[HN Gopher] Lessons from the Lebanese Space Program - Kasurian
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Lessons from the Lebanese Space Program - Kasurian
        
       Author : rbanffy
       Score  : 30 points
       Date   : 2025-04-30 11:41 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (kasurian.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (kasurian.com)
        
       | shayway wrote:
       | Fascinating! Space programs post ~1970 are one thing, but they
       | reached orbit by 1963! That would make them third in the world
       | after USSR and US. I'm surprised I haven't heard of this before -
       | I'll definitely be watching the documentary mentioned here, "The
       | Lebanese Rocket Society".
       | 
       | I don't care for the writing of this article though, a bit fluffy
       | and scant on information. And does anyone know what this is
       | referring to?
       | 
       | > The Lebanese Army and what remained of the Rocket Society would
       | go on to launch another rocket, the Cedar-10, and western powers
       | decisively stepped in to end Lebanon's experiment once and for
       | all.
        
         | rbanffy wrote:
         | > and western powers decisively stepped in to end Lebanon's
         | experiment
         | 
         | Western powers always stop countries before they get the
         | ability to make reliable ICBMs. Brazil was making some good
         | progress on their satellite launcher, but I believe there US
         | wasn't too happy the rocket used solid fuels, and solid fuel
         | rockets, as we all know, are excellent for ICBMs because they
         | can be launched as soon as they are pointing up-ish.
         | 
         | So, the lesson is to not make something with obvious military
         | applications, because only big kids can have these toys, and
         | your factories tend to explode (as if rockets themselves
         | weren't already dangerous by themselves) if you continue.
        
           | shayway wrote:
           | I understand the reasoning, what I'm curious about is what
           | 'decisively stepping in' means in this case.
        
             | rbanffy wrote:
             | I'm not sure I want to know that.
        
             | sidewndr46 wrote:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VLS-1_V03
             | 
             | one of the deadliest space related disasters
        
               | shayway wrote:
               | Sorry, by 'this case' I meant in the article:
               | 
               | > The Lebanese Army and what remained of the Rocket
               | Society would go on to launch another rocket, the
               | Cedar-10, and western powers decisively stepped in to end
               | Lebanon's experiment once and for all. The Rocket Society
               | was disbanded and the program shut down.
               | 
               | I did some searching around but I can't find any
               | information on what it might be referring to.
        
               | sidewndr46 wrote:
               | Oh in that case it is even simpler. Instead of "western
               | powers" just say "Mossad". They hunt and kill anyone who
               | attempts to help nations which could potentially be
               | hostile to Israel gain more advanced weapons. Territorial
               | boundaries don't apply in that circumstance.
               | Participating in a rocket program like this is the
               | equivalent of signing your own death certificate.
        
               | shayway wrote:
               | Whoa! Who was killed? The article focuses mostly on
               | Manougian, and I got the impression they were the key
               | person behind the Rocket Society, a la Korolev or Braun.
               | What role did the person who died play that caused the
               | whole program to just be scrapped?
        
         | mncharity wrote:
         | > they reached orbit
         | 
         | No, the text is misleading, confusing altitude with orbiting.
         | This was a sounding rocket.[1] Upon jumping 145 km high, it
         | might wave as something orbital zoomed by it at 8 km/s, but it
         | very wasn't one itself. A similar sounding rocket[2] is like
         | half the mass of the world's smallest orbital rocket[3].
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sounding_rocket [2]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrier_Orion [3]
         | https://global.jaxa.jp/press/2018/04/20180427_guinness.html
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBUFNgLrykc (Scott Manley)
         | 
         | OP> The Cedar-4 was a three-stage rocket capable of reaching an
         | altitude of 145 kilometres, thus entering the low Earth orbit
         | (LEO) zone, and blasting past their record of two kilometres in
         | 1961. LEO is where most satellite and human space flight
         | activities take place. In every sense then, the Cedar-4 was a
         | modern rocket; it rose over the Karman line, considered the
         | boundary between Earth's atmosphere and space, and the ability
         | to reach LEO opened up possibilities previously unimagined.
         | 
         | "[A]bility to reach LEO"? Well, in the unusual sense that a
         | 5-year old cutting across the campus has "reached Harvard".
        
           | shayway wrote:
           | Ah, thank you for the correction. Still impressive of course,
           | but that makes much more sense.
        
       | IG_Semmelweiss wrote:
       | >>> The Cedar-8 rocket had nearly hit a British naval cruiser in
       | the Mediterranean.
       | 
       | It seems they had no way to know where these things would land,
       | or if they did, had no way to communicate to state actors of
       | hazard zones ?
       | 
       | I'd love to know more.
       | 
       | >>> "By 1965, I realised that the Lebanese military's interest
       | had changed from scientific research for peaceful exploration of
       | space, to rockets as an instrument of war."
       | 
       | Due dilligence applies to all endeavors. Accepting VC money, or
       | accepting government money, it still requires some work.
        
         | sidewndr46 wrote:
         | You generally send out a NOTAM to inform pilots about this sort
         | of thing. I'm unsure if there exists an equivalent mechanism in
         | the international maritime communities to inform ships in the
         | area.
        
           | IG_Semmelweiss wrote:
           | That's if you are an-FAA like entity. But what about a ragtag
           | group of scientists putting objects in the sky, with no
           | access to airport operations or govt sanction ?
        
             | sidewndr46 wrote:
             | No? You can call in as a pilot and issue a NOTAM if you
             | want to. You can phone up the relevant air traffic control
             | center and issue a NOTAM as well. You might do this if you
             | saw something unusual like a plane in controlled air space
             | that was flying in a dangerous manner. Or if you were doing
             | something in uncontrolled airspace that could still be a
             | hazard, so you report it so other's can adjust for it.
        
               | euroderf wrote:
               | Sounds like an invite for every 12yo kid with an Estes
               | rocket to call the local ATC, just to probe the system in
               | a spirit of inquisitive co-operation.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2025-04-30 23:02 UTC)