[HN Gopher] Launch HN: Vassar Robotics (YC X25) - $219 robot arm...
___________________________________________________________________
Launch HN: Vassar Robotics (YC X25) - $219 robot arm that learns
new skills
Hi HN -- I'm Charles from Vassar Robotics
(https://vassarrobotics.com/ - not much there but you can order the
robot at https://shop.vassarrobotics.com/products/navrim-robot-
that-l...) Edit: the entire run sold out thanks to HN today--thank
you all! And sorry to anyone who missed out. You can get in on the
next batch here: https://vassarrobotics.com/newsletter. We are
bringing an upgraded version of the long beloved SO-101 robot arms
to a $219 price point with improved mechanical design and added
intelligence. See what it can do here:
https://youtube.com/shorts/xNyPKJZI400 (demos are sped up as shown
in the video) I've spent a few years building RC planes
(https://cyo.ng/hangar/) and micro gas turbines
(https://set.mit.edu), and I've always wished hardware were cheaper
so more people could experiment. I'm now launching a $219 desktop
robot-arm kit that keeps LeRobot SO-101's kinematics, swaps key
parts for sturdier, more precise SLA prints, and adds two
integrated 480 p cameras. After plenty of supplier haggling, the
whole kit costs less than the twelve servos alone. I'll release the
updated mechanical design under an MIT license by June 30. On the
software side, I'll also release an MIT-licensed MCP server by June
30 that exposes the local robot policy as tools for agentic LLMs
(Opus 4, o3, etc.) to use in long-horizon tasks. Here's how it
works: You can teach the robot new skills through teleoperation.
During inference, you simply talk to the agentic LLM using natural
language instructions. The LLM then calls the local robot policy
through MCP, automatically decomposing your high-level requests
into executable robot commands. Thanks to the LeRobot community
for making such an amazing robot accessible. If you've contributed
to the LeRobot GitHub repo, email hello@vassarrobotics.com for a
20% discount coupon as a small thank-you. I'd love your feedback!
Beyond manufacturing, cleaning up the codebase, and writing docs,
I'm considering: a force-controlled gripper, a parallel-jaw
gripper, an extra wrist DOF (matching the new Trossen and ARX
arms), full force feedback on the leader arm (though that may
triple the price), a more affordable version with lower resolution
each joint, and a longer-reach variant. Which of these--or
something else--would be most useful to you? You can order it here
if you want: https://shop.vassarrobotics.com/products/navrim-robot-
that-l.... (Edit: sold out! You can get in on the next batch here:
https://vassarrobotics.com/newsletter. I hope we can have your
business in the future.) Looking forward to any and all comments!
--- Edit: A quick explanation regarding shipping times (as stated
on our shop page): * The first batch of 20 units, which will be
shipped by June 30, is sold out. * The second batch of 100 units
will be shipped by July 15 (unassembled kits) and July 21
(assembled units). The order limit is to ensure we can ship on time
and maintain high quality. For those who have already placed
orders: I will reach out individually to ask if you would like to
receive weekly progress updates from now until the shipping date.
Author : charleszyong
Score : 541 points
Date : 2025-06-10 19:12 UTC (1 days ago)
| xchip wrote:
| Please don't call it a root if it uses cheap servos
| charleszyong wrote:
| We are using the same servos as SO-101 from Feetech
| GordonS wrote:
| Wow! Recently my son has been asking about doing a project with a
| robotic arm, and this looks _amazing_ , especially at the
| hobbyist-friendly price point. And adding in AI is really cool -
| and just the thing to _really_ grab the attention of an eight
| year old boy :) Will these be available in the UK, perchance?
|
| A bit of an aside, but how hard is it to get into building RC
| aeroplanes, compared to FPV copter drones?
| bittercynic wrote:
| Planes, like quadcopters, are as complicated or simple as you
| want them to be. They're available fully ready to fly, as kits
| with different levels of work needed, or you can build from
| scratch and choose your own parts and design.
|
| Flying is pretty different, though. If you're used to a copter
| that will just stay put when you release the controls, flying
| planes will be an adjustment.
| charleszyong wrote:
| Yes yes! Flying an aeroplane has no pause button. You are on
| your own from taking off to landing. It's a great practice
| not to panic under stress (I never flew one but I guess
| racing FPV quadcopters probably has the same feeling)
| charleszyong wrote:
| RC aeroplanes need some practice and a bigger field compared to
| FPV drones. I think I spent a week flying in simulators and
| another 2 weeks crashing several times to get a basic hold on
| it. It's kind of like training a robot foundation model to
| learn a new embodiment
|
| That being said, I enjoyed every moment flying my planes. I
| built and flew quite a few quadcopters but they never felt that
| free because there's always that control algorithm between the
| pilot and the motors, while aeroplanes are basically just
| mapping the movement of the joystick to the servos. I believe
| the UK has a lot of great local clubs, and I believe that's the
| best place to get started.
|
| Side note, when your son gets more experience in the field, he
| might wanna build his own gas turbine to power his planes. And
| this association based in UK is the best on this planet:
| https://www.gtba.co.uk
|
| For UK delivery, let me look into how to set up international
| shipping. Will get back to you by end of the day.
| GordonS wrote:
| I hadn't thought about clubs, probably because I live in a
| small, rural Scottish town... but I just had a quick look,
| and incredibly there's an active club just a few miles from
| me, which I had no idea even existed!
| bri3d wrote:
| Building RC planes is a little harder IMO, but not much.
|
| The main difference in building planes is you have to pay
| attention to center-of-gravity much more; minute differences
| will make the difference between your plane flying amazingly,
| like a brick (nose heavy), or not at all (tail heavy). There's
| also more work to do in setting control linkages and surface
| throws. But, overall, it's not too tough with most models.
|
| Takeoff with planes can be very stressful the first few times;
| you have to choose between ground/runway takeoff, which
| typically results in a very inefficient model due to landing
| gear drag and is prone to flipping over, throwing the plane by
| hand, which requires practice and can be quite hazardous with a
| "pusher" style plane with the prop at the back, and building
| some kind of bungee launcher, which you then have to set up and
| lug around.
|
| Then you have to decide how to fly - line of sight or FPV. Line
| of sight flying is quite an acquired skill and has a very steep
| learning curve - you basically have to learn to "become the
| plane" and understand how your control stick inputs are
| affecting the attitude of the plane without being able to see
| it very well.
|
| FPV plane flying, while less popular than LOS, is very easy and
| much more rewarding IMO. The reaction time in all but the most
| extreme plane stunt flying is much less dramatic than in FPV
| quads.
|
| And, due to quirks of the general hobby flight control software
| scene, most hobby FPV planes have a working loiter-in-a-circle
| setting while most FPV quads have a barely-functional GPS
| rescue mode and little to no ability to actually hover (it's
| very rare for an FPV quad to "just stay put"; this is the realm
| of camera drones).
|
| I fly FPV quads when I need a focus/adrenalin boost and FPV
| planes when I just want to relax and chill. You can fly planes
| in an adrenalin style, but they're much more conducive to just
| looking at the scenery and goofing around. Massive bonus points
| that most plane builds are almost silent compared to an FPV
| quad so you don't worry about bothering people so much.
| bathMarm0t wrote:
| If the goal is the building. Balsa kits (an xacto knife, 2
| bottles of super glue [thick/thin], CA-accelorator) are the way
| to go. Discuss gliders are easy to manage the risk of learning
| how to fly, and are light, so crashes will only be mildly
| catastrophic. I have this one, and it was easy-ish to build
| (~20 hours?)
|
| http://wrightbrothersrc.com/products/gambler.htm
|
| If the goal is the flying. You can't go wrong with an easy
| star. I've crashed mine a million times. You just patch it back
| together humpty dumpty style with thick CA + accelerant. Bonus
| points for the prop being in the back, so if you run into stuff
| you (probably) won't draw blood.
|
| https://mrmpxhobbies.com/product/rr-easystar-3/
|
| Note that the hobby does require some skill w/ flying and need
| some level of risk management. There are cords that let you
| plug your transmitter into a computer/fly over a simulation
| that can help with the former.
| euroderf wrote:
| > 2 bottles of super glue [thick/thin], CA-accelorator)
|
| I haven't built a balsa wood plane in ages. But so, the glue
| of choice has changed ? No more balsa wood glue with
| atrocious fumes ?
| charleszyong wrote:
| I've just set up shipping service to the UK. You should be able
| to place an order now. Let me know if you have any questions!
| laidoffamazon wrote:
| Alright, watching the video - I'm sold, even at a sped up rate.
| How do I buy? I'll do in-town pickup if that's faster!
| pryelluw wrote:
| A link to the product page, please.
| charleszyong wrote:
| There we go: https://shop.vassarrobotics.com/products/navrim-
| robot-that-l...
| martythemaniak wrote:
| Neat! Does this work with open source models like pi0 and
| OpenVLA? How does the inference-time teaching you outline work
| exactly?
| charleszyong wrote:
| The software stack is built around LeRobot. So anything you can
| run with LeRobot should be able to run with our software. Will
| do more testing before the official release. Personally, I feel
| GR00T N1 or ACT is much easier to train and do a fairly good
| job
| mclau157 wrote:
| will there be options to use GR00T N1 or ACT in the future?
| fragmede wrote:
| How backportable are the upgrades? If I have an SO-101, can I
| just replace a few parts to mount a camera and use your software?
| charleszyong wrote:
| The software is fully compatible with LeRobot's repo. As long
| as your dataset matches your inference time setup, you are good
| to go.
| rohitpaulk wrote:
| Where do I buy one?
| lucidrains wrote:
| Love to know as well!
| timmg wrote:
| https://vassarrobotics.com/
| dang wrote:
| Link added above :)
| timmg wrote:
| Funny, I was just about to build an SO-101, but tariffs adding
| $100 to the price of the servos annoyed me.
|
| How do I buy your kit, please?
| echelon wrote:
| Their website has it! I think I want one too.
|
| https://vassarrobotics.com/
| fragmede wrote:
| Need more videos, especially at 1x speed.
| dang wrote:
| This one shows the chess bit at 1x speed (at least I think so):
|
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbDTCwzFeIU#t=52
|
| (I timestamped it to skip the initial voice dialog with the
| robot but that might be entertaining for some people as well)
| fragmede wrote:
| damn, nice. that's quite the video!
| tomp wrote:
| I've been looking for a cheap 7 DOF arm. The only reason I
| haven't bought SO100/101 yet is that it's 6 DOF (and that
| delivery to Europe is hard to find..)
| charleszyong wrote:
| I hear you, man. After using 7-DOF arms, there's no going back
| to 6 DOF. I'll try to develop a version and hopefully get it
| out in August.
| Ninjinka wrote:
| Love how instantly recognizable the default NextJS app is
| charleszyong wrote:
| NextJS (and Vercel) is really easy to use ;)
| iamflimflam1 wrote:
| Interesting - I was just thinking the other day that a well
| implemented MCP server driving a robot with access to a camera
| could be a really interesting project.
| timmg wrote:
| And now I am too!
| Nevermark wrote:
| I love the arm/typewriter "printer"!
|
| It's not exactly on topic (other than fun ideas, begetting fun
| ideas), but a USB-C/WiFi driven typewriter would be a hoot.
|
| EDIT: Found [0]
|
| And for the reverse ... boom! (click! clack!) [1]
|
| [0] https://www.nutsvolts.com/magazine/article/turn-a-
| typewriter...
|
| [1] https://www.usbtypewriter.com
| asadm wrote:
| neat! what camera module did you guys settle on.
| dataminded wrote:
| Enjoy my money!
| lchengify wrote:
| I wonder if I can strap this to my Roborock from 2020 and train
| it to pick up socks.
|
| Roborock sells a new model that does this [1] but it costs $3,000
| and I refuse to pay that on principle when I know it's likely a
| straightforward model with some unsupervised training.
|
| Also I can probably fix it easier once it (definitely) breaks at
| some point due to collisions.
|
| [1] https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vHVQxXVgBm4
| yardie wrote:
| Of course this arrives right after I order all the electronic
| parts and just kicked off the 24+ hour 3D print job to complete
| my SO-Arm101.
|
| But I'm routing for you!
| charleszyong wrote:
| Thank you! Let me know how you like the SO-101 design. If you
| have complaints, I might be able to find a way to fix it ;)
| icedrift wrote:
| Literally same. Just finished printing the leader arm and not I
| have another 20 hour print for the follower.
| throwawaybbq1 wrote:
| Curious where you sourced the parts? In Canada, shipping kills
| it for me. When I priced out the robot + electronics + $100 in
| shipping, I am around $700 - far cry from the $100 on the
| "sticker".
| loxias wrote:
| Firstly, at the $219 price point you can have my money already.
|
| Beyond that, things that appeal to me are basically anything
| which increase the likelihood I can accomplish high dexterous
| fine motor control skills, for things like tinkering and DIY
| assembly. I think that would include extra wrist DOF and a
| longer-reach variant.
|
| Integrated cameras are an interesting idea, but I'd like to be
| able to swap them out for my own.
|
| My dream is to have some sort of multi-arm table at home. I
| imagine holding a circuit board, small component, soldering iron,
| and wire with four robotic arms I control with shaky hands from
| my laptop. :D
| charleszyong wrote:
| So true. Every time I solder surface mount components, I always
| wish I could have a steady hand. Sadly, this arm doesn't have
| that kind of accuracy. The output shaft of the servos we use
| has about 1 degree of wiggle room and the mechanical structure
| adds more.
|
| To get better accuracy, if sticking with this kind of RC servo,
| it's basically required to have two servos per joint to preload
| each other to kill that wiggle room. It's something I've been
| calculating, but I just can't figure out a way to offer it at a
| good price.
|
| Interestingly, for arms that are popular in academia, even when
| the price goes to $10k (like ARX or Trossen), the wiggle room
| is still there (better, but still there).
| fragmede wrote:
| even something twice the price ($438) would still be a great
| deal. Mind telling us something about your pricing strategy
| trade-off consideration matrix?
| charleszyong wrote:
| Design for manufacturing is one thing. I did it a lot when
| building micro gas turbines in college. Sometimes changing
| the design or manufacturing process will make it 10x faster
| to make one while not compromising the performance.
|
| The second thing is low margin. When people are pricing
| hardware, they usually plan a 50% to 100% margin to offset
| various costs that happen in the real world. From what I've
| heard, in extreme cases, some products cost around $100
| while they are being sold at close to $1000. I believe in
| the Prusa printer approach: you design a good product and
| price it a little bit above cost. So the company grows with
| the community.
|
| Deep down, there are so many times that I wish I could
| afford a fancy tool like a Milwaukee drill or a Mitutoyo
| caliper. And in extreme cases, I really wish I could have a
| HAAS UMC-400 or even a KERN Micro HD+. Now that I can set
| the price, I really wish I could make someone get what they
| want without breaking their bank.
| fragmede wrote:
| that's really great, thanks for sharing!
| tdeck wrote:
| For folks curious about why these kinds of margins are
| built in for hardware products, I found these videos
| informative:
|
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwrkfHadeQQ
|
| https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IdAT_SIRK8c&pp=QAFIAQ%3D%3D
|
| https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=63pnz-z_2sU&pp=QAFIAQ%3D%3D
| TylerE wrote:
| As a customer, thin margins scare the crap out of me. It
| means you probably won't be around in a few years.
| ericd wrote:
| Seems like this stuff is mostly built on open source, so
| no need to be too scared.
| fragmede wrote:
| that's more scary, not less! Sure, if the worst happens,
| since it's open source, we'll have the source, but being
| open source means they've got to figure out a more
| complicated business model than make thing, sell thing,
| profit. there are some success stories but also a lot of
| failures.
| brookst wrote:
| That's not at all reassuring to someone who wants the
| benefit of the product, not the obligation to become an
| expert on the product.
|
| I'll buy one of these for sure, but I would cheerfully
| spend 3x the price if it meant being sure of support and
| repair and software updates for a few years.
|
| I have bins full of exciting devices that no longer
| integrate, many of which have open source communities,
| which I just don't have the time to deal with.
| rancar2 wrote:
| It's worth reading the history behind Raspberry Pi. It
| depends on the team. With the right product market for,
| this strategy has and will work. In my view, the Vassar
| team got the pricing strategy right to do something even
| bigger than Raspberry Pi if they can scale at this price
| point for the low end model.
| charleszyong wrote:
| For software support, the software is open source, so the
| community can keep it going even if we're no longer
| around (hopefully not anytime soon).
|
| For repairs, the components are inexpensive enough to
| simply swap in a new one, and you can always find
| replacements on AliExpress.
| tdeck wrote:
| I was recently trying to get better angular accuracy with
| servos and minimize backlash. One option that kind of worked
| was to have a pulley on the servo shaft which wound a string
| attached to a spring to add mechanical bias.
|
| But I ended up giving up and going with 400 step stepper
| motors instead. They're larger, draw more current, and the
| drive circuitry is more complicated (it can't get simpler
| than a PWM servo after all). But they're accurate and
| significantly quieter.
| 6510 wrote:
| I know nothing about the topic but could one build some
| kind of 3d pantograph to scale down the motions?
| nine_k wrote:
| What you need is to scale down the tolerances. To remove
| the wiggle room.
|
| One of the solutions that does not add a bias that I
| remember is two identical flat gears on the same axis
| with a spring that tries to rotate them one relative to
| another. This removes the wiggle room between this
| composite gear and the next, regular gear. The motor may
| have wiggle room, but the gears (which carry angle
| sensors, don't they?) move without wiggling, and react
| immediately as you reverse the direction. The load is
| limited though: the beating surface is twice as small,
| and the friction is higher.
| 6510 wrote:
| have to share the noob thought because it is funny: You
| could attach an unbalanced wheel to a motor and induce a
| vibration to maximize wiggling and frequency across the
| available w-room.
| numpad0 wrote:
| I sometimes wonder if it makes more sense to just use
| those yellow gearboxes, everyone seem to start with SG90s
| only to reimplement most of the servo part.
| amelius wrote:
| Here's how to do it:
|
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCHXNcpq3OA
|
| Check his channel for servo motor modifications.
| tdeck wrote:
| Oh, I think I actually saw this! But it's a very manual
| process with a lot of small parts to assemble, and I want
| to eventually design a product I can manufacture myself
| so I didn't pursue it.
| amelius wrote:
| I understand. But you could sell a normal version and an
| enhanced version for those who need the accuracy.
| charleszyong wrote:
| Backlash is a real problem. I'm working with the supplier
| to prototype a small batch with 20 to 30% less backlash,
| though this may come at a slightly higher price and
| potentially a shorter lifespan.
|
| If cost isn't a concern, harmonic drives combined with
| brushless servos are excellent. I have a few harmonic drive
| units, and they're truly amazing.
| DidYaWipe wrote:
| Well, based on that info, I guess usability for pick-&-place
| of surface-mount components on PCBs is out of the question.
| charleszyong wrote:
| Yeah... the accuracy isn't good enough. A gantry system is
| probably needed.
|
| There was one robot startup (Haddington Dynamics) figured
| it out how to do it at a higher price. Sadly they've been
| acquired and shifted directions I think.
| slow_typist wrote:
| There are cheaper options for soldering SMD-parts on
| prototype boards. Developing and teaching robot arms to do it
| would give a good demonstrator but economically it's a
| disaster. And mass production is already highly automated.
| taneq wrote:
| > it's basically required to have two servos per joint to
| preload each other to kill that wiggle room
|
| Couldn't you preload with some form of spring?
| charleszyong wrote:
| The advantage of servos is that they can provide constant
| torque preloading, allowing the preload to be kept low
| (otherwise, the servo will overheat) but still sufficient.
|
| A spring might also be an option if designed properly. I'll
| probably give it a try in July.
| vasusen wrote:
| I love the idea of a trainable robot arm as a learning device at
| that price point.
|
| However, seeing the chess demo instantly makes me think of that
| horrible tragedy with the robotic arm breaking a kid's finger.
| How strong is this to be used around kids?
| charleszyong wrote:
| Yeah, safety is an important aspect. The good news is that the
| servos are not that powerful. Peaking at 3 Nm, with a moment
| arm of 0.2 m, you get 15 N of force, which is basically
| equivalent to the weight of three 500mL water bottles. This
| force might cause some scratches but should not lead to serious
| injuries.
|
| Initially, I was planning to launch a product using Piper Arms
| (much more powerful than the current product). But after
| testing them, I realized they could cause serious injuries if
| not used properly. So I canceled that version. I still have 8
| of them sitting in my office.
| vasusen wrote:
| thank you, I appreciate that!
| benob wrote:
| I am seeing different prices everywhere: - $199
| https://shop.vassarrobotics.com/ - $219
| https://shop.vassarrobotics.com/products/navrim-robot-that-l... -
| $599 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbDTCwzFeIU
|
| Which one is the actual price?
| bufferoverflow wrote:
| $199 was the Founder's edition, already sold out.
|
| $219 is the unassembled version.
|
| $299 is the assembled version.
| charleszyong wrote:
| $219 is for the unassembled version $299 is for the assembled
| version $199 is for the first 20 units of the assembled version
| $599 was the price before I spent hard hours dealing with
| supply chains
|
| When I was just a hobbyist, I had to pay the price on the
| website. Now that I have some funding to order in large
| quantities, prices come down a lot. I do the dirty work of
| sourcing the components so hobbyists don't have to ;)
| charleszyong wrote:
| Thank you for catching the mistake. I've updated the video
| descriptions.
| vavooom wrote:
| What a unique and fun build! So curious to hear about what ways
| it can be programmed and used for personal projects.
| mclau157 wrote:
| the website is pretty bad....could use a lot friendlier buttons,
| layout, more pictures, maybe some videos
| lysace wrote:
| Sometimes a lack of solid product photos/specs/etc is a
| feature. (To the seller.)
| peepeepoopoo135 wrote:
| Interesting project! Sorry if I'm out of the loop, but how
| exactly does the MCP server hand off visual data to an external
| LLM service to formulate the robot control actions? It's an
| interesting concept, but I'm having a hard time wrapping my head
| around how it works, because I thought MCP was text-oriented.
| codybontecou wrote:
| +1 to this. Curious how the MCP manages base 64 image-related
| data and the encoding + decoding.
| bconsta wrote:
| If I'm not mistaken, the idea is use MCP to let a user-facing
| LLM make tool calls to a VLA model with actions the user
| prescribes. He mentions using the LeRobot library in another
| comment.
| pj_mukh wrote:
| So cool!
|
| I would easily pay $1000-$1500 if you put two of these on a wheel
| base and made it all structurally sound. Extra points if the arms
| sit at least 1-2 feet of the ground and can reach the ground.
| GlenTheMachine wrote:
| You need some technical specs on the website. How many DOF does
| it have? Does it have joint angle sensing? If so, what's the
| resolution? What's the interface to the servos? What's the
| payload capacity? Does it have integrated motor controllers? How
| long is it, and what does the dexterous workspace look like?
|
| As a roboticist, what I'd vote for, in order, is:
|
| - more degrees of freedom
|
| - interchangeable tools, either an actual tool changer (unlikely
| at the price point) or a fixed bolt pattern with electronic
| passthroughs
|
| - better joint sensing, e.g. absolute encoders, joint torque
| sensing
|
| - fingertip force sensing
| michaelt wrote:
| _> You need some technical specs on the website. How many DOF
| does it have? Does it have joint angle sensing? If so, what 's
| the resolution? What's the interface to the servos? What's the
| payload capacity? Does it have integrated motor controllers?
| How long is it, and what does the dexterous workspace look
| like?_
|
| The post says "kit that keeps LeRobot SO-101's kinematics" so
| it's probably very similar to [1] namely 5DOF and a gripper,
| using STS3215 servos [2]
|
| _> As a roboticist, what I 'd vote for, in order, is:_
|
| As they are making a robot at the $219 price point, I very much
| doubt they have the money to add _anything_ to the design.
|
| [1] https://huggingface.co/docs/lerobot/so101 [2]
| https://uk.robotshop.com/products/magnetic-encoding-servo-st...
| GlenTheMachine wrote:
| They did ask for suggested upgrades.
|
| "I'd love your feedback! Beyond manufacturing, cleaning up
| the codebase, and writing docs, I'm considering: a force-
| controlled gripper, a parallel-jaw gripper, an extra wrist
| DOF (matching the new Trossen and ARX arms), full force
| feedback on the leader arm (though that may triple the
| price), a more affordable version with lower resolution each
| joint, and a longer-reach variant. Which of these--or
| something else--would be most useful to you?"
| charleszyong wrote:
| Thank you for stepping in. Yes, it's 5 DOF and a gripper
| using ST3215 (12V for the follower arms and 7.4V--various
| gear ratios--for the leader arms).
|
| As for hardware features, we can't add much to the current
| model since, as you mentioned, we are running on very thin
| margins. We're gathering suggestions primarily for future
| models.
| charleszyong wrote:
| Thank you for the feedback! Thinking out loud: * Adding one DOF
| to match ARX kinematics is doable, with a price increase of
| $30-40.
|
| * A tool changer is a great suggestion. A few of my friends are
| working on kinematic couplings, which would be ideal for this.
| I'll need to give some thought to how to pass electrical
| signals and power to the tool, while also keeping it
| lightweight.
|
| * Could you share what functionality you want in terms of
| encoders? The ST3215 uses 12-bit magnetic encoders, which can
| retain position after power loss. Are you looking for higher
| resolution? For torque sensing, if the order volume is large, I
| can add this for just a $20-30 price increase.
|
| * Finger tip force sensing: Is this for applications like
| picking up an egg?
| charleszyong wrote:
| Just to clarify, these improvements is for future models.
| GlenTheMachine wrote:
| * Adding one DOF to match ARX kinematics is doable, with a
| price increase of $30-40.
|
| You need at least six non redundant DOF to arbitrarily
| position the end effector in space, three for x-y-z
| translation and an additional three for roll-pitch-yaw. For
| _research_ grade arms, I typically want at least a 7 DOF
| arm, which gives you a lot of cool abilities, most
| importantly the ability to work around kinematic
| singularities, and makes the inverse kinematics problem
| nontrivial in interesting ways. I understand you 're
| hitting a price point, and each additional DOF costs money.
| I personally would pay for additional DOF. Maybe a modular
| design? * A tool changer is a great
| suggestion. A few of my friends are working on kinematic
| couplings, which would be ideal for this. I'll need to give
| some thought to how to pass electrical signals and power to
| the tool, while also keeping it lightweight.
|
| Yeah, typically with industrial tool changers there are
| spring loaded pins on the tool changer that hit pads or
| insert into sockets on the tool side. There will also
| typically be a ball detent for positive locking that is
| driven by a motor in the end effector. But even just a
| passive mounting plate and a documented connector interface
| would be huge. * Could you share what
| functionality you want in terms of encoders? The ST3215
| uses 12-bit magnetic encoders, which can retain position
| after power loss. Are you looking for higher resolution?
| For torque sensing, if the order volume is large, I can add
| this for just a $20-30 price increase.
|
| You take what you can get with encoders. _Ideally_ , you
| want an encoder that uses grey code, so it always knows
| exactly where it is no matter what. But for cost reasons
| this is rarely done, and you get what is essentially a
| relative encoder and you have to count the steps. The
| reason the former is preferable is that it doesn't rely on
| the microcontroller keeping up with the encoder, so there's
| no issue if you miss counts. But, again, those are as far
| as I know a significant step up in cost.
|
| You'd also ideally add torque sensing at the joints because
| it opens up a whole world of control techniques that you
| can't get with just joint position sensing. You can do
| compliance or force control, which lets the arm act as if
| it had a spring at the joints, so when it hits something
| the impact is nice and gentle, and importantly, so you can
| do things like e.g. a bolt insertion task where you have to
| control the position of the arm in x and y but you want to
| exert a small positive insertion force in z.
| * Finger tip force sensing: Is this for applications like
| picking up an egg?
|
| Yes, but even for picking up rigid objects this turns out
| to be very useful. If you're picking up an eg, you want to
| exert a controlled positive grip force that's big enough so
| you don't slip but not so big that you crack the egg. If
| you're picking up a bolt, you definitely won't break it but
| many robots are strong enough to deform the threads. If
| you're picking up something slippery, it would be great to
| try to detect the slip by touch. And so on. Often, you
| don't know exactly how big the object is or how
| flexible/brittle it is and it's hard to judge by vision
| alone whether the fingers are even in contact with it, or
| if they are how much it's being deformed, so being able to
| control grip force is very useful. Add force and position
| sensing to the grippers and you can judge how deformable
| the object is and make decisions accordingly.
|
| Or if you're folding clothes or handling cables or wires or
| anything else flexible, you really need to have a sense of
| touch. You can't really do these tasks very well with
| position sensing and vision alone.
|
| Another idea: Maybe add a passive mounting adapter and
| power leads at the end effector so people can add their own
| vision or lidar sensors, and just let them connect via
| bluetooth, so you don't have to route signal cables?
|
| FYI, I am a space roboticist by trade and I teach a
| graduate level class in robotics at the University of
| Maryland.
| GlenTheMachine wrote:
| Also, for the type of work I'd do with an arm like this,
| I'd be more than happy to just have the follower arm. You
| need a leader arm to do some types of teleoperation or
| imitation learning, but not really to do reinforcement
| learning or learn about control theory.
|
| What you _do_ need is an articulated rigid body model
| that you can import into e.g. NVIDIA Isaac Lab or Gazebo.
| The availability of a good digital model is a HUGE
| selling point.
| dimitry12 wrote:
| https://github.com/TheRobotStudio/SO-
| ARM100/tree/main/Simula... I hope applies to this first
| gen of the product.
| liotier wrote:
| > Maybe a modular design ?
|
| Pardon my naive imagination but, would stackable joints
| work - with same connector as the extremity tooling ? The
| joint would be a standard piece and more degrees of
| freedom would just mean stacking additional joints. I
| suppose this has already thought about...
| 15155 wrote:
| Check out Mill-Max magnetic connectors for the tool
| connectivity.
| charleszyong wrote:
| Very good suggestion! They look really promising. I'll talk
| to the company to see if the price will be acceptable.
| clw8 wrote:
| Are there any affordable robot kits you recommend for learning
| control, CV, RL etc.? I was budgeting for the SO-101 so I think
| I'll get OP's device and then something that's not an arm for
| variety.
| rfwhyte wrote:
| As someone who's long dreamed of owning a robotic camera control
| arm, but who doesn't have a spare $50K kicking around to buy one,
| I've been following the development of these kinds of projects
| with great interest. While this particular arm doesn't look like
| it would have enough payload capacity or smooth enough motion for
| the use cases I have in mind, the fact its a couple hundred bucks
| means something that does what I need it to do for an actually
| affordable price isn't likely too far off.
| hbarka wrote:
| Can this be coupled with some kind of vision AI to open/close my
| doggie door when pup-pup wants to?
| mclau157 wrote:
| if this can be extended to full size doors this could be a very
| good business, no more need to modify doors to have doggy doors
| mlboss wrote:
| Opening a door is still a challenging problem for robots.
| Better to have electronic control of doors that can be opened
| programmatically.
| dheera wrote:
| The reality is nobody can afford houses anymore, everyone
| is renting, so modifying doors is usually not an option. If
| you can work with existing infrastructure without modifying
| it, that is marketable.
| aesch wrote:
| While I don't think this will ship in time. There is a global
| online hackathon using these robot arms on Hugging Face June
| 2025, 14-15. https://huggingface.co/LeRobot-worldwide-hackathon
| charleszyong wrote:
| Man, I gotta say that I tried really hard to see if I could
| ship before that, but I failed ;( Chasing suppliers is pretty
| much like dating: sometimes no matter how hard you try, you
| just can't make it happen.
| chrishare wrote:
| Well, hopefully you can find some suppliers you can settle
| down with and live happily ever after
| guywithahat wrote:
| You should put it on Amazon; we used a robotic arm in one of the
| classes I taught, and for logistics reasons it was basically the
| only way we could order stuff. Plus it helps with discovery.
|
| I'm sure there's an extra fee but it's sometimes just impossible
| to order things if you're a big organization from small sites
| like this.
| charleszyong wrote:
| Thank you for the suggestions. I hear you. When I was at
| college, the school system basically only allowed Amazon plus a
| few industry-specific suppliers. Please allow me to prioritize
| manufacturing and testing so that I can ship the product as
| soon as possible and with the highest quality possible. Then I
| will start expanding sales.
|
| Also, the servos we are using actually have a version that has
| lower torque/force output, which would be safer for students
| but also limit what they can do with it. Would you be
| interested in the "safer" version for classes?
| guywithahat wrote:
| I was just a TA, but the big issues for my professor were
| cost (a lot of arms cost 1000+, so if you're buying 30 then
| that's $30k+ which is hard to budget for) or it was number of
| axis. Since it was a class he wanted more motors, which made
| the arm more complex and more similar to the real world.
| Counter-intuitively to teach someone about robotics you want
| an arm that's complex so students have more to learn,
| students would have to implement their own kinematics and
| some of the affordable ones were too simple. I never heard
| him mention anything about motor safety, and when we had to
| fix them we would often buy stronger, metal gear servos as
| replacements.
|
| I love the product though, and I appreciate your input!
| pama wrote:
| First world problems: can I email you and specify a later
| shipping date?
| charleszyong wrote:
| Sure! You can email us at hello@vassarrobotics.com
|
| As long as it's within this year, I'm sure we can arrange it.
| pama wrote:
| Thanks. Done.
| _tqr3 wrote:
| As another robot hobbyist, I wish there were more detailed
| documentation on how things work. So many projects online just
| show a working demo--usually on YouTube--and it's impossible to
| decipher what's actually happening, or if the robot is simply
| following some predefined movements.
| whoomp12342 wrote:
| combine one of these with an automated robotic mower and have it
| pick weeds, then we are in business baby!
| aesch wrote:
| I'd be interested to hear about your experience working with
| suppliers. How did you go about finding suppliers and haggling
| with them?
| TuringNYC wrote:
| I've been looking for a robot arm for a while to play ping pong
| with me. Curious:
|
| 1. Would we be able to control it deterministically via an API,
| rather than relying on LLM?
|
| 2. What is the latency on this? Do you think it would be fast
| enough in deterministic mode to play ping pong?
| TylerE wrote:
| Nothing fast enough k play ping pong is easily fast enough to
| cause fatal injury. That's stick it ina. Cage with a lockout.
| TylerE wrote:
| Nothing fast enough k play ping pong is easily fast enough to
| cause fatal injury. That's stick it ina. Cage with a lockout
| territory. High speed robots are not toys.
| charleszyong wrote:
| Kuka had this demo years ago: https://youtu.be/tIIJME8-au8
|
| Nowadays, if you're running a 2-3B parameter foundation model
| on a standard computer, you'll probably get a rollout frequency
| of 1 to 10 Hz. ACT would be faster, but I still don't think
| it's fast enough.
| Javantea_ wrote:
| Can you compare your robot to Baxter? I'm curious to see how this
| works.
|
| Congrats on shipping!
| charleszyong wrote:
| Do you mean that Baxter by Rethink Robotics?
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baxter_(robot)
|
| Thank you!
| pbrb wrote:
| Ordered. This is so cool. I also started looking at LeKiwi... I
| think I'm going to have to figure out how to make this thing
| mobile.
| m3at wrote:
| You're in luck: https://github.com/Vector-Wangel/XLeRobot
| didip wrote:
| wow, this is so freaking cool. Thanks for sharing.
| charleszyong wrote:
| XLeRobot and LeKiwi are both great!
| polishdude20 wrote:
| Can you explain more how this is possible? For a layman like me,
| what is happening when you tell the robot to do something and how
| does it know it's going to the right place?
| dimitry12 wrote:
| SO-ARM101 has a leader-arm, which is the arm with same exact
| dimensions and same servos - but used to read/record the
| trajectory. You move it with your own hand and teleoperate the
| follower-arm in real-time. Follower-arm is visible in the demo
| videos.
|
| If you fully control the environment: exact positions of arm-
| base and all objects which it interacts with - you can just
| replay the trajectory on the follower-arm. No ML necessary.
|
| You can use LLM to decide which trajectories to replay and in
| which order based on long-horizon instruction.
| charleszyong wrote:
| Yes. You are exactly right. If you want the model to have
| some adaptability, you will need to train a policy like ACT
| or GR00T.
|
| Just a quick difference I need to point out as it's critical
| product spec: leader arms are using 7.4v version of ST3215
| (various gear ratios) while follower arms are using 12v
| version of ST3215. (12v version have higher peak torque at
| close to 3 Nm)
| dimitry12 wrote:
| Thank you for confirming! Love how simple yet magical your
| demos look, the elegance of bridging LLM-driven long-
| horizon planning with the arm.
| fragmede wrote:
| > various gear ratios
|
| for anyone following along at home: THIS IS NOT A SMALL
| DETAIL!
|
| there are 12 servos total and 4 different types of 7.4 volt
| ones in the box. make sure you use the right one, or else
| you'll waste precious time to reassemble the arm.
| polishdude20 wrote:
| Wait so the arm isn't doing any learning or moving on its
| own? I don't understand why you need a leader arm?
| victorbjorklund wrote:
| It sounds like you use the leader arm to show the robot how
| the task should be done. If you just used your own arm for
| the task the robot would have to translate human movements
| to its own mechanics (hard) but this way it does only need
| to replicate the movement you showed (easier). After you
| teach it how to do the movement it can then do it by
| itself. You show once and it can repeat a million times.
| polishdude20 wrote:
| Ok I was under the impression (due to the cameras) that
| it's doing something with machine learning or can do a
| novel movement. This is just recording movements and
| playing them back.
| dimitry12 wrote:
| If you bridge recorded trajectories with LVLM, then
| cameras are necessary visual input for LLM to decide
| which sub-tasks need to be performed to accomplish long-
| horizon task, and sub-tasks correspond to pre-recorded
| ("blind") trajectories which are replayed.
|
| If you go beyond pre-recorded "blind" trajectories into
| more robust task-policies (which you would have to train
| from many demonstrations) then cameras become necessary
| to execute the sub-task.
| numpad0 wrote:
| It's just bunch of motors on a stick. Doesn't come with a
| computer at all. But that's still worth >$200, as 1) building
| an arm that works is a project of its own, and 2) hardware
| standardization is crucial for code reusability.
| notfed wrote:
| ...then why is this titled "that learns new skills"?
| numpad0 wrote:
| It's intended as a close replica of HuggingFace SO-101 arm,
| so same models should work. It also comes with a replica
| leader arm for "teaching", or teleop based programming in
| layman's term.
| bredren wrote:
| I'm down to buy the kit and build but need some idea for how long
| it takes. Like, I was able to detail finish and assemble a 3D
| violin but could not make the time and space to assemble a full
| 3D printer and had to sell it.
|
| Would you please provide more info on what's involved for the
| kit? Ranges are okay.
| charleszyong wrote:
| Great question. I would say that the first time I assembled a
| SO-101, it took me about 3 hours to assemble and calibrate
| everything.
|
| This product is largely based on the SO-101. With all the
| improved designs, let's say it would still take 2 to 4 hours,
| depending on your experience.
| bredren wrote:
| Right on. I bought the kit!
| polskibus wrote:
| How can I order it to Europe?
| charleszyong wrote:
| Which country are you in? I can set up the delivery option for
| your country.
| polskibus wrote:
| I guess it's too late now, please consider EU next time.
| Whether I would buy it would depend on total cost. I joined
| the waitlist.
| quadrature wrote:
| I'm curious about how the perception works, how do you find
| correspondences between the arm camera and the stationary camera
| ?
| joshu wrote:
| saw you guys setting up over the weekend! good luck tomorrow
| anythingworks wrote:
| really cool, hoping you're able to ship it in time, given the
| overwhelming demand
| charleszyong wrote:
| Good point. I've limited the orders to 20 units for shipping in
| June and 100 units for shipping in mid July.
| tdeck wrote:
| I love that you're open sourcing the design! Would be curious to
| hear your experience as you build and sell these.
| dimitry12 wrote:
| Do I understand correctly that chess-moving demo decomposes into:
|
| - you recorded precise arm-movement using leader-arm - for each
| combination of source- and target- receptacles/board-positions
| (looking at the shim visible in the video, which I assume ensures
| the exact relative position of the arm and chess-board);
|
| - the recorded trajectories are then exposed as MCP-based
| functions?
|
| Bought the kit. Thank you for the great price! Are table-clamps
| included?
| codekansas wrote:
| This is super cool! What have been your favorite and least
| favorite things about open source robots?
| charleszyong wrote:
| Favorite: git clone and start using (or spending a whole
| afternoon to fix environment issues) Least Favorite: some cool
| projects (especially in academia)--the results need H100s to
| replicate...
| cadr wrote:
| Just to check - do you ship from the USA? (international is
| confusing these days...)
| charleszyong wrote:
| Yes, we 3D print and assemble in San Francisco, and ship from
| there.
| DarmokJalad1701 wrote:
| Ordered. I haven't even watched the video. Let's see how this
| goes. Lol
| drodgers wrote:
| Love it! I've been looking for an excuse to dive into AI planning
| for robotics, and this looks like it will make it easy to get
| started.
|
| Just one question: does the power supply have a 220/240v option
| (I'm in Australia)?
| charleszyong wrote:
| Very good question. Currently, I've only sourced power supplies
| that meet US standards. However, I'm confident I can provide a
| power supply that works for Australia as well.
|
| When you are placing the order, make sure you put the shipping
| address to Australia address and so that I will know I need to
| source corresponding power supply.
| estsauver wrote:
| For what it's worth, I wasn't able to pick an address outside
| of the United States when it still had units for sale. If you
| want a first international sale, I'm estsauver at gmail dot
| com and would be thrilled to be your first customer from The
| Netherlands.
|
| Congratulations on a great launch!
| namank wrote:
| What does it take to fold my laundry? Not a joke. I'll pay.
| charleszyong wrote:
| For hardware, folding laundry with just one arm is really hard.
| So probably you will need a dual arm setup.
|
| For software, even the best policy in the industry struggles a
| little bit (the arms they are using is about $10k each): -
| https://youtu.be/Oa19cq_MxE0 - https://www.dyna.co/research
|
| In conclusion, for hardware, it might work if you have two of
| the arms; for software, it's probably too hard to collect
| enough data to make it work.
| norcalkc wrote:
| Came here to ask this. Two arms? I'll pay.
| charleszyong wrote:
| We will have a two-arm version available, as well as a kit
| for people to convert the current version to two arms--
| probably in August or September.
| bagels wrote:
| Is the longer term plan for industrial robots? Would be cool if
| you could put other end effectors on it.
| sexy_seedbox wrote:
| Can I put this on my desk and ask it to slap my co-worker?
| s3graham wrote:
| Please let me know when you're ready/able to ship another batch.
| apwell23 wrote:
| https://set.mit.edu
|
| this page design is so beautiful
| surfmike wrote:
| This is great! Given demand, I would consider a kickstarter for
| upcoming batches!
| _pktm_ wrote:
| Thank you for sharing this. Please let me know if/when it's back
| in stock.
| charleszyong wrote:
| You can sign up for email notifications here:
| https://vassarrobotics.com/newsletter
|
| It will probably be available in late July. We're expanding the
| team, so we might be able to offer it sooner.
| jaydeegee wrote:
| All gone :( let us know when you have more stock please.
| altairprime wrote:
| re: X25, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42770629
| dang wrote:
| We're going to stop using X to refer to Spring, but I haven't
| figured out how to do that in the standard title format yet, so
| I'm punting till next year.
|
| I wonder if we should just change the format to "YC YY", e.g.
| "YC 25" for 2025, and stop including a letter for the batch.
|
| "(YC Spring 2025)" is too long for HN titles!
| slater wrote:
| 1/2/3/4? e.g., (YC 1/2025).
|
| Or dots, for extra 1337ness - 2025.1, 2025.2, etc.
| altairprime wrote:
| (YC 25.1)
| dang wrote:
| Huh - interesting - thank you both!
|
| Notation is a funny thing...unimportant and important at
| the same time
| bravesoul2 wrote:
| This is awesome.
|
| Can I order one where I 3d print the in printable bits and you
| supply the rest. Not to save money but to have a more tweakable
| design.
| charleszyong wrote:
| We'll probably have an electronics-only kit available in late
| July. However, it won't be much cheaper, as we're running on a
| very thin margin.
| ZeroCool2u wrote:
| Already sold out :( Any idea when the unassembled kits will be
| back in stock?
| pachevjoseph wrote:
| Sold out unfortunately. When do you think you'll restock?
| charleszyong wrote:
| I need to ship the current orders before taking the next batch,
| so it will probably be sometime in late July. You can sign up
| for an email notification for the next batch here:
| https://vassarrobotics.com/newsletter
| qwert12345887 wrote:
| I was searching for something like this just this week, its sold
| out currently, could you set up waitlist email when you can ship
| more please.
| dang wrote:
| You probably already saw this but just in case not:
| https://vassarrobotics.com/newsletter
| EGreg wrote:
| As a related question, is there some way to buy or make plush
| toys that are robots underneath? I wanted to use a computer to
| train them and download the program onto the toy, or use wifi to
| send the telemetry and animate it. The toy would have a
| microphone, speaker etc.
| brcmthrowaway wrote:
| One thing i dont undersrand about the leader follower
| architecture. Can I enter the kinematics myself?
| matt3210 wrote:
| Post a demo without 30sec youtube ad
| ModernMech wrote:
| I came to say this as well. I don't even know what the arm
| looks like because I shut down the video so fast after seeing
| that ad.
| Cipater wrote:
| Isn't it YouTube that decides whether to serve pre-roll ads?
| madduci wrote:
| Unfortunately already sold out, but really a cool product
| charleszyong wrote:
| Sorry for being MIA for a bit. All 120 units are now sold out.
| I've created a waitlist at https://vassarrobotics.com/newsletter
| to keep you updated on when the next batch will be available
| (most likely in late July).
|
| Thank you so much for everyone's support. My top priority now is
| to get all the orders shipped on time and with high quality.
| dtnewman wrote:
| Looks like you might've found that magical thing which is
| product-market fit. I'm rooting for you.
|
| $200 is a really nice entry-price point. If I'm being honest,
| I'm marginally interested in this, but doubt that I'd actually
| use it too much. But the price point is justifiable for someone
| who is just interested in it from a _learning_ point of view
| (if I bought this, used it a few times and learned a bit more
| about AI as it relates to robotics, it 'd have paid itself off
| easily).
|
| Rooting for you to succeed.
| echelon wrote:
| 1000000%
|
| And you've got an excellent gradient to keep growing!
|
| All the best!
| charleszyong wrote:
| Thank you for your support! I'm actively working on the
| design and building the supply chain. In the next 3 to 6
| months, I should be able to:
|
| 1. Keep the price similar while adding new features, such as
| a torque-controlled gripper. 2. Re-examine design decisions
| to see if we can offer a similar product at an even better
| price.
| Tepix wrote:
| Having built the SO-ARM 100, i feel this post is missing a lot of
| context for those who have not yet looked at Hugginface's LeRobot
| project.
|
| The most important link to get started is probably
| https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot
| whazor wrote:
| can you have two arms work together?
|
| I can personally not solder, but I would love to have two arms
| that can just do it for me.
| myth_drannon wrote:
| For anyone who missed out, you can find online shops that sell
| similar kits.
| jjfoooo4 wrote:
| I like the bit of humor at the start of the video, but the bit
| goes on for a bit too long
| catwhatcat wrote:
| Great product, congrats on the quick sales! Big fan of robotics
| for a long time myself. If you're in need of some website
| development, I'd love to chat >>hello at joshmleslie dot com<<
| sabareesh wrote:
| Where can i find the specs. I am actively working on some project
| with robot arm and found following appealing eventhough this
| doesnt include servo or cameras or controllers.
| https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256808789646447.html?spm=a2g...
| charleszyong wrote:
| Interesting. Their servos seem to be PWM servos, which are
| available at a very good price. I would look into how to hook
| up all the servos--you'll probably need an MCU to convert USB
| to PWM for each servo.
| didip wrote:
| The one day I was too busy at work... this came out. Darn.
|
| The price point is crazy good. If it indeed can be so flexible in
| learning a number of things, just take my wallet. Having an extra
| hand for N number of DIY projects is invaluable.
| charleszyong wrote:
| The robot is only as good as the amount of time you're willing
| to spend teaching it. If you put in, say, 20,000 hours and make
| "some" hardware upgrades, you can get it to do things like
| this: https://www.physicalintelligence.company/blog/pi05
| jimrandomh wrote:
| Your price is too low. You should raise your price until you
| aren't selling out.
| charleszyong wrote:
| I'm running on a very thin margin here. I want to get the robot
| into the hands of robot lovers without them having to eat
| McDonald's all month just to save up for it. (I did that once
| myself, and I strongly advise against it--it's really bad for
| your health, both physically and mentally)
| jimrandomh wrote:
| When you're selling a physical product at the single-digit-
| hundreds scale, "thin margin" is a false economy at best,
| fatal self-sabotage at worst. You should have a thick margin,
| which you reinvest into scaling up.
| bhelkey wrote:
| How dangerous is this? If I buy/print one of these arms, how
| cautious would I need to be to prevent the arm from hurting me or
| other adults?
| charleszyong wrote:
| The servos we are using in the follower arms are capable of
| generating about 3 Nm of peak torque. This isn't a lot of
| torque, and they can't move very fast. If absolute safety is
| your top priority, you could opt for servos that use 7.4V and a
| low gear ratio, which would further limit their torque output.
| The consequence is that the arm will be significantly weaker.
| cjblomqvist wrote:
| I'm curious, since it's a YC/VC company - what's the business
| plan/model/vision? I assume it's not selling robot arms for $219?
| (Please correct me if I'm wrong!)
| charleszyong wrote:
| Dalton Caldwell: "Make a product people love; worry about
| making money later."
| littlestymaar wrote:
| Corollary: once you have a big enough captive audience, it's
| time to enshittify your product to make money.
| davidweatherall wrote:
| Hey Charles, annoyed I missed out on the first batch, signed up
| to the newsletter looking forward to the next one!
|
| I thought your product page could use a slightly nicer UI. - I'm
| building an app that let's people spin up multiple variations of
| their pages and easily implement new UIs. - I like to put HN
| websites through it whilst I'm training it up to see if I can
| improve them.
|
| here's what my app came up with for your site:
| https://streamable.com/vbby9q
|
| If you want the html + css, it's here free of charge, I've split
| each one up with a ## Variation 1/2.. etc.. just let me know what
| you think - https://pastebin.com/WGNieVmq
| bredren wrote:
| I looked at your video of alternatives and number 5 looked
| pretty good to me. Though, a better image of the product itself
| seems like the lowest hanging fruit for improving the landing.
| :)
|
| For stuff like this, it would be cool if you had a hosted demo
| of what you clicked through in the video.
| davidweatherall wrote:
| A share button is a great idea, thanks!
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-06-11 23:00 UTC)