[HN Gopher] Show HN: Claude Code Usage Monitor - real-time track...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: Claude Code Usage Monitor - real-time tracker to dodge
       usage cut-offs
        
       I kept slamming into Claude Code limits mid-session and couldn't
       find a quick way to see how close I was getting, so I hacked
       together a tiny local tracker.  Streams your prompt + completion
       usage in real time  Predicts whether you'll hit the cap before the
       session ends  Runs 100 % locally (no auth, no server)  Presets for
       Pro, Max x 5, Max x 20 -- tweak a JSON if your plan's different
       GitHub: https://github.com/Maciek-roboblog/Claude-Code-Usage-
       Monitor  It's already spared me a few "why did my run just stop?"
       moments, but it's still rough around the edges. Feedback, bug
       reports, and PRs welcome!
        
       Author : Maciej-roboblog
       Score  : 178 points
       Date   : 2025-06-19 09:46 UTC (13 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (github.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
        
       | pbowyer wrote:
       | With uv, is there a way to install Python and Node tools like
       | this in a self-contained way so they appear to the system as a
       | single executable?
       | 
       | I guess I don't want to duplicate Python/Node for every tool, but
       | I also don't want it to be fragile. And this wants a Node CLI
       | tool installed globally, which I've found breaks easily with
       | changing versions.
        
         | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
         | Good point, yes i can do it. If you can please add issue in
         | github and i will implement it :D
        
           | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
           | it is on my todo list
        
         | JimDabell wrote:
         | > I don't want to duplicate Python/Node for every tool
         | 
         | `uv tool install` doesn't duplicate Python for every tool.
        
       | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
       | Today, I will commit a new Auto Mode (with DuckDB) that uses
       | machine learning to understand your actual token limits, not
       | hardcoded solution.
        
         | robbomacrae wrote:
         | I'm working on a wrapper for these terminal agent coders that
         | reads directly from them... you might want to consider that
         | approach? I hope to have it here on ShowHN as soon as its
         | better tested but email me if you want in on the private beta
         | :)
        
           | robbomacrae wrote:
           | actually reading more about how you ingest
           | ~/.claude/projects/ _/_.jsonl the wrapper method is probably
           | over kill..
           | 
           | how about making it a tool that claude can use directly?
        
       | alFReD-NSH wrote:
       | How it does it monitor usage?
        
         | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
         | Check directory ~/.claude/projects/*/*.jsonl ;) hah very
         | interesting topic. I have a plan to write blog post about it
         | (all conversations history with metadata inside json lines
         | files) What do you think about this idea? Interesting?
        
           | M4v3R wrote:
           | Wow, I had no idea Claude Code had this kind of verbose
           | logging turned on by default. Looking around I also found a
           | cool tool for converting these logs to HTML format for easy
           | viewing: https://github.com/daaain/claude-code-log
        
             | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
             | Haha, in that case it sounds like an article I could
             | actually handle. By the way, is it better to go with an
             | article or short-form video?
        
               | pbowyer wrote:
               | Film video, transcribe, edit to become article?
               | 
               | I'm of an age where I rarely watch short-form videos so
               | would read the article but you'll miss an audience if
               | that's all you produce.
        
               | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
               | Okay, sounds good -- if I manage to do it, I'll send you
               | a message
        
           | Hortinstein wrote:
           | Is there anyway to ensure these logs are output in a current
           | project folder? Would like to store a copy in git for
           | reference
        
             | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
             | Yes in next relesase with duckdb, We will have the
             | possibility of a simple export
        
           | alFReD-NSH wrote:
           | It's definitely interesting. Probably, one could also see how
           | much of the context is unnecessary to optimise usage. I
           | wonder if one could also detect whether cache was used.
        
             | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
             | Yes, cache write and read is available to fetch i can add
             | new flag to view this values, please create issue in
             | repository with this idea https://github.com/Maciek-
             | roboblog/Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor...
        
         | soco wrote:
         | I keep the credits page open and refresh it from time to time,
         | because I honestly only care about money, not about tokens
         | whatever these are.
        
           | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
           | This tool is for plans with a fixed cost -- like Pro Max x5
           | or x10 -- not for API usage.
        
       | ed_mercer wrote:
       | Thank you! For me, I wish it was just a simple command that
       | outputs how much I have used out of my plan already. Also I feel
       | it's a bummer that I need python when CC is a node.js tool.
        
         | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
         | I will update it in next release :D And you will be able to
         | install the package directly.
        
       | teekert wrote:
       | Claude is cool, they focus on cool and useful things.
       | 
       | But man do I just want a way to quickly glance at my API credits
       | and to just occasionally chat with a model from those credits
       | without librechat of openwebui. Or set some limits, or see some
       | usage metrics.
       | 
       | And please please use "forever auth" with passkeys or something,
       | what is up with that auth email that just takes ages for a quick
       | glance?! It always takes me 3 attempts to find what address I
       | used at sign-up...
       | 
       | Oh and make it clearer why you have that API/credits system and a
       | subscription, why is it so difficult to understand when you start
       | using Claude that it's 2 different unrelated worlds?? First time
       | I started my subscription I just couldn't figure out where the
       | API section was, until I realized it just wasn't there.
       | 
       | I feel like I'm "holding it wrong", but please make it easier to
       | hold it right then.
        
         | redrove wrote:
         | >And please please use "forever auth" with passkeys or
         | something, what is up with that auth email that just takes ages
         | for a quick glance?! It always takes me 3 attempts to find what
         | address I used at sign-up...
         | 
         | As a person with the simple but brilliant technology of a
         | freaking password manager, I LOATHE email to login/no-password
         | websites. They are dreadful, we've somehow managed to come up
         | with something worse in UX rather than move forward.
         | 
         | If you're working on a product that does this, or wants to do
         | this, please please PLEASE reconsider, it's such a PITA for
         | technical users and normies alike.
        
           | teekert wrote:
           | Yeah, it's the reason I eventually tuned out of Slack too
           | (obviously I don't use it day to day). I used it for some
           | things, some community stuff, every now and then.
           | 
           | So when I open it up on a new machine or after months, you
           | have to go through that magic link bs multiple times! For all
           | your accounts/channels! I did that 2 or 3 times and then I
           | just stopped using it.
           | 
           | I don't even remember what I signed up for over the years, I
           | know some of it was nice (like an LoRa IOT channel, an "AWS
           | professionals" channel, I set something up for the LoRaWan
           | network in the previous city I lived in... All just tuned out
           | because of the login bs.
        
             | sokoloff wrote:
             | I don't get why Slack can't figure out how to help me
             | migrate all my workspaces on a device I still have and am
             | logged into in a new one in fewer than 3 steps per
             | workspace. Sure, if I've lost all devices with the
             | workspaces connected, maybe it needs to be that much PITA,
             | but it's a pretty common case to add/switch to a new
             | machine or device and that process is obnoxiously poorly
             | executed right now.
        
           | threeducks wrote:
           | Another reason to ditch email-to-login: It decreases active
           | user count because login is such a chore. I only use those
           | websites if I absolutely have to and there are no
           | alternatives.
        
           | rtsil wrote:
           | I used to think the same thing, and I still want a
           | login/password alternative for me. But after seeing normies
           | use online accounts and the trouble they have with password
           | managers, I realized one of my friends had the most secure
           | process: she would create extremely high-entropy passwords
           | everywhere, but not remember them. Once she's logged out of
           | her sessions after a couple of months, she uses the password
           | forgotten link to generate another password, and so on. So
           | her passwords are never stored anywhere, she's immune to many
           | login stealing phishing attempts through genuine-looking fake
           | websites as she can't enter the password, she doesn't have to
           | deal with syncing the passwords between all her devices, and
           | she doesn't have passwords on a post-it on her workstation.
           | And she also doesn't get those annoying emails saying "your
           | password is 6-months old, please change it or else!".
           | 
           | The email auth flow is a simplified and more efficient way to
           | achieve the same outcome.
        
             | dietr1ch wrote:
             | yeah, I find it annoying, but it's a simple way of making
             | something secure, piggyback on something that already made
             | a decent effort at trying to being secure enough.
        
         | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
         | I can write a blog post about this, plus in the next release,
         | DuckDB will be implemented along with a slightly more advanced
         | max tokens algorithm.
        
       | mellosouls wrote:
       | For cursor users, a similar extension to monitor usage:
       | 
       | https://github.com/Dwtexe/cursor-stats
        
         | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
         | Probably for API cost. It is for fixed price plans usage
        
       | hombre_fatal wrote:
       | Anyone else have a bunch of fun with Claude Code's Github
       | integration... until you realized it spends from your API wallet
       | balance?
       | 
       | Oops, when I saw the /install-github-app command, I assumed that
       | since I'm on a max plan and Claude Code in my terminal is free,
       | then the Github integration would be free.
       | 
       | So I hooked it up to my repo and tagged @claude in everything. It
       | was a lot of fun tagging it in backburner issues and seeing it
       | solve issues I couldn't be bothered to do for years. Or just
       | seeing what it would come up with on really low effort poorly
       | explained issues.
       | 
       | But not worth spending 50+ cents every time.
        
         | sokoloff wrote:
         | On one hand, it violated the principle of least surprise.
         | 
         | On another hand, you solved several years-old issues for under
         | $50...which seems like a big win.
        
         | shmoogy wrote:
         | You can use your max plan ( https://github.com/grll/claude-
         | code-action )
         | 
         | Currently in gray area but allowed as per anthropic comment on
         | it - https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code-
         | action/issues/4#is...
        
           | hombre_fatal wrote:
           | Oh, thanks! You didn't go digging that up just for me, did
           | you?
           | 
           | I'll try it out right now.
        
         | csomar wrote:
         | > Anyone else have a bunch of fun with Claude Code's Github
         | integration... until you realized it spends from your API
         | wallet balance?
         | 
         | Isn't Claude and Anthropic API two separate platforms? How does
         | it spend from your other account?
        
           | hombre_fatal wrote:
           | No.
           | 
           | https://console.anthropic.com/settings/billing
        
             | csomar wrote:
             | What's that link supposed to show? It shows my anthropic
             | account and billing. My claude account and billing (with
             | different payment details) is at
             | https://claude.ai/settings/billing
        
               | hombre_fatal wrote:
               | I see what you mean. Anthropic's UI and system
               | organization are always very confusing.
               | 
               | Your link and my link are just two views into the same
               | underlying account (unless you registered separate
               | accounts of course). At your link, you can manage your
               | Claude subscription. At my link, you can manage API keys
               | and API credits.
               | 
               | But they aren't siloed like you (or I) think.
               | 
               | I got Claude Code when it launched and it always charged
               | API credits until it was included in the $100 max
               | subscription (and then in the cheap base subscription).
               | It moves fast and it's not well communicated.
        
         | mwigdahl wrote:
         | Addressing those issues wasn't worth $0.50 apiece? That almost
         | certainly translates into less than a _minute_ of fully loaded
         | engineering cost from a human.
        
       | waynenilsen wrote:
       | they really should integrate this kind of thing, it is very
       | annoying
        
         | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
         | thx
        
       | bilekas wrote:
       | This is pretty cool.. I like the idea, could I make a semi-snarky
       | feature request and could we add the estimated power consumed to
       | produce results for each session ?
        
         | TypingOutBugs wrote:
         | Soon we will have low carbon developers
        
           | btbuildem wrote:
           | We all were low carbon developers once
        
             | cdurth wrote:
             | Maybe the few that were WFH prior to AI. I just calculated
             | my carbon output for commuting and going to lunch daily
             | versus WFH and using AI and it's wayyy less. Let's all save
             | earth, stay home and use AI.
        
           | ozim wrote:
           | Let's start with npm and node_modules first - I think it is
           | responsible for at least half of the global warming.
        
         | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
         | Greta would be proud, but I'm not sure how the number of tokens
         | relates to energy consumption.
        
           | actsasbuffoon wrote:
           | Soon the AI companies will have different tiers of plan based
           | on carbon output.
           | 
           | For $200 per month they'll only use carbon-free power sources
           | for your prompts. At $100 they'll use nuclear, then $20 per
           | month for coal, and then there will be a free tier where your
           | prompts are powered by throwing baby seals into a furnace.
        
             | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
             | <3
        
             | Lerc wrote:
             | This may be pedantic, but I'm guessing baby seals are a
             | renewable resource.
        
               | bilekas wrote:
               | It would be on the same level as saying burning wood for
               | power plants would be considered renewable. Is it "Green"
               | now.. Two different things.
        
         | tln wrote:
         | Or just straight to CO2. Google said 1000 tokens emits 8.3g
         | CO2.
         | 
         | How many tokens used in a heavy vibe coding day?
         | 
         | Average US daily per capita is like 40kg CO2
        
           | KMnO4 wrote:
           | I don't understand the concern of this. Let's say it says
           | you've used 1.521kg of CO2 today. How is that actionable?
           | 
           | A single flight from JFK to LAX produces around 20,000kg of
           | CO2. Using the 8.3g value means a flight is equivalent to
           | 2.41 billion tokens.
        
             | notarobot123 wrote:
             | if you take the long view, flying is irrational too
        
               | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
               | If you have some time, feel free to open a pull request
               | -- even just with a description or clarification of
               | what's going on! It all sounds super interesting, but I'm
               | still trying to fully grasp the business logic behind it
               | Once I get the idea, I'll be happy to jump in and
               | implement it.
               | 
               | Repo is here if you're curious:
               | https://github.com/Maciek-roboblog/Claude-Code-Usage-
               | Monitor...
        
               | mdemare wrote:
               | Claude, "Find the hacker news discussion about github
               | repo github.com/maciek-roboblog and implement the
               | suggestion by bilekas. Patch format."
               | 
               | It produced a patch. Unfortunately it was for removing
               | the emojis from the readme.
        
             | taosx wrote:
             | I really dislike when people don't see this. They try to
             | cut 10 grams of CO2 per day while other industries
             | (shipping, aviation, rails) produce hundreds of tons per
             | day and even this transportation modes are less that 20%
             | with most CO2 produced mainly being in energy production
             | and used by industry.
        
               | SV_BubbleTime wrote:
               | I think it's because this line of rationality, leads to
               | people to realize how ridiculous some of the conservation
               | efforts are.
               | 
               | Plastic bags, paper straws (wrapped in plastic), most
               | realities of recycling, vehicle selections, etc.
               | 
               | Leads to a lot of unpopular things.
        
               | curious_cat_163 wrote:
               | Rituals define a school of thought (or a religion). These
               | are rituals of folks who want to prevent catastrophe
               | through conservation. To each their own.
               | 
               | Ultimately, individual habits do add up. But with
               | climate, one would be hard pressed to find evidence that
               | conservation is the path forward. It does not work,
               | unfortunately.
        
               | tln wrote:
               | Sure, but that's all accounted for in per capita numbers.
        
             | bilekas wrote:
             | It doesn't necessarily need to be actionable for now but at
             | the moment there is an exponential growth in the datacenter
             | power usages.
             | 
             | For now, sure it might be ridiculously minor, but when it
             | starts to ramp up who's to say it wont be just a ridiculous
             | amount of energy ? Maybe not even measure the CO2, but I
             | would love to graph the increase of energy spent over time.
        
             | tln wrote:
             | Per capita that is what, 500kg?
             | 
             | So on that day you are 10x'ing the US person day
        
           | tln wrote:
           | I just hit my usage limit this morning, and the article shows
           | how to get these numbers so I can answer this myself -- I'd
           | be curious to see what other people are doing token wise day-
           | to-day
           | 
           | ccusage says I had 1k input tokens, 12k output and 1.2m cache
           | create.
           | 
           | I'm not sure if that is 1 _8.3g, 13_ 8.3g or 1213 * 8.3g.
           | 
           | At the highest number that's 10kg or 25% of average US daily
           | per capita emission or 1 gallon of gas.
        
           | gpm wrote:
           | By any chance do you remember the source for that? Googling
           | "1000 tokens emits 8.3g CO2" only gets me this thread.
        
             | tln wrote:
             | The search was "ai tokens per tonne co2" and the "1000
             | tokens emits 8.3g CO2" bit was my paraphrasing from the AI
             | overview.
             | 
             | This article [0] mentions "8.3g CO2" but it's linked source
             | [1] uses a different number - 4.32g. Perhaps revised after
             | publication.
             | 
             | I ran the search again and got different numbers... I'm
             | sure the real numbers will be changing quite a bit over
             | time too.
             | 
             | [0] https://ditchcarbon.com/blog/llm-carbon-emissions
             | 
             | [1] https://smartly.ai/blog/the-carbon-footprint-of-
             | chatgpt-how-...
        
       | jbentley1 wrote:
       | This is great. I built a UI tool to run simultaneous Claude Code
       | sessions (https://github.com/stravu/crystal) but by working on
       | multiple features at once I hit the limits of my max account.
       | Usually close to the reset, but it would be nice to know when it
       | is time to take a break.
        
         | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
         | Please write for me on github or create issue
         | https://github.com/Maciek-roboblog/Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor...
         | and we can try integrate your tool with usage monitor
        
         | rgoodwintx wrote:
         | Kudos! I was just thinking about having. Laude write something
         | like this for me. Not just within a project but the 5 different
         | ones I have open at the same time. Too much of a good thing
         | etc.
        
         | furyofantares wrote:
         | This is excellent. I am an EXTENSIVE Claude Code user but I've
         | been a bit scared to write my own tooling around worktrees +
         | multiple sessions because I don't understand git well enough.
         | 
         | To be honest, I'm a little scared to use this also. I feel like
         | ideally each worktree would also run in a container, but that
         | seems quite a bit harder to make work as smoothly as this does.
        
       | diego_moita wrote:
       | Is there something similar to this but for Gemini?
        
         | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
         | I can implement tool like this for Gemini, please create issue
         | https://github.com/Maciek-roboblog/Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor...
         | with this idea
        
       | loufe wrote:
       | I really like this idea as I find Claude's transparency
       | frustrating. Claude code's killer features revolve around better
       | tools to manage context and limits vs the desktop app (compact
       | and the % remaining until auto compact), but it's not enough.
       | 
       | If I can offer any advice, it's that the high use of emojis in a
       | project readme (at least for me) looks so unprofessional and
       | makes me worry that a project was vibe -coded in the sense that
       | the AI was possibly not babysat to the extent I think they
       | should. That's just me, though
        
         | oc1 wrote:
         | I got into software in a time where you would get sent to a
         | mental institution when spotted using emojis in a code base.
         | Times have changed.. I use emojis regularly because they help
         | me organize context more visually. Code has now many emojis to
         | keep me happy.
        
           | Maciej-roboblog wrote:
           | This code was written in pure vibe-coding style -- mostly for
           | fun. I've got about 10 years of experience in IT, and even I
           | fully agree: a 1000-line main file like this one probably
           | deserves to be locked away in a secure facility.
           | 
           | But hey -- if it's stupid and it works, it ain't stupid.
        
             | lukan wrote:
             | Always depends on the cost of failure I suppose.
        
         | wredcoll wrote:
         | > looks so unprofessional and makes me worry that a project was
         | vibe -coded in the sense that the AI was possibly not babysat
         | to the extent I think they should. That's just me, though
         | 
         | The irony of comments like this on software designed entirely
         | for ai coding...
        
           | lukan wrote:
           | AI coding where the human stays in control and reads and
           | confirms code is totally different from vibe coding where you
           | don't read code and just prompt until it sort of works.
        
             | loufe wrote:
             | I completely agree. Andrej's definition was pretty explicit
             | and in my experience it is two separate worlds of AI use.
        
         | partdavid wrote:
         | It strikes me as very much a current aesthetic in younger
         | companies or smaller startups, maybe highly influenced by
         | Notion. No one makes a list or page or calendar invite in my
         | current company without choosing an emoji for it.
        
           | adastra22 wrote:
           | It was cool until 2022. Then LLMs started injecting these
           | emoji everywhere and it became the chief marker for code/doc
           | smell.
        
         | danielbln wrote:
         | My goto for AI generated PR descriptions and README is this
         | addition to the prompt: tight, no purple prose, no emojis.
         | 
         | That turns thrse meandering emoji fests into suitable
         | documentation. YMMV
        
         | youcefb wrote:
         | if you actually look at the code, it's a single 400 line python
         | file that just wraps https://github.com/ryoppippi/ccusage, so
         | it's possible
        
       | jjice wrote:
       | Very neat! Is the limit on Pro really only 7k tokens? So less
       | than 7k words? I feel like I get more out of that. It feels like
       | that would blow up pretty quickly with an ongoing chat, but I
       | never hit that.
       | 
       | Or is this a Claude Code specific limit? I haven't used Claude
       | Code extensively yet.
        
         | rgbrenner wrote:
         | pro is the $20/mo plan that they recently started allowing
         | access to claude code.. but i've heard users hit the rate limit
         | with a few queries.. so imo that sounds about right. the chat
         | interface has its own limits separate from claude code.
        
           | ffsm8 wrote:
           | Has to be wrong. I'm on that subscription as I wanted to
           | reinforce my opinion that it's still shit for devs that
           | actually have experience, like it was a few months ago.
           | 
           | While my plan didn't pan out, cuz it was way too effective, I
           | can confidently say that I'm going through 3-6k tokens per
           | prompt on average, and usually get around 3 hours of usage
           | before I'm hitting the rate limit.
           | 
           | The limit is probably closer to 300k then <10k
           | 
           | Also the chat interface doesn't have a separate limit, once
           | you hit it via Claude code, you cannot use the website either
           | anymore.
           | 
           | Maybe it's a 7k limit _per prompt_? Dunno if I exceeded that
           | before
        
             | cmrdporcupine wrote:
             | I found I can hit the limit _very_ quickly if I have it
             | scan large quantities of code for analysis. If I try to be
             | more surgical, and give it terse but accurate documentation
             | and instructions, the budget lasts longer.
        
             | blitzar wrote:
             | Claude Code is chugging away on a step (6/10) for me right
             | now:
             | 
             | Transforming... (212s * 26.1k tokens * esc to interrupt)
             | 
             | I reset just under 2 hours ago, probably been going at this
             | pace for the last hour or so.
        
       | bevan wrote:
       | Something like this would be great for Cursor, I never know how
       | many credits I'm up to for the month or how much my Max calls are
       | costing.
        
         | Hrun0 wrote:
         | > Something like this would be great for Cursor, I never know
         | how many credits I'm up to for the month or how much my Max
         | calls are costing.
         | 
         | I think that's by design
        
       | martin_ wrote:
       | nice ship! I wrote a blog post on how to observe trends over time
       | for a team via OTel, but I prefer your method for individual
       | development!
       | 
       | https://ma.rtin.so/posts/monitoring-claude-code-with-datadog...
        
         | bazhand wrote:
         | I like this solution, I had tinkered with the Otel hoping to
         | get un-redacted prompt and responses but had no luck. Did you
         | perhaps get deeper into what data was useful?
        
       | anotheryou wrote:
       | interesting, so I should say hello to claude after waking up for
       | an early reset 5h later....
       | 
       | Tool also says I used 198% of my max5 plan %).
       | 
       | I guess it expect opus usage and I was usin sonnet (after the
       | first 20%, the auto thing)
        
       | randall wrote:
       | you are a saint.
        
       | joshmlewis wrote:
       | For a reference point, it says my max session limit in the past
       | was ~337,492 tokens and I have the Max20 plan and 99% use Opus.
       | 
       | My total tokens used since I started using Claude Code on May
       | 27th was 1,374,439,311 worth around $3397.34.
        
         | WXLCKNO wrote:
         | I'm around ~2100 dollars equivalent on Max20 plan.
         | 
         | Do they have huge margins on API or are they just losing money?
         | I use it everyday but I don't feel like I'm abusing it or
         | anything
        
           | joshmlewis wrote:
           | I've been wondering this too. They said on a podcast that the
           | average usage is around $6 a day in credits but I really
           | question that. If that's the case though and they do have a
           | lot of Pro and higher tier subscribers that might be making
           | up the difference.
        
       | atum47 wrote:
       | I read doge instead of dodge. I need to get off Reddit
       | immediately
        
       | _august wrote:
       | Incredible, thank you for making this!
       | 
       | Can this be installed with uv? https://github.com/astral-sh/uv
       | 
       | Edit:                 # Install uv       curl -LsSf
       | https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh            # Install the
       | required CLI tool (Node.js)       npm install -g ccusage
       | # Clone and setup       git clone https://github.com/Maciek-
       | roboblog/Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor.git       cd Claude-Code-
       | Usage-Monitor            # Install Python deps with uv       uv
       | add pytz       chmod +x ccusage_monitor.py            # Run it
       | uv run python ccusage_monitor.py --plan max20 --timezone
       | America/New_York
        
       | _august wrote:
       | I'm noticing that Token usage doesn't reset after the time window
       | unless you hit 100%.
       | 
       | This seems like a problem if for example, you hit 90% usage, pass
       | the window, then burn through the remaining 10% quickly and have
       | to wait a long time.
        
       | tiku wrote:
       | Had a very weird experience with Claude Code yesterday. Tried to
       | convert a simple phtml table page with very old php into a new
       | div layout. It didn't work and burned through 4 dollars. Perhaps
       | a WSL issue but I hope that doesn't happen more.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-06-19 23:00 UTC)