[HN Gopher] The Miyawaki Method of micro-forestry
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Miyawaki Method of micro-forestry
        
       Author : zeristor
       Score  : 79 points
       Date   : 2025-07-05 08:02 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.futureecologies.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.futureecologies.net)
        
       | zeristor wrote:
       | "The Miyawaki Method of micro-forestry is a viral sensation:
       | sprouting tiny, dense, native tree cover in neighbourhoods all
       | around the world. With the promise of afforestation at a
       | revolutionary speed, this planting technique has become the
       | darling of green-space enthusiasts, industry, and governments
       | alike -- yet few professional or academic ecologists have
       | commented on its efficacy, or even seem to have heard of it!
       | 
       | In this episode, we debate the legacy of Dr. Akira Miyawaki: the
       | man, the myth, and the method."
        
       | J7jKW2AAsgXhWm wrote:
       | I have seen a couple of these in Berkeley. They were all the rage
       | and still are in some ways.
       | 
       | I personally was initially enthusiastic. However, I think there
       | is much easier ways to get the benefits. For example, by adding
       | trees and landscaping in Parks, medians and other public spaces.
       | 
       | Once a forest is added to an area, it becomes completely
       | inaccessible because of how dense it grows. All of the ones I
       | have seen are completely fenced off.
        
         | korse wrote:
         | Doesn't seem bad to me. Grow the forest and then let the
         | maintainers cut a miniature trail network. People don't need to
         | tromp all over vegetation for it to be beneficial.
        
         | pphysch wrote:
         | The density and inaccessibility (to large birds and mammals) is
         | critical for sensitive species like butterflies. I'd wager we'd
         | see a resurgence in some declining insect populations if there
         | were more _dense_ pockets of forest.
        
           | frereubu wrote:
           | This is a point made well in the film Wilding -
           | https://www.wildingmovie.com/ - about a rewilding project in
           | the UK. You need change and open ground for any biodiversity
           | benefits. It's a bit like the close-planted commercial
           | forestry fir plantations that are entirely silent and dead
           | aside from the trees themselves.
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | > However, I think there is much easier ways to get the
         | benefits. For example, by adding trees and landscaping in
         | Parks, medians and other public spaces.
         | 
         | This _is_ a method to add trees and landscaping.
         | 
         | > Once a forest is added to an area, it becomes completely
         | inaccessible because of how dense it grows. All of the ones I
         | have seen are completely fenced off.
         | 
         | It sounds like they're completely inaccessible because of
         | fencing _and_ density. Fencing might be hard to remove, but
         | density at ground level tends to decrease as a forest grows;
         | the canopy blocks sun and lower tree limbs may drop or become
         | less productive and bushier plants have a harder time. After
         | the forest gets somewhat established, pathways are easier to
         | form (although brambles and thickets may need help to clear),
         | and thinning the trees can help the remaining trees thrive.
         | 
         | My parcel has a woods on the edges, and it wasn't too bad to
         | establish paths in most of it, especially with a little help
         | from goats to clean up the ground clutter. Similarly, there are
         | trails in a nearby well established reserve, but you could
         | easily go off trail if you had a reason too... Some bits are
         | too dense to pass through, but most of it is fine. Your local
         | forests likely grow a bit differently than mine though.
        
         | jeffbee wrote:
         | The one at King Middle School in Berkeley grew almost
         | instantly. I'd read a report about how much biomass they have
         | harvested there.
        
         | nothercastle wrote:
         | If you want to decrease the value of your land plant trees so
         | some nimby can come in designated it as protected habitat and
         | then prevent you from maintaining or cutting any of them down.
         | Tree law is almost as bad as HOA laws. Even if it's not
         | designed once a tree gets too big you loose any right to manage
         | or maintain it
        
         | beambot wrote:
         | Manicured trees & landscaped parks take a lot of active effort
         | and expense, whereas forests are naturally homeostatic. The
         | biodiversity in the latter is also beneficial to flora & fauna
         | compared to the overly-sterile environment of traditional
         | landscaping.
        
       | PaulHoule wrote:
       | Works well in some ecosystems when people choose the right plant
       | material. With the wrong ecosystem and the wrong plant material
       | it's one of those ideas from the temperate core that fails in the
       | tropical periphery.
        
         | tokai wrote:
         | I don't know what counts as _temperate core_ for you, but Japan
         | is famous for its diverse climate zones.
        
           | PaulHoule wrote:
           | Japan is mostly cold to temperate
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_Japan
           | 
           | except for some small islands like
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minamitorishima
           | 
           | There's a lot of concern that tree-planting projects wind up
           | like this
           | 
           | https://e360.yale.edu/features/phantom-forests-tree-
           | planting...
        
             | thimkerbell wrote:
             | The Yale article says forest scientists warn that "failed
             | afforestation projects around the world threaten to
             | undermine efforts to make [tree] planting a credible means
             | of countering climate change by reducing carbon dioxide in
             | the atmosphere or generating carbon credits for sale to
             | companies to offset their emissions."
        
             | soperj wrote:
             | I mean, you have major tree planting happening every summer
             | in Canada, and it's all around trying to mono-culture the
             | entire country for the sake of timber companies. They
             | immediately spray Glyphosate on areas burnt by forest
             | fires, so that low value fire break species like Alder
             | don't establish themselves in the area and then they can
             | send in tree planters to plant higher value pine, which is
             | a serotinous species, ie: promotes fire. Then they blame
             | all the bush fires on Climate change.
        
         | IncreasePosts wrote:
         | The entire point of this method is you look at successful
         | forests nearby and mimic them. So, choosing the right plant
         | material is implicit in this.
        
           | fredrikholm wrote:
           | And it's been successfully replicated in vastly different
           | places like India and the Netherlands.
        
         | sergejf wrote:
         | The Orchard of Flavours experimented successfully with the
         | Miyawaki method in their botanical garden located in Algarve,
         | Portugal, with a Koppen climate classified as temperate but
         | with hot and dry summer periods, see
         | https://www.orchardofflavours.com/miyawaki-
         | experiment-1-wild.... They grow plenty of tropical trees like
         | feijoa, guava, papaya, etc.
        
       | password4321 wrote:
       | Related: _The Japanese method of creating forests comes to
       | Mexico_
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44013933
       | 
       | (2 months ago, only 4 comments)
        
       | thimkerbell wrote:
       | Podcast. There is a transcript, which is in fine print and not
       | concise.
        
       | shermantanktop wrote:
       | Just saw a really interesting Nova centering on Crowther Labs at
       | ETH (recently disbanded).
       | https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aax0848 was held up
       | as encouraging unsustainable reforestation for greenwashing PR.
       | 
       | But the most interesting part was a segment covering how tree
       | roots engage in aggressive recruitment and exchange of resources
       | with an underground biome of bacteria and fungi.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-07-07 23:00 UTC)