[HN Gopher] Data Centers, Temperature, and Power
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Data Centers, Temperature, and Power
        
       Author : quectophoton
       Score  : 45 points
       Date   : 2025-06-27 17:42 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.backblaze.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.backblaze.com)
        
       | leConbineatort wrote:
       | Cannot browse website from france !!!??
        
         | remram wrote:
         | Works for me (from France)
        
       | jeffbee wrote:
       | Seems to be a mental mishmash. For one thing, they are taking it
       | as given that temperature is relevant to device lifetime, but
       | Google's FAST 2007 paper said "higher temperatures are not
       | associated with higher failure rates".
       | 
       | Second weird thing is that it says cooling accounts for 40% of
       | data center power usage, but this comes right after discussing
       | PUE without contextualizing PUE with concrete numbers. State-of-
       | the-art PUE is below 1.1. The article then links to a pretty
       | flimsy source that actually says server loads are 40% ... this
       | implies a PUE of 2.5. That could be true for global IT loads
       | including small commercial server rooms, but it hardly seems
       | relevant when discussing new builds of large facilities.
       | 
       | Finally, it's irritating when these articles are grounded in
       | equivalents of American homes. The fact is that a home just
       | doesn't use a lot of energy, so it's a silly unit of measure.
       | These figures should be based on something that actually uses
       | energy, like cars or aircraft or something.
        
         | dijit wrote:
         | > Seems to be a mental mishmash. For one thing, they are taking
         | it as given that temperature is relevant to device lifetime,
         | but Google's FAST 2007 paper said "higher temperatures are not
         | associated with higher failure rates".
         | 
         | Google have been wrong a couple of times, and this is one area
         | where I think what they've said (18 years ago btw) might have
         | had some time to meet the rubber of reality a bit more.
         | 
         | Google also famously chose to disavow ECC as mandatory[0] but
         | then quietly changed course[1].
         | 
         | In fact, even within the field of memory: higher temperatures
         | cause more errors[2], and voltage leaking is more common at
         | higher temperatures within dense lithographic electronics
         | (memory controllers, CPUs)[3].
         | 
         | Regardless: thermal expansion and contraction _will_ cause
         | degradation of basically any material that I can think of, so
         | _if_ you can utilise the machines 100% consistently _and_
         | maintain a solid temperature then maybe the hardware doesn 't
         | age as aggressively as our desktop PCs that play games-
         | assuming there's no voltage leaking going on to crash things.
         | 
         | [0]: https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~bianca/papers/sigmetrics09.pdf
         | 
         | [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14206811
         | 
         | [2]: https://dramsec.ethz.ch/papers/mathur-dramsec22.pdf
         | 
         | [3]:
         | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271300947_Analysis_...
        
           | jeffbee wrote:
           | I am not taking Google's result at face value, but the
           | article shouldn't make assumptions without supporting
           | evidence, either. ASHRAE used to say your datacenter should
           | be 20o-25o which you know makes a certain amount of sense
           | when it comes from an organization earning its money from
           | installing and repairing CRACs. Now they admit that 18o-27o
           | is common and they allow for up to 45o ambient designs. They
           | are following the industry up.
        
       | Python3267 wrote:
       | This article was written for non-technical folks unfortunately. I
       | read the phrase below and nearly puked from the corpo speech.
       | 
       | > So, the methodology around temperature mitigation always starts
       | at power reduction--which means that growth, IT efficiencies,
       | right-sizing for your capacity...
        
         | metadat wrote:
         | The person who wrote the HDD failure rate quarterly reports
         | recently retired. Sorry for the bad news, but what other
         | reports or blog posts published by backblaze have you enjoyed
         | reading? For me, the answer is.. none. I hope to be declared
         | wrong and that the legacy of quality HDD reporting will live
         | on.
        
       | jakedata wrote:
       | I have had high hopes for passive daytime radiative cooling since
       | I read about it 10 years ago. Converting waste heat to an
       | infrared wavelength that flies off into space day or night is
       | apparently not that easy or cost effective right now.
       | 
       | https://www.asme.org/topics-resources/content/new-solar-ener...
       | 
       | https://www.skycoolsystems.com/
       | 
       | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-023-01119-0
        
         | quickthrowman wrote:
         | This is unlikely to work in a data center with thousands or
         | tens of thousands of servers emitting heat. Possibly this sort
         | of system will some day function for buildings where only
         | humans are emitting heat.
        
       | louwrentius wrote:
       | So Backblaze is going to invest in nuclear power?
       | 
       | What is the purpose of this article exactly?
        
       | quectophoton wrote:
       | (2024)
       | 
       | I forgot to put it in the title and I can't edit anymore.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-06-30 23:01 UTC)