[HN Gopher] Methodical Banality
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Methodical Banality
        
       Author : CharlesW
       Score  : 22 points
       Date   : 2025-05-16 20:39 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (aeon.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (aeon.co)
        
       | vunderba wrote:
       | > They internalised the qualities of their models' prose as much
       | as possible, and also kept a sort of verbal rainy-day fund in
       | something called a commonplace book, which is to say that, as
       | they read, they transcribed a stockpile of salient words,
       | metaphors, turns of phrase and cliches - usually organised
       | thematically - that they would then draw upon while writing.
       | 
       | I'm reminded of an excellent passage from "Lives of the Great
       | Pianists" by former New York Times music critic Harold Schonberg
       | when speaking on the strength of Beethoven's musical
       | extemporization:
       | 
       |  _" How much Beethoven prepared his improvisations we do not
       | know. Most pianists did prepare, knowing full well that sooner or
       | later they would be called upon to supply an improvisation on
       | 'Batti, batti' or a similar well-known tune. And all pianists had
       | at their command a thorough supply of passagework by the yard,
       | which they could snip off and use for any possible contingency.
       | But when Beethoven improvised, prepared passagework or no, it was
       | evident to his hearers that after a while he was on his own, idea
       | pouring after idea. Then he would get carried away, pound the
       | piano, and the strings of the delicate Viennese instruments would
       | pop, or hammers would break."_
       | 
       | Speaking on a purely personal level, I am mostly unconcerned with
       | the amount of purple prose a writer chooses to embellish their
       | work with - because I'm always internally stripping away the
       | literary wrapping paper to get at the heart of the idea itself.
        
       | Calwestjobs wrote:
       | This is why communist / soviet countries were declining. Most
       | people get confused how can anyone label what happened in those
       | countries as decline, they build factories, they catapulted
       | peasants, serfs into city dwellers, they made huge scientific
       | progress. Those people do not realize that soviet countries did
       | it after it was done in west. For example Large Panel System
       | building so pervasively used in communist block was invented and
       | used 50 years before in England. Inventiveness was limited only
       | into areas that the regime deemed necessary. And even those areas
       | were not free to pursue scientific method, having go back and
       | forth between photos, books and letters from relatives, from west
       | + back and forth between "government ideologist" responsible for
       | "right" way of thinking made any effort to move human endeavor
       | into higher levels impossible.
       | 
       | https://www.socialismrealised.eu/normalistion-everyday-life/
        
         | mighmi wrote:
         | I guess the ussr originally were vibrant and full of innovation
         | but especially the 30s purges killed it off.
        
       | Calwestjobs wrote:
       | Similar problem with law. Rules based order is not ONLY about
       | laws, it is about ethics which is represented, imperfectly, thru
       | law. That is why most professions which deal with humans have
       | ethical codes, oaths, so even people who do not have same morals
       | ( or do not care about them, but want the job ) can do job in
       | accordance with ethic frame law is based on.
       | 
       | And if people follow only laws, without understanding of ethics
       | behind those laws, we get very strange and oppressive society.
       | Rules based order is system of rules which helps to make
       | meaningful, better life for everyone while minimizing harm we do
       | to each other.
       | 
       | So fascism, as journalist use it currently, is a lack of effort
       | for minimization of harm we do to each other. Never heard
       | anything scarier than that.
       | 
       | Law is not a goal but a means.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-05-16 23:00 UTC)