[HN Gopher] The History of Electronic Music in 476 Tracks (1937-...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The History of Electronic Music in 476 Tracks (1937-2001)
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 109 points
       Date   : 2025-07-02 22:28 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.openculture.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.openculture.com)
        
       | jschveibinz wrote:
       | Raymond Scott was left off of the list:
       | https://youtu.be/s87cYlMInwE?feature=shared
        
         | rzzzt wrote:
         | My addition would be Jean Jacques Perrey:
         | https://youtu.be/P8AKP4Tw9sE
        
           | gizajob wrote:
           | An even simpler addition would be "Strawberry Fields
           | Forever".
           | 
           | https://youtu.be/44GB53rnI3c?si=v7Uw3By6LwkE7w-F
        
       | gizajob wrote:
       | A list more notable for its glaring omissions than what it
       | includes.
        
         | hecanjog wrote:
         | > my college is a kind of a kind of a center of the most
         | tradicional, western avant-gard electronic music, so certainly
         | I agree that it leaves a lot of outside
         | 
         | Let's list some of the outside.
         | 
         | Maryanne Amacher, Pauline Oliveros, Eliane Radigue, Clarence
         | Barlow, Bebe and Louis Barron... I'm brain-farting so many,
         | keep going!
        
           | helpfulContrib wrote:
           | >Bebe
           | 
           | Awesome shout-out.
           | 
           | Missing: Cabaret Voltaire, Art of Noise, Yes ..
        
           | derbOac wrote:
           | Delia Derbyshire
           | 
           | Laurie Spiegel
           | 
           | It's a bit fuzzy in where the boundaries are for the category
           | represented by the list.
        
             | sramsay wrote:
             | Actually, what's amazing is that many of the people being
             | mentioned fit within any coherent statement of the
             | boundaries. Schaeffer is on it but not Radigue? When it
             | said, "There's few women," I didn't think they meant it
             | leaves off Oliveros!
        
           | tsimionescu wrote:
           | Isao Tomita, Alan Parsons, Vangelis, Keith Emerson, Rick
           | Wakeman probably deserved a mention as well.
        
       | aspenmayer wrote:
       | Related:
       | 
       | Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music
       | 
       | https://music.ishkur.com/
       | 
       | Previously:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44470331
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37919241
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25083516
        
       | amiga386 wrote:
       | I'd not heard of UbuWeb before, but it sounds likr an interesting
       | project for curating a cross-media avant-garde art collection
       | (although it has now finished?)
       | 
       | "Electronic Music" is a bit of a misnomer. I think most people
       | would think of Electronic Music as genres like rave, acid,
       | techno, house, trance, jungle, drum and bass, dubstep, and so on.
       | For _that_ , you want Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music
       | (https://music.ishkur.com/) and its branching history for how all
       | these genres influenced and evolved from eaxh other
       | 
       | But this collection is just the _avant-garde_ parts - the roots
       | of Ishkur 's tree. It's the musique concrete and theremins and
       | radiophonic workshop type music. Those early genres only get a
       | brief look in Ishkur, but here they are in detail.
        
         | TheOtherHobbes wrote:
         | This is what electronic music was before it became
         | commercialised and mainstream as "music with synthesizers."
         | 
         | Most of it is pre-synth, with early experiments with tape, and
         | sometimes analog synthesis and computer DSP.
         | 
         | It's ended up in a strange space culturally - lurking in modern
         | music's attic like an ageing mad uncle whom everyone agrees was
         | a genius, but hardly anyone still listens to. (Outside of
         | academia, which is its own world.)
        
           | mycall wrote:
           | It still exists under the moniker 'new music' and even has
           | shows happening (e.g.
           | https://www.bayimproviser.com/calendar.aspx)
        
         | fipar wrote:
         | As late as in 2000 it was still common to refer to electronic
         | music to what this article uses the term for, and what you
         | refer to as "dance music" instead.
         | 
         | See this great compilation (with a lovely booklet that's more
         | of a mini book) for example:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm:_The_Early_Gurus_of_Electr...
         | 
         | I got lots of late-night listening pleasure out of that one,
         | except for the first theremin track; I just found that one
         | unbearable...
        
           | SanjayMehta wrote:
           | I have this set, bought it in a museum near Legoland San
           | Diego.
           | 
           | They had a great collection of early synths. Can't remember
           | the name.
        
       | eimrine wrote:
       | This collection was an opener in my interest to really old
       | electronic sound, it is called musique concrete. There are some
       | of it on torrents, Pauline Oliveros and others are common guests
       | in my playlist now.
        
         | mycall wrote:
         | There are tons more to discover on archive.org
         | 
         | https://archive.org/search?query=musique+concrete
        
       | MarkusWandel wrote:
       | A bit snobbish isn't it? No computer singing "Daisy Daisy". No
       | Doctor Who theme. No Wendy Carlos. No Jean Michel Jarre, just to
       | name a few.
        
         | AlecSchueler wrote:
         | Is it? Why do you feel that excluding those particular pieces
         | and people make the list snobbish?
        
           | marchingkazoo wrote:
           | I don't mean to speak for the parent poster. But FTA:
           | "Spanning the years 1937-2001, the collection should
           | especially appeal to those with an avant-garde or
           | musicological bent." The tracks cited by the parent are not
           | avant-garde nor musicological, but popular. I think the point
           | is valid and all but admitted.
        
         | ethan_smith wrote:
         | Delia Derbyshire's groundbreaking work at the BBC Radiophonic
         | Workshop deserves special mention here - her realization of the
         | Doctor Who theme and pieces like "Blue Veils and Golden Sands"
         | represent a crucial bridge between academic electroacoustic
         | experimentation and more accessible electronic music.
        
       | Towaway69 wrote:
       | Been listening to it for the last four hours - definitely good
       | for focussing.
        
       | mk_stjames wrote:
       | This is a bit incorrectly titled, as the source denotes that the
       | tracks are "Electroacoustic" music, not general "Electronic".
       | 
       | The collection is clearly aimed at presenting music where
       | electronic triggers and some synthesis is used in concert with
       | acoustic instruments or spaces, and is super biased towards
       | "Musique concrete", and concert-hall, classical compositions for
       | what I can hear, ala Luc Ferrari.
       | 
       | You're not going to see an appearance of Kraftwerk, Suzanne
       | Ciani, Wendy Carlos, or Model 500.
       | 
       | This is less a "history", and more an "eclectic subgenre list by
       | date".
        
         | MichaelRo wrote:
         | Yes, very disappointing. I thought it'll be something similar
         | to this YouTube video "Evolution of Electronic Music (1929 -
         | 2019)", which btw I like very much but it's severely lacking
         | due to being only =~ 20 minutes:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqukyEC3qWM
         | 
         | I don't know how accurate the YouTube list is but I never heard
         | of anything prior to Jean Michelle Jarre's Oxygene (about 6
         | minutes in the list). If It were to compare the list with
         | geological history, before 1976 it's weird Ediacaran biota. And
         | afterwards, suddenly, it's like the Cambrian explosion :)
        
         | o0-0o wrote:
         | If there is no Juan Atkins on this list, it's surely mis-
         | titled.
        
       | mycall wrote:
       | Raymond Scott and Desmond Leslie were missing from their
       | collection but worth seeking out.
        
       | daneel_w wrote:
       | The list is missing a handful of true pioneers in electro-
       | acoustic and electronic music. I'm not thinking about composers
       | of popular synthesizer music, which don't really fit this
       | specific list, but people like Henk Badings, Tom Dissevelt, Jean-
       | Jacques Perrey, Kid Baltan and Morton Subotnick.
        
       | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
       | This is second openculture list I've seen on HN recently, and
       | when I visit the link, I may be dumb but I cannot see a list,
       | playlist or anything corresponding the actual title of the post.
        
         | perching_aix wrote:
         | Then what is it that you _do_ see? Because I see references to
         | specific releases like this, with an audio embed following them
         | right after:
         | 
         | > Hear below Stockhausen's "Kontact," Henry's "Astrologie," and
         | Bayle's spare "Theatre d'Ombres" further down.
        
           | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
           | There are 3 embedded audio widgets, with a total playing time
           | of about 55 mins.
           | 
           | That seems unlikely to contain 476 tracks ... and nowhere do
           | I see any actual list of tracks (other than the mention of 3
           | that you quoted).
        
           | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
           | Aha, the actual list is here:
           | https://ubu.com/sound/electronic.html
        
       | o0-0o wrote:
       | No Plastikman? Sigh
        
       | louthy wrote:
       | If you ignore Daphne Oram, Delia Derbyshire, Wendy Carlos,
       | Kraftwerk, or any of the genre defining moments/movements (like
       | Brian Eno, The Normal, Laurie Anderson, The Belleville Three,
       | Frankie Knuckles, LTJ Bukem, Aphex Twin, ...) then the list is at
       | best incomplete.
        
       | aimeric wrote:
       | Sadly, no mention of Louis and Bebe Barron, who together created
       | the first all-electronic soundtrack for the 1956 movie "Forbidden
       | Planet".
       | 
       | This was _before_ the invention of the synthesizer a few years
       | later: Louis created so-called  "cybernetic circuits", which
       | apparently had a life-cycle similar to living organisms, while
       | Bebe arranged the resulting sounds into music.
       | 
       | And, to this day, no one knows exactly _how_ they created their
       | music... ( _Almost_ no one, that is - it 's my PhD topic ;-)
        
         | quakeguy wrote:
         | Now we need to know more!
        
           | aimeric wrote:
           | A substantial mythology has formed around the soundtrack's
           | creation. One of the prevailing notions is that the sounds
           | were generated by torturing and electrically overloading the
           | "cybernetic circuits". There's evidence that this is simply
           | artistic misdirection.
           | 
           | In reality, the music was carefully crafted and performed -
           | with an emphasis on performance, rather than random events
           | and sounds. (The genre of "Krell music" went off at a
           | completely wrong tangent in this regard...)
           | 
           | It's unfortunate that Bebe Barron downplayed her own
           | compositional technique and creative input in order to
           | bolster this mythology.
           | 
           | The research is focused on the nature of the Barrons'
           | cybernetic circuits. Using digital equivalents of these
           | circuits, the aim is to recreate the title track, using only
           | the techniques that were available to the Barrons in the
           | 1950s.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-07-05 23:01 UTC)