[HN Gopher] How LWN is faring in 2025
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How LWN is faring in 2025
        
       Author : leephillips
       Score  : 111 points
       Date   : 2025-05-03 16:20 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (lwn.net)
 (TXT) w3m dump (lwn.net)
        
       | nu11ptr wrote:
       | Is this backlash against the US or indications of a recession
       | that is starting?
        
         | abnercoimbre wrote:
         | I'm trying to figure out the same. _Por que no los dos?_
        
         | leephillips wrote:
         | I agree with the suggestions in the article that we are seeing
         | the beginnings of a global economic slowdown caused by Trump's
         | trade policies and an understandable anti-US backlash.
        
         | mrweasel wrote:
         | There is certainly a backlash against certain US based
         | businesses, but I doubt LWN is on the receiving side of that
         | backlash. It could be, but I'd be surprised. I think it is much
         | more likely that people are being more frugal in their
         | spending, as a precaution. Sadly something like LWN is fairly
         | easy to eliminate from your budget.
         | 
         | Given the uncertainty the Trump administration has generated, I
         | think a recession could be a self-fulfilling prophesy.
         | Technically the economy might be strong enough, but we don't
         | know Trumps long term plans, or even his plans for next week,
         | so precautionary spending restrictions may end up triggering a
         | recession of sorts.
         | 
         | There are so many project and organisations, similar to LWN,
         | that I want to support, but it adds up quickly if you're not
         | careful.
        
         | mongol wrote:
         | It may be irrational but I cancelled a substack subscription of
         | a US-based writer that was highly critical of Trump. On one
         | hand, it is counter productive, but on another hand my spending
         | is limited and I will do my utmost to support the European
         | economy instead.
        
       | ofrzeta wrote:
       | Let's just donate or subscribe because something like LWN must be
       | kept alive at all costs.
        
       | wood_spirit wrote:
       | People all around me seem to be cutting back on discretionary
       | spending. These aren't lwn subscribers, just normal people
       | leading average lives, but I extrapolate that lwn subscribers are
       | in the same boat.
        
         | Volundr wrote:
         | I have a number of home improvement projects that I had planned
         | on tackling this year, but I've decided I prefer those funds
         | liquid. Same with getting a newer car. While nothings harmed my
         | economic situation yet my confidence in pretty much everything,
         | the stability of the job market, the economy, the country
         | itself it at an all time low.
         | 
         | Even here in red state territory that seems to be the general
         | vibe.
        
           | massysett wrote:
           | ^ This * millions of people = recession
        
             | Volundr wrote:
             | 100%, and yet I don't think I can rationally act
             | differently. It's not like if I just keep on like
             | everything is normal that'll save the economy. It'll just
             | put me in a worse spot if what I'm expecting does indeed
             | come to pass.
        
               | KerrAvon wrote:
               | This is exactly right. If you're old enough, you might
               | recall George W. Bush insisting people should go
               | shopping; the point was to encourage people to spend
               | their way out of his recession. Didn't work!
        
               | dragonwriter wrote:
               | The encouragement was mostly post-9/11 and the recession
               | ended in November, so if it wasn't effective, it sure at
               | least coincided with recovery.
               | 
               | (The recession started in March, well before 9/11, but
               | the attempt to encourage shopping to deal with the
               | perceived problem was a post-9/11 thing.)
               | 
               | The Bush recession is often perceived as longer and
               | deeper than it was because of the poor distribution of
               | gains (in part due to the tax burden shift of the Bush
               | tax cuts) of the expansion that started in late 2001 and
               | ended with the Great Recession.
        
       | markvdb wrote:
       | Superb publication for anyone into free/open source software. You
       | could do worse than get your employer to get a group
       | subscription...
        
       | vlovich123 wrote:
       | > Further attacks on global trade could make it more difficult
       | for us to accept payments from outside the country, even when the
       | buyer is willing.
       | 
       | Is this because of retaliatory tarrifs or is the US taxing
       | services as part of the tarrifs? Would setting up a subsidiary
       | help work around this?
        
         | ModernMech wrote:
         | It's probably a secondary effect of any tariffs. When people
         | are uncertain about the future one of the first things they cut
         | back on is entertainment subscriptions. LWN losing subs would
         | be leading indicator of economic turmoil, so setting up
         | subsidiaries is unlikely to help any.
        
           | vlovich123 wrote:
           | That's what the broader statement is about but this specific
           | statement seems to be implying difficulty accepting payments.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-05-03 23:01 UTC)