolling.
        
           | puppycodes wrote:
           | Sure... IP rather than patent ~ the vibe reminds me of patent
           | trolls is what I mean. It's the evil of opressive copyright
           | boots on the necks of people simply trying to enjoy
           | themselves.
        
       | throwasxy1784 wrote:
       | Animal Crossing will forever be a kids game that changed my life
       | profoundly, and twice. Like most of us, Animal Crossing got me
       | through Covid19. It was such a strange time to be locked in and
       | spending 10 hours of every day working on collecting and
       | manicuring your town. I remember my sister and I really bonded
       | over this game, and there were many days where my mom and dad
       | watched us play.
       | 
       | But aside from a worldwide pandemic, I remember the first time
       | Animal Crossing changed my perspective was when I was ~13? I had
       | grown up with a GameShark on the Gameboy Color, but years later
       | my next exposure to hacking was on the Nintendo DS playing online
       | in Animal Crossing. Had some random person I made friends with on
       | the Nintendo forums join our small group of friends to travel
       | between towns. This person could do some impossible things!
       | They'd dig rivers, spawn-in objects, and I still have a vivid
       | memory of them making the game rain items on balloons like some
       | festive meteor shower.
       | 
       | I remember at that time you'd hear horror stories about hackers
       | coming in and destroying peoples' towns. I did hear about abuse.
       | I liked my (Ukrainian?) friend who would show up and help us make
       | impossible towns with rivers that went in circles and showed us
       | game assets we'd likely never have discovered on our own.
       | 
       | I'm a PC gamer now, and I avoid consoles for the lock-in and
       | control companies like Nintendo exert over its players. I
       | understand why they do it but I feel like the experiences I had
       | could never happen today.
       | 
       | Whoever that was started me on a career of game modding and
       | software development and I'm glad I got to meet them while it was
       | possible.
        
         | andrepd wrote:
         | Thank you for sharing, both those resonate with me as well.
        
         | praveenbatra wrote:
         | I have a fond memory of playing Mario Kart Wii online with my
         | brother when I was a kid, and we ran into into a clearly
         | hacking player who was just constantly spamming items,
         | permanently invincible, etc.
         | 
         | Thankfully hackers weren't common when I played so it felt like
         | seeing a unicorn in the wild. Good times
        
       | hard_times wrote:
       | Why would someone in their right mind ever buy a Nintendo
       | product?
        
         | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote:
         | They make excellent games?
        
         | kulahan wrote:
         | Cool hardware, generally stable experience, family friendly,
         | lots of games which are enriching, the portability is awesome,
         | it's inexpensive, the games are fun, lots of exclusives...
         | 
         | You couldn't think of ANY of these?
        
           | freedomben wrote:
           | > Cool hardware
           | 
           | Eh, from what I've heard it's not really that great. Nintendo
           | isn't really known for cutting edge tech, they're really more
           | known for their first party offering. Steam Deck is a few
           | years old now but still pretty impressive hardware, so I
           | would call them about equal
           | 
           | > generally stable experience
           | 
           | Yes this is true (as long as you don't try to mod), though
           | Steam Deck has been rock solid stable for me
           | 
           | > family friendly
           | 
           | Can you expand on this a bit? Other platforms have family
           | controls and lots of family-friendly game options so I don't
           | know where Nintendo out competes in this area.
           | 
           | > lots of games which are enriching
           | 
           | Aside from the first-party games, this also doesn't feel like
           | a unique quality of Nintendo
           | 
           | > the portability is awesome
           | 
           | I'm assuming you mean physical portability? If so then yes,
           | but also not unique to Nintendo.
           | 
           | If you mean software portability like "can run games on other
           | systems/platforms" then absolutely not. Steam is going to be
           | way better at that.
           | 
           | > it's inexpensive
           | 
           | Is it? Here at least the switch 2 is $500 (there is one on
           | Amazon for $450 but it is "invite only"), compared with Steam
           | Deck which starts at $400 but goes up to $650 for the top
           | model. It seems like again Nintendo is just not unique in
           | price.
           | 
           | > the games are fun, lots of exclusives...
           | 
           | The exclusives are IMHO really the only reason to get a
           | Nintendo. If you really like their first party games then you
           | have no choice. Everyone I know who bought a Switch (and will
           | buy Switch 2) did it for this reason. To me personally the
           | exclusivity is a major turn-off
        
         | nielsbot wrote:
         | Really, what's a good alternative to Nintendo? I argue they
         | don't really have any competition.
        
           | freedomben wrote:
           | If you really want first party games or those with heavy
           | anti-cheat, then yes, but if you just want a handheld console
           | with a great UX, the Steam Deck is phenomenal. The same games
           | are also often way cheaper, plus if you want to play on PC
           | later you can...
        
         | rodrigodlu wrote:
         | For myself it was my first console bought on pre sale. And here
         | in my country is much more expensive.
         | 
         | Basically I raised the bar tremendously. I have the console,
         | MKW, probably will buy Metroid, probably another Zelda. But
         | that's it. I will not tolerate a low bar.
         | 
         | Now that indies are constantly increasing theirs with more
         | genuine experiences? No no no
         | 
         | I bought NSW2 to be my defacto indie platform as well, but I
         | just reporpused a laptop with Arch/Proton/Steam/Gog and I will
         | work on that.
         | 
         | All my accessories from 8bitdo are working flawlessly, so not
         | even a controller I will buy. I don't even bothered to buy the
         | special SD card they require because I can't see myself using
         | even the internal storage, unlike my NSW1.
         | 
         | I'm also part of the group that was shocked with the changes on
         | MKW as well. A long time Nintendo fan disappointed.
         | 
         | I stayed fan for all this time because the experience hassle
         | free. I don't want another Denuvo strategy, or games becoming
         | boring like many mobile games.
         | 
         | I hope more people realize that there are options out there.
         | Support the indies is my choice.
        
         | kallistisoft wrote:
         | > Why would someone in their right mind ever buy a Nintendo
         | product?
         | 
         | Correction: Why would someone in their right mind ever buy a
         | Nintendo product and use it accordance within the
         | manufacturer's guidelines?
         | 
         | I purchased a first gen (rcm exploit) switch and I couldn't be
         | happier with my investment.
         | 
         | I'm not concerned about being banned as it is never connected
         | to the internet... for "reasons". :)
        
       | MYEUHD wrote:
       | > To be clear, if this happens to you, the physical cartridges
       | that you own will remain playable, without updates, and some
       | previously downloaded digital games may remain accessible.
       | 
       | What about game-key cards? (the cartridges that don't contain the
       | game, but a license to download it)
       | 
       | This could reduce the library of games you can play, if they
       | don't let you download the games you purchased.
        
       | gs17 wrote:
       | > Other social media users were quick to reassure Nelson of two
       | things. Firstly, hardware bans received for using second-hand
       | game carts that have been cloned by tools like MIG Flash are not
       | uncommon.
       | 
       | I think the author and I have different definitions of
       | "reassure".
       | 
       | > And, probably more importantly, Nintendo is receptive to owners
       | who can provide corroborating evidence that they are innocent of
       | Nintendo-flavored piracy.
       | 
       | Unless you, say, borrowed a game from a friend who you didn't
       | know bought it from someone who ripped it. Right now it seems
       | they're pretty lax about the "evidence" you bought it, but I'm
       | sure they'll get stricter fast.
        
       | wil421 wrote:
       | Thought about this situation buying used games for the kids and
       | me off Facebook. It's terrible because I used to trade and buy
       | nes/gameboy and other systems games as a kid. It allowed me to
       | play more games but sometimes you'd get a game that sucked really
       | bad.
       | 
       | Modding is one thing but piracy is another. Nintendo despises
       | both.
        
       | highwaylights wrote:
       | It's pretty clear from the article that the ban is due to using a
       | defeat device (which he posted publicly about trying out) and
       | very likely has nothing to do with the game he bought.
        
         | gs17 wrote:
         | No, there are plenty of people who have reported being banned
         | over used games. The article cites another article where the
         | same thing happened (and no, it's not a pirate pretending to be
         | innocent, Nintendo reversed the ban).
        
       | xg15 wrote:
       | > _And, probably more importantly, Nintendo is receptive to
       | owners who can provide corroborating evidence that they are
       | innocent of Nintendo-flavored piracy. We reported on exactly such
       | a case, only last week, with a happy ending for the innocent
       | Facebook Marketplace-sourced used-game buyer._
       | 
       | I see, the Trump school of negotiation is finding imitators...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-07-17 23:00 UTC)