[HN Gopher] The Members of the Dull Men's Club
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Members of the Dull Men's Club
        
       Author : herbertl
       Score  : 65 points
       Date   : 2025-06-16 18:07 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com)
        
       | zh3 wrote:
       | I will exclude myself from this club by finding it interesting
       | enough to comment on.
        
         | andyjohnson0 wrote:
         | > I will exclude myself from this club by finding it
         | interesting enough to comment on.
         | 
         | I immediately thought of the interesting number paradox
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interesting_number_paradox
        
         | kergonath wrote:
         | I find some posts interesting, but most comments utterly stupid
         | and a huge waste of time, although there is an occasional gem.
        
       | romanhn wrote:
       | Reminds me of the Dullest Blog in the World
       | (https://dullestblog.com), which I frequently checked out more
       | than 20 years ago. Hilarious to see a new entry just a couple
       | years back.
        
       | silisili wrote:
       | Aw man, this sounded like just my kind of place. But...
       | 
       | > It's a sentiment eagerly embraced by The Dull Men's Club.
       | Several million members in a number of connected Facebook groups
       | strive to cause dullness in others on a daily basis.
       | 
       | Apparently I'm too dull to even have a FB account. I know it's a
       | bit tongue in cheek, but in the name of maximum dullness,
       | something with UX closer to this site seems much more appropriate
       | than a Facebook group.
        
         | reg_dunlop wrote:
         | I guess this explains my affinity for nocss.club
        
       | sandworm101 wrote:
       | I think once you are features in a guardian article, you arent
       | dull anymore. Building model airplanes in a shed is dull. Being
       | so good at building them that journalists take time to visit you
       | is not.
        
         | chubot wrote:
         | I don't think building model airplanes is dull. I'd say doom
         | scrolling and para-social behavior are the modern dull things
        
           | BizarroLand wrote:
           | This is pretty true. Brilliance is marked at many levels by
           | not doing what everyone else does, after all.
           | 
           | It's also marked by doing what other people do better than
           | they do.
           | 
           | Lonerly contrarianism is not a cornerstone of brilliance.
        
         | kergonath wrote:
         | > I think once you are features in a guardian article, you
         | arent dull anymore.
         | 
         | Come on, the Graun is the epitome of dull middle class.
        
       | ecshafer wrote:
       | The Dull Men's Club group of facebook is actually oddly
       | interesting. I would classify it more as a group who point out
       | the very small oddities of every day life that are not very
       | interesting. There is a post where someone saw two geese with 42
       | bay geese, another where the rental company fixed a door with a
       | piece of pool noodle. Its more like a "huh that's kind of weird I
       | guess" group.
        
         | RajT88 wrote:
         | It's a bit like reading this site...
         | 
         | Gentlemen, have you heard The curious tale of Bhutan's playable
         | record postage stamps (2015)?
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44054775
        
         | gambiting wrote:
         | I had to block it because I realized it just completely
         | overtook my feed and 99% of it was in that "interesting but
         | ultimately forgettable within 30 seconds of reading it" zone
         | that's filling up social media. I mean it lived up to its name
         | - it's very "dull" if vaguely interesting.
        
           | skeeter2020 wrote:
           | this is the part of the internet that everyone would be
           | better off avoiding: not bad but no long-term value. When the
           | internet was novel and your engagement limited these were
           | rarer, cool things to share (often face to face!). Now this
           | content is internet sugar that will be the health crisis of a
           | generation.
        
       | thinkingtoilet wrote:
       | I laughed out loud at this line. It feels like something out of
       | Futurama:
       | 
       | >Australian member Andrew McKean, 85, had dullness thrust upon
       | him.
        
       | dalmo3 wrote:
       | No banana for scale?
        
         | smj-edison wrote:
         | And no shoe size!
        
       | danielodievich wrote:
       | One of my most favorite places in nearby oregon is the community
       | of Boring, OR https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boring,_Oregon.
       | Exceptionally lovely place. I've yet to visit it's sister town of
       | Dull in Scotland, but I hope someday to remedy that, albeit with
       | measured levels of excitement
        
       | frakt0x90 wrote:
       | Reminds me of the proof that all natural numbers are interesting.
       | If there is some set of uninteresting natural numbers, there must
       | be a minimal element of that set. It being the smallest
       | uninteresting number is interesting which is a contradiction.
        
         | rzzzt wrote:
         | Why aren't all numbers in the set uninteresting? Did someone
         | make a mistake when defining it?
         | 
         | Perhaps the minimal element should be removed from the set;
         | there will be plenty of members that still remain.
        
           | Cerium wrote:
           | Serious response? In that case the set still has a smallest
           | member which can then be removed, if we keep going eventually
           | there will be no uninteresting numbers remaining.
        
             | leereeves wrote:
             | The problem with that is the explanation of why each number
             | is interesting becomes:
             | 
             | the smallest member of the original set of uninteresting
             | numbers
             | 
             | the second smallest member of the original set of
             | uninteresting numbers
             | 
             | the third ...
             | 
             | ...
             | 
             | That version of "interesting" quickly becomes "not
             | interesting". The concept simply defies mathematical logic.
        
         | Tade0 wrote:
         | My algebra 101 professor made this exact argument.
        
       | notnmeyer wrote:
       | > The over or under toilet paper debate raged (politely) for two
       | and a half weeks.
       | 
       | i found this particularly confusing because we all know that
       | "over" is the only sane choice.
        
         | wccrawford wrote:
         | Only if you don't have cats. If you have cats, "under" is the
         | only sane choice.
        
           | dgfitz wrote:
           | If you have cats you've willing given up your sanity.
        
             | GianFabien wrote:
             | ouch! that is a catty comment.
        
           | GianFabien wrote:
           | Don't you love all the punctures in the paper?
        
         | robocat wrote:
         | There must be a confounding variable: are you an engineer-type?
         | 
         | What traits are correlated with overing?
         | 
         | Do underers look at the world differently?
         | 
         | And it is a false dichotomy. Some people just don't care what
         | direction when they replace the roll - what's a suitable name
         | for that clade? And then there's the people who use the floor
         | and ignore the holder.
        
         | Volundr wrote:
         | Mine is in the under configuration, due to being near an AC
         | vent that will sometimes unspool the whole roll in the over
         | configuration.
        
       | calvinmorrison wrote:
       | if you're interested in the opposite, finding the intrigue or
       | fascinating in the seemingly mundane, you might be a candidate
       | for the RR&R. The most recent topic was an elaborate history of a
       | Oklahoma state senator based on some old telegrams found in a
       | junk shop.
       | 
       | https://www.ephorate.org/
        
       | _fat_santa wrote:
       | This is a cool concept but I have an issue with one being "dull"
       | on a conceptual level. Personally I think that every single
       | person on earth is both the dullest person you have ever met and
       | the most interesting person on earth, it just depends on your
       | perspective.
       | 
       | I have friends that play DnD which I personally find very dull
       | but hearing them talk about it, it's clear they do not see it the
       | same way. Conversely I love cars and talking about cars and I can
       | talk with another gearhead for hours on the topic, but the times
       | my wife has listened in on my conversations she said it was the
       | most boring thing she has ever heard in her life.
        
         | kergonath wrote:
         | > Personally I think that every single person on earth is both
         | the dullest person you have ever met and the most interesting
         | person on earth, it just depends on your perspective.
         | 
         | You are most certainly right, but I don't think that this is in
         | contradiction with how the Club works. Everyone is dull and
         | interesting depending on the situation and the audience. The
         | Club is for when you found or saw something interesting and
         | important to you, but your audience disagree, does not notice,
         | or does not care.
         | 
         | Nobody _is_ fundamentally dull, but everybody is being dull at
         | some point.
        
       | rramadass wrote:
       | This seems to be a riff off of the "Diogenes Club" invented by
       | Arthur Conan Doyle in his Sherlock Holmes Stories -
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diogenes_Club
       | 
       |  _" There are many men in London, you know, who, some from
       | shyness, some from misanthropy, have no wish for the company of
       | their fellows. Yet they are not averse to comfortable chairs and
       | the latest periodicals. It is for the convenience of these that
       | the Diogenes Club was started, and it now contains the most
       | unsociable and unclubbable men in town. No member is permitted to
       | take the least notice of any other one. Save in the Stranger's
       | Room, no talking is, under any circumstances, allowed, and three
       | offences, if brought to the notice of the committee, render the
       | talker liable to expulsion. My brother was one of the founders,
       | and I have myself found it a very soothing atmosphere."_
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-06-16 23:01 UTC)