[HN Gopher] Show HN: I built a more productive way to manage AI ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: I built a more productive way to manage AI chats
        
       Author : tapeo
       Score  : 152 points
       Date   : 2025-05-23 20:46 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (contextch.at)
 (TXT) w3m dump (contextch.at)
        
       | tapeo wrote:
       | I tried to solve my own problems that I had while copy and
       | pasting the same starting context from chat to chat. Now I can
       | generate the base context and start new chats from there.
        
         | ramoz wrote:
         | Yes def a needed thing for power users.
         | 
         | You and I are going to end up competing because im evovling my
         | original solution in this space,
         | https://github.com/backnotprop/prompt-tower ... best of luck,
         | great execution thus far.
        
           | tapeo wrote:
           | Thank you, will take a look at your software, competition is
           | always good
        
       | dangus wrote:
       | So now our jobs are shifting from doing work, to telling the AI
       | to do work, so now we need management tools to better manage how
       | we are telling the AI to do work.
       | 
       | I must have taken a turn to the wrong timeline.
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | New tools for a new kind of work!
        
         | icelancer wrote:
         | Yeah. That's how it works with employees, too.
        
         | econ wrote:
         | You give instructions as someone who can do the job themselves.
         | 
         | That ability will decay of course and you will be managing with
         | the best of them. Eh, I mean the worse :)
        
       | artichaud1 wrote:
       | Love this. I will give it a try. Beautiful landing page as well.
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | Thanks so much, if you try it out feel free to leave feedback
         | if you want!
        
       | wewewedxfgdf wrote:
       | I thought about building something along these lines (not the
       | same but vaguely similar).
       | 
       | Then Gemini AI Studio came along with a 1 million token window
       | and allowed me to upload zip files of my entire code base and I
       | lost interest in my own thing.
        
         | TZubiri wrote:
         | It technically handles 1M tokens, but if you ask it questions
         | it's obvious that it's too much to handle.
         | 
         | Just upload a novel and ask it questions, you'll see how it
         | botches simple stuff
        
           | wewewedxfgdf wrote:
           | Good or bad it's a zillion times better than Claude or
           | ChatGPT where you can't even upload a zipfile.
        
           | icelancer wrote:
           | Easiest way to prove it can't handle the full context in
           | reality is to upload a one hour documentary movie with audio
           | and ask it to write timestamps of chapters/critical moments.
           | It can't handle this beyond 10 minutes even remotely
           | reliably.
        
           | zwaps wrote:
           | If you want this in numbers check the nolima benchmark
        
             | golfer wrote:
             | Seems like this needs to be updated. Lots of newer models
             | not on their list.
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | Yes the long context it's complementary, in other chat services
         | like Gemini you have to rewrite that base context everytime for
         | each new fresh chat, plus they lack of specific data import
         | tools and projects management
        
         | douglasisshiny wrote:
         | Is it not a bit weird to freely give give away your entire code
         | base (I assume it's personal, not your company's, but maybe I'm
         | wrong) to an entity like Google?
        
           | sampullman wrote:
           | How common is it to have a personal project that isn't open
           | source? Probably more common than I think, but it seems like
           | a foreign concept to me.
           | 
           | Either my code isn't commercialized so I don't mind "giving"
           | it away, or it is commercialized but wouldn't be safe from a
           | clean room implementation anyway. Isn't that what bigco would
           | do of they really wanted to steal your idea?
        
           | myflash13 wrote:
           | As a business owner that uses Cursor, this is a real risk
           | that I worry about (third parties stealing my code). However,
           | the massive productivity benefit of having access to AI tools
           | far outweighs the risk of them copying my business based on
           | the code alone. Besides, AI is making code less and less
           | valuable. My code is not the moat -- the hard part is the
           | network, traction, brand, distributions, etc.
        
       | imranq wrote:
       | Nice idea!
       | 
       | I think it would be better if it was just context and not
       | connected to any model. Think of one place where you can hook in
       | your drive folder, GitHub, etc. and have it produce the best
       | context for the task you want to achieve. Then users can copy
       | that to their model or workflow of choice
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | Thank you, this could be a cool feature too add! For example
         | the ability to click a link that redirects to other chat
         | services with your project base context you built and
         | optionally all the messages sent until there
        
       | iankp wrote:
       | Isn't NotebookLM already exactly web and file context (a
       | "ContextChat")?
       | 
       | Edit: I assume it is basically a similar product, but your
       | differentiators are mainly the customer getting to choose their
       | model, and you getting to write your own context adding
       | ergonomics (like adding links from a Sitemap)?
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | Exactly, similar plus tools to import and manage projects
         | context fast (like GitHub private repos and sitemaps url),
         | multiple ai model and pay per use like using APIs
        
       | scottward wrote:
       | Cool! I was excited when I saw this and signed up.
       | 
       | One key thing I was hoping for was a consistent resync with
       | source material particularly google docs. Looks like I'll have to
       | download then upload to your app whenever they change.
       | 
       | Is that right? Auto syncing in the plan?
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | Auto syncing added to the plan!
        
           | scottward wrote:
           | Cool. One option is just to integrate with make/n8n/zapier so
           | I could a) trigger on doc changes and then b) upload (and
           | overwrite) the doc in your app
        
             | tapeo wrote:
             | Yes this sounds very useful and productive. Having project
             | context updated based on external events. I will share it
             | on socials when ready, thanks for the feedback!
        
               | scottward wrote:
               | Sure! Email your users too - since I'm one of them I'll
               | get the email. :)
        
               | tapeo wrote:
               | Will do thanks again!
        
       | pelagicAustral wrote:
       | edit: whoops... commented on the wrong tab... nevermind, but
       | Godspeed.
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | I appreciate it, thanks and keep building
        
       | jmcmaster wrote:
       | How are you handling privacy / security / confidentiality if I
       | upload all this data? No way I could use this for work.
        
         | mmh0000 wrote:
         | Why do you care about "work" data? They're selling your
         | data[1][2]. You should sell theirs, it's only fair.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://techpolicy.sanford.duke.edu/blogroll/fortune-500-com...
         | 
         | [2] https://techpolicy.sanford.duke.edu/blogroll/examining-
         | data-...
        
           | neuroelectron wrote:
           | Spread the love
        
           | davidcbc wrote:
           | Because I unfortunately still need to eat and if I'm fired
           | that will be much harder
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | Yes actually that it's not a trivial topic.
         | 
         | What I can do is to make it very transparent on how data is
         | managed.
         | 
         | The files content are appended to the context builder, then the
         | context and messages are processed through OpenRouter, which is
         | a provider that offers APIs to all the AI models, and the
         | output generated (and the account data) is stored on a secured
         | database on Mongodb platform.
         | 
         | It's all defined in the privacy policy here:
         | https://contextch.at/docs/privacy-policy/index.html
        
       | esafak wrote:
       | Its UX looks similar to You.com
        
       | fernly wrote:
       | Compare to Claude Projects?
       | 
       | https://www.anthropic.com/news/projects
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | For what I can see it doesn't offers the flexibility of
         | importing content from a detailed sitemap or private GitHub
         | repositories in a fast way (and more tools to come).
         | 
         | Then it doesn't has the possibility to switch to different AI
         | models plus you have to pay a monthly subscription.
        
       | npollock wrote:
       | Here's how I would market this:
       | 
       | Create "packages" of context for popular API & Libraries - make
       | them freely available via public url
       | 
       | Keep the packages up to date. They'll be newer than the cutoff
       | date for many models, and they'll be cleaner then the data a
       | model slurps in using web search.
       | 
       | Voila, you're now the trusted repository of context for the
       | developer community.
       | 
       | You'll get a lot of inbound traffic/leads, and ideas for
       | tangential use cases with commercial potential.
        
         | lagniappe wrote:
         | Of all the suggestions here, this is the one.
        
         | hoerzu wrote:
         | To be free and not forward credentials I built an alternative
         | to all-in-one chatting without auth and access to search API
         | through the web: https://llmcouncil.github.io/llmcouncil/
         | 
         | Provides simple interface to chat with Gemini, Claude, Grok,
         | Openai, deepseek in parallel
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | I love this, it can be very useful to have ready to use library
         | of context data and at the same time a perfect solution to
         | bring in new users. Thanks so much.
        
         | deepdarkforest wrote:
         | wouldn't that be just 3rd party llms.txt?
        
         | ar-jan wrote:
         | https://context7.com/ is just that, in the form of an MCP
         | server.
        
           | tapeo wrote:
           | You can't start fresh chats with updated context and you
           | still need to create multiple chat in your preferred chat
           | service and copy-paste data. But this is SO good to use with
           | development environment through docs or MCP! Thanks for
           | sharing
        
       | jeswin wrote:
       | An agentic flow can solve this within an existing UI/app; I
       | already use such a workflow when I have to bring in project
       | documentation. That will be your competition.
       | 
       | Since it's a commercial product and feedback can be useful:
       | people would generally be hesitant to leave their existing apps
       | if there's a workaround. There's a certain stickiness to them,
       | even ChatGPT. Personally I use self-hosted LibreChat, and the
       | history and additional features it provides are important to me.
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | I appreciate the feedback!
         | 
         | Yes I will work on make the context management more productive
         | with a ready to use service and with abilities to switch from
         | other services easily.
        
         | owebmaster wrote:
         | There is a huge market available not using any App yet.
        
       | argestes wrote:
       | This is nice. I would love to be in a mailing list regarding
       | updates
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | Thank you, you can follow products updates on
         | https://x.com/MatteoRicupero where I put products updates more
         | frequently, or here https://contextch.at/mailing-list if you
         | prefer emails
        
       | J_cst wrote:
       | I use RooCode and find it quite effective with the ability to
       | switch agents and models within the tasks currently. I recently
       | moved from Cline to RooCode.
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | Yes could be an alternative if you only need it on a
         | development environment
        
       | causalmodels wrote:
       | This is really nice. Any chance you have conversation branching
       | on the roadmap?
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | Thank you, usefule feature, just added to the roadmap. If you
         | are intereseted, follow product updates on
         | https://x.com/MatteoRicupero or here
         | https://contextch.at/mailing-list if you prefer emails
        
       | ta988 wrote:
       | 10% fee over the openrouter fees. That's fees all the way down.
        
         | tapeo wrote:
         | You're right, I have in roadmap to optmize it by using directly
         | the providers APIs. Would you prefer different pricing like
         | lifetime license?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-05-24 23:01 UTC)