[HN Gopher] Zombieverter: Open source VCU for reusing salvage EV...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Zombieverter: Open source VCU for reusing salvage EV components
        
       Author : trainsarebetter
       Score  : 69 points
       Date   : 2025-05-05 19:00 UTC (4 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (openinverter.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (openinverter.org)
        
       | pornel wrote:
       | It's cool that it has/claims support for DC fast charging. All
       | the custom conversions I've seen are AC only.
        
         | bartvk wrote:
         | Very cool. Sometimes, DC fast charging is more accessible than
         | AC.
        
         | aetherspawn wrote:
         | It's CHAdeMO - much simpler - and not CCS2
        
           | mdaniel wrote:
           | I am for sure not educated about the difference between CCS
           | and CCS2 but it does say it's not _just_ CHAdeMO https://open
           | inverter.org/wiki/ZombieVerter_VCU#:~:text=ccs%2... and
           | further down they cite a BMW i3 which I had and it fast
           | charged to my satisfaction
        
         | scrappyjoe wrote:
         | The child comments are a bit all over the place, but I can
         | clarify.
         | 
         | At present, the Zombieverter supports:
         | 
         | Chademo CCS by interfacing with the BMW i3 LIM CCS by
         | interfacing with the open source FOCCCI CCS controller.
         | 
         | The FOCCCI CCS controller is an associated project. See
         | https://openinverter.org/wiki/Foccci
         | 
         | FOCCCI is the newest kid on the block, but it has been
         | successfully integrated into several conversions now.
        
       | drzaiusx11 wrote:
       | This is a great resource with pragmatic solutions for reusing
       | commodity EV parts.
       | 
       | Worth a read through for folks like me that are mechanically
       | inclined but don't know/have time to figure out how the various
       | puzzle pieces in an EV "talk" to each other (because of their
       | proprietary nature.)
        
       | aetherspawn wrote:
       | Hey, my startup is currently working on something like this.
       | 
       | We use a production VCU hardware with custom software and
       | currently support most of the VCU functions you would find in a
       | production vehicle, including in-built CCS2 and NACS charging on
       | the single controller.
       | 
       | We are looking to raise to go to the next stage, would love to
       | hear from potential customers or interested angels?
        
         | NortySpock wrote:
         | Cool! I am not a "car guy", but I have (with my father-in-law)
         | changed my own oil and replaced the shocks on my (ICE) car.
         | 
         | I appreciate the somewhat open-source nature of car repair
         | work, and I would hate for EVs to become all proprietary,
         | locked down systems that are not repairable. At least the
         | standardization of PCs means I can kitbash some parts together
         | into a usable daily driver. Not so for EV's, it seems.
         | 
         | So, from the perspective of someone who may be a single-unit
         | customer in 10 years when I want to revive an old Prius or Bolt
         | or whatever used car comes my way, I wish you all the best.
         | 
         | In terms of ideas or advice -- I assume you've seen or talked
         | with the RichRebuilds youtube channel or other EV repair
         | youtube channels to see what they need in a VCU... If they like
         | it and praise your product on their channel that might get you
         | some buzz / street cred. Beyond that I assume it's just a
         | matter of becoming golfing buddies with the CTO or electronics
         | head of a automotive startup (Slate and Telo recently came up
         | in my news feed. They might be too far along to switch VCUs for
         | their first car, but if they had teething issues they might be
         | interested in swapping to you for their second car...)
        
       | neilv wrote:
       | Given that battery fires and automobile crashes happen, and that
       | there are business and legal cultures around that for _stock_
       | vehicles...
       | 
       | Does this "ZombieVerter" have a high chance of being blamed for
       | an incident involving death/injury or very expensive property
       | damage?
        
         | fuelled6532 wrote:
         | Dude, I built my own fuel system for my car.
         | 
         | I just put 43 liters of _gasoline_ in the tank this morning.
         | 
         | The rail is as much as 65psi, and it's inches from a hot
         | exhaust manifold.
         | 
         | It's fine. People can be competent.
        
           | alnwlsn wrote:
           | It's a special case, but in times like this I think about the
           | antique cars. There are still Model T owners out there
           | driving around with oil-soaked _cotton_ brakes. That 's the
           | same material my pants are made out of. And it's not one
           | brake per wheel, it's _one brake for the entire car_! Also,
           | the wheels are made from wood.
           | 
           | This is not only street legal, but insurable too.
        
         | scrappyjoe wrote:
         | Well, if you modify a vehicle, generally you need to take it
         | back to your DMV / TUV / MOT for inspection. Those are the
         | bodies responsible for determining that your car is road legal.
         | And if you don't have a proper BMS, emergency cutoff, adequate
         | cooling and engineering, it won't be certified road legal. Not
         | sure why an EV conversion should be treated any differently to
         | an ICE conversion.
        
           | neilv wrote:
           | And when you're sued and/or criminally charged, your lawyers
           | can bring that up that your vehicle passed inspection (unless
           | it was still being built in your garage), before the lithium
           | battery fire that involved the "ZombieVerter that you built
           | from plans you found on the Internet".
           | 
           | Even if it can eventually be proven (to the judge/jury) that
           | the ZombieVerter performed perfectly, and that you were not
           | at all negligent or reckless, that's going to be drawing
           | suspicion and blame.
           | 
           | While defense costs bankrupt you.
        
         | lotharcable wrote:
         | > Does this "ZombieVerter" have a high chance of being blamed
         | for an incident involving death/injury or very expensive
         | property damage?
         | 
         | No.
        
       | alnwlsn wrote:
       | It's always a little jarring to me to see a seemingly competently
       | laid out automotive grade PCB, with a cheap as dirt Amazon
       | special D1 mini ESP board lovingly stapled in one corner.
       | 
       | Best rating you can get on those ESP modules is "blue PCB".
        
         | scrappyjoe wrote:
         | The D1 board on the Zombieverter is just a piggyback board to
         | allow web interface access to the VCU. Once you've set
         | everything up, you can remove the board. It makes configuring
         | the Zombieverter significantly easier since you don't have to
         | mess around with serial cables.
         | 
         | If you like, you can leave it on and monitor your EV data via
         | the web interface. But if the D1 flakes out the VCU will be
         | unaffected.
        
           | alnwlsn wrote:
           | Ah, that makes more sense then, good idea! I have personally
           | blown up a laptop by having the USB section of a board it was
           | plugged into hang around too close to an exposed 24V supply.
        
       | scrappyjoe wrote:
       | I've got one of these, and it works great! The core developers
       | behind this work very, very hard on it, and I am amazed that it
       | works to the degree that it does. Like, there are cars on the
       | road running with this VCU.
       | 
       | Two weaknesses of the project are spotty / outdated / unclear
       | documentation and support. This is not because the community
       | doesn't care, it's because keeping the documentation up to date
       | is hard. And support is hard, because you have like 3 core
       | commenters on the forum answering 90% of questions. They know the
       | stuff inside out, but they take strain from having to answer 'my
       | hello world is broken' type questions over and over again.
       | 
       | It's hard to demonstrate this to software people. You know the
       | endless 'works on my machine' swamps people would get stuck in in
       | the bad old days? Imagine that, but you also have no assurance
       | that the machine the person is using has a hard drive connected,
       | or a cooling fan. You have to cover _all_ the hardware related
       | root causes before you can even begin to address and software
       | related issues people run into.
       | 
       | I think the best support this community could get is more
       | resources dedicated to documentation and support. That would also
       | serve to make the learning curve less steep.
       | 
       | EDIT: I think it's also worth saying that once you set one of
       | these once, it becomes very easy. It's just figuring it out the
       | first time that's hard. If anyone buys one and has trouble, hit
       | me up and maybe I can help.
        
       | solarkraft wrote:
       | I thought "This sounds a lot like the logical next step to what
       | Damien Maguire has been working on" and sure enough it is!
       | 
       | This man has been working for years on repurposing old EV
       | hardware and using it to electrify cars, sometimes in really
       | wacky (and extremely entertaining) ways on the Youtube channel
       | "evmbw" - I suggest giving it a watch! Some of the cars are
       | _really_ scrappy, but he obviously knows very well what he's
       | doing.
        
       | trebligdivad wrote:
       | I love the line in one page: 'If you combine a LHD transmission
       | with a RHD inverter (or vice versa) you might end up with a motor
       | that is juddering, not spinning. IN this case you need to swap
       | any two phase cables of both MG1 and MG2. '
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-05-09 23:01 UTC)