[HN Gopher] Denver's Deepest Dinosaur
___________________________________________________________________
Denver's Deepest Dinosaur
Author : gmays
Score : 18 points
Date : 2025-07-16 13:46 UTC (9 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (pubs.geoscienceworld.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (pubs.geoscienceworld.org)
| jebarker wrote:
| A funny thing about this find is that the bone was in a core from
| beneath the parking lot of the Denver Museum of Nature and
| Science which is heavily dinosaur focused. It's either a crazy
| coincidence or there are abundant dinosaurs under Denver.
| colechristensen wrote:
| A museum featuring dinosaurs being built in close proximity to
| dinosaur archaeology sites isn't _that_ coincidental :)
| elpakal wrote:
| The comment was about finding the bones below the museum not
| about the museum being built in an archeological hotbed.
| potato3732842 wrote:
| Nitpick: paleontological, not archeological.
|
| Denver is not exactly an archaeological hotbed, to put it
| mildly.
| jebarker wrote:
| Many major US cities have museums like this. It wasn't built
| there because of the dinosaur archaeology as far as I know.
| This core was found during unrelated digging in the parking
| lot of the museum, so I think it is a coincidence.
| awithrow wrote:
| There are a lot in the area. There is dinosaur ridge out on
| i-70 that features all sorts of dino tracks and fossils. There
| was also another fossil discovery during while building a
| shopping center not too long ago:
| https://www.colorado.edu/coloradan/2017/10/10/dinosaur-found...
| dabluecaboose wrote:
| Indeed the Morrison Formation [1] covers much of the state.
| Dinosaur ridge is one edge of it, just a stone's throw away
| from Denver.
|
| [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morrison_Formation
| GuB-42 wrote:
| I wonder if this is a coincidence too:
|
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denver,_the_Last_Dinosaur
| cadamsdotcom wrote:
| > This phenomenon is not uncommon in the metropolitan Denver
| area where such discoveries have catalyzed public curiosity in
| subsurface geology for nearly 150 years
|
| That sounds like it's the latter. But actually, it's both!
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-07-16 23:02 UTC)