[HN Gopher] Owls in Towels
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Owls in Towels
        
       Author : schaum
       Score  : 680 points
       Date   : 2025-05-26 20:27 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (owlsintowels.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (owlsintowels.org)
        
       | josh-sematic wrote:
       | I love this. The web used to be a place filled to the brim with
       | people making sites about stuff dedicated to some niche thing
       | that brought them joy. Glad to see that vibe still survives out
       | there.
       | 
       | Edit: to be clear, this site is connected with an organization
       | and probably exists to help promote it, but it still gives that
       | "look, this is cool!" passion to me.
        
         | lolinder wrote:
         | Is it connected with an organization? I don't see any evidence
         | of that in the About page or anywhere else. The donations page
         | says to find a local wildlife sanctuary and donate to that,
         | then links out to two options if you really can't find one of
         | your own. But I see no evidence that it's associated with
         | either one of those entities it links to.
         | 
         | https://owlsintowels.org/support/donate/
        
           | josh-sematic wrote:
           | Good catch! I saw the "donate" link and assumed whoever made
           | the site was using it for funding. All the better!
        
       | roughly wrote:
       | This is a delight!
       | 
       | This site is a great reminder that almost everyone visiting
       | Hacker News has a set of skills which can be put to beneficial
       | use for causes you care about - this is a small, simple, cheap
       | site (and I mean that in a good way!) that attracts attention,
       | awareness, and donations to something the author cares about.
       | It's easy for us, but it's magic for most people. Don't let your
       | tech industry imposter syndrome fool you - we can do valuable
       | things to forward causes we care about.
       | 
       | Also, it's adorable!
        
         | imposterr wrote:
         | I've stopped using the word "cheap" to describe situations like
         | this as the word has too many negative connotations. I tend
         | towards "inexpensive", "cost-effective", or "low-cost". I find
         | it better describes my intent to describe something as not
         | costing much but not speaking to poor quality which I feel like
         | the word "cheap" has come to imply.
        
           | novosel wrote:
           | Frugal?
        
           | gsck wrote:
           | Theres a phrase in the UK that is "Cheap and cheerful" which
           | I think is perfectly apt for this
        
             | specproc wrote:
             | I think "cheap" sounds worse in American.
        
         | jxf wrote:
         | This is a beautiful demonstration of how technology can be
         | simple and powerful for amplifying a message at the same time
         | -- no matter the silliness or seriousness of the message. Very
         | "Old Web" vibes.
         | 
         | Anyone who's worked on random enterprise CRUD REST apps earlier
         | in their career (myself included) knows the pain of wishing
         | that you were doing something a little more helpful or positive
         | for humanity.
        
           | gala8y wrote:
           | > Very "Old Web" vibes.
           | 
           | *Owl Web
           | 
           | Owl Rights Reserved (at the footer)
        
             | arkey wrote:
             | at the hooter?
        
           | ahazred8ta wrote:
           | Dovetails nicely with the Superb Owl enthusiasts.
           | 
           | https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22superb+owl%22&ia=images&iax=ima.
           | ..
        
         | patates wrote:
         | > cheap site (and I mean that in a good way!)
         | 
         | I guess English needs different words for the German "Gunstig"
         | and "Billig". They both translate to cheap, but "Gunstig" means
         | something like cost-effective/affordable (but I guess not
         | quite?), and is positive, while "Billig" is strictly negative.
        
           | thesuitonym wrote:
           | English already has a lot of words for both meanings. It's
           | more that American culture has designated _anything_ low cost
           | as being of poorer quality.
        
           | PopAlongKid wrote:
           | Has that changed over time? Nearly fifty years ago, when
           | self-serve gasoline pumping at gas stations was first coming
           | into widespread use, I (native English speaker) was in
           | Germany and remember a slogan I saw at gas stations to
           | promote it: "selbst tanken ist billiger tanken" (sorry if I
           | misspelled/mis-capitalized). So it seems Billig did not have
           | such a negative connotation then.
        
           | echelon wrote:
           | We have words for "cheap" that don't carry the pejorative
           | meaning.
           | 
           | "Affordable" is the most frequent replacement. There's also
           | "inexpensive".
        
             | anjel wrote:
             | Affordable can be as euphemistic as it isn't pejorative
             | though.
        
       | kristopolous wrote:
       | The consistency in the quality and sharpness of the photos isn't
       | lost on me. There's obviously lots of curation in this
       | collections, must be some work!
        
       | yflin wrote:
       | cute
        
       | pierrec wrote:
       | That's something I've done a few times! Mostly from having lived
       | in a wildlife shelter (LPO Ile Grande) for 2 months, since they
       | have quarters for volunteers who wish to stay. Out of all the
       | birds that collide and are unable to fly, you'd be surprised at
       | how many recover, and I mean it's not as grim as some people make
       | it out to be.
       | 
       | That shelter was especially interesting because it's near the
       | nesting grounds of marine birds that are relatively rare in
       | France or even Europe overall. Cargo ships in the English channel
       | illegally dump oil waste all the time, and the oiled marine birds
       | just float helplessly to the beach, still alive. People pick them
       | up and bring them to the shelter where we literally hand-wash
       | them with soap and put them in a bird drying station. The numbers
       | could get overwhelming and we would have to make "bird washing
       | assembly lines" on occasion.
       | 
       | It's a whole discipline with specialized equipment, passed-down
       | knowledge and passionate people!
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | One brand of American dish soap, Dawn, has a duckling as a
         | mascot, and has for some years advertised its grease-cutting
         | capability (and gentleness on living things) by showing that it
         | is used to clean oil off waterfowl who have been caught in a
         | slick.
        
           | f4c39012 wrote:
           | One brand of UK dish soap, Fairy Liquid, bears the label
           | "H412 - Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects"
        
             | thyristan wrote:
             | https://www.newhall.co.uk/media/7440_msds.pdf
             | 
             | The H412 comes from sodium laureth sulfate (SLES) which is
             | contained (in large amounts, like 20 to 70% by weight) in
             | practically every kind of liquid soapy detergent, shampoo,
             | liquid hand soap and what not. The only reason you know of
             | that one product is that they seem to sell to professionals
             | as well, which is why they need a material safety data
             | sheet. Your shampoo doesn't need that, so you just don't
             | know that it is just as harmful.
             | 
             | Edit: Dawn seems to contain it as well, look for CAS#
             | 68585-34-2: https://msdsdigital.com/system/files/Dawn_Profe
             | ssional_Dish_... The missing H- and S-numbers in that
             | datasheet come from the differing standards and maybe the
             | different concentrations.
        
               | mkesper wrote:
               | So use solid soap / shampoo for outdoors (check usability
               | first, naturally).
        
               | thyristan wrote:
               | Solid soap isn't any better. All of those work by making
               | fats water-soluble. This destroys mucous membranes and
               | skin slime layer of fish and other animals and breaks
               | down lipid barriers of algae and bacteria.
               | 
               | The real takeaway is that concentration matters a lot:
               | one person washing up for the morning won't kill a pond,
               | but a hundred people or prolonged exposition will.
        
               | SAI_Peregrinus wrote:
               | It's in all sorts of crap, not just soap. Hand lotion,
               | toothpaste, etc. I'm unlucky enough to be allergic to it,
               | my skin blisters & peels off after touching even rather
               | small quantities. Finding safe cleaning & hygiene
               | products (especially toothpaste) was difficult, but
               | thankfully there are some brands that started producing
               | sulfate-free products for the new-age free-range organic
               | everything crowd, so it's been getting easier.
        
             | rsynnott wrote:
             | Yes; don't wash your pet halibut with it. Don't think it
             | should be dangerous to birds, tho.
        
             | seanhunter wrote:
             | That's just to emphasise the fact that you don't use fairy
             | liquid to clean ducks. You use it to clean fairies.
             | 
             | Likewise toilet duck toilet cleaner is just a brand name.
             | You use it for cleaning duck _toilets_ not ducks
             | themselves. And don 't get me _started_ on duck tape. One
             | honest mistake and it 's a lifetime ban from the RSPB.
        
             | waysa wrote:
             | Fairy dish soap is the European version of Dawn. I'd be
             | surprised if the formulation were significantly different.
        
           | sixothree wrote:
           | Isn't its effectiveness because it's partially oil-based?
        
         | rkagerer wrote:
         | What's a bird drying station? (It conjures up a vision of a
         | 60's blow dry salon...)
        
           | pierrec wrote:
           | Modular cages through which air could flow freely, with
           | heater fans pointed at them at the right temperature. After
           | being exposed to soap, birds lose their vital layer of
           | insulation (until they're dried) so you have to artificially
           | maintain their body temperature.
        
         | julian_t wrote:
         | Years ago we found a large heron with a broken wing on the road
         | outside our house in Wales. It had probably hit a power cable,
         | and was hopping around dragging its wing. It was basically a
         | homicidal needle beak, obviously not in the best of moods.
         | 
         | An elderly lady come out to see what the fuss was about, saw
         | the bird, went back inside and then reappeared holding a block
         | of polystyrene foam. She marched up to the bird, which very
         | soon after found itself with a lump of foam on the end of its
         | beak. That gave others the opportunity to wrap it in a blanket
         | (bit big for a towel) and take it to the vet.
         | 
         | Those old ladies are tough!
        
       | cogogo wrote:
       | Such amazing animals. Everytime I see one I am so thrilled. Saw a
       | snowy owl this winter and they are so gorgeous. Also really weird
       | how easy it is to anthropomorphize an owl. They generally look
       | very surprised or very angry. Love it.
        
       | ttoinou wrote:
       | Do you think this kind of internet nuggets will still exist in
       | our soon to be post-AI world ? We won't be able to know who sent
       | a real vs. a fake picture
        
         | abstractbill wrote:
         | Honestly my first reaction to seeing these photos was to wonder
         | if they were AI-generated (I'm not suggesting they are, I just
         | have that response quite often now).
        
           | rajnathani wrote:
           | Exact same, my first reaction to the photos were to think
           | they are AI-generated (which amazingly, they aren't).
        
             | idamantium wrote:
             | I actually didn't think that at all, maybe because the
             | opening text was so straight forward, earnest, and
             | pragmatic?
        
         | GreenWatermelon wrote:
         | I guess we will have to rely on extra-net signals: Meta clues
         | from the real world.
         | 
         | For example, the website creator doesn't seem to be looking for
         | profit, nor did they add much oin terms of personal info that
         | would point to him looking for internet clout.
         | 
         | The FAQ page comes across as genuine and, as another commenter
         | put it, whimsical.
         | 
         | It's also all self hosted, and on a unique domain, while mass-
         | content-farmera prefer prefer the zombified audiences of Tiktok
         | and Facebook.
         | 
         | All those signals combine into a high probability of everything
         | on the site being genuine.
        
       | tharakam wrote:
       | I expected something Semantic Web-related.
       | https://www.w3.org/OWL/
        
       | fallinghawks wrote:
       | Now do Hawks in Socks!
       | 
       | (Nylon stockings are commonly used when transporting a wild bird
       | for an hour or two).
        
         | pfdietz wrote:
         | I went to a presentation on the reintroduction of the bald
         | eagle to New York state. When handling young eagles, the
         | presenter (then much younger) found the best way to immobilize
         | them was stuff them into the leg of her pants (not when she was
         | wearing the pants, mind you.)
         | 
         | She had to constantly do this as they fledged, since they
         | couldn't get back up to the platform where the nest was. In the
         | wild, the parents would continue to feed the young after they
         | left the nest but before they could fly, but that wasn't
         | practical for her to do.
         | 
         | The process of raising raptors from eggs is called "hacking",
         | so it's entirely appropriate for this site. Normally done on
         | hawks, this project showed it would work with eagles too.
         | 
         | https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hack#dictionary-e...
        
           | fallinghawks wrote:
           | The Cooper's hawk is known to falconers and rehabbers as
           | fitting perfectly inside a (clean) Pringles can. ;)
           | 
           | I must correct you on hacking, though. This process starts
           | with just-fledged raptors, already grown to full size, fully
           | feathered, but raised in closed quarters. They are put in a
           | shelter surrounded by plenty of space for flying where they
           | can see the outdoors, and they are fed daily for a few days
           | to acclimate. Then the shelter is opened and they're allowed
           | to explore. Food continues to be provided daily. The day that
           | one of the birds doesn't come back for its daily feeding
           | indicates it has caught something on its own, and is ready to
           | be recaptured and trained as a falconry bird.
           | 
           | This process allows the birds to learn flying and hunting as
           | if they were wild raptors. It reduces certain negative
           | behaviors you get in human-imprinted birds, and gives them
           | "street smarts" i.e. recognizing and avoiding other
           | predators. These days of course we put telemetry tags on them
           | so they're easy to locate and recover.
           | 
           | As metaphor it would be training to deal with the wide wild
           | world, which HN has a bit of too.
        
             | pfdietz wrote:
             | I stand corrected, or at least clarified!
             | 
             | Back in the day of this eagle effort, some four decades
             | ago, she had to track them by eye in the swamps of
             | Montezuma Wildlife Refuge and wade out to retrieve them.
             | Not fun, but hey that's what grad students are for.
             | 
             | Her book: https://www.amazon.com/Return-Sky-Surprising-
             | Eaglets-Restore...
             | 
             | The last effort to reintroduce bald eagles in the US was
             | wound down in Tennessee in 2003. Today they're everywhere
             | and are off the endangered species list. I see them quite
             | often when out birding in the Finger Lakes of New York.
        
               | fallinghawks wrote:
               | I was driving from Albany to Binghamton last week and
               | spotted my first BE in the wild over 88. Fully mature,
               | bright white head and tail. I'm into hawks and falcons
               | and don't go out of my way to look for BEs, so it was
               | lucky, and pretty neat.
               | 
               | In the Bay Area where I normally live we've had bald
               | eagles nesting in at least 2 locations -- Crystal Springs
               | reservoir, and next to a middle school in Milpitas, which
               | is rather surprising considering how suburban Milpitas
               | is.
        
       | deadbabe wrote:
       | It's cool but I'm wondering why isn't this an Instagram page or
       | something. I'd follow this.
        
         | chedar wrote:
         | IG: https://www.instagram.com/owls_in_towels other options on
         | the about page.
        
         | wila wrote:
         | Also on mastodon:
         | 
         | https://earthstream.social/@owlsintowels
        
       | hungmung wrote:
       | I've had to do this several times, it's really the best way to
       | handle birds and bats that get into your home -- just toss the
       | towel on top of it and pick it up. Another trick if a bird flies
       | into your window and stuns itself, you can pick it up with a
       | towel and place it in a (closed) cardboard box outside in the
       | shade so they can recover without a ton of sensory
       | input/stressors, you just have to make sure predators don't get
       | into it.
       | 
       | (If you ever have to relocate a bat, don't just leave them on the
       | ground, they can't take off from there and will almost certainly
       | die. Put them in a tree or somewhere higher up)
        
         | indoorcat wrote:
         | As a PSA: if you're in North America, do not handle bats. They
         | are the primary rabies vector and due to their tiny sharp
         | teeth, it is possible to be bitten unknowingly. Rabies is
         | (almost) 100% fatal once you have symptoms. Leave it to the
         | professionals who are vaccinated and know how to handle them
         | safely. In the US, local animal control can usually help.
        
       | masnick wrote:
       | The footer lol
       | 
       | > 2022-2025 Owl Rights Reserved
        
         | sentrysapper wrote:
         | this site is a hoot
        
       | simpaticoder wrote:
       | If only owls in towels needed something to bite on, like dowels.
        
         | julianz wrote:
         | They could perch on the dowels once dry...
        
           | simpaticoder wrote:
           | No, they perch on trowels.
        
         | D-Coder wrote:
         | You're thinking of fowls.
        
       | Caelus9 wrote:
       | Such cute owls! Do they need to be wrapped in a towel because it
       | gives them a sense of security? Just like babies, they sleep
       | better when wrapped up tightly. Rescuing small animals is such a
       | meaningful thing to do.
        
         | pavon wrote:
         | Burritoing a bird is a safe and relatively easy way to restrain
         | it while handling it. It can't flap its wings to fly away, it
         | can't claw you with its talons, and it is far less likely to
         | hurt itself resisting. And yes, they do appear to be more calm,
         | or at least more resigned to the situation.
        
       | susam wrote:
       | As delightful as the home page is, the FAQ page is endearingly
       | whimsical: https://owlsintowels.org/about/
        
       | bitwize wrote:
       | It reminds me of how people make a "purrito" by wrapping a cat in
       | a towel or small blanket in order to safely handle the cat
       | (administer pills, injections, etc.).
       | 
       | And since owls are pretty much just the bird versions of cats,
       | it's fitting.
        
         | throw310822 wrote:
         | Indeed. Cats and owls are a fantastic example of convergent
         | evolution: two species on pretty far vertebrates branches that
         | occupy a similar niche (ambush night predators, small preys)
         | and end up with the same physical appearance- colors, head and
         | eyes shape, even the outer ears shape!
        
         | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
         | Reminds me of this classic.
         | 
         | How to Give A Cat a Pill:
         | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC372253/
        
         | fankt wrote:
         | In Chinese, owls are called [Mao Tou Ying ] , which literally
         | means "a hawk with a cat's head".
        
       | 0xDEAFBEAD wrote:
       | I wonder how a mouse would feel about this website.
        
         | tonyedgecombe wrote:
         | Mice don't use the internet, too many cats.
        
       | sandruso wrote:
       | This is why I love internet. I've never knew I needed this.
       | Thanks :)
        
       | DidYaWipe wrote:
       | Owls are actually hooting outside my door as I pull this up at
       | 12:30 a.m.
        
         | arkey wrote:
         | You should have waited 4 more minutes to post this.
        
       | bandedetrappes wrote:
       | This is such a missed opportunity to name the site "BurritOwls" !
        
       | lippihom wrote:
       | Love it.
        
       | rob74 wrote:
       | Cute! But they should add a feature so you can use the images via
       | an API, similar to PlaceKitten (which seems to be defunct now).
        
       | tarkin2 wrote:
       | The sober spiritual successor to
       | https://www.tumblr.com/hungoverowls I assume
        
       | vldr wrote:
       | I wonder what's next... owls with runny bowels?
        
       | vitorfrois wrote:
       | Unexpected hahah so cute
        
       | fitsumbelay wrote:
       | This is making my day. Gracias, OP. Muchas gracias.
        
       | uneekname wrote:
       | I'm not seeing the link on this page, but I believe this popular
       | fediverse account[0] is run by the same folks
       | 
       | [0] https://earthstream.social/@owlsintowels
        
       | rcastellotti wrote:
       | add this to your <SHELL>rc for the best experience
       | https://paste.sr.ht/~rcastellotti/6fd79ed622e1c426be35f3f038...
        
       | lenerdenator wrote:
       | It's like a cat in a purrito.
       | 
       | Owls are like the cats of the bird world. It's too bad they don't
       | get to talk. I think they'd have a lot to talk about... night
       | time hunting, the size of mice and other rodentia,
       | hairballs/pellets...
        
       | ColinWright wrote:
       | Going to this page:
       | 
       | https://owlsintowels.org/gallery/
       | 
       | Finishes with:
       | 
       |  _" That's owl the posts"_
       | 
       | Yes, this is the internet/web I needed today.
        
         | shellerik wrote:
         | "Owl rights reserved"
        
       | rekabis wrote:
       | "Would you like a moist owlette?"
        
       | stefanka wrote:
       | One mentioned glue traps. What's that and why is it used? Sounds
       | like a horrible way to catch birds.
        
         | reaperducer wrote:
         | _One mentioned glue traps. What's that and why is it used?_
         | 
         | Glue traps are used to catch mice and rats. The owl sees its
         | prey struggling in the trap, and tries to eat it.
         | 
         | Many birds of prey die due to eating poisoned rats and mice.
         | Most famously, Flaco, who escaped from the Central Park zoo and
         | entertained New Yorkers for months before eating a poisoned
         | rat.
        
       | ayrtondesozzla wrote:
       | > A+ FACILITIES WOULD STAY AGAIN
       | 
       | Ok ok, you got me! Delightful!
        
       | ayrtondesozzla wrote:
       | Question - what is the lowest cost way to do something like this?
       | Imagine one was prepared to go in whatever direction, regardless
       | of difficulty. Can the pros weigh in here?
        
       | mortenjorck wrote:
       | This is the kind of project that always used to be its own
       | website, but these days largely exists only on a social media
       | platform where it's stuffed between other content and the usual
       | barrage of ads.
       | 
       | Which is a roundabout way of saying: I love that this is a
       | _website._
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-05-27 23:02 UTC)