[HN Gopher] Omnimax
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Omnimax
        
       Author : aberoham
       Score  : 195 points
       Date   : 2025-06-08 20:41 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (computer.rip)
 (TXT) w3m dump (computer.rip)
        
       | vFunct wrote:
       | First large format system I experience was Omnimax in Fort Worth
       | in the 80's. Much more immersive than IMAX. Actually, the Apple
       | Vision Pro movies reminds me of that experience now.
        
       | russellbeattie wrote:
       | I grew up outside of Boston and as a kid we went to the Museum of
       | Science's Omnimax dome quite a few times.
       | 
       | As I grew up, I started seeing/hearing about IMAX movies, and
       | didn't realize they were different until I went to one in another
       | part of the country. I was very excited to go, as it had been a
       | long time since I had been to an Omnimax.
       | 
       | I was pretty confused and disappointed, which is a weird reaction
       | to have the first time in an IMAX theater. "It's just a big
       | screen... Where's the dome?"
        
         | mschulkind wrote:
         | "I grew up just a few blocks from here."
         | 
         | "Who put the bomp in the bomp sha bomp!"
         | 
         | I too had a similar reaction the first time I saw an imax.
        
           | russellbeattie wrote:
           | OMG, I had totally forgotten about the Leonard Nimoy intro!!
           | 
           | I read your response and was like, "Huh?", then it hit me.
           | That's easily a 30 year old memory sitting in deep storage. I
           | haven't been there, or thought about it since college. The
           | human brain is amazing.
           | 
           | And since we live in the future, I can easily find a clip of
           | it online:
           | 
           | https://youtu.be/MHK2-BVfUzs
        
           | flymasterv wrote:
           | The helicopter intro was the best.
        
           | app wrote:
           | "These people wanna see a lobstah!"
        
       | classichasclass wrote:
       | I spent a great deal of time at Reuben H. Fleet as a kid growing
       | up in San Diego, playing in the science museum and watching
       | whatever Omnimax movie was on. Didn't matter what it was, they
       | were almost always great eye candy. Even saw, later, a Pink
       | Floyd-themed laser light show projected on the dome. Never failed
       | to impress.
        
         | latchkey wrote:
         | Hey, me too! SMB/OB/PL.
        
         | ludicrousdispla wrote:
         | The planetarium at the University of Arizona used to run the
         | Pink Floyd show weekly. Seems like they have now added others
         | to their program.
         | 
         | >> https://flandrau.org/explore/laser-light-music-nights
        
         | AStonesThrow wrote:
         | I also grew up in San Diego with an intimate connection to
         | Balboa Park and the Reuben H. Fleet. Watched the original
         | Aerospace Museum burn down; quite a warm night on the Prado.
         | 
         | The Fleet was where I played the Coordination Game with 2 hand
         | controls and 2 pedals for my feet, old incandescent bulbs
         | behind colored cels to match up simultaneously. I think I
         | scored over 30.
         | 
         | The Fleet was where I took science classes in summertime. We
         | learned how to make "Oobleck" and we used Apple ][ computers.
         | It was where I found my first blinking cursor. I couldn't type;
         | I couldn't find "g" on a Qwerty!
         | 
         | Fleet had the Cloud Chamber and Whisper Dishes and the big
         | Periscope that must've got moved 5 times??? There was the
         | orbital simulator where you'd roll balls down a black conical
         | incline, and someone else threw in a coin?
         | 
         | We watched Carl Sagan do stuff and Jacques Cousteau. None of
         | the IMAX films had a memorable name or stars, but they were all
         | documentaries with obligatory aerial shots on the geodesic
         | dome.
         | 
         | One science thing not in the Fleet science center but across
         | the Prado, just as near the giant fountain: "The Nat" (San
         | Diego Natural History Museum) hosted a giant Foucault Pendulum,
         | 3+ stories high, toppling "dominoes" all day every day, to tell
         | us the time!
         | 
         | Very late in time, it must've been ca. 2005 -- Mythbusters Live
         | was on tour and they made an appearance at the Fleet. So it was
         | Kari Byron and that Japanese guy who's dead now, and someone
         | else like, I don't know, all my attention and amorous energy
         | was focused on Kari, OK? And they had a panel discussion and
         | then a live Meet & Greet and we posed for a photo while
         | Mythbusters characters posed in real life next to us. And they
         | autographed my photo I think. They had a full Mythbusters-
         | themed display at the Fleet during that time, with hands-on.
         | 
         | Hands-on is the name of the game at the Fleet. You touch it! It
         | moves! You respond! _Der Blinkenlights!_ It 's a museum and a
         | science center!
         | 
         | I purchased and ate genuine Astronaut Ice Cream (freeze dried)
         | from the gift shop. A hologram sheet that was a real laser-
         | encoded, white-light 3D hologram of a woman blowing a kiss! The
         | Fleet Gift Shop had the best science toys and the best hard-
         | science experiments! Reality-based, evidence-based
         | entertainment! ("Edu-tainment"???)
         | 
         | The Fleet had one or two little side theaters where they would
         | hold lectures and in-person appearances. We were rarely
         | privileged to peek in, or much less sit in there; it seemed
         | like a VIP experience. But they definitely had a screen and a
         | lectern and awesome sciency science.
         | 
         | I believe that Tijuana eventually built their own IMAX
         | attraction theater across the international border. You could
         | go to smelly polluted Mexico and have your stupid turistic IMAX
         | show. But OMNIMAX was different and something uniquely special.
         | And plenty of _mojados_ in San Diego proper. With clean air and
         | crystal clear waters in the Coronado bay!
         | 
         |  _I never saw the Pink Floyd show!!!_ You must be mentally ill
         | to purchase a ticket and I was diagnosed late. But the Pink
         | Floyd Laser Show was the only laser show and it was a huge
         | thing in the 1980s! It was like Grateful Dead jams for nerds!
        
       | madcaptenor wrote:
       | I miss the Omnimax they had at the Franklin Institute in
       | Philadelphia. They closed it during the pandemic and it never
       | reopened.
        
         | nebula8804 wrote:
         | Was really special seeing Interstellar on that screen.
        
         | sjm-lbm wrote:
         | I sort of wonder how many of them had this exact fate - the Ft
         | Worth Texas one was in the exact same situation. My
         | understanding is that both parts to maintain the projection
         | system and people with the knowledge to operate it were getting
         | very rare, and the people largely retired when the pandemic
         | closed the theater. Since a lot of the Omnimax screens were
         | build during a similar range of time and would have had similar
         | challenges, I wonder if that fate was common.
         | 
         | (luckily, the Ft Worth theater specifically was converted to an
         | LED screen and recently reopened)
        
       | jsolson wrote:
       | I was surprised to see a mention of the Carnegie Science Center's
       | Omnimax and the year 1978 -- my recollection was that this
       | theater didn't open until I was both alive and cognizant enough
       | of the world around me to remember it.
       | 
       | That seems consistent with this announcement from 2017 that the
       | theater was going to close (citing a quarter century):
       | https://www.pittsburghmagazine.com/rangos-omnimax-theater-to...
       | 
       | I couldn't find any press covering it from 1978, although this
       | directory of IMAX/Omnimax theaters from 1992 matches my
       | recollection of it opening in ~1991.
        
         | jcrawfordor wrote:
         | I think you're right, I mixed up some different locations.
         | Here's the cool thing: while I was checking that against
         | newspaper archives I happened to run across an older version of
         | an illustration I saw used in the '90s, but the older version
         | has a more complete caption! It confirms that the Science
         | Museum of Minnesota installation was at least planned to have a
         | Spitz STS like the Fleet. I'll see if I can tell if it was ever
         | installed or not. I've been unsure of whether or not the Fleet
         | was the only example of a combined Omnimax/planetarium.
         | 
         | The same illustration appeared with announcements of some other
         | Omnimax theaters, but I suspect it had just been copied from
         | the Minnesota design without paying much attention. The
         | captions never mention the STS.
         | 
         | However, the side control booth located about halfway up the
         | house, which is present in all of the Omnimax theaters where
         | I've been able to check, is labeled as the "Planetarium
         | console." This could explain the curiosity of the '90s Omnimax
         | theaters having two different control booths. It seems odd to
         | keep that feature without the planetarium projector.
        
       | EvanAnderson wrote:
       | The Omnimax theatre at the Cincinnati Museum Center at Union
       | Terminal is worth the trip if you're in the area. They still show
       | the "wormhole" and show off the speaker stacks outside the dome
       | during the pre-show.
        
         | BirAdam wrote:
         | I've been to that one many times, and Union Terminal alone is
         | worth the trip.
        
         | paulv wrote:
         | Wow, I thought for sure they would have retired it by now. I
         | remember having a birthday party there when I was a kid (90 or
         | 91?) and thinking that it was the coolest thing ever. It made
         | up for them not moving the planetarium from their old location
         | when they moved the museum to Union Terminal, which I (at 9)
         | recall making me really sad.
        
           | EvanAnderson wrote:
           | It has had a digital retrofit (no more giant reels of film
           | paying-out into the projector to watch while in line for the
           | next show) but is otherwise pretty much unchanged.
           | 
           | We took a "behind the scenes" your years ago and got to see
           | the projection dome from the outside. That was pretty freaky.
        
       | ckmiller wrote:
       | Growing up in Cincinnati, the Omnimax at the museum center was a
       | huge influence. The light tunnel intro (one of many adapted from
       | the Graphic Films Corporation logo [1]) absolutely blew my mind
       | and gave me a lifelong obsession with computer graphics.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-09F87C6Ps
        
         | mrandish wrote:
         | You probably already know this, but the light tunnel intro
         | wasn't computer graphic imagery. It was created using optical
         | effects generally referred to as slit scan. The same technique
         | was used to create the star gate sequence at the end of 2001: A
         | Space Odyssey.
        
       | ocdtrekkie wrote:
       | So fun fact: For many years I thought IMAX _was_ Omnimax. I had a
       | very bad experience in an Omnimax theater when I was younger (I
       | found it extremely disorienting) and avoided pretty much all IMAX
       | showings for years. I forget how I found out IMAX screens were
       | flat...
        
       | SyzygyRhythm wrote:
       | I went to Space Camp in Huntsville in '89 or so. One of the perks
       | was a daily showing at their Omnimax theater. Felt absolutely
       | incredible at the time. The most memorable moment was a scene
       | where they filmed the Space Shuttle tower escape system--
       | basically a basket on a zipline that goes into a sand pit.
       | Everyone in the theater instinctively leapt forward when the
       | basket hit the sand. The difference, I suppose, is that the
       | screen filled your peripheral vision as well. I didn't experience
       | the same level of immersiveness until VR, much later on.
        
       | flymasterv wrote:
       | Who put the bomp...
        
       | clhodapp wrote:
       | Given the expense of running a proper Omnimax theater and the
       | lack of new content to keep it going, it seems like the only way
       | Omnimax can be properly preserved in the long term is through VR.
        
       | bythreads wrote:
       | Thanks for this, well written
        
       | Xorakios wrote:
       | I couldn't get an email or post to work correctly to the author,
       | so hoping they find this.
       | 
       | Thank you to the shout out to my father, Preston Fleet, for his
       | work on developing Omnimax and everything is the article is
       | factually correct. He died young after also building Fotomat and
       | WD40 (and funding the Cabaret movie, for which he shared an
       | Oscar). He shied away from the spotlight and named everything
       | after his contributors because he was kind. And a totally shock
       | the author knew about his presidency at the American Theatre
       | Organ Society, which my mother followed after his death.
       | Unfortunate selfish to say in a public forum, but really just
       | want to thank the article's author in some way
        
         | jcrawfordor wrote:
         | Thanks! email to me@computer.rip should work, sorry if it has
         | given you trouble. Theater organs are one of my weird little
         | interests, so maybe it's a leap but when I saw a tangential
         | mention that Preston Fleet had been a theater organist some of
         | the dramatic design features of many Omnimax theaters (like the
         | glass-walled projection rooms and displaying the speakers in
         | the preshow) made more sense to me. They're similar to the way
         | many theater organs were installed, especially as they started
         | to become such a niche instrument.
        
       | jrowen wrote:
       | _It might seem a little bit deceptive that an attraction called
       | the Sphere does not quite pull off even a hemisphere of
       | "payload," but the same compromise has been reached by most dome
       | theaters._
       | 
       | This paragraph is bizarre to me, framed from a presumably
       | extremely niche "Sphere-as-dome-theater" perspective. I would
       | think that, for most people, the Sphere is the exterior part and
       | it delivers and is every bit as innovative as anyone who has seen
       | a picture of it would say. I don't understand the effort to
       | downplay that and say "oh forget that part it's actually just a
       | not-even-spherical dome theater."
        
         | mrandish wrote:
         | A lot of people I know assumed that the Las Vegas Sphere
         | interior screen was on the "other side" of the exterior dome.
         | They were surprised when I showed them this image:
         | https://i0.wp.com/alia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/sph...
        
           | jrowen wrote:
           | I was certainly surprised when I saw images of the inside,
           | and upon reflection wasn't sure exactly what I had had in
           | mind or how that would have worked with the realities of
           | infrastructure needs for a venue like that.
           | 
           | But still, it feels weird to express a sentiment of "well it
           | didn't really live up to the sphere thing" while dismissing
           | the massive obvious spherical component that was the
           | innovative work of engineering/tech/art/whatever.
        
       | necubi wrote:
       | Fascinating article! I have many fond childhood memories of the
       | IMAX (I guess Omnimax? Although I've never heard it called that)
       | dome theater at the Tech Museum in San Jose. I probably saw
       | "Everest" half a dozen times.
       | 
       | I'm also slightly embarrassed to just now learn that the opening
       | sequence where the speakers and backing structure for the screen
       | are shown looked so real because...it was. They weren't
       | projecting an image, just turning on lights so you could see back
       | through the perforated metal screen!
        
       | themadturk wrote:
       | So glad to see the mention of "The Dream Is Alive." I love the
       | movie, but the soundtrack has haunted me for years. Excellent and
       | informative article.
        
       | pgib wrote:
       | We had an Omnimax theatre in Vancouver, BC, and I always loved
       | going to it as a kid. The little introduction before any feature
       | was a highlight where they showed off the capabilities and turned
       | on the lights behind the screen at each speaker so the audience
       | could actually see where the sound was coming from.
        
         | srejk wrote:
         | Here, here, and here.
        
       | empressplay wrote:
       | I remember going to an Omnimax in Seattle on a school trip in
       | 1987, they were showing (thank you Internet) "Block-buster -
       | clips from a helicopter ride around Seattle's Space Needle, a
       | motorcycle pursuit through downtown Atlanta, Georgia, a ride
       | through the Kamakazi curve of the Orient Express roller coaster
       | at Worlds of Fun in Kansas City, Missouri, and a speeding bobsled
       | at Lake Placid." Anyway, it made us all very queasy!
        
       | thrdbndndn wrote:
       | > Fortuitously, almost simultaneously the Multiscreen Corporation
       | was .. > IMAX made an obvious basis for a high-resolution
       | projection system, and so the then-named IMAX Corporation was
       | added ...
       | 
       | I got confused about the name of the company and even Wikipedia
       | seems to be very inconsistent about it [1].
       | 
       | What exactly was it called in 1960s and 70s, "Multiscreen
       | Corporation" or "IMAX Corporation"?
       | 
       | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMAX_Corporation:
       | 
       | It says:
       | 
       | > IMAX is a Canadian corporation that is based in Mississauga,
       | Ontario. The company was founded in 1967 when three filmmakers--
       | Graeme Ferguson, Roman Kroitor and Robert Kerr--incorporated IMAX
       | Corporation
       | 
       | No mention of "Multiscreen Corporation" other than in the
       | infobox.
        
         | jcrawfordor wrote:
         | I agree that the article text could be clearer. As I understand
         | it, it was originally incorporated as Multiscreen Corporation
         | (probably to work on some kind of multi-projector format which
         | were in vogue at the time) and then renamed to IMAX Corporation
         | after the success of the IMAX system at the 1970 Expo.
        
       | joelccr wrote:
       | We had a proper IMAX in my home town which was knocked down
       | partly due to locals complaining its beach-front location was
       | making it an eyesore. I try to see any new 15/70 IMAX films
       | (essentially, anything by Christopher Nolan) at the London BFI,
       | one of only three screens left in the UK.
        
       | rjmunro wrote:
       | "Back to the Future: The Ride" was also an Omnimax dome system,
       | but with moving platforms instead of seats. It was installed in 3
       | locations, with 2 screens at each, so a total of 6 screens.
       | 
       | I'm not sure if any later similar rides used a similar system,
       | (for example Disney's Soarin') or if they are new enough to be
       | digital from the start.
        
         | JonathonW wrote:
         | Soarin' (in California and Florida, at least) originally used
         | IMAX film projectors and OMNIMAX-style dome screens; it was
         | updated to digital at around the same time as the ride film
         | changed to the current "Soarin' around the World" in 2016 (plus
         | or minus a year; I think the digital conversion might've been a
         | bit earlier in California)
        
       | jefflinwood wrote:
       | This was a great article!
       | 
       | I saw "To Fly!" for the first time at the Smithsonian Air and
       | Space Dulles location (Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center) on their IMAX
       | screen two years ago. Definitely a film of its moment, and I can
       | see how that influenced future science film documentaries.
       | 
       | My dad worked for Spitz doing Omnimax installations and
       | planetariums, but I don't know any of the details. I would assume
       | this was probably the late 70s or early 80s.
        
       | dmm wrote:
       | Great article! Thanks for sharing your research into the history
       | of these super interesting theaters and projection systems.
       | 
       | There is something I've wondered about though:
       | 
       | > While far from inexpensive, digital projection systems are now
       | able to match the quality of Omnimax projection.
       | 
       | Are they really? The St Louis Science Center Omnimax was switched
       | from the 70mm film system to "laser 4k" digital projection in
       | 2019. I've only been to one show but it didn't seem particularly
       | sharp, with large clearly visible pixels. It was very bright,
       | with high contrast, though.
       | 
       | 4k seems like a pretty low resolution for such a large screen?
        
         | jcrawfordor wrote:
         | This is definitely an area for debate. I've seen the physical
         | resolution of a 70/15 film frame estimated at 70MP, which is
         | obviously a lot more than the ~8MP of 4k. The MP comparisons
         | between film and digital are a little iffy though, and digital
         | ought to be sharper within the limitations of that resolution
         | than film. Ultimately it comes down to marketing but, having
         | not had a direct comparison, I would still expect 70mm to look
         | better than a digital projection system.
         | 
         | I think that digital LED domes might beat film because of the
         | excellent light output and color reproduction, but I guess I'll
         | have to shell out for the Sphere to find out as there are very
         | few of that size.
        
         | Sniffnoy wrote:
         | I thought it was 8k rather than 4k that was generally
         | considered to be roughly equivalent to IMAX?
        
       | mikepurvis wrote:
       | I grew up going to the Omnimax theatre at the Ontario Science
       | Centre; that image of the giant projector going up the angled
       | elevator is a very familiar sight. I loved the little short films
       | they showed there, but it's obvious it was an incredibly bulky
       | and obtuse format that was unlikely to be of much competition
       | against digital alternatives.
       | 
       | Sadly the OSC as a whole is now being demolished after years of
       | under-investment and mismanagement, and the Cinesphere (IMAX) at
       | Ontario Place is likewise in dire straits.
        
       | sailfast wrote:
       | Awesome article. I have fond FOND memories of all of these things
       | from MSI Chicago growing up. It was an epic experience to see
       | such a film.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-06-09 23:01 UTC)