[HN Gopher] Is being bilingual good for your brain?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Is being bilingual good for your brain?
        
       Author : Anon84
       Score  : 58 points
       Date   : 2025-06-28 16:50 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.economist.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.economist.com)
        
       | muneeer wrote:
       | https://archive.is/lSCR2
        
       | Groxx wrote:
       | > _We value your privacy_
       | 
       | > _... Together with our 173 trusted partners..._
       | 
       | In a full screen, multi-stage permissions pop-up.
       | 
       | Yeah how about no. No need to lie, tell me how you really feel,
       | maybe "we will sell anything we can to anyone we can because we
       | need the money".
       | 
       | (It is a very detailed pop-up tho, in a good way - breaks down
       | each toggle with individual companies, and there's a search
       | across all of them)
        
         | signal-intel wrote:
         | If your user agent is providing strangers with information you
         | don't want it to, find a better user agent.
        
           | whoisyc wrote:
           | Your comment would be much more persuasive if you provide a
           | concrete actionable suggestion instead of vague handwringing
           | about "finding a better user agent" (and don't get me started
           | on how "user agent" is basically just an ingroup signal these
           | days)
        
             | noisem4ker wrote:
             | Let me do it on their behalf:
             | 
             | Firefox + uBlock Origin + EasyList Cookie List
             | 
             | ...until Firefox learns to dismiss cookie banners on its
             | own (they're working on it).
        
             | ashwinsundar wrote:
             | "User agent" is a technical term. what ingroup does it
             | signal that you're part of, by using the term correctly?
        
               | signal-intel wrote:
               | The most despicable group of the modern era: folks who
               | expect their own software to act on their own behalf.
        
               | whoisyc wrote:
               | Thank you for the snark. I am sure this will work wonders
               | to persuade more people to take their privacy seriously.
        
             | fsckboy wrote:
             | english usage aside: you could accuse him of handwaving,
             | but he's not complaining, so his comment is not
             | "handwringing". you are complaining (about his comment) so
             | your comment is closer to handwringing.
             | 
             | "find a better user agent" is not handwringing; "i can't
             | find a better user agent" is handwringing.
        
           | Groxx wrote:
           | Already doing that, they don't really have a choice.
           | 
           | I still have to deal with the awful UX they've chosen to
           | inflict on everyone by "valuing our privacy by selling our
           | info to over 100 companies", and they can still sell data
           | they collect directly.
        
             | signal-intel wrote:
             | Indeed. Blame the regulators that required this, and/or the
             | engineers that have developed a system that gives away your
             | data.
        
         | kgwgk wrote:
         | They don't lie! When they say "We value your privacy" they mean
         | that your privacy is valuable to them. Of course, they need to
         | convert that value into money.
        
       | TMWNN wrote:
       | I have heard that hyperpolyglots, such as translators at EU
       | headquarters who work with many languages, are more susceptible
       | to mental illness.
        
         | mythrwy wrote:
         | Could be from listening to politician talk all day every day
         | though.
         | 
         | Just look at how much mental illness politics seems to produce
         | in people who interact with it less frequently.
        
       | dehrmann wrote:
       | With time being limited, I wonder if using a second language,
       | playing an instrument, solving puzzles, physical activity, or
       | some other activity is "better" brain stimulus.
        
         | basisword wrote:
         | Would any effect be limited once you achieve mastery (or close
         | to it)? After 25 years playing my instrument when I play it my
         | brain just switches off. No thinking at all. Doesn't matter
         | whether I'm looking at sheet music playing something new,
         | improvising, or playing something I know well. It's all easy. I
         | imagine it's similar with a second language if you fully
         | immerse yourself in it for a long time.
        
           | SoftTalker wrote:
           | When did this transition happen? I have tried to play but
           | found that even after four or five years it was difficult,
           | required a lot of concentration, and gave me little pleasure.
           | 
           | The only physical skill I have that might be comparable is
           | typing, but (as a programmer) even after typing for over 40
           | years, while I can type without "thinking" about where the
           | keys are, I can usually type only three or four words without
           | needing to make a correction.
        
             | basisword wrote:
             | Probably not until the 12 year mark. Maybe a little before
             | that. I would say that it was a combination of time +
             | actively learning certain skills. There were periods where
             | I rested on my laurels for a few years so I probably could
             | have reduced the time by a few years (if that was the aim).
             | I would say 7 years is around where it got really enjoyable
             | though and I knew enough that it wasn't too much effort to
             | learn new songs and skills.
             | 
             | Worth mentioning I started when I was a kid. Learning
             | something when you're young is so much easier due to the
             | available time and the ability to obsess (this was also
             | pre-internet mostly). When I try learning new instruments
             | these days it takes much longer because I have
             | responsibilities.
        
             | dehrmann wrote:
             | I try to play guitar. For simple songs, I can play them
             | without thinking about it. My fingers just find the next
             | chord, almost like driving a car and not remembering the
             | last minute of driving. For more complex things, I have to
             | think.
             | 
             | So may it really is about the journey, and any learning is
             | good learning.
        
         | hombre_fatal wrote:
         | I reckon differences between them are dwarfed by the constraint
         | of which one you're willing to do every day.
        
         | ANewFormation wrote:
         | For things like this I don't think you can view it as a
         | destination, but rather a journey.
         | 
         | Your mind, body, and any skill will deteriorate over time if
         | not regularly trained, so it must become a part of your life.
         | 
         | And because of this, the answer is easy - do what is
         | permanently and realistically sustainable for yourself. It
         | doesn't matter what's best when you're only going to really
         | keep with things that are personally satisfying for yourself.
        
         | heigh wrote:
         | My father was 76 and started to forget things, basic things
         | like what he did yesterday, who we met the week before (family
         | from overseas who we haven't seen in years)...
         | 
         | This is when I realised it was getting serious. But he's a
         | Norwegian born in the 40s, so talking about his mental health
         | and opening up to him is near impossible.
         | 
         | I did call him out on these massive lapses in memory, but
         | jokingly though.
         | 
         | However, without formally addressing anything, he started out
         | of no where and never, ever before doing it my entire life:
         | sudoku.
         | 
         | 1-2 hours a day, then more, all the time.
         | 
         | He's now in his mid 80s and as sharp as ever.
         | 
         | I know he went and saw a GP, and they prescribed sodoku.
         | 
         | But the effectiveness of it, taken seriously, is absolutely
         | incredible.
        
           | SlowTao wrote:
           | I forgot who said it but they had the theory that the way to
           | stay sharp is to take on new mental tasks that create new
           | though patterns.
           | 
           | You know when you are learning something and you get to that
           | point where it is kind of a strain. That feeling that is kind
           | of tense, exhausting but intriguing, all because you are
           | about to get that thing. It is the transition from something
           | being purely cognitive and moving into behavior intuition,
           | like playing an instrument.
           | 
           | That is the thing that, in part, is keeping you sharp.
           | 
           | I say in part because don't forget your physical health, diet
           | and social health. They all contribute.
        
         | tmtvl wrote:
         | I am quite familiar with various languages, have learned an
         | instrument, and engage in regular physical activity and I am
         | probably the stupidest person on Earth. I don't think any of
         | those things are universally beneficial to people's mental
         | capacity. At least physical activity has the benefit of
         | improving quality of life in one's later years, so that should
         | probably be the go-to.
        
           | polotics wrote:
           | Ok, let's see... Mantis fist practitioner living in Belgium.
           | Daily driving GNU/Linux since 2012. Interested in C, Scheme,
           | Lisp, Perl, and Java. This does _not_ sound like the
           | stupidest person on earth, at all. Were you concussed when
           | you wrote this maybe?
        
         | timr wrote:
         | I started learning Japanese after age 30 (currently around CEFR
         | B1; JLPT N2), but I did it by moving to Japan. I don't know if
         | the "language study", _per se_ , provided the benefit, but the
         | act of moving there so radically transformed my daily life that
         | it was like being 20 years younger.
         | 
         | David Sedaris did a long interview on learning French (he also
         | became proficient late in life) where he said something like:
         | _when you first start learning a language, everything is new
         | and interesting. Eventually you become fluent, you get into a
         | pattern, and 'living in a foreign country' is just 'living'._
         | (heavily paraphrased -- I'll try to find the original).
         | 
         | Anyway, my point is that I think "learning a language" is
         | probably as good as anything else when it comes to "brain
         | stimulation", but in my opinion, the real value comes from
         | being completely immersed in a new culture and kicked
         | forcefully out of any sense of routine.
         | 
         | Edit: interview is here -
         | https://www.thisamericanlife.org/165/transcript
         | 
         | Relevant bit:
         | 
         | ---
         | 
         | Someday, David says, he'll be more comfortable in French. His
         | accent will improve and that daily anxiety will be removed from
         | his life.
         | 
         | David Sedaris: But when it is removed from me, then I probably
         | won't be interested in living here anymore. I'll probably
         | leave.
         | 
         | Ira Glass: Because it'll be just like living back home.
         | 
         | David Sedaris: Plus the more you learn, the more disappointed
         | you wind up being. It's easy to like somebody when you don't
         | know what they're saying.
        
       | b0a04gl wrote:
       | it maynot magically boost my IQ or anything but it's surprisingly
       | good at making my brain switch gears faster .like i'm on a call
       | in English and my mom yells from the kitchen in Tamil and i just
       | reply back without even thinking .or i'm writing code, then get a
       | message in WhatsApp in Hindi, i reply, and jump right back into
       | the code without losing track . my brain getting better at
       | handling midstream flips .
        
       | hombre_fatal wrote:
       | The most interesting part:
       | 
       | > Age plays a role too. Studies suggest that the effects of
       | languages on the brain are stronger for young children and the
       | old than they are for young adults. Bilingual tots seem to
       | outperform in cognitive development in the early years, but their
       | monolingual classmates may catch up with them later. One meta-
       | analysis on the topic found that 25 studies of 45 found a
       | bilingual advantage in children younger than six, while only 17
       | found them in children aged 6-12.
       | 
       | That's gonna be a let down to most people who read the title and
       | make assumptions.
        
       | instagib wrote:
       | Need to learn the second language and use it over years switching
       | thinking between the two languages. Learning it in university
       | then not using it does not count.
        
       | AdrianB1 wrote:
       | I think that most people working in tech that don't have English
       | as their native language are bilingual. What that means, I am not
       | sure, the article suggests some benefits and the next logical
       | step is to assume these people should be slightly better on
       | average than native English speakers, but this is just
       | speculation.
        
       | afiodorov wrote:
       | I use my third language, Spanish, every day, and my second,
       | English, for work. On top of that, my partner is a native
       | Portuguese speaker, so I'm passively soaking up a fourth. (I
       | usually reply to her in Spanish, but we watch everything in
       | Portuguese--though this month it's been all Italian, just for
       | fun).
       | 
       | To this day, I still find Spanish a bit more challenging than my
       | native language or even English. I think it's because even though
       | I moved to Spain over seven years ago, I never fully immersed
       | myself in the culture. I'm pretty sure I haven't read a single
       | book in Spanish.
       | 
       | I still do that classic thing non-fluent speakers do: I'll get
       | halfway through a sentence, realize I don't know a specific word,
       | and have to rephrase my thought more simply. To be clear, I'm far
       | from a beginner, just not yet fluent.
       | 
       | Anyway, I can attest that grappling with a language you haven't
       | quite mastered is a daily mini-puzzle that definitely keeps the
       | brain working a bit harder than it otherwise would.
       | 
       | On a side note, I love that LLMs can handle so many languages
       | now. After 17 years of living abroad, I still feel most at ease
       | speaking my native language, Russian, even though my vocabulary
       | is a bit lacking these days for more complex topics. It makes me
       | completely understand why people prefer to receive medical care
       | in their native tongue.
        
         | timr wrote:
         | > I still do that classic thing non-fluent speakers do: I'll
         | get halfway through a sentence, realize I don't know a specific
         | word, and have to rephrase my thought more simply. To be clear,
         | I'm far from a beginner, just not yet fluent.
         | 
         | Isn't that a thing everyone does? I don't have as many
         | languages as you, but when I finally got to the point where I
         | could reliably do what you're describing in Japanese, I felt
         | like I had actually achieved a baseline level of fluency for
         | the first time. The flywheel became self-perpetuating vs. my
         | French, where every sentence is a struggle.
         | 
         | Not asking to be argumentative, btw -- just wondering what's on
         | the other side.
        
           | afiodorov wrote:
           | There's another level after fluency (C1), which is near-
           | native fluency (C2). At the level of such mastery you don't
           | feel the need to simplify just to be understood, your
           | utterances now define the language itself as you've achieved
           | the level of the crowd whom the language belongs to in the
           | first place.
           | 
           | P.S. I've typed this out in English after having achieved
           | such unlock.
        
             | xvilka wrote:
             | With a certain level of language skill, you start to
             | experiment more with it, create new words, change grammar
             | intentionally to accent your point, and simply stop caring
             | about the correctness of what you say or write.
        
               | timr wrote:
               | Yeah. That's a level beyond -- You're "fluent" enough
               | that you can break the rules -- but that's partially not
               | about _language_ , but about being _perceived_ to be
               | native. Changing the cultural presumption, so to speak,
               | so that people give you the benefit of the doubt when you
               | 're saying something non-standard. I think anyone who
               | attempts humor in a foreign language runs into this wall,
               | hard.
               | 
               | The C1/C2 divide does seem to mix up that concept and the
               | idea of "looking for the right word". I sort of
               | understand what it's getting at, but it's unclear.
               | 
               | I still think (as a native English speaker), it's fairly
               | routine to stop and re-think what you are saying because
               | you're grasping for the right word.
        
               | afiodorov wrote:
               | When you spend some time transcribing live, impromptu
               | speech, you'll notice that it often doesn't follow the
               | rules of written grammar; speakers frequently abandon
               | sentences midway through.
               | 
               | For example, in the linked clip[^1], the speaker says:
               | "uh the European Union uh that's not a US creation that's
               | a you guys creation so don't ex..[abandoned word] the
               | strength of the west [abandoned sentence] and the west is
               | a really I don't know what"
               | 
               | For a moment, she struggles to express herself. Yet,
               | there's a qualitative difference between not knowing what
               | to say because a thought is not fully formed, and knowing
               | what you want to say but realizing you've forgotten the
               | specific word you need. For instance, you might be about
               | to say "cherry," only to find you've forgotten the word
               | and instead say something more general, like "forest
               | fruit (fruta de bosque)," which is still correct but less
               | precise.
               | 
               | [^1]:
               | https://youtu.be/_hBd8w-Hlm4?si=7-kvpUoeYo5ODPiI&t=787
        
             | senkora wrote:
             | I would describe it as: natural human languages with native
             | speakers eventually develop a grammatical way to complete
             | the vast majority of incomplete thoughts that speakers tend
             | to have.
             | 
             | So, if you know the entire language, then you can complete
             | your thought. But if you only know the common parts of the
             | language then you may need to start over with a different
             | sentence structure in order to express your thought.
             | 
             | Maybe that maps to C1 vs C2? At C1 you can express your
             | thoughts with occasional backtracking, but at C2 you almost
             | never need to backtrack?
        
         | celeryd wrote:
         | Do you find there's a similarity between Spanish and Russian?
         | In my limited experience, Russians who speak Spanish also seem
         | to speak it quite well.
        
           | afiodorov wrote:
           | The phonetic similarity between Russian and Spanish is a huge
           | relief. As a Russian speaker, pronouncing English has always
           | felt like a workout for my mouth; the sounds are completely
           | alien. Spanish, on the other hand, is effortless. It just
           | flows, since I'm using the same phonetic toolkit I grew up
           | with.
        
             | madaxe_again wrote:
             | Yeah, I have the opposite problem, being a native English
             | speaker living in Portugal - to my ear, I'll say something
             | perfectly coherent and pronounced exactly as the locals do
             | - and they won't understand a bloody word. It isn't just
             | the phonemes, it's the cadence - syllabic vs rhythmic
             | stress. I'll be like "um galao" and they'll be like
             | "galao?", "sim, um galao", "um... que? Galao?", "sim,
             | galao", "ahhh, um galao!" and I just can't seem to be
             | understood.
             | 
             | My wife is a native Russian speaker, and despite making
             | numerous grammatical errors is far better understood than I
             | am.
             | 
             | German, I have no such problem despite being far weaker at
             | the language imo.
        
               | afiodorov wrote:
               | European Portuguese sounds very Slavic; I'm sure Russians
               | have a blast with it. English is a phonetically isolated
               | language, largely due to the Great Vowel Shift. Unlike
               | English, most languages have a closer linguistic
               | relative. This makes English challenging for most people
               | to learn, and it also makes it difficult for native
               | English speakers to learn a foreign language without a
               | heavy accent.
        
         | _zoltan_ wrote:
         | German is my third language and this has been exactly my
         | experience - I find it more challenging than English, my second
         | language. I feel like my brain is at 100% when I want to speak
         | German.
         | 
         | however, my kids are soaking up languages like a sponge. we
         | speak Hungarian at home, English and Hungarian with our
         | friends, and they speak both Swiss German and German at school,
         | so they are already trilingual.
         | 
         | I know several families where the parents brings their own
         | language, they speak English as a common language at home and
         | the kids learn German/Swiss German at school, so that makes
         | them... quadlingial?
        
         | hintymad wrote:
         | > To this day, I still find Spanish a bit more challenging than
         | my native language or even English
         | 
         | I feel the same, albeit on a much lower level. Somehow Spanish
         | just feels strange to me. For instance, a subject in Spanish
         | often gets placed after the verb in a sentence, so I constantly
         | have to figure out where the subject is: is it before the verb?
         | after the verb? Or there's no subject and the conjugation of
         | the verb implies the subject? I guess it's just a matter of
         | time to get familiar with the verbs and it takes time. Also,
         | listening comprehension is a huge problem for me. Even
         | discerning words from conversations is very challenging. When I
         | was learning English as a second language, I could understand
         | most of what was said in an action movie or a simple sitcom
         | like Friends after I could read simple novels like Sheldon's If
         | Tomorrow Comes. However, I can read simple novels like El
         | Alquimista now, yet I could only understand what was said in
         | Extra at best with a super focus. In contrast, listening to
         | Japanese is much easier for some reason, even though my level
         | of Japanese is way below N5 (equivalent to Spanish's A1).
        
       | self_awareness wrote:
       | I wonder why pro-diversity folks didn't pick it up yet. What
       | could be more monocultural if not the language? We need more
       | language diversity.
        
         | BuckRogers wrote:
         | No one is pro diversity. Including Google, Microsoft and Apple.
         | They just think it's good publicity to make more money. And
         | getting women and immigrants put to work drops drive down
         | wages. More workers equals less pay.
         | 
         | You can see this by how those companies operate with their
         | divisions in the Middle East. You won't see a pride flag. If
         | you were really taking a stand, you'd fight the hard fights,
         | lose money. Not just do things where you think you can get away
         | with it.
         | 
         | In fact, if I'm not mistaken, most of those companies changed
         | their policies on DEI hiring as soon as Trump said anyone with
         | contracts with US government could not participate in DEI or
         | they lose those contracts. But there is no uproar all.
        
       | robomartin wrote:
       | > A study from 2019 showed that a moderate amount of language
       | learning in adults does not boost things like executive function.
       | 
       | I guess these days a few paragraphs qualifies for an "in depth"
       | article. No links to any of the sources referenced, except to one
       | of their own pages. Not very useful.
       | 
       | That said, sure, as someone who speaks several languages and can
       | mostly understand a few more, I think there are interesting
       | insights gained by having this ability. For me, a lot of it has
       | to do with, perhaps, less-than-verbal communication. Each culture
       | has a certain way to communicate in person during conversations.
       | Spanish spoken in Spain, Mexico, Peru, Ecuador and Argentina,
       | while different, also drag along non-verbal cues that are
       | distinct in each culture. Same with English in various parts of
       | the UK, US and other anglo-speaking countries. As much as some
       | Canadians think themselves to be French, there are differences
       | there as well with France. Non-verbal cues in the Arab world (and
       | Middle East in general) are different as well. How you sit, move,
       | pace, use your hands and gesticulate during in-person
       | conversations are linked to both language and culture. Etc.
       | 
       | Who remembers the bar scene in Inglorious Basterds? Yup, very
       | true. Instant communication.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86Ckh80mLlQ
        
       | heresie-dabord wrote:
       | What is "good for one's brain" (apart from proper nutrition and
       | absence of concussions) is a strong education and healthy
       | lifelong social interactions. Human language is essential for
       | these interactions. Having multiple human languages _opens more
       | books, interactions, and cultures_.
       | 
       | The opposite is to remain closed. This is a dangerous state of
       | mind and culture.
       | 
       | From TFA:                    all these studies take for granted
       | the uncontroversial mental superpower that you get from language
       | study: being able to talk to people you could not have otherwise.
       | 
       | Not just to talk to people, but to unlock an understanding of
       | their culture and perspectives.
       | 
       | Talking to more people in more contexts is a _practical_
       | affordance: having more tools in the shop means being able to
       | handle new and different types of problems effectively. People
       | solve problems _working together with_ people.
       | 
       | Having the _cognitive adaptability_ to use new and different
       | tools is certainly a valuable quality. We can nurture it as a
       | learning objective, but it may may not be as universalisable as
       | we have hoped. That said, the cost of not trying to educate
       | people is to _fail even worse_.
        
       | keiferski wrote:
       | These studies always miss the obvious cultural point to me, [1]
       | which is that knowing more than one language usually means you
       | deeply understand more than one culture. This by default makes
       | one a bit more capable of nuance, seeing other perspectives, etc.
       | Languages are not just interchangeable collections of words, but
       | are whole worldviews. Language in this sense is a kind of
       | knowledge and not a different brain state, akin to reading books
       | about history to understand a conflict better.
       | 
       | 1. Maybe that's not their fault, as they are ostensibly
       | interested only in the biology. But it still seems like a major
       | hole when discussing the benefits of being bilingual.
        
         | leidenfrost wrote:
         | I wonder if these studies also take in account indigenous
         | languages and its native speakers.
         | 
         | People from Paraguay speak both Spanish and Guarani. A lot of
         | people from Mexico speak both Spanish and Mayan.
         | 
         | Does that have the same effect as the son of a family that
         | speaks English and German?
        
           | keiferski wrote:
           | In terms of the knowledge sense I mean, I think it is logical
           | that the more distant the worldviews of the languages, the
           | greater the effect. Even more so if they both have a large
           | media / cultural sphere.
        
           | FlyingSnake wrote:
           | I think so, yes. My daughter speaks English and German
           | fluently and I can see she has deep insights into these
           | cultures. (She also speaks 2 other languages)
           | 
           | She once told me that she likes to read conversational books
           | like "Greg's Tagebuch" in German while "Harry Potter" type
           | books in English.
        
       | agumonkey wrote:
       | Personally, being half lifed and busted mentally, I found
       | surprising how refreshing it was to learn bits of latin. It
       | rewires concepts all across the brain in a smooth way and connect
       | news ideas that you don't in you native language.
        
       | dumroll wrote:
       | I have a different take. I am an immigrant. I speak 3 regional
       | languages fluently and can partly speak German. While I always
       | had English exposure since the age of 5 or 6, my parents spoke
       | different language.
       | 
       | Everyone in my neighborhood who was not economically okay spoke
       | different language than English.
       | 
       | I think it hurts more than helps when you are polylingual if you
       | decide to spend majority of time in country like United States.
       | 
       | I have collected a lot of data around this. Time and time again,
       | I can prove with data, that native english langauge speakers
       | outperform anyone else. Whether it is college admissions,
       | admissions to incubators like Y Combinator, job opportunities,
       | sports opportunities, housing opportunities and more. If language
       | is the sole factor to be considered, then polylinguals do not
       | win.
       | 
       | When you speak a foreign language than English, you accent is
       | bound to be messed up. Look at Indian Americans or Pakistani
       | Americans or other people who speak dual langauge. There is
       | always something off about their accent. This leads to acceptance
       | and at time getting asked "are you american" or "were you born
       | here?"
       | 
       | I am not saying dont learn foreign language. But, language is one
       | aspect of being polylingual. You just dont speak words. Words
       | have meaning and they are deeply ingrained in cultures.
       | 
       | If you know long term where you want to be, learn and speak and
       | immerse yourself in the culture. Otherwise you are just creating
       | more noise for social media points and making it harder for
       | yourself to be a master of one language.
        
         | seszett wrote:
         | > _When you speak a foreign language than English, you accent
         | is bound to be messed up. Look at Indian Americans or Pakistani
         | Americans or other people who speak dual langauge._
         | 
         | That's not true, in this case it is simply the accent they
         | learn because everyone around them has this accent.
         | 
         | But learning different languages when young doesn't mean one
         | develops a foreign accent. I know Flemish people of Vietnamese
         | origins who speak correct Vietnamese as well as Flemish with a
         | perfectly good farmer accent from West Flanders. And their kids
         | speak native French with a neutral (French) accent in addition
         | to native Flemish, because the French speakers in their family
         | are French and not Belgian.
         | 
         | When learning languages young, accents don't creep from one
         | language to the other, that happens when one learns a language
         | later on.
        
       | zeroCalories wrote:
       | Unless you love the culture, there's no reason to learn a
       | language besides English. I would ditch the knowledge and
       | thousands of hours spent on my native language to improve my
       | English, or really any other skill. Always funny watching
       | Americans try to larp as cultured cosmopolitans by learning a
       | language they'll never actually need. Especially in 2025, when
       | you can just point an AI at something and ask it to read it for
       | you.
        
         | swat535 wrote:
         | I'm not sure about that. I speak 3 language fluently, I think
         | its important to nurture your native language. Perhaps because
         | we partially identify our personalities and cultures based on
         | our mother tongue, but I would feel like a part of me would be
         | lost if I drop it.
         | 
         | I agree with your point regarding English however, I think
         | everyone should learn it regardless and I can't help but feel
         | like it's a lighthearted language.
         | 
         | I wonder if others are the same, but I feel like a different
         | person based on the language I speak.. somehow I'm "kinder" (is
         | that the right word?) when I speak English for example..
        
         | BuckRogers wrote:
         | You should be complementing people trying to be cosmopolitan
         | and learning another language. There's nothing wrong with that.
         | And as people have commented here, it's good for their mind.
         | 
         | It seems that Americans can never win. Either the most racist
         | xenophobic people in the world that deserve to have foreigners
         | take their country over. Or, they're fake cosmopolitans
         | larping. Of course the real answer is that people are just
         | envious of Americans. But we won't go into that.
         | 
         | It's true that AI is making nearly any intellectual endeavor
         | pointless from a necessity standpoint. But that's OK, we're
         | going to be able to intellectually dive into things that we
         | actually want to do for enjoyment in the future. People will
         | still learn languages and study whatever they want.
         | 
         | I find foreign language is interesting and fun. I don't know if
         | it's the brain stimulation or just the sheer joy of having a
         | secret language that many people around me don't understand.
        
         | FlyingSnake wrote:
         | This is such a sad and utilitarian take.
         | 
         | I would rather do the opposite and try to learn as many
         | languages as possible. I can't imagine the fun of reading "Cien
         | Anos de Soledad" in Spanish or Dostoevski in Russian.
        
       | nayuki wrote:
       | I think English monolingual people have a harder time learning
       | and distinguishing homophones (words with same pronunciation but
       | different spelling) - such as to/too/two, there/their/they're,
       | its/it's, etc. If you know another language and correspond the
       | aforementioned English words with those in the other language,
       | you can see that they become quite distinct. For example,
       | to/too/two in French is a/aussi/deux.
        
       | xvilka wrote:
       | Mandatory mention of Language Transfer project[1].
       | 
       | [1] https://www.languagetransfer.org/
        
       | FlyingSnake wrote:
       | Sometimes I really pity the monolinguals who can't witness the
       | beauty of the varied linguistic cultures of the world.
       | 
       | It's not a brag but here's a sample of how my polylingustic life
       | looks like: In the past week I had discussions about Clausewitz's
       | "Vom Krige" and "Ret Samadhi" by Gitanjali Shree, discussed
       | Marathi poetry with my daughter, listened to mellifluous Tamil
       | songs like "Nenjukkul Peidhidum", appreciated my wife's Uttara
       | Kannada accent, all the while consuming English media in copious
       | amounts.
       | 
       | Languages and accents are a unique part of being human and I
       | firmly believe that we're meant to be multilingual.
        
       | hiAndrewQuinn wrote:
       | n=1 data point here, but most of my free time these days is spent
       | learning Finnish, a notoriously difficult language for English
       | monolinguals. (I haven't always been in the monolingual camp, but
       | a decade away from Latin has 99% put me back there.)
       | 
       | For the most part, I don't feel like it has made me any sharper.
       | Had I taken the ~2000 hours I'm in the hole for so far and spent
       | them on going to the gym and sleeping more I'm nearly certain
       | that would have had a much larger effect on my day to day mental
       | acuity. Had I spent it on my career I'd probably be substantially
       | richer. I probably have another ~2000 to go before I reach a
       | level where I'm happy plateauing.
       | 
       | In general I think it's very hard to justify learning a foreign
       | language when subjected to a normal adult person's cost-benefit
       | analysis. I persist mostly because I just really, really, really
       | want to reach true proficiency, not the fake proficiency that
       | gets you an A in Spanish or Latin class, as I outlined in [1]. If
       | you don't have a similar drive your time and energy is probably
       | better spent elsewhere.
       | 
       | [1]: https://andrew-quinn.me/thoughts-on-language-learning-at-
       | the...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-06-28 23:01 UTC)