[HN Gopher] Zinc Microcapacitors Are the Best of Both Worlds
___________________________________________________________________
Zinc Microcapacitors Are the Best of Both Worlds
Author : Brajeshwar
Score : 65 points
Date : 2025-05-13 14:57 UTC (3 days ago)
(HTM) web link (spectrum.ieee.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (spectrum.ieee.org)
| dvh wrote:
| What's wrong with C0G?
| magicalhippo wrote:
| Very low dielectric constant, so low capacitance for a given
| size[1].
|
| It also seema these devices are more 2D than 3D so surface area
| matters more than volume[2].
|
| [1]: https://blog.knowlescapacitors.com/blog/capacitor-
| fundamenta...
|
| [2]: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c07549
| marcosdumay wrote:
| They are not even the same kind of component.
|
| If you try to make an integrator out of this thing, you'll have
| a very bad time.
| myself248 wrote:
| Sounds like a good match for sensor nodes where energy harvesting
| may be slow and consumption is intermittent. You don't need
| massive energy capacity, but you need good power density to
| support transmit bursts, and you need very high cycle durability.
| scld wrote:
| Yeah, as long as self-discharge/leakage rates are acceptable,
| there are a lot of use cases for this middle ground tech.
| westurner wrote:
| Why Zinc if Carbon is sufficient?
|
| From "Eco-friendly artificial muscle fibers can produce and store
| energy" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42942421 :
|
| > _" Giant nanomechanical energy storage capacity in twisted
| single-walled carbon nanotube ropes" (2024)
| https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-024-01645-x :_
|
| >> _583 Wh /kg_
|
| That's with mechanical twisting though; graphene supercapacitors
| in general have lower energy density than (micro-) capacitors?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-05-16 23:01 UTC)