[HN Gopher] How a hawk learned to use traffic signals to hunt mo...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How a hawk learned to use traffic signals to hunt more successfully
        
       Author : layer8
       Score  : 308 points
       Date   : 2025-05-27 11:46 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.frontiersin.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.frontiersin.org)
        
       | munchler wrote:
       | Surely the author teaches at Rutgers University, not "Rudgers".
        
         | c-linkage wrote:
         | It's spelled like it sounds! :D
        
           | troelsSteegin wrote:
           | Local to south Jersey it's "ruckers".
        
             | cameronh90 wrote:
             | I'm from south Jersey and have never heard of this
             | "ruckers". Is it near Ouaisne?
        
               | layer8 wrote:
               | It's an Albany expression.
        
               | hughdbrown wrote:
               | I was about to call fake on this -- Americans from south
               | Jersey are largely unfamiliar with the present perfect
               | and would not say "[I] have never heard of" but "[I]
               | never heard of" instead.
               | 
               | But it turns out this grammatical cue is an effective way
               | to discover that the comment is not about an American
               | south Jersey but a British one.
        
       | panny wrote:
       | I've watched karasu carefully wait for a yellow light to drop his
       | walnut in an intersection. The last car passing cracked his nut,
       | then he had time to gather the meat during the light change
       | before other cars came along.
        
         | Someone wrote:
         | Some crows in Japan do something like that, dropping nuts
         | on/near a pedestrian crossing, and waiting for a green
         | pedestrian light. See
         | https://youtu.be/BGPGknpq3e0?feature=shared
        
           | Neywiny wrote:
           | Looks like Karasu is the Japanese word for crow. So this is
           | an interesting linguistics exchange
        
       | fortran77 wrote:
       | There's a better writeup of this here:
       | 
       | https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2025/05/hawk-new...
        
         | bayindirh wrote:
         | Or, the original paper:
         | 
         | https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ethology/articles/10.33...
        
       | krisoft wrote:
       | I have a similar story. I was taxiing a Cessna 152 at LHBS. It is
       | a big grassy field. On that day there were a large flock of black
       | birds sitting on the grass. I made the usual radio call to
       | announce that I'm leaving the runway and taxiing to the tie-downs
       | when the birds flitted away just between my airplane's nose and
       | my destination. The birds outside of that "road" by roughly a
       | wingspan distance remained on the ground and kept doing whatever
       | they were doing. And the ones who took to the air settled back a
       | short distance away from my future path.
       | 
       | Now just to clarify I don't think the birds were listening on my
       | radio call. The way I explained it to myself is that they were
       | observing airplanes coming and going long enough that they
       | learned that if an airplane hesitates at that point the next
       | thing they will do is to turn towards the tie-down area. Or maybe
       | it was just randomness. Or maybe as I was making the radio call I
       | already started turning and they just got scarred away by my
       | engine noise.
        
         | Neywiny wrote:
         | I'm not an ornithologist but I think birds integrate some
         | onboard magnetic compass sensors. So, it would be interesting
         | if they can pick up the magnetic part of an electromagnetic
         | wave of the radio. Seems very low likelihood but would be cool.
         | 
         | Edit to add
         | https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/08/230828130356.h...
         | . What frequency were you at? Seems they may actually be
         | listening.
        
           | IAmBroom wrote:
           | "Picking up" and "discerning useful data" are very different.
           | 
           | I'm not even talking about "deciphering". Even knowing that
           | energy in a certain bandwidth means planes about to leave
           | seems a large jump - and a radio tuned to a station is likely
           | an order of magnitude more stringent than an animal's sensory
           | abilities.
        
           | PunchyHamster wrote:
           | I'd imagine the fact they are high frequency rather than
           | constant field would make it impossible
        
         | throwanem wrote:
         | I see pigeons and sparrows dodge cars by inches, too. For that
         | matter I do the same myself! Sparrows hawk insects out of the
         | air, and I believe starlings also. Predicting motion would need
         | to be second nature, I think. Like skillfully catching a ball,
         | but much more so and between your teeth...
        
           | vikingerik wrote:
           | Well, there is survivor bias there, of course; you don't see
           | the ones that _didn 't_ learn to dodge...
        
             | stanmancan wrote:
             | We call that evolution
        
               | hnlmorg wrote:
               | Nit pick, but it's natural selection
               | 
               | The cars aren't evolving the birds, but they are
               | selecting the fittest.
        
             | im3w1l wrote:
             | But it makes you wonder why they cut it that close. What
             | benefit they get from it. I can think of several plausible
             | reasons but none that is self-evidently true.
        
               | fullstop wrote:
               | Perhaps for the same reason that people skydive or engage
               | in other risky behavior.
        
               | throwanem wrote:
               | Why waste energy giving someone else a free shot at
               | whatever you're finding it worth your time to stand in
               | the street over? It isn't that someone else wants that
               | dropped french fry or whatever. It's that _everyone_ else
               | does.
        
               | quinnirill wrote:
               | This is quite common prey animal behavior. Larger
               | predators have a harder time adapting to rapid turns made
               | just as the jaws/claws are about to snap shut.
        
               | harrall wrote:
               | Not a bird but as a human, it's fun.
               | 
               | Adrenaline is hell of a drug... and the best one.
        
             | throwanem wrote:
             | Correct. They would be visibly laminated to the pavement or
             | smashed in the gutter. It does happen, but less often than
             | ospreys drop fish in late summer.
        
             | PunchyHamster wrote:
             | You do, you can usually find those on your passenger seat
        
           | blarg1 wrote:
           | I once threw a tennis ball straight up, just as a bird
           | happened to be flying past, it rolled right and dodged it by
           | a cm.
        
             | throwanem wrote:
             | I don't really know what it's like to be a bird, of course,
             | but I have to imagine their subjective experience of
             | duration differs greatly from ours.
        
               | dmd wrote:
               | Search for "flicker fusion rate" to learn a lot more
               | about this.
        
               | throwanem wrote:
               | That talks about the mechanics of visual perception. I'm
               | discussing qualia, which I am far more confident crows
               | share with me than does the particular subtype of Hacker
               | News commenter who will with tiresome predictability and
               | total lack of novelty turn up to press the footless
               | insistence that crows could never.
        
               | rzzzt wrote:
               | Mine is 42 Hz according to a recent examination. Are high
               | refresh rate monitors are wasted on this pair of eyes?
        
               | throwanem wrote:
               | I don't know. Have you tried one? That's neither the
               | rhetorical nor the dismissive response it may seem...
        
               | rzzzt wrote:
               | The mouse is very snappy compared to a 60 Hz display.
        
               | umbra07 wrote:
               | Just do a basic double blind test. get someone else to
               | switch the hz a couple of times for you, and see if you
               | can tell the difference. i would be surprised if you got
               | anything less than a 100% success rate.
        
               | toss1 wrote:
               | Our flicker fusion rate is different for the fovea and
               | nearby central vision vs the peripheral vision.
               | 
               | The central vision is slower-response, higher-resolution,
               | and of course color vision.
               | 
               | The peripheral vision is monochrome and has a much faster
               | flicker-fusion, tuned to picking up motion in the
               | periphery.
               | 
               | So, the same flicker rate that you never notice on a
               | small monitor may flicker annoyingly on a large monitor.
               | To check that a setup will not flicker for you, set it up
               | in a darkish room, focus around 70deg-100deg to one side
               | of the monitor so it is in your peripheral vision, and
               | both look at one place and notice your periphery, and
               | also move your focus quickly from one place to another
               | and notice if the screen blurs like bright stationary
               | objects or looks like a discontinuous blur (really easy
               | to get that effect with fluorescent lights). Do it both
               | left & right and towards the ceiling. If flicker shows up
               | in these tests, it will still eventually bug you when
               | looking directly at the screen, even if it isn't as
               | noticeable because your focus is in the center of your
               | vision.
        
           | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
           | Squirrels, OTOH...
        
       | sodokuwizard wrote:
       | If true, then this hawk has more pattern recognition than many
       | humans I've encountered over the years.
        
         | hoseja wrote:
         | If you have nothing else to do and your lunch depends on it,
         | many patterns can be gleaned even by birdbrains.
        
           | throwanem wrote:
           | The voice of experience.
        
       | lloeki wrote:
       | > Cooper's hawk is on a rather short list of bird of prey species
       | that have successfully adapted to life in cities. A city is a
       | difficult and very dangerous habitat for any bird, but
       | particularly for a large raptor specializing in live prey: you
       | have to avoid windows, cars, utility wires, and countless other
       | dangers while catching something to eat every day.
       | 
       | Peregrine falcons adapted quite well, and they're much more
       | sizeable. That said, their size make them very apt to hunt
       | pigeons, so this could be a less risky niche to hunt for; I mean,
       | pigeons usually fly higher up than sparrows.
        
         | Etheryte wrote:
         | Plus pigeons are not exactly known for being incredibly smart
         | or agile, so if you're big enough to take one down, you
         | probably won't struggle too much for food.
        
           | Modified3019 wrote:
           | Pigeons are actually known for being very agile, and are able
           | to do vertical takeoffs and evasive maneuvers like a backflip
           | loop immediately after takeoff, which is precisely to evade
           | predators like falcons.
           | 
           | City pigeons just tend to become fat, lazy and used to
           | suppressing their flee response around traffic and people.
        
           | KineticLensman wrote:
           | Pigeons fly surprisingly fast and can outfly smaller raptors
           | in a straight line. A stooping (diving) Peregrine will
           | usually win. Its strike may decapitate the pigeon which tends
           | to minimise the struggling
        
           | morkalork wrote:
           | Except for the part where pigeon racing is an entire sport
           | that relies on both their speed and intelligence
        
             | jfk13 wrote:
             | Except that it's not clear whether the intelligence+ that
             | underlies their homing ability is equally effective in
             | helping them evade predators.
             | 
             | +Is "intelligence" even the right word here? I don't know.
             | Much depends on how you define it, I guess, combined with
             | the unknowability of the pigeon's own mental processes.
        
         | varispeed wrote:
         | The other day when visited local city park (in South London) I
         | spotted a Buzzard just chilling on the tree among pigeons.
         | 
         | Small, but majestic nonetheless.
        
           | eorthling wrote:
           | Obligatory note that if you're from the US you are probably
           | picturing a different bird than parent saw.
        
             | happyopossum wrote:
             | would you care to expound on that?
        
               | sethhochberg wrote:
               | In the US, buzzard is pretty much always slang for a
               | turkey vulture. The common buzzard in Europe/Asia is a
               | different bird entirely.
        
               | lloeki wrote:
               | > The common buzzard in Europe/Asia is a different bird
               | entirely
               | 
               | Funnily enough in France:
               | 
               | - buzzard is "buse" (mostly - although not limited to -
               | Buteo[1])
               | 
               | - there's an unrelated yet identically pronounced
               | "busard" (Circus[2]).
               | 
               | - EDIT: oh, and "balbuzard" (Pandion[3] a.k.a ospreys)
               | 
               | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buteo
               | 
               | [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circus_(bird)
               | 
               | [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandion_(bird)
        
         | hshdhdhj4444 wrote:
         | You have the story of Flacco the owl who lasted 1 year in
         | Manhattan after having spent his entire life in captivity.
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flaco_(owl)
         | 
         | Even his death (due to a collision with a building) was likely
         | less because of his ability to survive, since he managed to
         | learn all the skills necessary, and more due to the fact that
         | his primary food source, rats in and around the city, were
         | laden with rat poison.
         | 
         | We have consistently and regularly underestimated non human
         | animals cognitive abilities which is frankly strange if you
         | understand evolution since it would be strange for only humans
         | to have a certain evolutionary feature such as intelligence and
         | every other species to not have it at all.
        
           | nashashmi wrote:
           | > underestimated non human animals cognitive abilities
           | 
           | I think humans have done precisely what humans do:
           | misunderstand. Unlike other animals, humans don't have the
           | ability to understand creatures they have not studied for
           | long periods of time.
           | 
           | We know animals are intelligent. But we don't know what
           | intelligence means. Is it something we can use? no? then it
           | is something we ignore. And it is most likely something we
           | disrespect.
        
         | skipkey wrote:
         | In my neighborhood in the East Valley in Phoenix, I've seen
         | Cooper's hawks, kestrels, peregrine falcons, zone tailed hawks,
         | merlins, and one immature bald eagle. Along with the numerous
         | turkey vultures and the occasional black vulture.
        
         | pdabbadabba wrote:
         | > Peregrine falcons adapted quite well, and they're much more
         | sizeable.
         | 
         | I'm not sure what you mean. As far as I am aware -- and
         | according to every source I've looked at in the last few
         | minutes -- Peregrine falcons and Cooper's hawks are about the
         | same size (length and wingspan are within 1-2 inches).
        
           | throwanem wrote:
           | Peregrines are somewhat smaller and much more lightly built.
           | I live in a nesting pair's territory which often sees
           | transitory Cooper's; they're easy to distinguish both in
           | flight and at rest. Male Cooper's are more peregrine-sized
           | and hard to tell from sharp-shinned hawks sometimes, but that
           | is an ordinary enough sexual dimorphism in birds.
           | 
           | Interestingly, while peregrines and accipiters like Cooper's
           | share a habit of taking passerines in flight, the response of
           | potential prey seems to differ. I frequently see songbirds
           | mob a Cooper's; I can't think offhand of a time I've seen
           | them respond to a peregrine other than by crypsis.
        
             | lloeki wrote:
             | Sadly we don't have Cooper's around here so I have no
             | experience with them, hence why I looked them up (see
             | nearby comment) and according to that source found out they
             | were on the smaller size and much smaller weight.
             | 
             | Around here the only ones who would dare mob a peregrine
             | would be crows.
        
               | throwanem wrote:
               | Sure. I'm just talking about the impression they give in
               | life. But I suppose in that sense the other birds must
               | find a peregrine much more striking, and it very
               | belatedly occurs to me that peregrines no doubt look
               | smaller and more gracile to me for the higher altitudes
               | their stooping hunting habit would require. When I do
               | occasionally see them on approach to their nearby nest,
               | I'm struck by their relative size. So yeah, between that
               | and reviewing my Sibley's the error here is mine, though
               | - for that matter, likely also because - I do find all
               | falcons rather streamlined and compact in impression
               | compared with accipiters or buteos.
        
           | lloeki wrote:
           | > according to every source I've looked at in the last few
           | minutes
           | 
           | I may be mistaken but that's what I found:
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peregrine_falcon
           | 
           | > The peregrine falcon has a body length of 34 to 58 cm
           | (13-23 in) and a wingspan from 74 to 120 cm (29-47 in)
           | 
           | > Males weigh 330 to 1,000 g (12-35 oz) and the noticeably
           | larger females weigh 700 to 1,500 g (25-53 oz)
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper%27s_hawk
           | 
           | > Total length of full-grown birds can vary from 35 to 46 cm
           | (14 to 18 in) in males and 42 to 50 cm (17 to 20 in) in
           | females. Wingspan may range from 62 to 99 cm (24 to 39 in),
           | with an average of around 84 cm (33 in)
           | 
           | > In northern Florida, males averaged 288 g (10.2 oz) and
           | females averaged 523 g (1.153 lb). In general, males may
           | weigh anywhere from 215 to 390 g (7.6 to 13.8 oz) and females
           | anywhere from 305.8 to 701 g (0.674 to 1.545 lb), the
           | lightest hawks generally being juveniles recorded from the
           | Goshutes of Nevada, the heaviest known being adults from
           | Wisconsin
           | 
           | (not putting the full regional rundown, just the biggest
           | entry)
        
         | hackeraccount wrote:
         | There are Peregrine falcons in my city. I remember walking
         | downtown one time and seeing one on the sidewalk with a pigeon
         | in its talons. All the commuters and I just walked around it.
         | Really weird somehow.
        
           | lloeki wrote:
           | Interesting, around here raptors hunt high, and if prey falls
           | to the ground they abandon it; too dangerous to go down in
           | the streets.
        
             | glxxyz wrote:
             | I almost ran one over turning in a car park in Edmonton.
             | Backed up and it was still standing on the pigeon glaring
             | at me. I drove around.
        
             | IAmBroom wrote:
             | That's a hawk vs falcon hunting difference, not a city vs
             | countryside one.
             | 
             | Quail won't take off if a falcon's shadow passes over them;
             | they'll burst if a hawk's does.
        
           | vidarh wrote:
           | London apparently has a high density of them (but high
           | density still only means something like 40 breeding pairs),
           | and some people are all excited about the prospect that they
           | can do something about the rapidly rising wild parakeet
           | population...
        
             | morkalork wrote:
             | I'm having a hard time squaring away the image of grey
             | gloomy London also being overrun with colourful tropical
             | looking birds, I had to google it and see.
        
               | throwup238 wrote:
               | They're surprisingly well adapted to a large range of
               | temperatures because of the species found in temperate
               | rainforests at higher altitudes. They frequently enough
               | escape from pet stores and zoos that there are many
               | sizable populations spread out around the world. The one
               | nearest me is the infamous Pasadena parrots [1] which is
               | made up of thousands of birds likely built up over
               | decades of escapes. There are populations in Chicago, New
               | York, Rome, Tokyo, and plenty of other cities in the
               | world.
               | 
               | [1] https://www.lafieldguide.com/p/the-pasadena-parrots
        
         | guerby wrote:
         | There's a couple of peregrine falcons with a live streaming
         | webcam on top of Cathedrale Sainte-Cecile in Albi, south of
         | France
         | 
         | https://albi.fr/environnement/les-faucons-pelerins
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albi_Cathedral
        
         | twic wrote:
         | The Black Redstart evolved to live in holes in cliffs and the
         | like, and never used to be widespread in the UK. After the
         | second world war, cities all over the south were bombed out,
         | and they moved into the deserted, derelict bombed areas in
         | great numbers. As the bomb sites were cleared and the cities
         | redeveloped, their habitat was eroded. But at the same time,
         | Britain was de-industrialising, and they moved into the
         | abandoned factories in the North. As those now get redeveloped,
         | they are losing their habitat again.
        
       | johngossman wrote:
       | If you are interested in these birds and live in the Seattle
       | area, the Urban Raptor Conservancy has a wealth of information:
       | 
       | https://urbanraptor.org/research/seattle-coopers-hawk-projec...
       | 
       | There are over a hundred nesting pairs in Seattle.
        
       | nosmokewhereiam wrote:
       | Japanese _crow-dactles would put candy in wrappers into
       | crosswalks and let cars run over them. They may have used the
       | sounds of the crosswalk. I have no sources, just anecdotal.
       | 
       | _ They were big birds. Intimidating wingspans, if hit by cars on
       | their highways: they damaged cars, etc.
        
       | pfdietz wrote:
       | Now I just need to learn to tell Coopers from Sharp-shinned. The
       | eternal struggle.
        
         | quercusa wrote:
         | If only they'd perch side-by-side!
        
       | devoutsalsa wrote:
       | I once wrote a personal's ad in SQL on Craigslist, back when they
       | had that section. A DBA replied and asked if I wanted hawking.
       | She had a Cooper's hawk. I met her at a commercial park in a
       | Saturday morning. She was driving a Honda CRV, the hawk was in
       | the front passenger seat, and I hopped into the back seat.
       | 
       | She started driving and spotted some crows. The hawk saw them as
       | well. Wearing a "don't kill me either your claws" glove, she
       | moved her hand to the hawk, who gleefully jumped on. She rolled
       | down her window, stuck the hawk outside, and it was basically a
       | drive by shooting with a bird bullet. This happened three times.
       | 
       | My most vivid memory of this was her ripping the crows apart into
       | pieces and putting the then into a bucket, like it was sushi
       | you'd order from KFC.
        
         | dmd wrote:
         | And you didn't get married!?
        
           | throwanem wrote:
           | Not OP, but I'm friends with crows. Imagine having to try to
           | explain _that_...
        
             | srean wrote:
             | Very intelligent birds.
        
             | IAmBroom wrote:
             | "Baby, those body parts mean nothing to me! I love crows!"
             | 
             | Don't hate the player, baby.
        
               | throwanem wrote:
               | They have a much stronger sense of propriety than most
               | humans. So really do most animals other than us and
               | perhaps some close relatives. I'm not actually sure that
               | says anything in our favor.
        
         | qingcharles wrote:
         | This is peak HN.
        
         | senkora wrote:
         | I bet she was a very good database administrator.
        
           | layer8 wrote:
           | Probably the hawkish type.
        
         | 3cats-in-a-coat wrote:
         | And this, kids, is a Markov chain.
        
         | cs02rm0 wrote:
         | _I once wrote a personal's ad in SQL on Craigslist, back when
         | they had that section. A DBA replied and asked if I wanted
         | hawking._
         | 
         | I feel I have to reply, but I have no idea what to say.
        
           | deadbabe wrote:
           | For starters he could post what the hell his SQL query was.
        
         | tsss wrote:
         | That's really horrible. Crows can feel pain too, you know.
        
         | patrick41638265 wrote:
         | Reading the first paragraph of this made me think how LLMs must
         | feel when someone tries prompt injection on them
        
         | speakfreely wrote:
         | I've reread this a few times and I still can't figure out if
         | there's something wrong with me or something wrong with this
         | post.
        
           | cryptonector wrote:
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44109901
        
         | isatty wrote:
         | Whatever this is, write more.
        
       | plank wrote:
       | The point the story tries to make is that the Hawk learned
       | traffic signals. That is not necessarily the case. It could be
       | that the hawk just sees that the cars are blocking the sight of
       | the prey.
       | 
       | Still an intelligent action, only does not mean the hawk
       | understands the signal itself.
        
         | happyopossum wrote:
         | the story as told outlines that the hawk will stage itself when
         | it hears the sound of the crosswalk, in anticipation of the
         | line of traffic getting long enough for it to use as
         | concealment.
        
         | hatthew wrote:
         | The suggestion is that the hawk hears the signal and knows that
         | the line of cars is about to be unusually long in a minute, so
         | it prepares by flying into position.
        
       | p3rls wrote:
       | I once saw racoon prints descend from the rafters in a barn,
       | complete with little muddy handprints on the doorknob into the
       | feedroom, like some sorta sylvan-bandit tom cruise.
       | 
       | When food is on the line, animals can figure all sorts of things
       | out.
        
         | hughdbrown wrote:
         | 'Racoon', variant of 'raccoon'.
         | 
         | Of course, I prefer the double-c variant because of the
         | orthographic anomaly of the person who tends to the raccoons'
         | area at the zoo, the raccoon-nook-keeper.
        
       | AStonesThrow wrote:
       | Coincidentally, American pedestrians are using HAWK signals to
       | navigate road traffic successfully.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAWK_beacon
        
       | louky wrote:
       | >> As of 2025, he also teaches mathematics at Rudgers University.
       | 
       | In the second sentence.
       | 
       | Not even run through an AI grammar-checker?
        
         | xandrius wrote:
         | What's wrong with that?
        
           | Philpax wrote:
           | I believe it's Rutgers, not Rudgers.
        
             | cryptonector wrote:
             | Spelling, not grammar. Perhaps OP meant that the comma is
             | unnecessary?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-05-27 23:00 UTC)