[HN Gopher] Homotopy Equivalences
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Homotopy Equivalences
        
       Author : ibobev
       Score  : 64 points
       Date   : 2025-06-20 09:56 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (bartoszmilewski.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (bartoszmilewski.com)
        
       | skulk wrote:
       | > In fact such a 2-sphere can be wrapped around the core an
       | arbitrary number of times.
       | 
       | This is really hard for me to visualize. What does it look like
       | for a 2-sphere to wrap around the core multiple times? Also, I
       | would have expected it to be able to wrap around in multiple ways
       | since there are more dimensions here, leading to pi^2(b^3 \ {0})
       | = Z^2. How would one even prove that this isn't the case?
        
         | semolinapudding wrote:
         | There is a nice illustration of a 2-sphere wrapped twice around
         | another 2-sphere on the Wikipedia article for the homotopy
         | groups of spheres [0].
         | 
         | Now, there are many ways of proving that there is only one way
         | (up to homotopy) of wrapping a 2-sphere n times around another
         | 2-sphere, but all of them are fairly involved. The simplest
         | proof comes from an analysis of the Hopf fibration, which
         | roughly describes a relation between the 1-sphere, the 2-sphere
         | and the 3-sphere [1]. Other than this, it follows from the
         | theory of degrees for continuous mappings, or from the
         | Freudenthal suspension theorem and some basic homological
         | computations.
         | 
         | [0]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homotopy_groups_of_spheres#/me...
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopf_fibration
        
         | pfortuny wrote:
         | This answer is probably a bit convoluted and possible
         | erroneous. Assume the Earth has radius 2. Use coordinates (t,z)
         | to denote "longitude" and "latitude from the North pole". Thus
         | (0,0) is the North Pole, (0, pi/2) is the Greenwich equatorial
         | point and (0, pi) is the South pole.
         | 
         | You can have "two" spheres wrapped within the Earth with the
         | following parametrization. Using a first coordinate r to denote
         | the distance to the Earth's center, so that (1,t,z) denotes the
         | points in the sphere of radius 1:
         | 
         | (a,b)-> (1+cos(b)/2, a,b), for a,b in the interval [0,2pi].
         | 
         | Those are not proper spheres (the radius changes) but the
         | surface so parametrized is homotopic to a sphere "counted two
         | times".
         | 
         | It is not possible to have a warped sphere which does not cross
         | itself, as far as I can tell (but I might be wrong).
         | 
         | The wikipedia image linked by a sibling comment did not help
         | me...
         | 
         | ETA: the issue is not the dimension (2) of your spheres but the
         | codimension (1) inside the object, and the fact that you have
         | only removed the center of the main sphere. I think (caveat
         | emptor) that if you remove 2 points form the solid sphere, you
         | get Z^2. Similar to the case of surfaces and holes.
        
         | lying4fun wrote:
         | this great visualisation of homotopy groups might be helpful
         | 
         | A Sphere is a Loop of Loops (Visualizing Homotopy Groups)
         | 
         | https://youtube.com/watch?v=CxGtAuJdjYI
        
       | coderatlarge wrote:
       | in terry tao's recent interview with lex fridman there's an
       | interesting bit on poincare conjecture where he goes out of his
       | way not to use these words.
        
         | randomtoast wrote:
         | It's a good (and long) interview, and I genuinely enjoyed it.
         | Terry Tao comes across as a truly nice person. However, I
         | noticed that he tends to be somewhat non-committal in his
         | responses. For each question posed, he provides thorough
         | explanations that most with a basic understanding of math can
         | follow. Nevertheless, he rarely makes predictions or offers his
         | opinion. He frequently ends with a remark such as, "Yes, well,
         | it's a challenging problem."
         | 
         | I completely understand where he is coming from. While it's
         | true that "we don't know what we don't know", I would
         | appreciate hearing more about his (opinionated) thoughts
         | regarding the topics discussed during the interview.
        
           | williamstein wrote:
           | Fascinating observation. Maybe he is better at research
           | partly by being disciplined to not have such opinions. Having
           | an opinion can bias one's approach to a problem, making it
           | harder to solve.
        
             | coderatlarge wrote:
             | maybe a more mathematical interviewer could hove drawn out
             | more predictions. i appreciate lex for having invited tao.
             | i hope he manages to convince perelman.
        
               | xanderlewis wrote:
               | Just about anyone would be a more mathematical
               | interviewer than Fridman. Even when it comes to CS, it's
               | blatantly obvious he doesn't know what he's talking
               | about.
               | 
               | How he got famous is such a mystery...
        
               | coderatlarge wrote:
               | starting from knuth + pearl and evolving to potus and
               | india pm is pretty amazing. he obviously brings something
               | that people crave.
        
               | randomtoast wrote:
               | I think Lex is prepping his interviews very well. He will
               | ask questions that address the areas in which the
               | interviewee is an expert in. However, you begin to
               | realize that he often struggles to ask follow-up
               | questions that are relevant to what the interviewee has
               | shared on various topics.
               | 
               | This differs in other podcasts. For example, Sean
               | Carroll, a theoretical physicist, conducts interviews
               | with colleagues, who are also theoretical physicists.
               | This enables him to engage in a meaningful conversation
               | with the person being interviewed. When both parties
               | strive to use language that a wider audience can
               | understand, it truly becomes enjoyable.
        
               | Syntonicles wrote:
               | It's a lot to ask of two experts to also be excellent
               | communicators for an audience that may struggle to follow
               | along.
               | 
               | I wonder if a potential application of LLMS could be:
               | have two experts have a really interesting but dense
               | conversation with each other, and then translate the
               | conversation into simpler language with interjections for
               | explanations.
               | 
               | It may not be enjoyable for the most general audience,
               | but it would scratch an itch for some of us.
        
       | hackandthink wrote:
       | "Grothendieck conjectured that the infinity groupoid captures all
       | information about a topological space up to weak homotopy
       | equivalence"
       | 
       | The homotopy hypothesis has something mystical about it.
       | 
       | https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/homotopy/homotopy.pdf
        
       | m_j_g wrote:
       | vaguely related : synthetic homotopies visualisation tool -
       | https://github.com/marcinjangrzybowski/cubeViz2
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-06-23 23:01 UTC)