[HN Gopher] The NSA Selector
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The NSA Selector
        
       Author : anigbrowl
       Score  : 293 points
       Date   : 2025-05-20 18:30 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (github.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
        
       | rekttrader wrote:
       | This is killer art
        
       | cole-k wrote:
       | This went over my head at first, but I really like it. So for
       | those like me: it converts network traffic into audio output.
       | 
       | YouTube explainer: https://youtu.be/vfgySTaM1TI
        
         | tobyjsullivan wrote:
         | For those interested in hearing some beats, the terminal demo
         | starts at 4:34 https://youtu.be/vfgySTaM1TI?t=274
        
           | zelon88 wrote:
           | It really starts getting good at 15:00 when he starts losing
           | packets.
        
         | grayfaced wrote:
         | Yes kinda, I would say network activity rather then traffic.
         | Audio signal is going to be in scale of 48Khz while measuring
         | ethernet signal at scale of 100Mhz. At that rate it wouldn't
         | even get more then 1 sample from a full size packet. So really
         | it's polling 48Khz whether or not there was activity during
         | that period. The gimmick is that it uses some analog
         | components. Fully digital you could craft a meaningful audio
         | signal that represents traffic.
        
         | echelon wrote:
         | This is a fun demonstration of the principle.
         | 
         | "every website sounds different" - that's super cool.
         | 
         | The bitmap images sent at the end of the video also sound
         | really cool.
        
       | m463 wrote:
       | No Such Agen^H^H^H^HAttachment
        
       | tptacek wrote:
       | There used to be a thing on SunOS (I think) where you'd get
       | `ping` to write to /dev/audio so you could diagnose network stuff
       | by sound.
        
         | fuddy wrote:
         | One of the funnier parameters to encounter in the snoop
         | manpage.
        
         | monster_truck wrote:
         | You can still do this with /dev/dsp or similar. Might need sudo
         | these days
         | 
         | `cat /dev/urandom > /dev/dsp`
        
           | jdthedisciple wrote:
           | thanks this almost crashed my pc
        
             | dylan604 wrote:
             | some people learn the hard way that blindly copying and
             | pasting things from the interweb directly to a terminal is
             | not always the best of ideas. some times, they're bloody
             | brilliant
        
               | dgfitz wrote:
               | curl $url | bash is probably the only worse culprit.
        
           | rfl890 wrote:
           | For a more modern approach, try ffplay: cat /dev/urandom |
           | ffplay -f s16le -
        
         | schoen wrote:
         | You can "ping -a" nowadays to get beeps for each reply, but
         | it's not quite as cool!
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | Cool, but I was hoping for some 80s era modem sounds.
        
       | riknos314 wrote:
       | > if possible disable encryption, then you can profit from not
       | only timing pattern (of white noise), but also listen in on the
       | plaintext payload. the NSA loves plaintext.
       | 
       | Haha, incredible.
       | 
       | On a more serious note this is a really cool idea. Would be
       | interesting to listen to the same origin traffic in different
       | network conditions to hear things like TCP rate control.
        
         | neuralkoi wrote:
         | SSL added and removed here! :-)
         | 
         | https://www.agwa.name/blog/post/cloudflare_ssl_added_and_rem...
        
       | ww520 wrote:
       | Good for network wiring diagnostic. It would be great if it can
       | pipe the noise to Bluetooth audio. I can pair a headphone to it,
       | plug this into the network in another room and still can hear it
       | while checking the line connections on the switch/router.
        
         | hnuser123456 wrote:
         | That audio port is blasting out a total bandwidth of 100 Mbps
         | (4 bits at 25 MHz) versus 768 Kbps for BT audio, assuming a
         | high quality codec (16 bits at 48 KHz), so not without loss.
        
           | ww520 wrote:
           | Can be downsampled for the purpose. It's just noise after
           | all.
        
       | danesparza wrote:
       | The Snowden silkscreen is a nice touch. What a great hardware
       | build!
        
       | rurban wrote:
       | Don't forget the GHCQ which installs a mirror on each UK modem. I
       | don't think the NSA goes to these extremes
        
         | godman_8 wrote:
         | I've worked with quite a few ISPs and exchanges. I haven't set
         | up port mirrors for the NSA but I have setup temporary mirrors
         | for the FBI upon request.
        
           | 0xbadcafebee wrote:
           | The NSA/govt gets its own dedicated floor in some DCs, esp.
           | large interconnects
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | Oh man, I really hope they don't get all my TLS connections.
        
         | dekhn wrote:
         | The NSA worked with GHCQ to tap Google's fiber between data
         | centers, which at the time, was not encrypted. You can see
         | several presentations including "SSL added and removed here"
         | (reference to the SSL connection being terminated at the Google
         | front end and then transmitted unencrypted to the backend in
         | another data center), as well as an actual BigTable packet from
         | tcpdump that included a user identifier.
         | 
         | If you read The Idea Factory, it shows that AT&T leadership
         | worked closely with NSA and other governmental agencies (on a
         | "secret schedule" so nobody would know who the execs were
         | meeting with) to help them access US phone data.
         | 
         | I'd love to know the extent of what NSA has done between its
         | founding and today; I'm sure they've pulled off some astounding
         | things, and bolluxed up other stuff badly.
        
           | neuroelectron wrote:
           | I doubt encryption makes much of a difference, depending on
           | the magic numbers in your implementation.
        
           | cs02rm0 wrote:
           | FWIW, as we've had this twice, GCHQ - Government
           | Communications Headquarters.
        
         | tgmatt wrote:
         | This seems hard to believe, given how many different modems
         | from different sources you can use, as well as thirdparty ones.
         | Source?
        
       | 1317 wrote:
       | You can also achieve something like this with a powerline
       | networking adapter + a shortwave radio
       | 
       | bit evil really, they shit up almost the entire 0-30mhz
       | 
       | but they do work...
        
       | simpaticoder wrote:
       | Really cool, but has anyone built software to do this locally on
       | a PC? For example:                  sudo tcpdump -i "eth0" -w -
       | -U | aplay -f S16_LE -r 44100
        
         | mzs wrote:
         | snoop -a on solaris
         | 
         | https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=46328&cid=477520411
        
         | Hypergraphe wrote:
         | A good comment :)
        
       | jll29 wrote:
       | In NSA parlance, a "selector" primarily is a string that semi-
       | uniquely identifies and addresses a persons intercepted data,
       | such as
       | 
       | - an IP address,
       | 
       | - an email address,
       | 
       | - a phone number,
       | 
       | - a SIM card's MSIN
       | 
       | - a person's social security number,
       | 
       | - a national ID card number,
       | 
       | - a passport number,
       | 
       | - a social media handle etc.
       | 
       | (elsewhere also known as "accessor", "key", "handle" or "index")
        
         | jonathanstrange wrote:
         | They are interesting because combining and updating them is a
         | non-trivial problem, as I've realized today while implementing
         | a user ban system.
        
           | Terr_ wrote:
           | There's a certain system I work with where random
           | unauthenticated visitors on the internet end up supplying
           | data like name/phone/email, with no validation... And of
           | course, the business wants to _somehow_ convert that into a
           | list of  "real people" and start correlating it to other
           | records.
           | 
           | I've been trying to stop anything too terrible from happening
           | by asking them to clarify their business requirements, e.g.
           | what should happen when there is malicious impersonation, or
           | the expected result should be when inconsistencies and
           | overlaps exist.
           | 
           | It's not like there's _no_ value to the data... but I 'm
           | afraid they don't really understand the problem are are
           | hoping the magic computer can somehow *poof* garbage into
           | fine cuisine.
        
             | transcriptase wrote:
             | "Enrichment" is what they actually want. People think it's
             | Google, Amazon, Facebook etc selling their data when in
             | reality they are simply letting people target based on it.
             | 
             | On the other hand there are hundreds of companies nobody
             | has ever heard of that do buy, collate, clean, and sell
             | access to the data that apps, browser extensions, windows
             | apps, loyalty card programs, branded credit cards,
             | retailers, and companies that scrape LinkedIn etc will
             | happily sell.
             | 
             | You provide what you have and for a price these
             | "enrichment" services will provide what is essentially a
             | dossier of everything that can be even remotely inferred
             | from the thousands of datapoints they have based on your
             | email/name/phone.
             | 
             | What most people think big tech is doing is actually being
             | done in ways that are far more unsettling by companies with
             | cutesy names and vague services that major companies sign
             | contracts with to improve their signal to noise ratio.
        
             | grues-dinner wrote:
             | Everyone in countries with data protection laws: _concern_.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | Since he's building a sequencer, I'm almost disappointed it
         | wasn't named Selecta.
         | 
         | Rewind Bo Selecta!!
        
         | tantalor wrote:
         | That doesn't tell me why _this_ is called selector.
        
           | Fnoord wrote:
           | > In CSS, selectors are patterns used to match, or select,
           | the elements you want to style. Selectors are also used in
           | JavaScript to enable selecting the DOM nodes to return as a
           | NodeList.
           | 
           | From [1]. This nomenclature was also used way before CSS even
           | existed; in SQL.
           | 
           | [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-
           | US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_selecto...
        
             | tantalor wrote:
             | That doesn't help at all. What do SQL or CSS have to do
             | with it
        
               | salawat wrote:
               | My guess is it is meant tongue-in-cheek seeing as it is a
               | way to render into audio _all_ network traffic. The idea
               | being that if you are being targeted by some nefarious,
               | infamous 3 letter agency who has gotten something
               | nefarious running on your system, this could, in theory,
               | be used to identify traffic you didn 't intend to have
               | happen.
               | 
               | Realistically speaking, it's hogwash because you'd have
               | to profile all "loopback" traffic and whatnot, but in
               | theory, with enough time and effort, that dastardly
               | stream of bits could be heard, I guess. The circuit board
               | itself though has quite a bit of punning in it.
               | 
               | Also... If they really want on your databus, they will
               | get on your databus. After a certain point, cost is not
               | an issue.
        
           | aa-jv wrote:
           | Probably as a piss-take? After all, the NSA is a wholesale
           | subjugator of human rights - why not take the piss out of it?
        
       | desertmonad wrote:
       | Imagining in a server farm. Cool project!
        
       | hottakesbun wrote:
       | The joke is on him - I used to get this functionality for free
       | way back in the day when (what I presume was) RF noise generated
       | during the processing of ethernet traffic would get picked up by
       | my cheap ISA sound card and sent to the speakers. I never built a
       | sequencer out of it though.
        
         | sevensor wrote:
         | Back in college, I would listen to AM radio while I worked on
         | my computer. The radio would pick up electrical noise from the
         | keyboard and the mechanical mouse. I wonder if this sounds
         | anything like it.
        
         | anjel wrote:
         | TRS-80s were famous for bleeding over AM band. The entire AM
         | band.
        
           | sterlind wrote:
           | I read that the FCC really started cracking down on EM
           | interference because early microcomputers were serious
           | offenders. I'm guessing that's why there's a humongous RF
           | shield inside my Amiga 1200.
        
       | psunavy03 wrote:
       | Cool idea to audio-ize network traffic. Artwork is peak edgelord
       | cringe, though . . .
        
       | als0 wrote:
       | Stuff like this is exactly why I come to Hacker News.
        
       | Liftyee wrote:
       | Great idea and +1 for excellent PCB art!
        
       | phendrenad2 wrote:
       | Can you say "calm down my selector"?
        
       | yapyap wrote:
       | So ridiculous, love it
        
       | deadbabe wrote:
       | The seller does not ship to the United States at all.. :(
       | 
       | How are you going to name this product after the NSA, and not
       | ship to the US???
        
         | reaperducer wrote:
         | _The seller does not ship to the United States at all.. :( How
         | are you going to name this product after the NSA, and not ship
         | to the US???_
         | 
         | Click through, and you'll find a more expensive version that is
         | shipped to the US. It's called TariffBox.
        
           | deadbabe wrote:
           | We should make an American version and not allow it for sale
           | anywhere else but the US.
        
             | aa-jv wrote:
             | You should make the NSA not function anywhere but within
             | the US too, while you're at it.
        
               | lazide wrote:
               | Their charter is literally to spy on everyone outside the
               | US.
               | 
               | You might as well ask the SVR/GRU to stick to snooping on
               | Russians.
        
       | fnord77 wrote:
       | So could you stream an MP4 movie, record the sound, then decode
       | the sound back into a (probably lossy) reconstruction of the
       | movie?
        
       | Xx_crazy420_xX wrote:
       | It would be nice to compare all packets dumped by system and
       | check if there are any unmatching packets running from your
       | computer that were not sent by OS but a closed source hardware
       | inside like Intel ME
        
       | ChuckMcM wrote:
       | This is pretty cool. I believe it was Bob Metcalf at PARC who had
       | a device in his office that was hooked up to the 3Mbs Ethernet
       | cable and would essentially do the same thing. He built and
       | installed it to get a feel for how much of an issue "collisions"
       | would really be on the network. At the time, the idea that you
       | could just back off when you detected a collision and re-transmit
       | was considered heresy of the highest order and the "experts" all
       | believed that once you got to a certain small number of clients
       | the wire would be overwhelmed with collisions and the network
       | would be unusable. His gizmo proved that wasn't the case.
        
       | herewulf wrote:
       | Feature request: Replace all the blinking LEDs with these to
       | drown out the fan noise in the server room.
        
       | aa-jv wrote:
       | Many times over the decades I have constructed a MIDI->Audio
       | cable so that I can record MIDI signals as audio, which as a
       | technique is very useful for measuring and fixing
       | MIDI->Synthesizer engine latency.
       | 
       | Its nice to know that if I ever get around to shipping a product
       | with RTP-Midi (MIDI over Ethernet), I can just get a ready-made
       | Eurorack module to do that testing! :P
        
       | cranium wrote:
       | The accompanying video is really nice:
       | https://youtu.be/vfgySTaM1TI?t=269
        
       | sockp0pp3t wrote:
       | Is there a plugin for Goom ?
        
       | johnklos wrote:
       | When I was young, I'd use an AM radio right next to my Sinclair
       | ZX81 to hear what it was doing when it was running in FAST mode.
       | 
       | By making loops of different speeds, one could even make basic
       | tones and crude music.
       | 
       | The video really brought back memories of those sounds :)
        
       | lofaszvanitt wrote:
       | Something like this, but with a hard drive-like sound for SSDs,
       | would be nice.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-05-21 23:02 UTC)