[HN Gopher] New 'Superdiffusion' Proof Probes the Mysterious Mat...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       New 'Superdiffusion' Proof Probes the Mysterious Math of Turbulence
        
       Author : rbanffy
       Score  : 29 points
       Date   : 2025-05-16 17:08 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.quantamagazine.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.quantamagazine.org)
        
       | llm_nerd wrote:
       | For those fascinated by that balloon challenge-
       | 
       | https://legends.gordonbennett.aero/1st-coupe-aeronautique-go...
       | 
       | The winner took off from Paris and landed in Yorkshire, GBR.
       | 
       | The longest trip was 3400km in the 2005 outing, going 3400km -
       | 
       | https://legends.gordonbennett.aero/49th-coupe-aeronautique-g...
        
       | RhysU wrote:
       | If turbulence wasn't such a pain in the butt, we wouldn't exist.
       | 
       | The article reads like there's a more rigorous proof of some
       | classical renormalization results. I wish it had connected the
       | renormalization results to empirical utility for applications.
        
       | codesnik wrote:
       | of course it's quantamagazine. Such a weird journal, I still
       | wonder who's the audience.
        
         | macawfish wrote:
         | Don't yuck my yum!
        
         | Enginerrrd wrote:
         | Quanta magazine is one of my absolute favorite read-for-
         | pleasure publications.
         | 
         | Scientific American filled a similar niche but used
         | significantly less rigor. Physorg overly sensationalizes every
         | single article and thus has zero credibility. Physics Magazine
         | is an absolute gem but is limited in scope to physics and thus
         | omits computer science, biology, and mathematics.
         | 
         | So quanta fills a niche for people interested in news from
         | other fields without grossly overstaying results and is willing
         | to go into just a bit more detail than usual. It's a wonderful
         | niche for the curious and the source publications are usually
         | just a click away.
         | 
         | Instead of rhetorically dismissing people that like it, can you
         | explain what you do NOT like about it?
        
           | malux85 wrote:
           | This is me too, it's a great source of news for areas of
           | science that I'm not an expert in but am curious about.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-05-16 23:00 UTC)