[HN Gopher] WSJ: 'Xi Has Spent Decades Preparing for a Cold War ...
___________________________________________________________________
WSJ: 'Xi Has Spent Decades Preparing for a Cold War with the U.S.'
Author : MilnerRoute
Score : 17 points
Date : 2025-07-05 17:33 UTC (5 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.msn.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.msn.com)
| jauntywundrkind wrote:
| Related, China also speaking of a strong desire to keep the war
| in Ukraine ongoing, as distraction for the world & the US.
| https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/07/04/europe/china-ukraine-eu-w...
|
| Just feels like China has very little to do in this cold war
| right now. The US just funded a massive war against itself, that
| is absolutely going to suck up fantastic resources & deeply
| deeply weaken our nation.
| dumbledoren wrote:
| Could that be because the US think tanks and establishment
| mouthpieces published papers on how the US needed to destroy
| China to prevent it from becoming an economic competitor decades
| ago, and then started appointing people to the State Dept. to
| implement that plan?
| AngryData wrote:
| China isn't dumb, they saw what the US did to the USSR and anyone
| who else who was even the smallest possible threat to the US. And
| they knew how big of an actual potential threat they would become
| as they industrialized and hollowed out US manufacturing. And I
| think it is the right move on their part, surpass the US
| economically, let the US continuously drain its resources across
| the globe, and when the US is under pressure and decides China
| has too much control it will be too late and they can just starve
| the US out economically. The worst thing that can happen at this
| point to China is the US actually does build back a broad local
| manufacturing sector and reduces imports, but that still leaves
| China with a far larger domestic market. Every other potential
| outcome has China sitting in an even better position.
| lvl155 wrote:
| What did they do to the USSR? They collapsed all on their own.
| If China were on its way up, people will flock there to find
| opportunities (just as they did briefly following the financial
| crisis) but the exact opposite is happening. China had its shot
| but they timed it poorly.
| AngryData wrote:
| Besides the repeated sanctions and embargos, propaganda,
| proxy wars, and military dick waving contests?
|
| I don't know how you can believe China is on anything except
| an upward trend right now. Many countries won't even let
| people buy Chinese cars because they are so far ahead of
| everyone else in cost and manufacturing efficiency and I
| don't know any industry where China can't match foreign
| companies in and compete against.
|
| They are in a prime position right now in my opinion. All of
| their industries have major players in cutting edge
| technology, yet they still have more population to modernize
| and sell to domestically, and they supply half the world's
| manufacturing needs and do work in basically every sector.
| They have tons of foreign investments into infrastructure and
| mineral extraction to keep feeding themselves raw materials,
| they have all the processing equipment to convert raw
| materials into base materials, they have all the
| manufacturing to turn those base materials into pretty much
| any goods they want or need. They have highly educated people
| and education programs and schools, a robust government, a
| domestic population still fairly far away from dropping off a
| cliff like every western nation, they have a strong enough
| military to be secure against basically any nation outside of
| global nuclear war, and a populous that broadly supports
| their government. Outside of multiple chartoonish sized
| blunders I don't see any path for the near future that
| doesn't result in Chinese economic growth and increased
| global positioning and power.
| kashunstva wrote:
| > as they industrialized and hollowed out US manufacturing
|
| Just to be clear about cause and effect - during the long
| period of globalization, the U.S. chose to off-shore
| manufacturing, trading high availability/low cost for domestic
| production. Off course, China has been an active participant in
| that process; but the U.S. could have chosen otherwise. Much of
| the rhetoric from the current administration's leader in the
| U.S. implies that the U.S. has been victimized unwittingly by
| the process, which of course is entirely unfounded.
| akomtu wrote:
| It's not really a revelation that war machine #1 has spent
| decades preparing for a war with war machine #2. That's the
| entire point of their existence: waging wars and preparing for
| wars.
| animitronix wrote:
| lol whatever, China's screwed
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-07-05 23:02 UTC)