[HN Gopher] Estrogen: A Trip Report
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Estrogen: A Trip Report
        
       Author : sebg
       Score  : 111 points
       Date   : 2025-06-19 20:15 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (smoothbrains.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (smoothbrains.net)
        
       | calico96 wrote:
       | Lynn Conway, fellow (former) MIT student documented her
       | biochemical journey with estrogen therapies of the 1960s:
       | https://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/LynnsStory.html
        
         | calico96 wrote:
         | In 1966 Dr. Harry Benjamin (who worked with Lynn) documented
         | early 20th century hormone research and treatment options in
         | his book, "The Transsexual Phenomenon":
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Transsexual_Phenomenon
        
       | DoctorOW wrote:
       | As a transgender woman myself, I have been witness to many in my
       | community reduce some recreational drug use with HRT. I think
       | it's unlikely that estrogen literally causes euphoria, but gender
       | euphoria is real, lasting happiness. When you compare to the
       | health effects of letting someone waste away on recreational
       | drugs to dull dysphoria, it paints a visceral picture of
       | transition as healthcare.
        
         | karcass wrote:
         | I lost interest in psychedelics after transitioning.
        
         | antithesizer wrote:
         | Amen
        
         | deadbabe wrote:
         | Is gender dysphoria thus caused by the body craving
         | testosterone or estrogen hormones, when it doesn't have?
        
           | DoctorOW wrote:
           | I haven't studied gender dysphoria but I've been diagnosed
           | with it. In my experience, it's an incongruence between your
           | idea of yourself and your perceptible form. In some ways it
           | could be argued your body is "craving" it but not in the same
           | way it may crave a specific nutrient. Instead, you're sort of
           | surprised and often upset by the way that you are.
        
           | kelseyfrog wrote:
           | That's one way to think of it, but the root of it (imho) is a
           | mismatch between ones internal sense of inalienable gender
           | identity and the embodiment of that identity physically -
           | think clothing, bodily form, social perception, etc.
           | 
           | It might be difficult to imagine how those two things are
           | separable if one has lived their whole life with them in
           | congruence. If perhaps, you close your eyes and concentrate
           | on your being, there is a part of you that feels that your
           | sense of manness of womanness is part of who you are? What
           | would you do if you retained that sense, and woke up in the
           | body of the opposite sex and were expected to behave in
           | congruence with that contrary to your internal sense of self?
           | It can be a bit like that.
        
         | nyanpasu64 wrote:
         | It's chilling watching the latest political powers openly
         | declare that trans people are not who they are inside and must
         | never be allowed to become what they are inside, while
         | eliminating legal recognition and protection and criminalizing
         | life-saving transition healthcare. I find myself retreating
         | into dissociation because to _feel_ the horrors is more than I
         | can bear.
        
           | wahern wrote:
           | The glass-is-half-full take is that no states have prohibited
           | gender affirming care for adults. All the present bans in the
           | U.S. only proscribe treatments for minors. But one would be
           | forgiven for not knowing this because it's not how it's
           | reported.
           | 
           | Point being, even the most conservative states haven't (yet)
           | sought to limit treatment for trans adults.[1] Which is not
           | nothing considering how many were so quick to ban abortion.
           | 
           | Also, it's not just the U.S.; plenty of "liberal" Western
           | European countries have reversed course on care for minors.
           | Even the Netherlands, the origin of the WPATH protocol, has
           | pulled back on the reigns for minors, though they haven't yet
           | instituted any prohibitions.
           | 
           | IMO, the trans advocacy rhetoric that equivocated hurdles to
           | gender affirming care for minors as murder backfired. The
           | fact there seems little motivation to limit treatment for
           | adults suggests substantial openness to the issue among even
           | conservative populations. And there are many in the LGTBQ
           | community, include trans community, who share similar
           | sentiments, at least regarding the rhetoric.
           | 
           | [1] Not sure about legislation dictating certain aspects,
           | like waiting periods, but those were widespread as a
           | practical matter in even the most liberal states.
        
             | NewJazz wrote:
             | Yeah but the whole point so far has been to pass laws under
             | the guise of "protecting children" because that was easy to
             | justify politically. Now that SCOTUS has green-lit denying
             | healthcare on the basis of assigned gender at birth, the
             | gates are wide open.
        
               | titanomachy wrote:
               | "Denying healthcare on the basis of assigned gender at
               | birth" seems like a deliberately loaded way to state
               | this. Isn't it more accurate to say it's a blanket denial
               | of a certain type of treatment to all minors?
        
               | nyanpasu64 wrote:
               | I'm pretty sure they're still allowing puberty blockers
               | for premature puberty, inducing puberty in cis teens, and
               | surgically and medically forcing intersex people into a
               | binary sex without consent.
        
               | wahern wrote:
               | Much of the majority and most of the dissenting opinions
               | in the recent SCOTUS case are exactly about that--is it
               | sex discrimination?: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion
               | s/24pdf/23-477_2cp3.pdf All the opinions are worth a
               | read. The best arguments for both sides are there.
               | Though, I thought all the best arguments on both sides
               | kind of sucked; it's just a very difficult issue.
               | Transgender questions lay to waste 100 years of sex and
               | gender discourse on both the right and left.
        
               | KittenInABox wrote:
               | No, because puberty blockers can be assigned to children
               | (in fact, children are the only applicable group here).
               | They just can't be assigned to children _specifically
               | because they are transgender_. Similarly, mastectomies
               | are available treatment for teens... they just can 't be
               | used as a treatment for teens assigned female at birth.
        
               | DoctorOW wrote:
               | Personally I think it's less accurate to rephrase medical
               | treatment as "a certain treatment". It's also false to
               | say all minors, since cisgender minors are still approved
               | to receive puberty blockers (and are regularly prescribed
               | them for various reasons).
               | 
               | It's the same medicine from the same medical
               | professionals and the only difference is your gender
               | identity.
        
               | wahern wrote:
               | > Now that SCOTUS has green-lit denying healthcare on the
               | basis of assigned gender at birth, the gates are wide
               | open.
               | 
               | Yes, we're at a juncture. But my point is I don't think
               | bans for adult care are inevitable, nor that strict
               | prohibitions for minors need be permanent. If trans
               | advocates and their supports took a breather and figured
               | out how to reframe things, the backslide (such as it is)
               | could be arrested and even reversed. But that will
               | require, at a minimum, taking back the microphone from
               | the most radical "advocates". And probably to
               | depoliticize it. The issue has become highly politically
               | polarized, but that's a relatively recent thing. I was
               | gobsmacked by the generally tame and sympathetic
               | conservative response to Caitlyn Jenner among
               | conservatives 10 years ago. The turn was avoidable and,
               | arguably, reversible.
        
           | aucisson_masque wrote:
           | From the point of view of a conservative and non us citizen,
           | you have a good life there compared to the rest of the world.
           | 
           | Technically, most countries don't allow people to be openly
           | gay. In some countries, being gay even privately means you
           | get beaten to death or your head chopped off.
           | 
           | Needless to say that transgender people are not even taken
           | into consideration.
           | 
           | If I was gay or transgender, god knows I would rather be in
           | the USA or maybe north Europe than any other country and
           | especially not Africa, Arabia, South America.
        
             | xiande04 wrote:
             | Ah, the old "it could be worse" fallacy.
             | 
             | So to recap, you're saying, "don't worry about what's going
             | on in the US right now, because you still have it better
             | than most of the world"
             | 
             | Just because something could be worse does not mean that 1.
             | It's nothing to be concerned about 2. That we shouldn't
             | take steps to improve the situation.
             | 
             | Things can always be worse, so this "logic" is always
             | applicable. It's a vacuous argument. Even if you lived in
             | the country with the worst homo/transphobia in the world,
             | you could tell the person, "well, at least your alive."
             | 
             | Moreover, there's nothing constructive about this line of
             | thinking. If people actually lived by this logic, we would
             | live in a static world, because "it could be worse."
        
       | marcellus23 wrote:
       | Does this suggest at all that these changes could also be
       | differences in the way (cis) men and women perceive the world? In
       | other words, do cis women experience sweet food tasting sweeter,
       | colors being more vibrant, etc, compared to cis men?
       | 
       | Edit: I'm aware there's evidence for differences in color
       | discrimination and taste preferences between the sexes. But
       | seeing the differences described from a first person perspective
       | of someone used to being a male is fascinating. It's a common
       | cliche that women laugh much more than men, for example -- and
       | here's someone saying that being on estrogen actually made funny
       | things seem much funnier. I wonder what the experience is like
       | for FtM who take testosterone?
        
         | mintplant wrote:
         | Women are generally better at perceiving and distinguishing
         | colors and smells, according to the studies we have.
         | Anecdotally, my sense of smell has gone from dull to vibrant
         | over the course of my (MtF) transition, and I have a friend who
         | no longer experiences the color-blindness she used to before
         | hers, though I'm not aware of any scientific evidence or
         | inquiry in this area.
        
           | tofof wrote:
           | Women (here I mean XX individuals) have two different alleles
           | present for each of the green (OPN1MW, also the OPN1MW2
           | duplication) and red cones (OPN1LW), since these are found on
           | the x chromosome. X-inactivation means that only one gets
           | expressed in a particular cell, but this means individual
           | photoreceptor cells can express either allele. The individual
           | proteins and gene encodings of the cones can differ, and
           | small variations shift the spectral sensitivity to slightly
           | shorter or slightly longer wavelengths. It's possible, then,
           | for a woman to express as many as five unique-ish cones in
           | theory -- though there's only been one 'true' tetrachromat
           | found so far. Still, having red and green cone variants that
           | respond with a peak preference shifted 10-20 nm in addition
           | to another unshifted cone (or, better, shifted the opposite
           | direction) provides a biological basis to expect women
           | (again, specifically XX individuals) to have finer color
           | differentiation. This explanation, however, could not occur
           | following a hormone replacement.
        
         | TheOtherHobbes wrote:
         | There are some established differences. Women have better
         | colour, taste, and smell discrimination. Some women are
         | tetrachromats with an extra colour sense, while men are more
         | likely to have red/green colour blindness.
         | 
         | Men have better night vision, are more aware of motion, and are
         | better at tracking location and judging distances.
        
           | antonfire wrote:
           | > Some women are tetrachromats with an extra colour sense,
           | while men are more likely to have red/green colour blindness.
           | 
           | If I'm not mistaken, red/green color blindness is more common
           | in men because it's caused my a mutation on the X chromosome
           | (which men tend to have fewer of). I would guess a similar
           | thing about tetrachromacy.
           | 
           | So those are probably unrelated to color-perception changes
           | due to exogenous estrogen.
        
         | Fraterkes wrote:
         | Gendered cliches are incredibly common, but I've never heard
         | one that involves women liking sweet food more or less than
         | men, which you'd expect if there were actual differences in
         | taste I think
        
           | vinoveritas wrote:
           | It's an extremely common pattern for alcoholic drinks, to the
           | point that a man ordering a very sweet drink or a woman
           | ordering neat whisky is likely to draw comments (not even
           | necessarily negative ones, especially in the case of a woman
           | preferring usually-masculine drinks). It's also present in
           | wine marketing--the lower end of the market has heavily
           | feminine-coded marketing and tends to be very sweet (at least
           | in the US), and in fact that aligns with actual preferences
           | I've observed (I'm not sure I know a single woman who prefers
           | dry wines?)
           | 
           | Chocolate (dark vs milk) and coffee drinks (heavy on milk and
           | sugar versus light on them, or black) follow similar patterns
           | in perception (and actual observed preferences, IME)
           | 
           | Of course, how much of that is nature versus socialization is
           | another matter... but also, the kind of risk-taking and one-
           | upsmanship behavior that might drive men to be more willing
           | to acquire tastes for things that aren't initially appealing
           | and to so-expand their palates may itself be hormonal, so
           | even one plausible "nurture" cause for this might actually be
           | "nature" one step removed.
           | 
           | But either way, and even if data doesn't bear any of that out
           | (pretty sure it would, though), the perception that all
           | that's generally true is certainly common.
        
         | blindriver wrote:
         | You are assuming that people mostly experience the world in
         | exactly the same way. That is a huge assumption that's likely
         | to be wrong.
        
           | marcellus23 wrote:
           | What? How in the world did I make that assumption?
        
         | foxmoder wrote:
         | Anecdotal, but I found that my sense of smell improved
         | significantly after a long time taking estrogen, and I've heard
         | many similar one-off stories from other people who've done so
         | too. It certainly does change your physical perception of the
         | world in a few ways, as well as the general feeling of existing
         | in one's body.
         | 
         | One recurring theme I've heard from people going from majority
         | testosterone to majority estrogen is a feeling like a
         | continuous 'buzzing' sensation in their head had finally
         | stopped; this is something I personally experience, and there's
         | a certain degree of relaxed serenity that comes with it for me.
         | (This said, experiences vary a lot, and many who have had both
         | primary hormones prefer the feeling of testosterone.)
         | 
         | I personally think that it's a beautiful opportunity to get to
         | experience life through both sets of hormones; it's offered a
         | lot of interesting perspective on my personal notions of
         | 'self', and allowed me to develop empathy for different
         | experiences others experience in their bodies.
        
       | MondayGravity wrote:
       | Perhaps this is an insensitive question/comment, but do trans
       | women feel like they have the wrong body or the wrong wholesale
       | gender? In my experience with trans women I know, they still seem
       | to relate primarily to men (they still gravitate towards male
       | dominated interests) whereas many gay men I know seem to relate
       | primarily with women, and gravitate towards women interests.
       | 
       | So this reconciliation is hard, and the topic too sensitive for
       | me to dare asking people I know in real life.
        
         | davmar wrote:
         | don't forget that socialization plays a role. boys are guided
         | to certain activities in their youth, girls to others.
        
         | PartiallyTyped wrote:
         | The people I know couldn't relate to men at all, felt like
         | completely different species. While they may have some
         | interests from their "past" life, many of them felt that they
         | could now enjoy things women did without judgement, and so they
         | did.
        
         | Fraterkes wrote:
         | I haven't really found that to be true in my friend groups, but
         | also it is really common for people on the spectrum to be
         | trans, and a lot of autistic people in general tend to have
         | interests that we view as male-coded.
        
         | antonfire wrote:
         | > Perhaps this is an insensitive question/comment, but do trans
         | women feel like they have the wrong body or the wrong wholesale
         | gender?
         | 
         | It varies.
         | 
         | > In my experience with trans women I know, they still seem to
         | relate primarily to men (they still gravitate towards male
         | dominated interests) whereas many gay men I know seem to relate
         | primarily with women, and gravitate towards women interests.
         | 
         | For whatever it's worth, I think observations like this are as
         | useful a cue to look inward for an explanation as they are to
         | look outwards.
         | 
         | For one thing, part of the whole "gender" thing is the way
         | people's preconceptions lead them to parse information about
         | others (and themselves!), and your sense of trends is probably
         | influenced by that. (E.g. when a (gay) man gravitates towards
         | "women interests" that may just be more _salient_ than when a
         | woman does, so you notice it more.) For another, you might be
         | _in_ a lot of male-dominated spaces (e.g. this one), so the set
         | of trans women you know is probably not that representative.
         | These might not be the whole story, but they certainly have a
         | role to play in whatever reconciliation you 're seeking. Gender
         | is difficult to navigate: we're all swimming in it.
         | 
         | For me personally: I'm "nonbinary", whatever that means. As I
         | see it today, for me being trans feels like more of a "wrong
         | wholesale gender" thing than a "wrong body" thing. (But I'm
         | open to the idea that I'm just not in touch with my body.) Part
         | of the "wholesale gender" thing is the realization at some
         | point in my life that "gender" was playing a much bigger role
         | in my life than I had realized, including how I relate to
         | people, what interests I gravitate towards, and so on.
         | Something I find deeply aversive.
         | 
         | But I'm also averse to, like, rearranging my whole life to
         | retroactively "fix the gender story" around it, just to make
         | myself more legible. You might parse me as gravitating towards
         | interests that line up with my assigned gender at birth (AGAB),
         | and maybe even as relating to people primarily of my AGAB, and
         | so on. I'm sure some people go further and functionally take
         | this as an excuse to continue to relate to me through the lens
         | of my "birth gender" or what have have you. I'm sure it's
         | easier. From my perspective, I suspect those people are
         | underestimating how much of a clusterfuck the whole "gender"
         | thing is.
        
         | brooke2k wrote:
         | I don't think it's an insensitive question at all. To answer -
         | As a trans woman, interests/hobbies are not really a marker of
         | gender that I feel is important to me. I would say the same is
         | true of all my trans friends, although ofc that is not a
         | representative sample, so take it with a grain of salt.
         | 
         | For me, in no particular order, these are the elements of
         | sex/gender that I find important (and which were crucial for me
         | to align during my transition):
         | 
         | * My body. This was perhaps the single most important one.
         | Hormones worked wonders here, as well as growing out my hair,
         | shaving, learning to take care of my skin, etc.
         | 
         | * Clothing/makeup went a long way towards making me feel better
         | about myself. It takes a very long time and a lot of practice
         | and skill-building to be "good" at fashion/makeup/etc, but it
         | was worth it.
         | 
         | * My personality. This one is the hardest to describe. I can
         | only say that when my body ran on testosterone, I was
         | miserable, antisocial, arrogant, and annoying, and after
         | switching over to estrogen, I am much happier, better at
         | conversation, more empathetic, and by all reports much more
         | likeable.
         | 
         | * My relationship to other women. It's hard to describe, but as
         | I transitioned I became a lot closer to the women in my life,
         | and grew apart slightly from the men in my life.
         | 
         | I think in part this emerges from the negative side of being a
         | woman in society (being leered
         | at/catcalled/harassed/stalked/patronized/discriminated
         | against/etc). It leads women to stick together and trust each
         | other more implicitly than men. So as a trans woman, gradually
         | being welcomed into this "club" was very gender-affirming
         | (although the negative stuff still sucks :/)
         | 
         | * Name and pronouns. At this point (~4 years) I pass enough in
         | public that I am essentially never misgendered, but on the rare
         | occasion I am, it certainly ruins my day. Pronouns matter more
         | than cis people might think.
         | 
         | * Relationship to my family. Being called "daughter" by my
         | parents, doing mom/daughter stuff with my mom, etc.
         | 
         | There are probably other factors that I'm not thinking of right
         | now, but this is what comes to mind as I write this. And
         | notably, my interests/hobbies aren't really included there. I
         | do software development, I'm into skateboarding and punk music
         | and videogames, I play dungeons and dragons. All "male-coded"
         | hobbies for the most part, but I really just attribute that to
         | the fact that I developed my hobbies as a kid, and as a kid I
         | was a boy with friends who were boys and who did boyish stuff.
         | 
         | I personally don't find that that affects my perception of my
         | gender at all. Hopefully this helps clear up your confusion!
         | Let me know if there's anything I can clarify further.
        
         | RebeccaTheDev wrote:
         | I can't speak for other trans women, but is kind of how I
         | describe my experience with this. And this is from someone who
         | is a later-transitioner, talking about this specific type of
         | social dysphoria [0].
         | 
         | It took me _enormous_ effort to relate to other men, and I was
         | never sure if I was doing it correctly. I would go out of my
         | way to try to learn  "how to man," including having typically
         | male-coded interests (like sports, or home repair) that I
         | really didn't actually care about but knew I had to because it
         | was socially expected of me. I knew I had to, because I had to
         | operate in that world, but I was never comfortable, none of it
         | ever came naturally and all of it just felt _wrong_.
         | 
         | I was desperate to relate to women. It would hurt that I
         | wouldn't be able to participate in that world even though I
         | longed to be a part of it. Often my wife and I would have grill
         | out parties, and I would be at my expected place outside with
         | the guys, talking stuff I hated, but I longed to be chatting
         | with the other women inside. I feel comfortable as a woman, and
         | much more comfortable relating to other women in my life.
         | 
         | Do I still have male friends? Of course. I have men I worked
         | with for decades and that I'm still friends with. Our
         | relationships definitely changed a bit, but we still have
         | shared experiences that bind us together. At the same time,
         | with my female friends, our relationships definitely changed as
         | well. Things felt different. Our conversations got deeper and
         | more meaningful, and I feel like I "know" some of them better
         | than I ever knew any of my male friends.
         | 
         | I also kept some of my male interests because _I 'm interested
         | in them._. I still love aviation and trains. Definitely male-
         | coded interests (though there are quite a few more women than
         | one might expect.) I also picked up, or in some cases learned
         | to stop repressing, typically feminine-coded interests. I have
         | far more fun with dress than I ever cared about doing as a guy.
         | Or, now I proudly own that I read romance novels instead of
         | sheepishly hiding my kindle.
         | 
         | [0] https://genderdysphoria.fyi/en/social-dysphoria
        
           | aucisson_masque wrote:
           | Can't you just be a man that loves spending time with women
           | instead of a woman 'trapped' in the body of a man ?
           | 
           | I have known several men, non gay, that just behaved more
           | like women than men. that was fine, and as far as I know they
           | didn't swapped gender.
           | 
           | Like you can be a duck, happy when around dogs but still be a
           | duck.
        
             | RebeccaTheDev wrote:
             | You can do whatever you like. Many do, and are totally
             | happy about that.
             | 
             | Note, again, I am talking about one specific "type" of
             | gender dysphoria, social dysphoria. There are usually far
             | more facets that come into play as well.
             | 
             | And that's also a way you know you're trans, and not just a
             | man that loves spending time with women. Because the
             | relationships dynamics and social expectations are totally
             | different regardless, we feel out of place. And not being
             | seen in the correct way causes ... pretty deep negative
             | feelings.
        
             | srinivgp wrote:
             | Some people certainly can simply enjoy spending time with
             | people not of their assumed cluster of traits. But that's
             | not what's going on with trans women. They aren't doing
             | some sort of "going overboard when you'd be perfectly happy
             | with less" or whatever you're asking. Is it really so hard
             | to believe trans women? Brains do _all sorts_ of things
             | that seem weird if your own brain doesn't do it.
             | Aphantasia, synesthesia, plurality, autism all come to mind
             | immediately.
        
         | heterodoxlib wrote:
         | A slightly different but closely related question for those who
         | are answering: what do you attribute the difference to? Is it
         | biological in basis, spiritual/metaphysical, or cultural?
         | 
         | I keep hearing people say "gender is a social construct" and
         | those same people then go on to emphatically support
         | transgender as a concept. This leads me to wonder: if gender is
         | a social construct, is identifying as transgender the result of
         | feeling pressure to conform to a cookie-cutter definition of
         | what someone with male/female parts is meant to be like? If so,
         | is being transgender _also_ just a social construct that can
         | and maybe should be addressed by loosening up our tight
         | expectations for gender roles? Or is being transgender more
         | biological than cultural for you?
        
           | ghushn3 wrote:
           | You are asking a good question (it reads to me like a good
           | faith question that comes from a desire to learn more about
           | how others think).
           | 
           | > Is it biological in basis, spiritual/metaphysical, or
           | cultural?
           | 
           | Personally, I view it as cultural leading to physiological --
           | what does it _mean_ to be a man? What is  "manly"? I think
           | everyone can agree that "manliness" is different globally. Is
           | Bill Gates manly? He's very _successful_ , but is that
           | something that's manly? Is Tom Cruise manly? Or Kid Rock?
           | What about George Takei? Manliness has some multi-axis
           | definition that exists in each culture around the world.
           | 
           | We call that set of vectors "being a man", and we push people
           | who are born with penises into it because it seems to fit
           | most people who are born with XY chromosomes. Personally, I
           | think it's useful to decouple the two ideas -- what my body
           | is, and what the cultural expectations are in how I should
           | behave because I have that body. This is what people mean
           | when they say gender is a social construct -- they are
           | saying, "The piece we call 'manliness' is a separate concept
           | from the piece we define by bodies."
           | 
           | Now, say I experience anxiety, fear, and revulsion about the
           | set of vectors that define "manliness". I have a penis, but
           | absolutely all the vectors for "womanliness" line up with my
           | understanding of how the world works. Clothing, presentation,
           | speech patterns, interests, activities, etc. etc. etc. What
           | do I do in such a case?
           | 
           | I could just live my life in pursuit of the 'wrong' set of
           | vectors -- but socially that's quite dangerous. When people
           | who are "supposed" to maximize one set of vectors try to live
           | with another set, they tend to get bullied (if not violently
           | attacked.) This puts me in a bind -- either live a miserable
           | life pretending to be manly OR push my body to try and match
           | the set of vectors associated with womanliness. (Or, change
           | society to stop caring so much about people who fall outside
           | of the traditional vector space, but that's a lot harder than
           | either of the two other approaches.)
           | 
           | > is being transgender also just a social construct that can
           | and maybe should be addressed by loosening up our tight
           | expectations for gender roles?
           | 
           | For me, absolutely! That's the exactly the sort of ideal
           | world I'd love to be in -- let people just... pursue what
           | makes them feel happy. If someone with a penis wants to get
           | way into makeup and the color pink, stop beating the shit out
           | of them for it.
        
       | gherkinnn wrote:
       | What an interesting read. I wonder, are these reports a reliable
       | way to begin to understand what it feels like to be of the other
       | sex? Insofar as such a thing is possible, of course. The
       | anecdotes of smell and the sensation of _powering up a hill_ are
       | fascinating.
       | 
       | On a different note,
       | 
       | > At smoothbrains.net, we hold as self-evident the right to put
       | whatever one likes inside one's body;
       | 
       | I never thought of it that way, but I agree.
        
       | pazimzadeh wrote:
       | > It's as if I took the entire volumetric representation of the
       | space around me and increased the degree to which every point
       | within that could influence the location of every other point,
       | recursively. This allows everything to elastically settle into a
       | more harmonious equilibrium.
       | 
       | What does this mean? There has to be a simpler way to get this
       | idea across..
       | 
       | > Perhaps taste could be built out of something like dyadic
       | vibrations, tuned by evolution towards consonance or dissonance
       | in order to generate an attractive or aversive response in the
       | organism?
       | 
       | Same here
        
         | ghushn3 wrote:
         | > What does this mean?
         | 
         | My understanding was like... you know those spring diagrams,
         | where edges of a graph are all attached by a spring, and
         | physics sorta causes nodes to cluster naturally? I think this
         | is saying, "I wish all the space around me could order itself
         | into a more natural and pleasing shape."
         | 
         | > Same here
         | 
         | Dyads are like... imagine you had two vectors, represented by
         | lego bricks. After attaching them, rather than having a red
         | brick and a blue brick, you have a particular Red-Blue brick.
         | So, one can imagine these unique shapes move and vibrate in
         | ways that are unique to that pair.
         | 
         | The author is saying, I think, "Individual preferences aren't
         | composed of atomic units, but rather subtle adjustments in all
         | the combinations of those individual pieces. Evolution probably
         | looks for places where those combinations line up nicely (and
         | avoids places they don't line up nicely), and tunes the
         | organism to seek those combinations."
        
       | HK-NC wrote:
       | I remember reading that autism was basically the brain equivalent
       | of some roided out muscle beast. Too much testosterone in the
       | womb or something. Given the huge crossover with trans and
       | autism, could it just be a case of giving autistic men female
       | hormones to try to balance this out over time? I dont really buy
       | the rest of the fluff that comes with it, especially given the
       | attitudes around it and my own experiences getting over dysphoria
       | before there was a culture around taking things in another
       | direction.
        
         | ghushn3 wrote:
         | > before there was a culture around taking things in another
         | direction
         | 
         | You are talking about a time before culture? Trans identity
         | shows up as early as Mesopotamia, and there are cultures around
         | the globe that have different genders than just Man and Woman.
        
         | comrade1234 wrote:
         | Interesting also that penis size is directly correlated with
         | testosterone levels in the womb...
        
       | comrade1234 wrote:
       | You're telling me you can just go to a Walgreens in the USA and
       | get a bag of estrogen and start injecting it without the advice
       | and monitoring of a doctor? Even though hormone replacement
       | therapy can lead to all kinds of problems? Is this normal?
        
         | wtfwhateven wrote:
         | Where on earth are you getting this idea from?
        
           | comrade1234 wrote:
           | From the first few paragraphs of the article?
           | 
           | > and subsequently found myself cycling home from the
           | pharmacy with a paper bag filled with repurposed menopause
           | medication
           | 
           | and then no mention after of monitoring of health effects?
        
             | roughly wrote:
             | So, the beginning of that sentence is:
             | 
             | > I had jumped through the relevant bureaucratic hoops
        
         | cobertos wrote:
         | No. This is incorrect. OP explicitly mentions "jumping through
         | bureaucratic hoops"
         | 
         | > Not long after, I had jumped through the relevant
         | bureaucratic hoops, and subsequently found myself cycling home
         | from the pharmacy
        
         | cthalupa wrote:
         | Wait until you hear about how easy it is to get testosterone.
        
           | yuriks wrote:
           | Ironically, testosterone in theory is _harder_ to get. Since
           | it is widely used for sports doping, it 's considered an
           | anabolic steroid, and is a scheduled substance in the US, and
           | so has a bit more oversight to prescribe and dispense. (But I
           | imagine there's probably also a larger black market for it
           | for the same reasons.)
        
             | cthalupa wrote:
             | There are a billion TRT clinics that will prescribe you
             | testosterone with basically zero oversight and at dosages
             | that are supraphysiological.
             | 
             | And yes, the black market is huge - anyone with google and
             | the ability to purchase crypto can get it easily delivered,
             | either domestically, or from china.
        
         | runeblaze wrote:
         | My opinion is that at least (safe, not spiro) anti-androgens
         | should be able to be bought OTC. If some people want to place
         | blockers on themselves they should be allowed to
        
       | looneysquash wrote:
       | > when prompted to state my gender identity or preferred
       | pronouns, I fold my hands into the dhyana mudra and state that I
       | practice emptiness on the concept of gender.
       | 
       | That's fine, but when I tell people "Cube Flipper wrote this
       | great blog post!", what pronouns do you want me to use actually
       | use?
       | 
       | I guess I'll refer to you as "they" since you didn't otherwise
       | specify. But the "unknown/unspecified" version of "they" and not
       | the "prefers they" version of "they".
       | 
       | Looks like a great article. I didn't quite make it to the end.
       | The science is interesting, but that isn't a trip I am
       | considering, so I skimmed a little.
        
       | kushan2020 wrote:
       | Waking up everyday and drinking monster energy drink followed by
       | Diet Coke in theory should have some effect on your brain. Does
       | abstaining from them have any effect on your HRT?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-06-19 23:00 UTC)