[HN Gopher] Geometrically understanding calculus of inverse func...
___________________________________________________________________
Geometrically understanding calculus of inverse functions (2023)
Author : tobytylam
Score : 92 points
Date : 2025-05-05 15:01 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (tobylam.xyz)
(TXT) w3m dump (tobylam.xyz)
| crdrost wrote:
| Upvoted for the cute proof- without-words geometrical diagram of
| the Legendre transform, but the fact that you defined the inverse
| map as (x, y) to (\hat y, \hat x) I found impossible to keep my
| head straight. Probably it's easy if I slow down and stop
| skimming the article.
|
| IMO the easier derivation -- may just be personal tastes as
| someone more on the engineering side -- is just another
| integration by parts.
|
| So with f(g(x)) = g(f(x)) = x, define y = g(x) for U-substitution
| with x = f(y): [?] g(x) dx = [?] g(f(y)) f'(y)
| dy = [?] y f'(y) dy = y f(y)
| - [?] f(y) dy = g(x) x - F(g(x)) + C
|
| The more interesting thing is that this is a really basic
| integration by parts which means that this diagram of yours that
| I like, is more universal than it appears at first? I'd have to
| think about that a bit more, how you can maybe graphically teach
| integration by parts that way, is there always a u substitution
| so that you can get u f(u) or so and get this nice pretty
| rectangle in a rectangle... hmm.
| messe wrote:
| Yes, there's a similar diagram on the Wikipedia page for
| Integration by Parts.
| gowld wrote:
| And it links to the more specific page on Integral of inverse
| functions:
|
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_of_inverse_functions
| gitroom wrote:
| haha this stuff twists my brain up but i love the visual angle.
| makes me wonder if breaking things down more like this really
| changes the way i remember them long-term. stuff like diagrams
| actually help or am i just tricking myself?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2025-05-05 23:00 UTC)