[HN Gopher] Fields where Native Americans farmed 1000 years ago ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Fields where Native Americans farmed 1000 years ago discovered in
       Michigan
        
       Author : CoopaTroopa
       Score  : 137 points
       Date   : 2025-06-12 13:13 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.smithsonianmag.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.smithsonianmag.com)
        
       | folli wrote:
       | Tangentially related: I'm trying to make LiDAR data in
       | Switzerland more accessible, see
       | https://github.com/r-follador/delta-relief
       | 
       | There's some interesting examples in the Readme.
        
         | 38 wrote:
         | How is this related at all?
        
           | TacticalCoder wrote:
           | TFA literally says archaeologists discovered the crop(s)
           | using LIDAR and GP links to a project using LIDAR to map
           | lands.
        
       | firesteelrain wrote:
       | It's amazing how smart our ancestors were and creative and
       | observant based on amateur science and gardening skills. The
       | amount of planning and organization this must have taken would
       | require a large coordinated effort.
        
         | cvoss wrote:
         | But a farmer is a professional scientist and a professional
         | gardener. Living 1k years ago did not make them uninformed or
         | unskilled at their profession. It's quite a modern bias to
         | suggest this is amateur.
        
           | firesteelrain wrote:
           | My use of 'amateur' was more about how their methods predate
           | formal scientific institutions rather than diminishing their
           | expertise.
        
         | duxup wrote:
         | "Stuff grows good in this black muck, but floods here and is
         | hard to work in. Let's bring some of it up closer to the camp."
        
       | steve_adams_86 wrote:
       | The unanswered questions are intriguing. I wonder if the crops
       | grew better because they were suited to the climate, but those
       | crops aren't around anymore? Could they have cultivated varieties
       | of corn over say 1000 years that grew well at that latitude and
       | in the relative cold? Or could there have been warmer micro
       | climates?
       | 
       | Maybe not. Even corn specifically developed for my area in
       | British Columbia needs a very warm summer to do well.
       | 
       | I wonder if it's possible that they used corn less as a food crop
       | and more as a scaffolding crop in the 3 sisters system.
        
         | thaumasiotes wrote:
         | > Or could there have been warmer micro climates?
         | 
         | Microclimates? The whole world was warmer. Remember when the
         | Vikings settled Greenland? That was 1000 years ago.
        
           | steve_adams_86 wrote:
           | According to graphs I'm seeing, it looks like it was warmer
           | for a period, but then cooler until now. They would have been
           | farming here during a cool period. It's entirely possible
           | that they established the farm thousands of years ago when it
           | was warm (and warm means about the same temperatures as
           | today), then kept farming throughout the 'little ice age'
           | despite crops yielding less. Perhaps that's what triggered
           | such a huge expansion of the farm land. Or, perhaps there
           | were far more people there than we think. Lots of questions
        
             | thaumasiotes wrote:
             | What graphs are you seeing? This is what the article says:
             | 
             | > Radiocarbon dating suggests the ridges [farming furrows
             | or similar] were initially constructed roughly 1,000 years
             | ago. They were maintained and used for 600 years after
             | that.
             | 
             | Wikipedia says this:
             | 
             | > Erik Thorvaldsson (c. 950 - c. 1003), known as Erik the
             | Red, was a Norse explorer [...]
             | 
             | > Around the year of 982, Erik was exiled from Iceland for
             | three years, during which time he explored Greenland,
             | eventually culminating in his founding of the first
             | successful European settlement on the island. Erik would
             | later die there around 1003 CE
             | 
             | ["Erik the Red"]
             | 
             | And this:
             | 
             | > The Little Ice Age (LIA) was a period of regional
             | cooling, particularly pronounced in the North Atlantic
             | region.
             | 
             | > The period has been conventionally defined as extending
             | from the 16th to the 19th centuries
             | 
             | > The NASA Earth Observatory notes three particularly cold
             | intervals. One began about 1650, another about 1770, and
             | the last in 1850
             | 
             | ["Little Ice Age"]
             | 
             | And this:
             | 
             | > The Medieval Warm Period (MWP), also known as the
             | Medieval Climate Optimum or the Medieval Climatic Anomaly,
             | was a time of warm climate in the North Atlantic region
             | that lasted from about 950 CE to about 1250 CE.
             | 
             | ["Medieval Warm Period"]
             | 
             | The article would appear to suggest that the farm was
             | established near the beginning of the Medieval Warm Period
             | and abandoned near the beginning of the Little Ice Age...
             | which seems incredibly unsurprising.
             | 
             | > They would have been farming here during a cool period.
             | 
             | I see no indication of that.
        
         | kasey_junk wrote:
         | Corn is grown in the UP with current varieties currently. It's
         | not commercially viable because the yields are too low to
         | compete with southern mega yield growers in a highly connected
         | market with efficient transportation systems. There isn't
         | anything fundamentally hard about growing lower yield corn
         | crops at that location though.
        
         | mapotofu wrote:
         | Or, they had far advanced knowledge of working and remediating
         | soil to grow food. Peat mosses, charcoal, household compost,
         | are all valid soil additives that we now have scientific
         | knowledge to explain how those benefit soil, but they were
         | practicing it in soil that is otherwise unproductive. Given
         | that no one else farmed it in that time it seems that knowledge
         | was lost, but lines up with regenerative agriculture practices
         | we see today.
        
           | ashoeafoot wrote:
           | There are several indicators in the south american jungles of
           | civilisation going through booms and busts. If they would
           | have been significant ahead, they would have colonized europe
           | or china.
        
             | mapotofu wrote:
             | That natives did not colonize Europe or China does not mean
             | they were not highly skilled with plants. What kind of
             | argument are you making?
        
               | acdha wrote:
               | I think they were just engaging in time-honored
               | speculation about how different history could've been had
               | a few historical accidents changed. For example, the
               | Mayan civilization collapsed about 500 years before the
               | Spanish showed up due to the worst drought in something
               | like 7k years, so people have speculated about what
               | Mesoamerica might have looked like when contact was made
               | of those millions of people hadn't died. Repeat for
               | having draft animals, not losing the immune system
               | lottery so badly, etc. Given their martial traditions
               | it's very plausible that in slightly different scenarios
               | the arriving Conquistadors would've been killed or
               | captured and lead to return expeditions.
        
               | ashoeafoot wrote:
               | They also had a civilization knowledge base within them ,
               | which they could have mined. But there wasn't even a
               | united south-north native empire.
        
         | masklinn wrote:
         | It didn't necessarily need to be highly productive, just more
         | productive than cultivating local stuff, and even if the corn
         | was not necessarily at its most productive it might have been
         | worth it (and with no real replacement) as part of the
         | companion garden, getting just a few ears of corn would still
         | have been worth more than unproductive wooden stakes.
        
         | asdff wrote:
         | You'd be surprised but the "landraces" e.g. historic
         | geographically constrained cultivars tend to do better than
         | modern cultivars in certain geographical regions. A modern even
         | GMO cultivar might have a couple of beneficial traits
         | introduced over the course of a few decades of work. Whereas a
         | landrace might have been selected for yield in that area for a
         | thousand years or more, maybe 100x or more as many generations
         | under selection. As such there is a huge interest among a
         | subset of biologists today to catalog all of these remaining
         | landrace crops and the genetic diversity they contain before
         | they are lost, either due to changing climate wiping out their
         | native environment or the modern farmer replacing these
         | cultivars with ones you can buy in bulk quantities from your
         | seed supplier and have more of an export market (some landrace
         | crops aren't fit for export shipping due to fragility of the
         | crop unlike more modern cultivars; bananas are a good example
         | where there are 1000 types grown but only 1 single varietal
         | particularly fit for overseas shipping hits the supermarket).
        
           | hosh wrote:
           | It doesn't take many generations for selective breeding to
           | show improvements in landraces. Even just making sure that
           | volunteers from seeds that were thrown out as food waste were
           | given a chance to fruit and seed starts that process.
           | 
           | One of the more interesting sources of landraces can be found
           | in local seed saving programs, such as ones hosted by local
           | libraries. They are more likely to be viable seeds that is
           | adapting to the local conditions.
        
       | jfengel wrote:
       | I'm surprised that anything remains. If the area is fertile I'd
       | expect it to be farmland now.
       | 
       | Clearly it was logged for a while, and perhaps they were
       | expecting to cut it down again at some point.
        
         | asdff wrote:
         | What is farmed in this country is land compatible with american
         | farming practices not fertile land. E.G. any mountainous farm
         | region in the U.S. will see basically only farming on the
         | valley bottoms. Whereas many civilizations in the past and
         | present developed terrace farms to make use of the entire hilly
         | region not just the convenient bottoms. It isn't really done in
         | the U.S. due to the cost and the availability of vast
         | quantities of flat farmable land well beyond market need.
        
       | mapotofu wrote:
       | > During their excavations, the scientists also found several
       | artifacts, including charcoal and fragments of broken ceramics.
       | These discoveries suggest that the area's Indigenous farmers may
       | have dumped their household waste and the remnants of fires onto
       | their fields, using them as compost. Samples taken from the
       | mounds suggest the farmers enriched the dirt with soil from
       | nearby wetlands.
       | 
       | Exciting - that sounds a lot like Terra preta:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_preta
       | 
       | No doubt this practice was used widely across the Americas. The
       | natives were tremendously skilled with plants. This is another
       | step to uncovering some of the knowledge lost. I hope they can
       | find more of these same features.
        
         | politelemon wrote:
         | I wouldn't have imagined broken pottery could serve as compost,
         | how is that made possible? It's clay but it retains some
         | properties even after baking?
        
           | p1mrx wrote:
           | They probably couldn't be bothered to sort trash and compost
           | into separate bins.
        
           | sologoub wrote:
           | If you try to make a planting bed in any settlement that's
           | more than say 100 years old on a site that was continuously
           | lived on, you are guaranteed to come across at least some
           | shards of glass, pots, plates, etc. Even if the spot was
           | never explicitly a trash mound. Things break, people usually
           | try to pick them up and put in trash, but (especially in
           | grass) miss pieces. When kids break stuff you often don't
           | want them picking up sharp objects. Things get stepped on and
           | pressed into soil. Many many reasons to find pottery shards
           | where they seemingly don't belong.
        
             | pfdietz wrote:
             | I was also going to say, earthworms will slowly bury
             | objects (Darwin wrote on this), but that region didn't have
             | earthworms at the time.
        
               | bastawhiz wrote:
               | TIL that earthworms in the American northeast are largely
               | invasive species. That's very surprising to me
        
               | 7thaccount wrote:
               | Are they problematic though? There were earthworms there
               | before the ice age I think.
        
               | andy99 wrote:
               | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasive_earthworms_of_No
               | rth...
               | 
               | Also learning about this today. Apparently they're bad
               | for ecosystems that had evolved with slowly decaying
               | organic matter (because they eat it all quickly). In
               | particular forests.
               | 
               | At least in my education they have always been framed as
               | a vital component of the ecosystem and a sign of healthy
               | soil. It's interesting to learn that's not true.
        
               | pfdietz wrote:
               | To some extent it's a matter of definition, and whether
               | being caused by humanity means it's bad. After all, the
               | native earthworms would eventually have migrated north
               | and caused similar changes.
               | 
               | Is it bad that redwoods are doing very well in the UK?
        
               | happosai wrote:
               | The problem isn't "because it was caused by humans" per
               | se. Invasive species because of the speed they migrate.
               | Adapting genetically changing environment is the core of
               | life in our planet, but it takes thousands of
               | generations. Humans spread invasive species much faster
               | than the local fauna can adapt.
        
           | sublinear wrote:
           | Just a wild guess here, but isn't all kinds of stuff usually
           | added to soil to help regulate moisture and pH levels?
        
             | pfdietz wrote:
             | Clay also acts to retain positive ions, since the surfaces
             | of clay particles have negative charges.
        
           | edmundsauto wrote:
           | I have thought about this and figured it was more mechanical
           | (ie drainage) than chemical (nutrients).
        
             | fhk wrote:
             | Yes very established in Hydro and Aquaponics
             | 
             | Clay pellets / balls
        
           | mapotofu wrote:
           | If you added the pottery fragments to the compost pile they
           | would be "baked" again, albeit in a very different
           | environment, and the finished product would have structural
           | diversity closer to soil. Normally that would be rocks, but
           | if your goal is to grow food clay rocks might be better for
           | many reasons.
        
           | brookst wrote:
           | Pottery of the time was low-fired and did not generally reach
           | vitrification, and it was not glazed with a silica-based
           | glaze that would seal it.
           | 
           | So over time this pottery would absorb water. And especially
           | low-fired bits could totally break down.
           | 
           | Source: amateur ceramicist, and I have first-hand experience
           | with cone 6 clay (vitrifies at 1200c) bisc-fired to cone 04
           | (1060c) and crumbling to bits when left in water too long.
        
             | politelemon wrote:
             | Thanks this was educational for me.
        
             | 999900000999 wrote:
             | If you were in the woods( pick a spot) and had whatever
             | food/medicines you needed could you build pottery from
             | scratch.
             | 
             | Electricity is fine and all, but I imagine the basics of
             | civilization could be replicated by a few good
             | craftsmen(people)
        
               | hinkley wrote:
               | Primitive Technology on YouTube does this repeatedly.
               | 
               | You make a hole or find a piece of slate for processing,
               | you mine clay from a stream bed, and then you make your
               | first pot as a tool for moving water, the second pot for
               | making food, and before or after the second pot you make
               | clay bricks to build a kiln to high fire other things
               | more efficiently - less fuel and more multitasking of
               | other tasks.
        
             | hinkley wrote:
             | There's a type of low fired clay used in bonsai soil and a
             | harder one used in hydroponics. Good for retaining moisture
             | and they don't swell and shrink with water.
        
             | duxup wrote:
             | I have some reproduction native American pottery from the
             | upper great plains. They're pretty neat as they have round
             | bottoms. Just holding it feels like given enough time it
             | would break down and melt for sure. It feels very porous.
        
             | ruined wrote:
             | to add some context, in modern gardening things like
             | crushed vermiculite are a common soil amendment. being a
             | porous absorbent mineral, it serves the same purpose.
        
           | sfjailbird wrote:
           | You're all overthinking it. They dumped their kitchen waste
           | in the fields, and it happened to contain broken pottery too.
           | It's the same for other archeological sites all over, many
           | are waste dumps that contain interesting objects.
        
             | MangoToupe wrote:
             | How would you characterize this distinction? It sounds like
             | you're simply describing the same behavior.
        
         | mc32 wrote:
         | Until further evidence is found it's premature to say that
         | there is no doubt that it was widely used in the Americas. I
         | think there is doubt though that could be removed with more
         | evidence.
        
       | yapyap wrote:
       | 1k year old?
        
         | jjtheblunt wrote:
         | One click away is the article title :
         | 
         | "Massive Fields Where Native American Farmers Grew Corn, Beans
         | and Squash 1,000 Years Ago Discovered in Michigan"
        
         | coin wrote:
         | My thoughts too. Using SI prefix for a thousand years is
         | uncommon.
        
       | Scarblac wrote:
       | Does anyone know a 3 sisters equivalent native to Eurasia?
        
         | swalling wrote:
         | Asia and Africa have rich historical polyculture traditions.
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyculture?wprov=sfti1#Histor...
        
         | asdff wrote:
         | Probably rice cultivation with an understanding of irrigation
        
       | romanhn wrote:
       | For anyone else confused about the three sisters and why they
       | weren't mentioned in the article, it's a reference to this:
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Sisters_(agriculture)
        
         | themadturk wrote:
         | Thank you! That headline really threw me for a loop.
        
         | rusk wrote:
         | Thank you. The other thing I really wanted to know was why they
         | were arranged in mounds/quilt? I'm guessing it relates to
         | irrigation
        
           | alephnerd wrote:
           | My hunch (based on how my grandfather would cultivate) was to
           | provide a mount of fertilizer for added nitrogen along with
           | the added irrigation aspects.
           | 
           | It's surprising ("I'm shocked, shocked, well not that
           | shocked") how this style of farming somehow made it all the
           | way to my ancestral village for cultivating these New World
           | crops.
           | 
           | Gotta love proto-globalization.
        
         | lambda wrote:
         | Was the article edited? I don't see a reference to the phrase
         | "three sisters" on it, it just says "corn, beans, and squash."
         | Did the original headline mention it?
         | 
         | No, not in the archived version:
         | https://web.archive.org/web/20250612153046/https://www.smith...
         | 
         | Oh, was this mentioned in the original HN title? Has that been
         | edited?
         | 
         | Yes, it was.
         | https://web.archive.org/web/20250615154352/https://news.ycom...
         | 
         | Original HN title was "1k year old 3 sisters crop farm found in
         | Northern Michigan"
         | 
         | I really wish that when titles were edited there was some
         | history, it would make it much easier to understand these
         | little discussions based on the original title.
        
       | vram22 wrote:
       | Related: Check out the book Tending the Earth by Winin Pereira,
       | on Other India Press.
       | 
       | https://www.google.com/search?q=tending+the+earth+winin+pere...
       | 
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other_India_Press
        
       | i4i wrote:
       | Science Mag Podcast covered this as well... with Madeleine
       | McLeester, assistant professor in the department of anthropology
       | at Dartmouth College. I thought interesting that they have yet to
       | find the village that associates with the gardens.
       | https://www.science.org/content/podcast/farming-maize-ice-ag...
        
       | ji646646 wrote:
       | 7723456789
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-06-15 23:00 UTC)