[HN Gopher] The Era of Exploration
___________________________________________________________________
The Era of Exploration
Author : jxmorris12
Score : 58 points
Date : 2025-07-07 15:23 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (yidingjiang.github.io)
(TXT) w3m dump (yidingjiang.github.io)
| webdevver wrote:
| speaking of exploration, has anyone ever thought about non-
| cartesian displays? say, pixels that are arranged in a hexagonal
| pattern. or pixels arranged in a radial pattern and addressed via
| polar coordinates.
|
| what pattern are human color/light sensors arranged in? maybe we
| should replicate that pattern? an organic arrangement discovered
| via simulated annealing?
|
| all this bitmap x/y display stuff is very pre-AI-ish. old tech.
| victorian era clockwork mechanism. built to make it easy to
| reason about for humans, before the advent of neuron-soup. maybe
| we can do better?
| AlotOfReading wrote:
| Yes, it's been well-explored and there's a number of clever
| ways to convert them back to Cartesian coordinates because
| those are much nicer to work with for humans.
|
| The very earliest color CRTs used triangular arrangements of
| subpixels for each color, for example.
| visarga wrote:
| I like this approach. It's not that intelligence is in the brain
| or the model, and it should not be a noun. It is a process, a
| search process based on exploration and learning.
|
| Think of a river - the water carves the banks, the banks channel
| the water. Which is the real river?
|
| A model is like the river banks, it is not intelligent in itself.
| Neither is activity by itself. Intelligence comes from their co-
| constitutive relation.
|
| You can see the structure+flow coupling in many places. The model
| weights (banks) vs the training set (water). The contextual
| tokens (banks) vs the mass of probability for the next token
| (water). Agent environment (banks) vs agent activity (water).
|
| The trick here is that neither is capable of explaining the
| process, or more fundamental than the other. It is a recursive
| process rewriting its own rules.
|
| And we know from Godel, Turing and Chaitin that recursive
| processes exhibit incompleteness, undecidability and
| incompressibility. There is no way to predict them from outside,
| they can only be known only through unrolling, you have to be
| inside, or you have to be it to know it.
| chrisweekly wrote:
| +1, Brilliant metaphor, thanks for your thought-provoking
| comment!
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-07-07 23:00 UTC)