[HN Gopher] Bazzite would shut down if Fedora goes ahead with re...
___________________________________________________________________
Bazzite would shut down if Fedora goes ahead with removing 32-bit
Author : speckx
Score : 17 points
Date : 2025-06-25 19:54 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.gamingonlinux.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.gamingonlinux.com)
| pbohun wrote:
| It may not look like it now, but I think Linux is not viable
| long-term as a desktop OS. There should probably be an effort to
| specifically make FreeBSD a gaming-ready OS. We know it can be
| done since Sony already did it for PlayStation (but that's
| proprietary).
|
| FreeBSD also needs an OS-level graphics/window API just like
| Windows. Linux is still trying to pretend like its the 60s where
| text was the only way to interact with a computer. Graphics is
| integral to all mobile and desktop computing and should be part
| of the operating system.
| bigyabai wrote:
| None of this is really related to the issue though. You _could_
| fix this by uprooting all of your software and switching to
| another OS... or with Bubblewrap and a Steam Flatpak.
| Containerization was always the future of UNIX-like gaming,
| even "native" Steam installations use it with pressure-vessel.
| Same goes for Linuxulator on FreeBSD.
|
| FreeBSD is an excellent example of how much development you can
| expect from a license that allows full commercial exploitation
| of it's codebase. You will sooner see Sony sell $600 PS3s than
| you will have a graphical installer or hardware-accelerated
| Chromium. If Linux is running the race with a bum leg, BSD is
| drafting it's will in the hospital bed.
| heavyset_go wrote:
| > _There should probably be an effort to specifically make
| FreeBSD a gaming-ready OS_
|
| This will only happen for consoles as it is the case already,
| due to the driver issue.
|
| It's one thing to create a specialized Linux distribution, it's
| another thing to try to support thousands of SKUs found in
| common desktops, roll your own modern WiFi stack, etc.
| TacticalCoder wrote:
| > It may not look like it now, but I think Linux is not viable
| long-term as a desktop OS.
|
| I'm using Linux on the desktop since the early Slackware days,
| in the nineties.
|
| The one thing that changed since then is that Linux now powers
| 500 of the world's Top 500 supercomputers and that's it. Wait,
| no, I forgot... It powers as well as billions if not tens of
| billions of phones, routers, servers, TVs, etc. It's in space,
| in cars, at sea, underground, etc.
|
| It's typically also powering OCI containers, containers host,
| VMs, Kubernetes (even Talos is still Linux), etc.
|
| Now of course the one thing that hasn't changed is the _" This
| year is the year of Linux on the desktop"_ joke. But somehow,
| in the face of billions of devices running Linux, that joke
| doesn't have the same punch to it anymore.
|
| What makes you think that an OS that basically now powers the
| entire world isn't suitable long term as a desktop OS?
|
| It's become so easy to use Linux as a desktop OS that even my
| wife is on Debian: not exactly a "newbie friendly desktop
| distro".
|
| Is the whole Gnome/KDE/Xorg/Wayland a mess? Sure is. And yet
| Linux is definitely here to stay.
|
| Linux shall still exist, even on the desktop, long after I'm
| gone.
|
| Linux is perfectly viable on the desktop.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-06-25 23:01 UTC)