[HN Gopher] How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How did Soham Parekh get so many jobs?
        
       Soham Parekh is all the rage on Twitter right now with a bunch of
       startups coming out of the woodwork saying they either had
       currently employed him or had in the past.  Serious question: why
       aren't so many startups hiring processes filtering out a candidate
       who is scamming/working multiple jobs?
        
       Author : jshchnz
       Score  : 23 points
       Date   : 2025-07-02 20:28 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
       | revskill wrote:
       | No surprise, it's all about the cloud driven interview.
       | 
       | Seriously, a good programmer cares about good abstraction, not
       | the correct cloud setup.
       | 
       | Those startups are worth the scam, it's skill issue all the way
       | down.
        
       | robswc wrote:
       | This is my question too.
       | 
       | I'm no longer job searching but every interview involved multiple
       | steps and "background checks."
       | 
       | I'm seeing the dude's resume has him working half a dozen jobs in
       | a year which even to me is a huge red flag. Then he has a github
       | with automated commits... I don't want to be disparaging to start
       | ups because its brutal out there but how does someone like that
       | have such a high success rate? Is he taking a super low salary or
       | something?
        
         | robswc wrote:
         | To add to this. It would be great to see which companies he
         | interviewed at but didn't get the job. Would argue those
         | companies have better BS-detectors conducting the interviews.
        
         | deepsun wrote:
         | Background checks come in different varieties, usually it's
         | criminal and global watchlist checks. Employment and education
         | check is couple $$ extra for the employer, and some employers
         | really don't mind.
        
       | bibek_poudel wrote:
       | I read through one of his emails. This guy is great at
       | communicating his interest and signaling himself as a "high
       | performer".
       | 
       | Perhaps, he is also genuinely good at cracking these interviews.
       | No wonder, he's been through so many of them.
        
         | mathiaspoint wrote:
         | Interviewing really is a distinct skill from contributing and
         | the more people crank it the more it seems to test for
         | interview ability.
        
       | ATechGuy wrote:
       | Looks like he has cracked the hiring playbook. I wouldn't be
       | surprised if Zuck came forward and said they also hired SP for
       | their ASI team.
        
       | jasonthorsness wrote:
       | He should pivot to giving talks on landing an interview and
       | interviewing
        
       | jm20 wrote:
       | Odds are this is a dev shop with more than one person doing at
       | least some things. It would explain how "he" was able to get so
       | many jobs and maintain appearances. And a lot of startups don't
       | have the best screening processes to begin with (have a beer with
       | a founder, check out their source code, you're hired!). This is
       | exactly the place where the structure and processes of larger
       | companies can be a benefit. And even then, people work multiple
       | jobs and get away with it. It's become popular post COVID.
       | 
       | Given these two factors, I don't think it would be out of the
       | realm of possibility for something like this to happen.
        
         | meistertigran wrote:
         | Think so too. Also because different companies have different
         | "reviews" of his work. Some saying he was only good at
         | interviews, others saying the quality of work was good. Must
         | have been diffferent people working.
        
       | jonathan-adly wrote:
       | Lots of YC companies copy each other process and selection
       | criteria. Basically- they all have the same blind spots and look
       | for the same type of engineer.
       | 
       | So, super easy to scam all of them with the same skillset and
       | mannerism.
        
       | dazzeloid wrote:
       | he's a really talented engineer, crushed our interviews. the
       | funny thing was that he actually had multiple companies on his
       | linkedin at the same time, including ours. we just thought they
       | must have been internships or something and he never updated them
       | (he felt a bit chaotic). but then it turned out he was working at
       | all of them simultaneously.
       | 
       | worked for us for almost a year and did a solid job (we also let
       | him go when we discovered the multiple jobs)
        
         | robswc wrote:
         | Did he just lie and say he wasn't working at those places? Or
         | did the question never come up?
         | 
         | When I used to interview I always had to check a box that said
         | I wasn't currently employed, or they would ask at some point.
        
         | the_real_cher wrote:
         | Why would you let him go if he was doing a solid job?
        
           | deepsun wrote:
           | Sometimes it's NDA. Depends on what company does, but it's
           | hard to imagine a product that does not compete with e.g.
           | Google.
        
           | avmich wrote:
           | Yeah, this looks like a cargo culting. Don't need work, need
           | the guy to belong only to them...
        
       | tuckerpo wrote:
       | All anecdotes I see about this dude is: "we hired him and he did
       | a fantastic job, but once we found out he had multiple employment
       | we fired him".
       | 
       | ... why? If the guy's doing well by all metrics and not leaking
       | IP, literally, who cares?
        
         | spwa4 wrote:
         | He's not going to get much sympathy. Because:
         | 
         | 1) from the employer side, this runs afoul of all MBA theory
         | and practice, so he could have been more profits. Almost by
         | definition, this means you're not getting the maximum out of
         | the guy. Oh and there's jealousy of course.
         | 
         | 2) from employee's side, this runs afoul of union thinking.
         | Those jobs could have employed 5 people, maybe more. Oh and
         | there's jealousy of course.
        
       | suyash wrote:
       | It just shows how most startups don't have a good vetting system
       | in place.
        
         | anon_2222 wrote:
         | I dont know if you meant technical vetting. But I did a coding
         | interview with him. He did poorly and was rejected. BTW the
         | recruiter talked him up big time.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-07-02 23:01 UTC)