[HN Gopher] 'Gwada negative': French scientists find new blood t...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       'Gwada negative': French scientists find new blood type in woman
        
       Author : spidersouris
       Score  : 127 points
       Date   : 2025-06-21 07:38 UTC (15 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.lemonde.fr)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.lemonde.fr)
        
       | ajb wrote:
       | The OP is low on details. There is more in this article (in
       | french): https://www.lindependant.fr/2025/06/21/il-ny-a-quelle-
       | qui-es...
       | 
       | Apparently the ISBT have added this to their list:
       | https://www.isbtweb.org/isbt-working-parties/rcibgt.html (the
       | page still says 47 but the data tables have it added)
        
         | xattt wrote:
         | Neither article talks about whether this is a minor or a major
         | antigen.
         | 
         | Blood for transfusion needs to be crossmatched against antigen
         | types of the recipient. Many patients will tolerate several
         | transfusions of a minor mismatched antigen before developing a
         | sensitivity. Major antigens are what cause significant
         | reactions that can be life-threatening.
         | 
         | Minor antigens come into play when crossmatching for infants
         | and premies, but this is way beyond my scope.
        
           | yorwba wrote:
           | With a single known case of somebody producing antibodies
           | against the antigen, it might be a bit hard to say how many
           | transfusions it typically takes to develop a sensitivity.
        
           | JackFr wrote:
           | I recently had major surgery and got two units of blood in
           | during the operation and two more post-op. Post-op before I
           | got the blood, they typed my blood again, and a nurse stayed
           | in the room while I got the blood and I wondered why. This
           | comment makes it clear.
        
             | xattt wrote:
             | Close observation for 15 minutes is typical for any blood
             | transfusion. You do a set of pre-transfusion vitals, vitals
             | when the blood hits the vein, vitals every 5 minutes until
             | 15 minutes is up, vitals every 15 minutes until the blood
             | is done. Ask any nurse why they hate running blood.
             | 
             | Depending on the severity of the reaction, blood will
             | either be stopped or the patient will be loaded up with
             | Benadryl and Tylenol with the blood running at a slower
             | rate.
        
           | ajb wrote:
           | That's interesting; I didn't know that to realize it was
           | missing.
        
           | paulgerhardt wrote:
           | > Minor antigens come into play when crossmatching for
           | infants
           | 
           | I'm reminded of that American high schooler in Uganda running
           | an orphanage and ran into this exact issue when doing a
           | transfusion on a malnourished infant. [1]
           | 
           | She was skilled enough to perform a transfusion and
           | knowledgeable enough to test for a ABO+/- match but not so
           | knowledgeable as to be sensitive to this issue with
           | disastrous results.
           | 
           | On the other hand her clinics metrics were on par or slightly
           | above the local hospitals so it's not clear to me they would
           | have faired better getting care elsewhere there.
           | 
           | [1] https://stories.showmax.com/za/hbos-docuseries-savior-
           | comple...
        
             | leereeves wrote:
             | I don't know anything about the case in Uganda, but
             | transfusion reactions can happen to anyone, even in the
             | United States.
             | 
             | We don't actually express antibodies to antigens until
             | we're exposed to them, so crossmatching won't detect a
             | minor antigen mismatch until the first transfusion
             | containing the antigen is administered.
             | 
             | That first time causes a delayed hemolytic transfusion
             | reaction, which is generally milder than the kind of
             | reaction crossmatching will prevent, but can be serious or
             | even fatal.
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_hemolytic_transfusion
             | _...
        
           | mmazing wrote:
           | Type O Negative here, they all kill me so luckily I don't
           | have to guess!
        
         | h1fra wrote:
         | @dang should change the OP, entrevue is really a poor website
         | (think tmz)
        
           | wut42 wrote:
           | TMZ is a very respectable publication if you compare it to
           | Entrevue...
        
           | j-bos wrote:
           | You'll need to email the mods.
        
           | spidersouris wrote:
           | FYI, the only English article at the time of posting was
           | Entrevue's, which is why it was initially chosen. But indeed,
           | Le Monde's article is much better.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Ok, we've changed the URL from https://entrevue.fr/en/un-
         | groupe-sanguin-inedit-decouvert-en... to a different article
         | (in English). Thanks!
        
       | kimos wrote:
       | My clearly incorrect understanding was that there are ~8 blood
       | types. So reading that there are 48 is shocking.
        
         | nick238 wrote:
         | There are 48 blood type _systems_ , of which ABO (giving A, B,
         | AB, and O) and Rh (+/-) can be combined to form the 8 common
         | types.
         | 
         | There are effectively millions of types because all the systems
         | combined combinatorially, but most antigens beyond ABO and Rh
         | don't cause that much of an issue, so in emergency cases, they
         | just go with them.
        
           | thaumasiotes wrote:
           | Why are A and B considered to belong to the same "system"?
           | They combine with each other combinatorially in exactly the
           | same way that rhesus factor combines with them, and
           | presumably the same way that all other systems combine with
           | all other systems.
        
             | thechao wrote:
             | Hold my beer; I'm gonna middlebrow this! My best guess
             | (dimly remembered from drawing blood for testing in my lab)
             | is that these "groups" (systems?) all live at the same
             | place on the chromosomes that do/n't express them --
             | they're alleles.
        
             | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
             | Blood type systems are defined by the single allele that
             | encodes the antigens (as you point out, sometimes multiple
             | antigens per allele). This table shows all of the different
             | blood type systems, https://www.isbtweb.org/resource/tableo
             | fbloodgroupsystems.ht..., and the chromosomal location of
             | the respective allele.
        
             | wbl wrote:
             | ABO all involve the same gene locus and the same protein
             | just different glycans that get added.
             | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABO_(gene)
        
           | gus_massa wrote:
           | A few years ago, I made a comment in a similar topic asking
           | for more details, and I got a very good reply. Hat tip to
           | tait:
           | 
           | > _It 's complicated._
           | 
           | > _There are more than 35 red blood cell groups
           | (seehttps://www.science.org.au/curious/people-medicine/blood-
           | typ... for a nice writeup). For each of those blood groups,
           | there is more than one possible configuration of some protein
           | or carbohydrate (something like more than one possible
           | genetic sequence leading to more than one kind of molecule on
           | the surface of the RBCs)._
           | 
           | > _And, even with ABO, there can be infrequent variations
           | that make things more complicated (seehttps://professionaledu
           | cation.blood.ca/en/transfusion/best-p... for more)._
           | 
           | > _For the other blood groups, I think every case the groups
           | were identified because a patient somewhere made an antibody,
           | causing either a transfusion reaction (if not tested ahead of
           | time) or, more likely, a positive (incompatible) reaction on
           | in compatibility testing._
           | 
           | > [...]
           | 
           | It's worth reading the full original comment because it has
           | more interesting details
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33507052
        
           | hinkley wrote:
           | Is that what's going on with organ matching?
        
         | AnotherGoodName wrote:
         | The other thing people should have more awareness of is that
         | plasma and blood have opposite compatibilities; a universal
         | plasma donor will have blood only compatible to their blood
         | type and vice versa.
         | 
         | Which makes the hollywood trope of 'i'm a universal donor'
         | really silly. Universal donor of what? And then they pump the
         | blood and plasma straight into the other person pretty much
         | guaranteeing problems since either the blood or plasma will be
         | incompatible. The only reason blood donation works is due to
         | machines that separate the blood and plasma.
        
           | greggsy wrote:
           | When people are directly piped to each other in movies, I
           | often wonder if there is some negotiation protocol like PD
           | that ensures that the donor continues to charge the
           | recipient, even when their capacities both reach equilibrium.
        
       | thaumasiotes wrote:
       | > The discovery of new blood types isn't limited to transfusion
       | emergencies. It also sheds light on certain previously
       | unexplained pathologies. The specialist discusses the recent case
       | of three siblings who had suffered from mysterious
       | rheumatological disorders since adolescence. It was only after
       | identifying their rare blood type that doctors were able to
       | establish a probable link with their symptoms.
       | 
       | How does that work? Were all three siblings regularly receiving
       | donated blood? The article doesn't expand on this at all.
        
         | spondylosaurus wrote:
         | I read it to mean that the rheumatological symptoms they had
         | were the result of their unusual blood type. Hard to say
         | without more info, but something about that particular blood
         | type could be linked to an inflammatory disorder.
        
       | kalium-xyz wrote:
       | This is one of those things that doesnt matter most of the time
       | but when it matters it really matters.
        
       | xyst wrote:
       | It's cool to see these discoveries, but as a patient. It's
       | probably a nightmare to be unique in this aspect.
       | 
       | If American, think higher costs of care. If involved in car
       | accident or other traumatic injury outside of normal area, good
       | luck getting your blood transfused. Might get lucky with
       | substitute. Surgery preparation also more complicated.
       | 
       | Maybe you have competent medical staff that recognize it. Maybe a
       | few hematologists in the world familiar with your blood and
       | history. Maybe a few neurons fire off in the back of an aging
       | emergency physician that recalls this in a case study he/she read
       | about in medical school/residency.
        
       | escapecharacter wrote:
       | Manga lore fan wikis about to go nuts...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-06-21 23:00 UTC)