[HN Gopher] A glob of 99M-year-old amber trapped a zombie fungus...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A glob of 99M-year-old amber trapped a zombie fungus erupting from
       a fly
        
       Author : jackgavigan
       Score  : 122 points
       Date   : 2025-06-26 21:25 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.cnn.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.cnn.com)
        
       | TruffleLabs wrote:
       | Zombie fungi pulled from amber is the makings of a movie ;)
        
         | excalibur wrote:
         | Sounds like a more promising direction than what the Jurrasic
         | Park franchise is doing currently.
        
         | metadat wrote:
         | Next iteration: Jurassic Park + The Last of Us
        
           | chakintosh wrote:
           | Jurassic in Us
        
             | troupo wrote:
             | Jurassic'R'Us
             | 
             | The real journey was all the zombies we infected along the
             | way.
        
             | Juliate wrote:
             | "Jurassic of Us" has a catch too.
        
           | reactordev wrote:
           | The Last Park - because zombie Jurassic creatures is the last
           | thing this world needs.
        
             | nosioptar wrote:
             | We already have a bunch of Jurassic zombies. Most people
             | call them senators.
        
               | reactordev wrote:
               | Can't wait for the Cretaceous period...
        
           | pryelluw wrote:
           | The Last of _Them_.
           | 
           | Shivers ...
        
           | teeray wrote:
           | This gives the whole raptor clicker training Chris Pratt did
           | a whole new interpretation.
        
         | shawn_w wrote:
         | The Velociraptor With All The Gifts.
        
         | adityaathalye wrote:
         | https://bombaylitmag.com/contribution/the-cordyception/
         | 
         |  _In my imagined world of Halahala, silent stories have
         | occupied prime real estate since 2005. I think of them like
         | music without lyrics, jazz-like in the experience. The
         | Cordyception is another riff on Halahala's staple theme of
         | nature, sustainability and our obsession with a certain ladder.
         | An Attenborough documentary led me to these marvellous fungi
         | called Cordyceps and the rest is pure Halahala. The fungi
         | infect and take over specific insect-hosts - body and mind -
         | commanding them to a high vantage point for dispersing spores._
         | 
         |  _I swear I drew this before the pandemic_
         | 
         | --Appupen
        
           | HelloUsername wrote:
           | "The BBC show we were ripping off (for 'The Last of Us') is
           | Planet Earth, where they talked about the cordiceps fungus
           | and how it affects insects."
           | 
           | https://venturebeat.com/2013/08/06/the-last-of-us-
           | creators-i...
        
         | ge96 wrote:
         | Thaw, The Thing (overt), Andromeda Strain, Deep Rising (overt)
        
       | pfdietz wrote:
       | These aren't necessarily related to today's Ophiocordyceps
       | fungus. Fungi that take control of arthropods and cause them to
       | climb to disperse spores have convergently evolved more than
       | once, including Arthrophaga myriapodina, which affects
       | millipedes, and is in a different Division (the level above
       | Class) from Ophiocordyceps.
       | 
       | Convergent evolution is more common than you might think. Trees,
       | for example, have separately evolved at least 100 times.
        
         | n_kr wrote:
         | > Trees, for example, have separately evolved at least 100
         | times.
         | 
         | Can you explain more? Sounds interesting
        
           | jgilias wrote:
           | Not OP, but:
           | 
           | https://eukaryotewritesblog.com/2021/05/02/theres-no-such-
           | th...
        
             | pfdietz wrote:
             | Thank you for link.
             | 
             | As an aside there: the blog post briefly talks about birds.
             | It turns out that membrane wings are much easier to evolve
             | than feathered wings. There have been lots of membrane
             | winged creatures (including "birds" with membrane wings in
             | the Jurassic) but not nearly as many appearances of
             | feathered wings.
             | 
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxA38gH8Gj4
        
           | andrewflnr wrote:
           | Trees are barely a firm category of plant at all. It's
           | basically just tall plants with woody stems. Plants can gain
           | and lose woody stems without too much trouble (relatively
           | speaking, over evolutionary time). So any time a plant
           | species currently growing soft stems can benefit from being
           | really tall, they have a good chance of evolving into
           | "trees".
        
             | kjkjadksj wrote:
             | I've seen rather large cactus turn the base of their stems
             | woody and bark clad.
        
           | lupusreal wrote:
           | One example is oak trees being more closely related to tulips
           | than to pine trees.
           | 
           | (Tulips and oak trees are both angiosperms, flowering plants,
           | and share a common angiosperm ancestor. Pine trees on the
           | other hand are gymnosperms.)
        
         | dclowd9901 wrote:
         | I recently visited the national history museum and finally got
         | a sense of the _weirdness_ of prehistoric trees. No bark, a
         | green trunk (utilizing photosynthesis), tall like a palm tree.
         | I'd love to see something like that now.
        
           | climb_stealth wrote:
           | That sounds awesome! The oddest trees I have come across had
           | big thorns like roses all over the trunk. Kind of hard to see
           | because the trunk is so big, but you'd very quickly notice
           | leaning against it.
           | 
           | That was in a botanical garden in Australia. No idea what
           | they were or how common they are. Blew my mind.
        
             | galangalalgol wrote:
             | Ceiba speciosa maybe? That is a weird tree for sure. I grew
             | up where there were wild thorny honeylocust trees. The
             | trunks are spotted with dense clusters of branching thorns,
             | some of which are 8" long and stiff enough to puncture
             | tractor tires. To paraphrase family guy, nature is scary.
        
               | dotancohen wrote:
               | Yeah, we've got these in Beersheba (south of Israel). The
               | only tree my ten year old won't climb. They've also got
               | really interesting cotton-like fruits, though I'm not
               | brave enough to taste them.
        
               | dylan604 wrote:
               | Sounds like the nightmare tree I had to deal with as
               | well. I never did find out what it was. Does the
               | honeylocust produce a bunch of red berries? My dad used
               | to get mad at me as a teen when I'd be lazy and not pick
               | up the fallen limbs from this tree and puncture the
               | tractor tires. It was to the sole reason I became very
               | proficient at using the tire repair kit.
        
             | Rendello wrote:
             | The oddest tree I know of is poplar, which is incredibly
             | common around here and is basically considered junk wood.
             | Turns out, those individual, fast-growing trees are in fact
             | stems of a large underground root system.
             | 
             | One of these trees has 47,000 stems:
             | 
             | > Most agree [...] that Pando encompasses 42.89 hectares
             | (106 acres), weighs an estimated 6,000 metric tons (6,600
             | short tons) or 13.2 million pounds, and features an
             | estimated 47,000 stems, which die individually and are
             | replaced by genetically identical stems that are sent up
             | from the tree's vast root system, a process known as
             | "suckering". The root system is estimated to be several
             | thousand years old, with habitat modeling suggesting a
             | maximum age of 14,000 years and 16,000 years by the latest
             | (2024) estimate.[
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pando_(tree)
        
               | jpfdez wrote:
               | Poplars have underground roots, but they are not
               | "underground root stems" per se. Their main stem is the
               | trunk we see growing above ground.
        
               | Rendello wrote:
               | I'm mostly using the terminology from the Pando article.
               | The article quotes a "Mitton and Grant" as writing:
               | 
               | > quaking aspen regularly reproduces via a process called
               | suckering. An individual stem can send out lateral roots
               | that, under the right conditions, send up other erect
               | stems; from all above-ground appearances the new stems
               | look just like individual trees. The process is repeated
               | until a whole stand, of what appear to be individual
               | trees, forms. This collection of multiple stems, called
               | ramets, all form one, single, genetic individual, usually
               | termed a clone.
        
               | Ifkaluva wrote:
               | Poplar is considered junk wood? This is news to me. I've
               | seen plenty of poplar furniture.
        
               | throwup238 wrote:
               | It's too soft to be of much use except the odd piece of
               | furniture (for which it is pretty terrible because it
               | dents too easily). As a woodworker finishing it also
               | sucks because the fibers tear too easily. Its grain
               | pattern looks bland at best, it ages poorly, and its
               | color is too inconsistent from tree to tree.
               | 
               | That said, it's one of the most stable woods so it
               | doesn't warp much which is why it's a popular base
               | material for plywood and it's easy on cutting tools. I
               | usually only use it for the interior parts of drawers.
        
               | pfdietz wrote:
               | It also grows very fast, particularly (per acre) if
               | closely spaced, which makes it of interest for biofuels.
               | 
               | https://farm-energy.extension.org/poplar-populus-spp-
               | trees-f...
        
               | Rendello wrote:
               | It's considered to be a poor firewood around here, as
               | well.
        
               | tharkun__ wrote:
               | Which is all great for arrow shafts actually. Just may
               | need to be thicker than usual.
               | 
               | The Mary Rose shafts seem to mostly have been poplar.
               | 
               | Not that this would be very relevant nowadays but still.
        
               | jorts wrote:
               | It's often used as trim that's painted over, as many
               | don't consider the wood pretty. I love seeing poplar with
               | a wide variety of colors.
        
               | kergonath wrote:
               | It's brittle, light and flimsy. It has its uses but is
               | not great for furnitures or burning.
        
               | lupusreal wrote:
               | My favorite odd tree is the ginkgo. The way the leaves
               | are look ancient, like a tree from a fargone era. And it
               | is exactly that.
               | 
               | Also the fruit was fun to throw at people when I was a
               | kid... Very stinky.
        
             | DHRicoF wrote:
             | I don't know if you are talking about Drunken tree (palo
             | borracho in spanish) but once playing soccer in a field
             | with some of them I ended with around 15 funny parallels
             | cuts. Good old times.
        
           | williamdclt wrote:
           | > visited the national history museum
           | 
           | what nation?
        
           | kzrdude wrote:
           | Well, bamboo comes to mind as a really weird tree. It's not a
           | tree, but it's the size of one..
        
           | pif wrote:
           | > prehistoric trees
           | 
           | I suppose you are actually talking of a time preceding
           | prehistory by a fair lot!
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | How can something precede history. Isn't that just older
             | history?
        
               | kergonath wrote:
               | Conventionally, History starts with written records.
               | Everything that came before is prehistoric. It's useful
               | as a concept when discussion groups of humans in the last
               | 10-odd millennia, but not really for things that are a
               | couple of millions years old.
        
           | marcellus23 wrote:
           | which museum? Do you mean the Natural History Museum in New
           | York?
        
           | ceejayoz wrote:
           | Closest you can come today is probably a tree fern. I've got
           | a _Dicksonia antarctica_ in my living room under grow lights.
           | It 's a neat plant.
        
           | kjkjadksj wrote:
           | Cycads are pretty old
        
           | dpc050505 wrote:
           | Pot plants have no bark and a green trunk and can reach
           | heights of like 12 ft.
        
         | pabs3 wrote:
         | My favourite tree evolution thing is the forests in the
         | Galapagos being evolved from dandelion seeds blown in on the
         | wind from South America.
        
           | BitwiseFool wrote:
           | Fascinating. Do you have a link to that, or the name of that
           | species?
        
             | h1c wrote:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalesia
        
         | mystified5016 wrote:
         | Mullberry plants are weird. They're happy to exist as a small
         | shrub or a 60ft tree, depending on how they're cultivated.
         | 
         | One of the largest trees I've ever personally seen was a
         | mullberry on some long-abandoned land adjoining mine. But
         | they're also a bush?
        
       | downrightmike wrote:
       | Fungi likely precedes the Dinos by 100's millions of years
        
       | usrbinbash wrote:
       | _" You want Zombie Apocalypse?! Because THAT's how you get Zombie
       | Apocalypse!"_
        
       | nervousvarun wrote:
       | Everyone is understandably referencing the Last of Us but Common
       | Side Effects deserves a mention as well.
       | 
       | I for one welcome our new mushroom overlords.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Side_Effects
        
       | WediBlino wrote:
       | "Bomb the city and everything in it"
        
         | dmd wrote:
         | Did a fungus write this? That'll just spread it wider. (cf. The
         | Genius Plague by David Walton)
        
           | WediBlino wrote:
           | https://youtu.be/3hRYHX8bLVA?si=Jz03JZO1gTyjAQuH
        
       | davidpfarrell wrote:
       | When you realize the fungus' primary intent was to convince the
       | fly to land in amber ...
        
         | cwmoore wrote:
         | ...and wait for us at this moment...
        
       | bluepuma77 wrote:
       | "Cold Storage" by American screenwriter David Koepp comes to
       | mind, a comedy splatter novel. I don't usually read such books,
       | but this one was funny and entertaining.
        
         | jackgavigan wrote:
         | Apparently set to become a movie, starring Liam Neeson:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_Storage_(film)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-06-30 23:01 UTC)